Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Only White Contributions are Unique

Posted by Bob on March 3rd, 2010 under Coaching Session, History, Musings about Life


Someone once defined Leftism as “A constant screaming about how everyone should be above average.”

That is an insane attitude, but it is a very RATIONAL attitude, in the economic sense. Half of he population will always be below average and you will always have a clientele if you rant about it.

Attacks on whites always concentrate on what whites have, not what third worlders don’t have that we do. Yes, starvation happens nowhere. Starvation only happens where we are blocked from getting at it. But it will be cold day in Hell before an anti-white takes notice of this.

But a CAUTION. When we use the Mantra anti-whites’ only counter is condemning whites. PLEASE don’t argue that. With the reality I just mentioned. PLEASE always hit them with “So you are justifying genocide.”

We don’t have time or space to get into IQ scores, crime rates, or what the white man has actually done.

STICK TO GENOCIDE.

Someday we will have time to give the information we are aching to give out, BUT THAT TIME IS NOT NOW.

I think this subject may interest you, but it will be far worse than useless if it SIDETRACKS you.

The term “subsistence farming” gives me cold chills. If you actually see that someone is depending on his naked crops out in the field to give him enough food to survive on, it is different from a textbook term. Books always tell us how peasants resisted the new farming techniques, and historians dismiss it as superstition and ignorance.

Of course peasants were resistant. They were TOLD these new methods would produce more food, they may even have believed it, but no one seems to realize why they didn’t want to take the CHANCE. It was not an economic risk, it was life and death, watching their families starve to death because they had risked everything on a promise.

Subsistence farming is HORRIBLE. No wonder priests who promise to make the crops good this year by a sacrifice or praying to Saint Whoever got power and money for it. They were the only intellectuals the peasant had. They were usually caring and believed what they said. How was a peasant to know the experts in scientific agriculture were indifferent?

The fact is that a wise peasant would not have believed a ten thousand year succession of well-meaning experts. How would they know that this particular set had a point? Can you imagine how terrified they were even when this was tried on even a few acres, realizing that if this set of priests made it work, they would be forced to abandons methods that had fed their families since time out of mind?

This is not what historians write about or read about. They think only in The Big Picture, who against Progress and how those who were for Progress were the good guys. Their information is produced for each other and for well-fed students who think that subsistence is a credit card at the grocery.

That’s not fair but it makes my point.

In the real world, no Indian would go back to his forefathers’ world, and they had it good. Indians had thousands of acres for each of them. But they also died young. Almost everyone had pain they lived with that we would not tolerate.

But the rest of our third world had lives that were, in plain English, horrible. They starved routinely. That was the poor guy. Rich ones lost their teeth, for a start. Every single Pharaoh suffered from a malnutrition that would be intolerable today in Nicaragua.

Multiculture is big business, but what offends multiculturalists is that not one single culture the West went into has the slightest interest in dumping all that has come in and go back to their ”kinder and simpler” life.

White people had diseases, slavery, no respect for the native culture. But so does everybody else.

Not one single sin of the white man was unique to us. But the white IS unique in what it did FOR the world.

But please read this AGAIN:

When we use the Mantra anti-whites’ only counter is condemning whites. PLEASE don’t argue that. With the reality I just mentioned. PLEASE always hit them with “So you are justifying genocide.” We don’t have time or space to get into IQ scores, crime rates, or what the white man has actually done.

STICK TO GENOCIDE.

Someday we will have time to give the information we are aching to give out, BUT THAT TIME IS NOT NOW.

I think this subject may interest you, but it will be far worse than useless if it SIDETRACKS you.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by shari on 03/03/2010 - 9:25 am

    I recognize that this is important. Keep emphasizing GENOCIDE, because if you look at all the advertising, school activities, church good works, etc. what they emphasize is that it doesn’t matter! Anti-white racists either believe or push the picture that whites can be blended out and everything will be carried on as we know it, with happiness for everyone. That’s false,and we know it,but in the mean time we can emphasize GENOCIDE. The evil that is ignored.

  2. #2 by Dave on 03/03/2010 - 10:29 am

    If you don’t remained focused you don’t have a sword.

    Genocide IS is the issue. Our steadfast determination to point it out, IS our sword.

    Changing people’s mentality to recognize the illegal atrocity and depredation upon us.

  3. #3 by Simmons on 03/03/2010 - 11:24 am

    Yes we can all agree Bob is the smartest human being ever. One thing though about his thesis of “Why was this info produced?”, he misses half the equation which is, “Who is this produced for.” sorry for the bad grammar

    You know the second part then counter info can be tailored to defeat the propaganda.

    By now the best of the bugsters should be able to profile thru a computer screen to see what demographic of lefty or respectable is sitting opposite you.

  4. #4 by Dave on 03/03/2010 - 3:34 pm

    What defeats the propaganda is a mentality (a way of thinking), not an argument.

    That is the most important lession I have learned from BUGS.

    Propagating that mentality (a way of thinking) is our task, not engaging in arguments.

    Revolutions cannot proceed on the basis of argument. They require the spreading of a mentality to succeed.

    Robert Whitaker isn’t the smartest man on the planet, but he is a real teacher. And that is what real teacher’s do, they teach a way of thinking.

  5. #5 by Wolf on 03/03/2010 - 7:40 pm

    I agree completely to sticking to the mantra and sticking to the topic of genocide.

    No matter how many facts and figures you throw at someone about crimes, etc they will just say you can only judge the individual, or it was the way they were raised. It is a futile argument with people who do not want to believe it.

    When people suggest they want this blended humanity to live in I sometimes say to them: “Do you want to be Mexican? Is Mexico the best place in the world?” (You can replace Mexico with most South American countries as well)

    They answer “no”.

    Then I say: then you don’t want a blended humanity, because that’s what Mexico is. The people are a mix of whites (Spaniards), Asians (natives are a type of mongloid), and Blacks (slaves mixed in). Mexico doesn’t have a low standard of living because of the land, there’s lots of resources. It’s poor because of the people.

    When you ignore the people and look at locations in the world, lots of the places where people are “starving” or having a hard time are pretty good places. Look at where white people live in comparison. We can make relatively inhospitable Iceland or Norway the best place in the world to live. Pretty amazing.

    If we want to stay amazing, we can’t become like the people south of the US… I look at some of these countries as kind of an example of where we’re headed unless we stop.

  6. #6 by Epiphany on 03/03/2010 - 8:15 pm

    Radical Feminism and Multiculturalism are two pincers of the “Liberal’s” attack on the White Man: Radical Feminism makes the White Man feel bad about being a man; Multiculturalism makes him feel bad about being White.

  7. #7 by Al Parker on 03/03/2010 - 8:44 pm

    Sorry for being off topic, but has anybody seen these new programs about celebrity genetic ancestry that go into ethnic makeup and racial mixtures – and what do you make of their message — progress or P.C. spin?

  8. #8 by Simmons on 03/04/2010 - 9:51 am

    I agree Dave it is about having the right mentality, especially of having the mentality that they are the guilty ones not us.

    I’ll reiterate at least some of us will have to know “who” is the target of what information. “Know thy enemy”, I always say.

  9. #9 by Wandrin on 03/13/2010 - 11:20 pm

    Another facet of this that i didn’t think of before i heard the phrase itself is “follow the white rabbit”.

    Go with the flow.

    Go with the grain.

    What do white rabbits like?

    All those respectable conservative white rabbits who are 100% ok with their dispossession through mass immigration. What makes them mad?

    Illegal immigration.

    White rabbits likes dem the law.

    For example the law against genocide.

    ps Also you can relate all the other stuff to it e.g relate crime statistics to:

    “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”

You must be logged in to post a comment.