Backbaygrouch points out the many hits he got on Google for BUGS when He put in “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.” Most rewrites of the Mantra leave this out.
That is because they are based on theory rather than practice. That is term that gets noticed. That is where you get a chuckle from even the most unwilling people. That is where you get a break from the seriousness.
It also shows why I am so careful about the wording. I developed this by USING this, not by THEORIZING about it. You can get the points in faster, but in the real world, can you GET them in? What, IN PRACTICE, do you need to get them in?
The only improvement so far has been Genocide by Assimilation and Shari’s emphasis on
ASIA FOR THE ASIANS! AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS! WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYONE!
If you left out anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, it turns out, you have far less chance of being Googled. That never occurred to me before BBG tried it, but it is the only unique word in the thing.
There is probably no way to get why I wrote the Mantra as I did if you don’t PRACTICE the Mantra. It looks cumbersome, but believe me I have tried to cut out stuff.
On the good side, I made an error I am glad was dumbass. Gator61 put the Mantra in Yahoo Talks a second time. I went there and found that his second reply was the usual, whites are horrible bit. I Immediately wrote he should follow up with “You are advocating genocide.” Turns out he already had, with quotes from the genocide convention.
It occurs to me now that he might not have aimed that at the commenter I was talking about. My point is that “white people are awful” is the regular knee-jerk reaction. If you THINK about hat, they can only be saying that genocide is all right against whites. What other purpose could that statement possibly have?
Hit them on that! They get a busted-nose introduction to our new way of thinking by way of getting hit for knee-jerk reply.
I assumed that Gator61 had not used this because I have a hell of a time getting anybody to use the Mantra, much less the next step.
I will never know. Yahoo pulled the plug on the whole thing at last.
Go on to the next. Protest Yahoo’s cutting us off, but it also means we are definitely taking prisoners.
If you are working in a dictatorship, you have to expect your phone to hang itself up a lot.
#1 by Tim on 02/18/2010 - 8:31 am
Bugs Alert,
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4317
someone noticing the “lone ranger” gems on BUGS
#2 by Gator61 on 02/18/2010 - 8:35 am
Yahoo answers is not a regular forum where you can really debate with individuals. You can only ask or answer questions and you can only answer once. You can add comments or edit your question but if you start aiming that at an individual, you get deleted for chatting. This makes it impossible in many cases to follow up on an answer.
The upside of Yahoo answers is you usually get different people responding to your question each time.
One other thing you can do on Yahoo answers is search for questions. I have found it particularly fruitful to look for questions about the Holocaust in the Homework Help section. Young people are often more open minded.
#3 by Gator61 on 02/18/2010 - 9:01 am
I just posted the manta on a new forum. (new for me anyway) I believe that this one will allow some debate. Hope some of you will go there and post on the thread I started. If several people are in agreement others agree, just to be part of the in crowd. http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TE47H7L2QQS3AK8P5
That reminds me of a joke we used to play way back when I was in middle school years ago. Someone would tell a joke that made no sense at all. Everyone who was in on the joke would laugh. There was always one or two poor kids who were not in on the joke. They would laugh too, not knowing that they were the real butt of the joke. I don’t think that most people change that much. They still want to be part of the group. If several of us say the same thing in the same place, the effectiveness will not just be multiplied by the number of us there it will increase exponentially.
#4 by Simmons on 02/18/2010 - 12:10 pm
The phrase “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionmorejews” is perfect because it has a joke quality to it that matches well in describing kid libs. It can also safely as of now posted on “respectable” sites.
#5 by Bob on 02/18/2010 - 12:29 pm
Gator, EXCELLENT!
But once again the old computer illiterate has to ask, “Where is it?”
I see the title, but I can’t figure out how to reach your comment itself.
#6 by Bob on 02/18/2010 - 12:33 pm
Gator, did you ever hear the old “Laugh Record?”
It had nothing on it but laughs.
It started out iwth a small chuckle and went on and on. Everybody who listened to it ended up laughing so hard they had tears in their eyes.
#7 by Simmons on 02/18/2010 - 2:55 pm
We could also use a mantra version for everyday discussions of our problems with run of the mill “dittohead” types that if you describe our problems they call you a whiner.
#8 by Gator61 on 02/18/2010 - 9:26 pm
Bob,
This link http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TE47H7L2QQS3AK8P5 took me right to my post. I posted here under the name Veritatis.
The thread has 11 responses so far. I believe that all of them are from BUGS. This is good news and bad. Anyone looking at that thread gets a very consistent message. The bad news is I’m not sure how many people have looked at that thread. I do think we are on the right track.
This brings me to an idea for BUGS. I believe that we, or it may be just me, lack focus. We talk to people here and there and we randomly post the mantra on the web. Not that that is a bad thing, anytime the Manta is used it is a positive. If we all concentrated on a specific area for a week or month at a time it would get the mantra established in that one area and growing on it’s own. An analogy might be planting a kernel of corn here there. If you have ever seen a single stalk of corn it produces only a few grains of corn on an ear. If you plant a dozen or more together the yield is much higher.
To gain this focus, I suggest that each week Bob, post an assignment and we make it our goal to complete that assignment.
My suggestion for the fist assignment, would be to look around the web and find what we believe would be a fruitful place to post the Mantra. Then write a one page report on that site. Include information about the political leaning of the site or blog, how easy it is to post and how much traffic it gets.
I, like Bob am not all that computer savvy. I can blunder my way around and find some interesting things. I found yahoo answers when someone posted on Stormfront that they had been banned by yahoo answers. Topix if found by asking on Yahoo Answers where a good place to debate might be found. I think both places are good, but there was no rhyme or reason to my finding them.
After reviewing the reports, the next week, Bob could assign 10 posts of the mantra for each of us on that particular site.
The same sort of thing could be done with current news stories where comments are allowed. If the Ocala Star Banner runs a story about that cities changing demographics and I post the Mantra in the comments, I am a crank. If 10 or 12 people post Mantra thought there, it is a trend.
If it was an assingment,
#9 by BGLass on 02/18/2010 - 10:09 pm
On topix, you can enter existing conversations about immigration, local legal mishaps, areas that might be good to live, schools, a crime etc. The word “diversity” comes up and you can go into a variant of pro-diversity is anti-white. (anti-racism is anti-white) Final solution by substitution to what somebody else seems to be seeing as “the white problem.” (However you do it.) But so it’s just part of your conversation. Or break up the paragraphs through the conversation. City Data is another one, but have not been there in awhile. That works better for me. Don’t know if that’s ok with Bugs, but the sign said, “freely given, use at will.”
#10 by Epiphany on 02/20/2010 - 4:55 am
Notice, the media hardly ever talk about the crimes of the Russian and Chinese Communists, among other Communists. They especially do not dwell on the deaths of all those tens of millions of Christians, who, had perished at Communist hands. I have always wondered why that was. Perhaps, the mainstream media is slanted Leftwards, politically.
Also, movies and television shows are getting more and more pornographic and violent over the years. I often begin to wonder if they are not going out of their way to offend people. They probably are.
Notice that they hardly ever speak about Stalin and his NKVD. They do not mention the Gulag system of concentration camps, either. It is as if they actually consider the lives of Christians of less importance than those of other people. There may, or may not, be a reason for that.
This, of course, is something that is not much looked into, these days.