Lord Nelson says, “God bless the American Constitution and the men who wrote it.”
The rule is as old as the hills and always new: No one appreciates freedom like those who are denied it.
Here we are allowed SOME speech and we are allowed to be armed if we know the rules.
These were details back before immigration. Who needed a gun in Britain in 1959?
When I was working in Germany one time, a Lutheran explained to me that Protestant churches in Germany were locked, but Catholic churches were not. I mentioned this to some Hispanic-Americans in Central America, and they said “That’s fine in Germany, but not in the barrios.”
Actually, I doubt it’s so fine in Germany any more. One of the best-guarded secrets in liberal suburbia today is that the crime rate is higher in their European Ideal Society than it is in the US. If it is not as violent, that’s simply because Europeans do not resist.
A repeat minority criminal in Europe has a right to have a gun, just like he does in New York or Ottawa. But if LN has one, his life will be ruined.
Our “violent heritage” pays off.
I know it from prison: No matter what the gun law is you go into a certain number of houses in America when the people are still there, somebody has a gun. Every suburbanite has been trained in the idea that it only takes one gun to kill, so they say even one gun is too much.
Every prisoner has been trained in the idea that it only takes one gun to kill, so one gun is too much.
Fashionable suburbanites, Europeans, cops, and prisoners, they all agree.
A criminal can go into the house of any Hero of WWII or the Falklands and watch the Heroes offer him their preteen daughter to rape if he just won’t HURT Said Hero with his Big Old Smelly, Loud, Illegal GUN.
“I didn’t OFFER my daughter. There was just nothing I could do because of gun laws, and I approve of them. Guns are for when our Leaders and our Queen choose to let us have them.”
Amen and God Bless the Queen!”
Please note that I just put this in plain English. I doubt any suburban Brit would even try to deny it.
I KNOW no trendy American suburbanite would admit it even while worshipping it.
Euro-weenies is the term.
#1 by Dave on 04/10/2010 - 10:25 am
We are fighting a mentality and our broad publics are deep into the Stockholm syndrome.
The Stockholm syndrome is for real, more pervasive in Britain and Europe, but bad enough in Canada, the US, NZ, and Australia.
The Establishment “tricks out” every right as to make rights meaningless.
In the US, the police have a policy to shoot anyone holding a firearm in his or her hand and it is a policy they follow relentlessly. I can’t believe how stupid typical National Rifle Association types are about this real and actual policy of the police.
Here‘s the fantasy: You find yourself confronted by an intruder in your bedroom. You grab a gun handy by your bed stand and control your intruder while you call the cops on your cell phone. They arrive and make an arrest and you are patted on the back for being a good citizen.
Here’s the truth: The police will fire on anyone who has a gun in his or her hand regardless of the circumstances. From the police perspective, anyone in possession of a firearm holding it in his or her hand must be immediately killed. That is the policy.
Here’s another aspect of how guns are actually regulated in America that make a mockery of the 2nd Amendment: The law is clear in matters of “self-defense”. Your actions must be entirely “cold-blooded”. You duty is to retreat, that is, to be a perfect coward. Not only that, if there is any element of anger or reactivity in your actions, your “self-defense” is deemed “offense” and you are guilty of assault.
What pure unmitigated crap! But that’s the LAW.
These are means the Establishment uses to enforce a Stockholm syndrome mentality on the part of the public.
That’s why it is your mentality that is important, not the weapon.
Always remember, the Establishment stands with the criminal, not you.
Now if you really think about this, it makes perfect sense.
#2 by shari on 04/10/2010 - 11:56 am
The second amendment has been hedged or “infringed” in many ways, but that’s no reason to give up owning any guns. Americans KNOW that is their right, even those who want to do away with it. The anti-whites will go too far. Indeed, they already have. And that is an excerise of my free speech rights! By the way, I never have paid much attention to guns, but my family has ALWAYS had them.
#3 by Simmons on 04/10/2010 - 2:55 pm
“Our side” berates the Left with facts, wins hands down and still loses. I am tired of that.
It’s Mantra Think folks, real simple.
The Left and their henchman respectables are responsible, and that is a fact they can carry to their graves.
Eg; “You Mr/Ms Liberal are responsible for my family being defenseless, let me say it again you are responsible, no ifs, ands or buts!”
Utopian cultists care not a wit about facts, they fear for their very being of being held responsible.
#4 by Gator61 on 04/10/2010 - 9:41 pm
I see a huge parallel between the way the left seeks to erode the Second Amendment out of existence and the way they want to blend white people out of existence. The meaning of the Second Amendment is clear to anyone who takes the time to read it. Some people don’t like the Second Amendment. Fair enough. The Constitution spells out what is required to repeal an amendment.
This process was used in the 21st Amendment to Repeal the 18th Amendment
The liberals won’t do that. That would be a stand up fight that would be opposed by the overwhelming majority of Americans. They seek to simply erode the second amendment little by little until it is meaningless. In the same way they do not seek to kill off the white race. White people would understand what was going on then and rise up to put a stop to it. Instead they blend us away little by little.
“We aren’t taking away your Second Amendment rights we just don’t want guns on school grounds…within a hundred yards of a school…within a mile of a school…within 5 miles of a school. You don’t want guns in schools do you?”
“We aren’t promoting miscegenation we just want students to go to neighborhood schools…want schools integrated…want to teach children diversity… Don’t you think people have the right to marry who they choose?”
#5 by Simmons on 04/12/2010 - 1:22 pm
Question for Lord Nelson.
Is is illegal in your country to say or write that anti-racists are in fact anti-white?