Archive for March, 2010

We’re in a Fix

The Communist motto was always “Two steps forward, one step back.” They would make a huge demand and then compromise. This required an “opposition” which was dumb enough to let the Left have half of what it didn’t have before, and then crow about its own “moderation” and “reasonableness” and “willingness to compromise.”

I other words there is absolutely nothing new about today’s respectable conservatives. Lenin called them useful idiots.

You will often hear anti-whites saying they are just for Choice. They claim they are not demanding massive immigration into ALL white countries and ONLY white countries. So militants demand that borders be open in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries, but many conservatives claim all they demand is that, once they’re in, they have the Choice to stay in.

Conservatives are a lot like the Inquisition or the Jews who got Jesus crucified. The Inquisition never did the killing, it just “turned heretics over to the secular authorities.” Jews did not do the crucifying. They just convicted Jesus and turned him over to the secular authorities.

Respectable conservatives simply give the Left half of what it demands at first and thereby claim to be an opposition. This was an old game when LENIN took it up over a century ago.

People take this little dance seriously. People take professional wrestling seriously. In other words, they ENJOY thinking that is a real contest going on. They cheer on their Gorgeous George or their Hannitys. A lot of people think this MUST be a Conspiracy. NOBODY, much less most of the population, is dumb enough not to see the World Wrestling Championship and the game of Political Dialogue is fixed.

And they are half right. Every wrestling fan does it for kicks. They are all aware THAT game is fixed.

3 Comments

Gator on the Fourteen Words

Gator says:

A year or two back I did an experiment on yahoo answers. First I posted:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Jewish children.
It got very positive responses. As it did when I used black children, and Native American children.
It was only when I used white children did I get called a racA year or two back I did an experiment on yahoo answers. First I posted:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Jewish children.
It got very positive responses. As it did when I used black children, and Native American children.
It was only when I used white children did I get called racist
Try it.

Gator asks me for instructions. He is already following my instructions. He already TRIED it and he is finally telling us so.

I need active brains, not followers.

Sic ‘em, Gator!

9 Comments

Sic ‘Em!

During the 1968 campaign, before George Wallace was shot, John Wayne wrote a check for a considerable amount to Wallace. On it were the words:

“Sic ‘em, George!”

Only the Duke could have said that to a Governor. And only George Wallace didn’t mind being called an attack dog.

A little while back I bitched about how I missed some stuff I had read from commenters about how to use the Mantra. Then I discovered that you had not ceased to do that, I had just been looking in the wrong place. I was wrong.

That happens a lot.

The wonderful fact is that General Comments consists of a conspiracy against the rest of the world by BUGS experts. It is not a response to Bob‘s Latest Wisdom.

It is more like a conspiracy to shoot anti-whites in the knees.

But without the violence.

If this sounds beyond normal comprehension, you can put yourself in my place. They are talking about You Tube techniques in detail. The last Latest Technology I was in on was able to use ham radio to reach Tennessee from South Carolina.

I was reading an exchange one of us had started on Facebook with the Mantra and referred to in General Comments III. Some bitch had said the usual thing about how ignorant we racists were and one of our people got one of my quotes out,. That BUGSTER simply quoted me as saying that the standard anti-white reply was, “YOU IGNUNT!”

It is hard to understand how wonderful I felt seeing this. The BUGSer who did this did not care whether I understood Facebook or any technology. That BUGSER could have tried to put his own spin on the reply.

All that mattered was that I had heard this same crap a thousand times, and it was hard to improve on my response.

It is almost too simple to state: No matter what the technology, nothing they say is new. So, for one of US, there is no way we are going to treat their crap as anything but the same old crap they stated in hieroglyphics or Morse Code.

When I read General Comments, I keep seeing us repeating the Basics, someone bringing us back to the basics.

When I was young, I naturally hoped and expected that older people were wise and more profound than I was, thinking thoughts that I would only fully appreciate after years of accumulated wisdom and experience.

To say I was “disappointed” in the “wisdom” I was offered is one of history’s great understatements.

I was crushed by the failure of those before me. But I am astonished by you. When one is raised in a Pod World, where everything is distorted, it is amazing when people come out making sense. I am tired, I am discouraged, I have no hope.

Then along you come.

Sounds dramatic, but screw that. I couldn’t care less if it sounds dramatic.

It IS dramatic.

Sic ‘em!!

7 Comments

Fourteen Words

Why is information produced?

The Fourteen Words are now famous. Every documentary I see on Evil Racism includes them. I was trying to remember exactly those fourteen words are and got “Fourteen Words to Racism” and such, but the words themselves were hard to find.

The words are, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.”

That is GENIUS!

It is all we ask!

Why on earth would THEY push that?

This is inexplicable if THEY are a Conspiracy of Evil Geniuses. The reason that THEY concentrate on the fourteen words is because THEY want to show how reasonable us naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews can sound.

They want people to give them money because we are dangerous because we can sound so reasonable.

If I understand correctly, the man who formulated these fourteen words is now in prison for violence.

The point is that THEY are not at all interested in the fact that a huge part of the audience reading the fourteen words will think they make sense. Unlike the hook-nosed Conspirator Geniuses who are dedicated to Evil the way Satan is, this THEY is only interested in its own CONTRIBUTORS.

That’s a world of difference.

Brian Lamb of C-Span had the general reputation that no one could TELL which side he was on. I don’t know, either. But once he was talking to someone who was denouncing Hate Sites on the Internet, and the example that person produced of Hate was a picture of a couple with a baby with the words, “It is a privilege to be white.”

Brian Lamb, champion neutral of neutrals, said, “But you wouldn’t mind if they were blacks and the words were about being black?” His interviewee responded, “Oh, no.”

It was not a partisan comment. It was an obvious, neutral question. It was also a question no respectable conservative and no one on our side would have asked.

Pitiful!

No group of Geniuses Who Rule the World would allow the fourteen words to be repeated, much less put them front and center.

Now for the very, very few people who have an operative frontal lobe and who can understand Brian Lamb’s question, the reason THEY repeat the fourteen words is simple: THEY want contributors to realize that, no matter how reasonable WE sound, we are anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

From the point of view of the International Genius Conspiracy, the fourteen words is a threat to what they are trying to achieve. Meanwhile on Planet Earth, they are a group which makes its living on contributions from frightened old Jews and limousine liberals.

THEY use the me tactic we do to make us look HUGE. You will never see the audience at a racist meeting in a documentary and you will never see the audience in one of our films. Both we and THEY have the same goal: to make us look HUGE.

In our films and in their films you see only the speaker and hear the audience reaction.

I have never heard anyone MENTION this similarity, much less THINK about it, ANALYZE it.

Both sides are fighting on a front that does not exist Each side is raising money.

That means DRAMA.

How much MONEY can one raise pushing the Mantra? Well, I devoted my life to the Mantra AFTER I retired comfortably from decades of fighting Communism and being barely within the limits of respectability.

I have told you that over forty years ago it was taken for granted that I could take down the anti-whites at the University of Virginia in a matter of minutes. Everybody knew I could breach their lines in short order. But no one followed me, and I knew why.

Information is a product. It is there to raise money or to get published. The Mantra is not sexy. The Devil’s Conspiracy is sexy.

For BOTH sides.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, I am fighting for the existence of people who look like me, which is all nature is interested in.

14 Comments

Only White Contributions are Unique

Someone once defined Leftism as “A constant screaming about how everyone should be above average.”

That is an insane attitude, but it is a very RATIONAL attitude, in the economic sense. Half of he population will always be below average and you will always have a clientele if you rant about it.

Attacks on whites always concentrate on what whites have, not what third worlders don’t have that we do. Yes, starvation happens nowhere. Starvation only happens where we are blocked from getting at it. But it will be cold day in Hell before an anti-white takes notice of this.

But a CAUTION. When we use the Mantra anti-whites’ only counter is condemning whites. PLEASE don’t argue that. With the reality I just mentioned. PLEASE always hit them with “So you are justifying genocide.”

We don’t have time or space to get into IQ scores, crime rates, or what the white man has actually done.

STICK TO GENOCIDE.

Someday we will have time to give the information we are aching to give out, BUT THAT TIME IS NOT NOW.

I think this subject may interest you, but it will be far worse than useless if it SIDETRACKS you.

The term “subsistence farming” gives me cold chills. If you actually see that someone is depending on his naked crops out in the field to give him enough food to survive on, it is different from a textbook term. Books always tell us how peasants resisted the new farming techniques, and historians dismiss it as superstition and ignorance.

Of course peasants were resistant. They were TOLD these new methods would produce more food, they may even have believed it, but no one seems to realize why they didn’t want to take the CHANCE. It was not an economic risk, it was life and death, watching their families starve to death because they had risked everything on a promise.

Subsistence farming is HORRIBLE. No wonder priests who promise to make the crops good this year by a sacrifice or praying to Saint Whoever got power and money for it. They were the only intellectuals the peasant had. They were usually caring and believed what they said. How was a peasant to know the experts in scientific agriculture were indifferent?

The fact is that a wise peasant would not have believed a ten thousand year succession of well-meaning experts. How would they know that this particular set had a point? Can you imagine how terrified they were even when this was tried on even a few acres, realizing that if this set of priests made it work, they would be forced to abandons methods that had fed their families since time out of mind?

This is not what historians write about or read about. They think only in The Big Picture, who against Progress and how those who were for Progress were the good guys. Their information is produced for each other and for well-fed students who think that subsistence is a credit card at the grocery.

That’s not fair but it makes my point.

In the real world, no Indian would go back to his forefathers’ world, and they had it good. Indians had thousands of acres for each of them. But they also died young. Almost everyone had pain they lived with that we would not tolerate.

But the rest of our third world had lives that were, in plain English, horrible. They starved routinely. That was the poor guy. Rich ones lost their teeth, for a start. Every single Pharaoh suffered from a malnutrition that would be intolerable today in Nicaragua.

Multiculture is big business, but what offends multiculturalists is that not one single culture the West went into has the slightest interest in dumping all that has come in and go back to their ”kinder and simpler” life.

White people had diseases, slavery, no respect for the native culture. But so does everybody else.

Not one single sin of the white man was unique to us. But the white IS unique in what it did FOR the world.

But please read this AGAIN:

When we use the Mantra anti-whites’ only counter is condemning whites. PLEASE don’t argue that. With the reality I just mentioned. PLEASE always hit them with “So you are justifying genocide.” We don’t have time or space to get into IQ scores, crime rates, or what the white man has actually done.

STICK TO GENOCIDE.

Someday we will have time to give the information we are aching to give out, BUT THAT TIME IS NOT NOW.

I think this subject may interest you, but it will be far worse than useless if it SIDETRACKS you.

9 Comments

Hunger and Homelessness

When I was in the program, I was amazed by the people who would casually mention to me that they were homeless. They were clean, they led normal lives outside. You couldn’t tell the players without a scorecard.

They were not homeless because of societal inequity. They were homeless because of building codes. Today you couldn’t build a Depression-era shantytown on Federal land in utmost Nevada. Recovering addicts are often construction workers. They could put something over their heads, but WHERE?

Once again, the reason one sees this is because they never ask themselves is WHY IS THIS INFORMATION PRODUCED? The are thousands of people who make heir living with the homeless, but damn few of them can even imagine building one’s OWN shelter.

All information published about the homeless is published by people who are using homelessness for their own living or their own cause, or both. You should see how they react to my suggestion of leaving areas for shacks.

That is fascistic bourgeois thinking, that is typical, “Let them eat cake ” stuff!” This is hiring more experts like government building projects and experts in homelessness would plan and administer. No one with a Master’s in Sociology or who is a Marxist would encourage MORE shanties.

And that is where ALL of our information comes from. But no one ask why the information is produced.

One guy made billions by making tiny loans to tens of millions of third-world borrowers. He did more good than ten World Banks. The money did not filter through governments. It went to people who found solid reasons to get into the little debt they could get into.

He has been recognized as a humanitarian lately, but it was late because information is produced by experts to promote the idea that Idealists like them should get paid to plan projects. To put it simply, professionals are interested in using homelessness to promote Economic Democracy while the people only they speak for publicly want to get a roof over their heads.

Less than two centuries ago, Europeans would remark casually a particular family was going to starve come winter. This was not because, as the Idealists would say, they didn’t care. They lived in a world where they couldn’t do anything about it. Feed the family this year and they will starve next winter. There were too MANY of them.

Demography is a branch of economics, mainly because you have to put it SOMEWHERE. As a result I had to do a fair amount of reading in the area for my credentials. My impression was that Experts on Hunger don‘t know what hunger IS. They use the words starvation and malnutrition interchangeably. They want to prove that capitalism will always, and uniquely, produce Hunger.

Back on Planet Earth, the only white countries that have seen actual lack of food were in the Peace Loving People’s Republic, countries run by experts who CARED about the poor, if you ask Mommy Professor. Mommy Professor can stand in the middle of a group of people whoa re actually starving and rant about “inequities.” That’s what he’s there for.

An actual human being among starving people will want to get food to them. NOW.

One of the greatest and least noticed phenomena of our age is how few people actually starve. I do not know whether people starve in India any more. But all a Hunger Expert will note is that Indians get paid very little. The security net there is very, very low. But for the first time in thousands of years, it EXISTS.

This is of no importance to someone who is only interested in a New World Order. But it would impress YOU if you ever saw the ways things USED to be.

People who have no roof over their heads want one. They could build one if there was a place for them to do it. But once again, one has to realize that information is PRODUCED. I am telling you this, but I have no stake in Homelessness.

But who is going to talk about this? It is information only a non-Expert would be interested in.

6 Comments

BUGS Fills the Gap

The first comment on my article “Torture” said no one can stand up under interrogation. I can’t comment on that. I was just called in when I could be use, and I never cracked anybody. In fact, the person I was talking to was never aware he had given me ANY information.

Every American who was in World War II says he really knows what Combat is. So since I did some questioning, people assume that I claim to know a lot about interrogations in general. They are not open to the public, or to me, so you can find out more about them on Google than from me.

But thinking about it, I think my usefulness there relates to what we are doing here. The person I LISTENED to, and that is all I did, was not aware I got information out of him. Ninety percent of the people who are influenced by the Mantra will not remember where or when they saw it and we will not know about them.

In fact, ninety percent of THOSE people will never have heard of the Mantra itself. They will hear from those who do and get the point. We MAY find out about one percent of the people we influence, but I doubt it will be that many.

Everything here relates to everything, and even I am just finding out things like the link between my interrogation methods and the stuff I just mentioned.

Also this all relates to the question one needs always to ask oneself: “Why was this information PRODUCED?” People who run organizations or raise money or want to be Leaders have to limit themselves to results they can SEE. That is the only way to get what they are, in most cases legitimately, really after.

That leaves a huge opening for people like us, who are only interested in results for their own sake. We will always be flying blind to a certain extent, but that is because we are filling a gap only we can fill. Where there are measurable results, there are others who have the incentive to get them.

Just as I have never “cracked” anybody, at least ninety-nine percent of the people we influence will not be aware we influenced them.

And we want it that way. Some day a historian may write a book that includes us, but not for decades yet. In his time, Monet was a very déclassé painter. Nobody who WAS anybody liked him.

No one in BUGS, least of all me, has any interest in making “Whitakerites” out of anybody. If I were trying to be a LEADER or we were raising money, that would change our approach completely. This may answer some of Gator’s questions.

The best definition I ever heard of the difference between Nixon and Reagan was: “Nixon ran for president to BE something. Reagan ran for president to DO something.”

BUGS is here to DO something.

3 Comments

Switch to our mobile site