<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Factor of Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gator61</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45775</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45775</guid>
		<description>Just got a video of this blog post up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOlwaGbmpm4

Don&#039;t be selfish.  Please share with your friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got a video of this blog post up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOlwaGbmpm4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOlwaGbmpm4</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be selfish.  Please share with your friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45755</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45755</guid>
		<description>Dave wrote
&lt;blockquote&gt;
They shouldn’t be taken seriously. 

I really like the way Simmons keep emphazing how nutty the people we oppose are. 

Simmons is right and he is accurate. 

We are fighting mentalities that fundamentally don’t make sense and they are weak and exposed. That is the simple truth of it.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Without the respectables propping up the left and churning out authoritarian goons to enforce its laws the left would crumble within weeks.  It would be an orgy of violence down to Nigger revolutionaries raping the white libs, literally.

But we have the Limbaugh mouths spewing inaccurate jargon about &quot;them libruls&quot; as if them libruls were a unified coherent conspiracy, when in fact they are an unstable collection of mini cults.  

Our PHDs fall for this, but there is hope however slight for the intellectuals on our side, a new grouping at some site called &quot;Alternative Right&quot; is getting down to basics (not yet at BUGs level).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave wrote</p>
<blockquote><p>
They shouldn’t be taken seriously. </p>
<p>I really like the way Simmons keep emphazing how nutty the people we oppose are. </p>
<p>Simmons is right and he is accurate. </p>
<p>We are fighting mentalities that fundamentally don’t make sense and they are weak and exposed. That is the simple truth of it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Without the respectables propping up the left and churning out authoritarian goons to enforce its laws the left would crumble within weeks.  It would be an orgy of violence down to Nigger revolutionaries raping the white libs, literally.</p>
<p>But we have the Limbaugh mouths spewing inaccurate jargon about &#8220;them libruls&#8221; as if them libruls were a unified coherent conspiracy, when in fact they are an unstable collection of mini cults.  </p>
<p>Our PHDs fall for this, but there is hope however slight for the intellectuals on our side, a new grouping at some site called &#8220;Alternative Right&#8221; is getting down to basics (not yet at BUGs level).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivener</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45751</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45751</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s nothing wrong with Mexico as a country, there’s no reason why people can’t make a good life there – except for the fact they’re Mexican. Race is real and it matters&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If I recall my history correctly, we ended up with nominal political control of most of Mexico after the Mexican-American War.  Certainly we had military dominance.  But the point is, we had the country.  

The problem was, it was ungovernable.  The PEOPLE of Mexico were a lot more trouble than they were worth and I&#039;m sure that was a deciding factor in asking the Mexican government to come back and pretend that little conquest thing never happened.  

Polk&#039;s administration and the occupying commanders would think we were nuts for willingly BRINGING Mexican peasants here by the truckload to do whatever it is they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s nothing wrong with Mexico as a country, there’s no reason why people can’t make a good life there – except for the fact they’re Mexican. Race is real and it matters</p></blockquote>
<p>If I recall my history correctly, we ended up with nominal political control of most of Mexico after the Mexican-American War.  Certainly we had military dominance.  But the point is, we had the country.  </p>
<p>The problem was, it was ungovernable.  The PEOPLE of Mexico were a lot more trouble than they were worth and I&#8217;m sure that was a deciding factor in asking the Mexican government to come back and pretend that little conquest thing never happened.  </p>
<p>Polk&#8217;s administration and the occupying commanders would think we were nuts for willingly BRINGING Mexican peasants here by the truckload to do whatever it is they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45750</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45750</guid>
		<description>Warweaver,


The Libertarians don&#039;t have a monopoly on not making sense. They repeat a lot of classical economic theory (that they call &quot;Austrian Theory&quot;) that needs repeating and is valid. 

It is their overall orientation that doesn&#039;t make sense because it is distorted and unrealistic. 

I look at them the same way I look at the typical nutbars you find running muncipal governments. They are lost in the &quot;rulebook&quot; that they live by. 

They shouldn&#039;t be taken seriously. 

I really like the way Simmons keep emphazing how nutty the people we oppose are. 

Simmons is right and he is accurate. 

We are fighting mentalities that fundamentally don&#039;t make sense and they are weak and exposed. That is the simple truth of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warweaver,</p>
<p>The Libertarians don&#8217;t have a monopoly on not making sense. They repeat a lot of classical economic theory (that they call &#8220;Austrian Theory&#8221;) that needs repeating and is valid. </p>
<p>It is their overall orientation that doesn&#8217;t make sense because it is distorted and unrealistic. </p>
<p>I look at them the same way I look at the typical nutbars you find running muncipal governments. They are lost in the &#8220;rulebook&#8221; that they live by. </p>
<p>They shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously. </p>
<p>I really like the way Simmons keep emphazing how nutty the people we oppose are. </p>
<p>Simmons is right and he is accurate. </p>
<p>We are fighting mentalities that fundamentally don&#8217;t make sense and they are weak and exposed. That is the simple truth of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45749</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45749</guid>
		<description>I always try to explain this concept to people at work.  I tell them that if a Mexican moves to the US he doesn&#039;t suddenly become productive.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with Mexico as a country, there&#039;s no reason why people can&#039;t make a good life there - except for the fact they&#039;re Mexican.  Race is real and it matters.

I had heard before how Europeans took all the good lands for themselves, but if that were true why do we pay so much for oil from the middle east?  Why do we generally live where it&#039;s cold and we have to waste energy heating stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always try to explain this concept to people at work.  I tell them that if a Mexican moves to the US he doesn&#8217;t suddenly become productive.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with Mexico as a country, there&#8217;s no reason why people can&#8217;t make a good life there &#8211; except for the fact they&#8217;re Mexican.  Race is real and it matters.</p>
<p>I had heard before how Europeans took all the good lands for themselves, but if that were true why do we pay so much for oil from the middle east?  Why do we generally live where it&#8217;s cold and we have to waste energy heating stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warweaver</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45747</link>
		<dc:creator>warweaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45747</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to point to a libertarian because either we&#039;re talking about some theoretical philosophy that doesn&#039;t have any practical application or else Bob is looking at the libertarian strain in the USA different from the one that I look at - namely, Lew Rockwell gold bugs.

I&#039;ll agree with Bob, if he&#039;s calling the Lew Rockwellians simpletons - Bob, are you calling the libertarian economists, such as those posting on Lew ROckwell, simpletons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to point to a libertarian because either we&#8217;re talking about some theoretical philosophy that doesn&#8217;t have any practical application or else Bob is looking at the libertarian strain in the USA different from the one that I look at &#8211; namely, Lew Rockwell gold bugs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree with Bob, if he&#8217;s calling the Lew Rockwellians simpletons &#8211; Bob, are you calling the libertarian economists, such as those posting on Lew ROckwell, simpletons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45746</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45746</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
You know, that got me thinking. Back when I was in school, the teachers would talk about the fact that America was relatively resource poor compared to places like Brazil and Africa. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nowadays the teacher&#039;s aim is to live thru the experience and collect a paycheck.  Most teaching slots are in &quot;vibrant&quot; schools and hence just hoping not to be necklaced by the Africans.  Ask them if you think I lie.

As for the &quot;sanity&quot; thing, all you have to do is interogate a lefty or their respectable counterpart.  They can answer nothing, absolutely nothing, but yet our PHDs insist on lengthy tomes that miss the point, &quot;just ask them&quot; works so much better.  

&quot;So what you want is the genocide of the white race, my race, is that what you are saying?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
You know, that got me thinking. Back when I was in school, the teachers would talk about the fact that America was relatively resource poor compared to places like Brazil and Africa.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nowadays the teacher&#8217;s aim is to live thru the experience and collect a paycheck.  Most teaching slots are in &#8220;vibrant&#8221; schools and hence just hoping not to be necklaced by the Africans.  Ask them if you think I lie.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;sanity&#8221; thing, all you have to do is interogate a lefty or their respectable counterpart.  They can answer nothing, absolutely nothing, but yet our PHDs insist on lengthy tomes that miss the point, &#8220;just ask them&#8221; works so much better.  </p>
<p>&#8220;So what you want is the genocide of the white race, my race, is that what you are saying?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrivener</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45745</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrivener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45745</guid>
		<description>Yet every libertarian economist insists that if the American population moved out and the third world moved in, he would be just as willing to invest his money here. It is the American” land” that is productive, and a new population wouldn’t change it.

You know, that got me thinking.  Back when I was in school, the teachers would talk about the fact that America was relatively resource poor compared to places like Brazil and Africa.  

By the time I was in college, the official rhetoric was that Europeans had taken the &quot;best land&quot; for themselves.  

Of course, a lot of things have changed.  Back when I started school, the teachers still believed we were going to be living on the moon in the year 2000.  I grew up thinking that we were going to expand into space.  Now, I just want somewhere in my own country for my people to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet every libertarian economist insists that if the American population moved out and the third world moved in, he would be just as willing to invest his money here. It is the American” land” that is productive, and a new population wouldn’t change it.</p>
<p>You know, that got me thinking.  Back when I was in school, the teachers would talk about the fact that America was relatively resource poor compared to places like Brazil and Africa.  </p>
<p>By the time I was in college, the official rhetoric was that Europeans had taken the &#8220;best land&#8221; for themselves.  </p>
<p>Of course, a lot of things have changed.  Back when I started school, the teachers still believed we were going to be living on the moon in the year 2000.  I grew up thinking that we were going to expand into space.  Now, I just want somewhere in my own country for my people to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGLass</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45743</link>
		<dc:creator>BGLass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45743</guid>
		<description>One need only imagine a &quot;tipping point,&quot; in China--- where 50% of Chinese are replaced in just 50 years by blonde-blue Midwesterners, and there are big photo ops, with them holding up signs, proudly proclaiming, &quot;I AM CHINA!&quot;  Big groups of whites, screaming in broken Chinese, &quot;I love China!&quot;  And another 30% of Chinese replaced by Dominicans, Haitians, Jews, Mexicans, and them clamoring, &quot;I AM CHINA!&quot;  (Usually the sign says &quot;I am America!)   The previous Chinese must be expelled!  They do not represent the TRUE CHINA!   Land, itself, produces nothing.  There are plenty of better places than America,  if you just want to talk about land.  They will never get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One need only imagine a &#8220;tipping point,&#8221; in China&#8212; where 50% of Chinese are replaced in just 50 years by blonde-blue Midwesterners, and there are big photo ops, with them holding up signs, proudly proclaiming, &#8220;I AM CHINA!&#8221;  Big groups of whites, screaming in broken Chinese, &#8220;I love China!&#8221;  And another 30% of Chinese replaced by Dominicans, Haitians, Jews, Mexicans, and them clamoring, &#8220;I AM CHINA!&#8221;  (Usually the sign says &#8220;I am America!)   The previous Chinese must be expelled!  They do not represent the TRUE CHINA!   Land, itself, produces nothing.  There are plenty of better places than America,  if you just want to talk about land.  They will never get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gator61</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/03/12/the-first-factor-of-production/comment-page-1/#comment-45742</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator61</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=5414#comment-45742</guid>
		<description>I think this post has the makings of a good youtube video.  I&#039;ll get started on it tonight.  

Bob, I wish you would would provide an audio version of your posts.  Then I could use your voice instead of my lispy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this post has the makings of a good youtube video.  I&#8217;ll get started on it tonight.  </p>
<p>Bob, I wish you would would provide an audio version of your posts.  Then I could use your voice instead of my lispy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

