Despite the fact that I am an Ancient Philosopher and Brian is a snot-nosed kid, we have some things in common. He was the one who expressed to me our feelings about General Comments III:
“I don’t want to say anything there because it might break the flow.”

Yes, if you want to break an old man’s heart, just break the flow. For me, Comments III is a dream come true.

You see, what I always wanted to do was show pro-whites the right attack strategy. Year after year I exposed the soft underbelly of our enemies to the point where it became a standing joke: “How many minutes will it take Whitaker to make a complete loon out of this guy?“

They watched me do it. They ENJOYED watching me do it.

Then they refused to use any of my techniques.

It felt a little like I suppose people do when they have a dream where they are running away from something but they seem to be running in molasses.

It is, literally, a nightmarish feeling.
1) Pro-whites keep saying they want to convince others.

2) I convince others. They see it.

3) Then they ignore me.

I am an egotist, just a little different. It amazed my wife how I could take personal insults and not miss a beat. One reason I loved her was that she showed all the resentment I should have shown: She was entirely on my side.

But she never understood my particular type of ego. I am not that concerned about what people think of ME.

But don’t mess with my IDEAS.

My IDEAS are my life’s work. So when I read Comments III, I see a group of people in a CONSPIRACY to get my stuff out.

I never understood Jehovah. His whole concentration seems to be to have people repeating and praising his name, though, as I have pointed out, Jesus never said anything about Praising God, but only about LOVING God.

But then again, I’m not Jehovah. Reading a group of people who are actually exchanging EXPERIENCES about the Mantra and the thinking I have offered pro-whites for decades is a joy I never thought I would experience.

So keep doing what you’re doing in Comments III. Bob the Praiseworthy LOVES it.

So does the snot-nosed brat.

I just put “starvation today” into Google.

On the first page I got “Ethiopia” and “malnutrition.”

In the Evil White Man’s world, there is no starvation. Last I looked, long ago, Ethiopia’s Marxist government as cutting off food shipments. They have collected enough money for Ethiopia’s starving children to keep the whole country fat.

They never mention the reason children WERE starving. I don’t know how it is today. I still see a photo of the same starving kid I saw ten years ago on the same posters.

Malnutrition is not starvation. If it were, we wouldn’t have any vitamin pills. Malnutrition was the reason so many people in Eastern Europe were fat. They had calories enough o keep them going, but they were always hungry because their body wanted what it was missing.

In fact, it occurs to me that there is probably SOME something that is missing from ALL diets that the body would like to have. That’s why the health nuts HAVE their up-to-date magazines.

But, contrary to what Google says, there is a subtle difference between a Yuppie reading a magazine at a health club and a person who is actually starving. Jane Fonda wouldn’t know that, but it’s true.

Is there any starvation anywhere on Planet Earth today because of a lack of calories, which is the only definition of starvation? The children dying in the streets of North Korea were the last real example I heard of, and the people who took their pictures risked death. A few in the media actually published them, but damned few.

Now that I think of it, there are probably children starving in the People’s Republics of Angola and Mozambique. But none of this has anything to do with lack of food. While the Ethiopia Famine Activist and Anti-Racism Leagues collect all the money for publicized food for children that never actually gets there, there may be a few people who smuggle food into those People Republics, though even I wouldn’t try it in North Korea even second-hand.

As Pope John Paul found out, if you offend the People’s Peace-Loving Republics, they’ll KILL you. Think what happens if you aren’t POPE.

I’ve never seen a single thing on television about any Communist state killing anybody in other countries, until the Communists lost power.

So the world looks a little different if you have actually dealt with the People’s Peace Loving Democratic Republics. It’s like offending the Mafia.

By the way, did you hear that there were anonymous threats on some congressmen?

That really impresses the HELL out of me.

The last I head of gun control on cable was a liberal commentator who said that it was just dead for now. He predicted there would be another Columbine and the demand for gun control would come back.

Imagine what happens when we say something like that. The guy saying it was positively salivating, cheering on another mass shooting. But it will be a long cold day in the Bad Place before anyone criticizes him for it.

Respectable conservatives like to say that open borders would be fine if there were no welfare. They show their attitude that only money matters. Any other subject brings them to a slope which may be slippery enough to make them deal with reality.

Respectable conservatives assume that the only cost of a flood of third worlders is welfare. At the same time conservatives always want to compromise with liberals when liberal activists make demands.

A college in Boone County, NC had its first mass shooting ever. The picture of the shooter was not shown. Guess what color he was? The prisons in California and Texas would mostly have to close if there were no blacks or Hispanics there.

One guy who was shot on the Long Island Railway by a black on a rampage with an automatic weapon — even Mace is illegal in New York, had a wife who used that incident to win a congressional seat in COLORADO on a gun control platform.

Millions of people in America make their living in the Activist Industry. Our president never made his living any other way.

The Activist Industry makes it bread by making everything that happens an excuse for pushing a new regulation and a new law and new Community Action. So every time a minority kills somebody or has sex with a minor in his family, it becomes the basis of a demand that EVERYBODY be regulated.

But Milton Friedman said the only problem with immigrants was the cost of welfare. Respectable conservatives agree with him, since they don’t want to talk about living around REAL minorities.

When you have white flight, it is not enough to build buildings for immigrants. They have to be buildings right beside the white flight crowd. The white flighters become interested in controlling guns in the whole area.

And, as the liberal said with drool going down his chin, there will be “incidents.”

Above all, of course, what no one dares to say is that the reason Mexico is poor is because it is populated by MEXICANS. For some odd reason, California, the very place known for its rapid growth for well over a century, has suddenly begun to go backward.

White people can become the kind of Americans people have always wanted to invest in. Clearly this is not happening with third world immigrants.

The Tea Party wants to talk about over regulation and a collapse of Family Values.

This is SILLY. We have to look beyond these mindless yucks.

I am embarrassed for recently talking about Church sex scandals for a unique reason.

I only discussed them because I thought they were over. Now they have popped up again.

Now I can understand why the Church would be unique in this case. Scandals in institutions popular with the media have the half life of a newly created element. When scientists proving global warming got caught flat-footed making up their data, that was instantly forgotten. When black reporters in New York and Washington had to give back their Pulitzers because they made the stories up, this was forgotten instantly.

The Curia have been good boys for years. On every social issue the Church has gone along with anything the media wanted except abortion, which is the safest possible issue. Abortion takes all the pressure off the real issues, and is safely anti-white.

But the Catholic Church simply cannot do enough to obtain forgiveness where it really counts, our real established religion. The percentage of Catholics who go to confession, even annually, is down to a tiny fraction, but the ones who go to REAL confession on social issues is up toward a hundred percent.

My mistake is perfectly understandable, to even my worst critic, me. After all, the CIA and other security agencies are demons of the media, but no one even asked that anybody in it even be criticized for the errors which allowed 9/11 to happen.

I am honestly mystified that this sex scandal has come back up.

I am also puzzled why the Church has not come out with the Old Standard: “We should be looking to the future, not Assigning Blame for errors of the past.“

Of course, I have also wondered why that one doesn’t come up at every murder trial: “Stop bugging me. I PROMISED I wouldn’t do it again, so why are we spending all this time Assigning Blame for the Past?”

In fact, the only group one is allowed, nay REQUIRED, to Assign Blame for the Past is the white race.

You know, the crowd that doesn’t exist.

The half life for White Guilt is apparently forever. On the other hand, the hundreds of murders and mutilations OF white people by blacks which took place last night and will occur tonight have the half life of Element 120.

But one thing is consistent. Neither of the black reporters who faked the articles that won them the Pulitzers has ever been out of work since. No MAJOR figure in security will ever be even mildly criticized for 9/11, and no one will ever blame a single bishop who knowingly caused more child molestation than any fifty actual molesters could have done.

By contrast to the criminal negligence in the security services, a few priest-pederasts actually went to prison.

In my last book, I provided a list of the Politically Correct Pecking Order. For example, blacks are a minority and militant women are high on the list, too. But what do you do when the male committing Thought Crime is BLACK?

This is an obvious problem but I haven’t seen it discussed for some reason. I get the impression that the media doesn’t WANT it talked about in such brazen terms.

The Catholic Church gets SOME immunity for its dedicated blubbering over arguing with SOME Politically Correct goals in the past. The bishops are as safe as any Mafia capo before the RICO Statutes.

But as for the sex scandal, maybe the media are keeping THAT knife on the shelf for future purposes. But no one did more to make “Hispanic” mean a colored race than the Church did.

This discussion would be very uncomfortable for an anti-white to listen to. It is too matter-of-fact about what should be referred to in very correct jargon and never as a single unit.

Every group has its exact place in the Politically Correct Hierarchy. It makes income tax law look simple. Yet no one has gone into it in detail

And nobody ever will.

I just wrote an article entitled Inside the Beltway. It will be placed where Brian, as editor, decides to put it.

Since Inside the beltway said nothing BUGSers aren’t familiar with, I tried to make it worthwhile by giving an analysis specifically of drug regulation which you might not be familiar with. But that is not the reason I wrote it. I wrote Inside the beltway as an Introduction.

You see, the reason we have front page news about the Tea Parties is because some people are bitching about how the government works exactly as I said in that article. This is a lot like the British public suddenly coming out in mass shouting that there is such a thing as a Parliament.

The so-called Tea Parties are bitching about what every literate person has known since he reached the age of literacy.

You see, the Tea Parties end where the Mantra Thinking begins. They are screaming reality, that the government has no interest in them. Hell, anybody who ever held a policy-level job knows that.

Tea Parties are screaming out a reality. That is the opposite of Mantra Thinking. Mantra Thinking begins with reality.

A BUGS member takes an oath much like that in court: Reality, the whole of reality, and NOTHING BUT reality. I think we are all bemused by this phenomenon. Here huge groups of apparent adults are screaming about reality, protesting reality.

In politics, you look to where the loudest screaming is coming from. As Huey Long said, “The secret of leadership is to figure out where the public is going and get out in front.” The media follows the same rule.

But not BUGS.

They can meet, they can yell, Hell, they can even get violent, but it means nothing to us. Fox news went into predictable mode over the whole thing. Every commentator began to demand that this revolt not get violent, that it stay within the bounds of respectable opposition, which is the institution Fox represents.

To us it makes no difference whether they get violent or not.

We are dedicated to something the establishment fears a lot more than it does violence. But what we demand is as illegal outside the United States as any form of violence. In fact, for Thought Crime there is a minimum sentence. Violence can be negotiated by your counsel.

In the United States a person can demand and organize violence and be forgiven in a few years. David Duke will be Former Klansman David Duke for the rest of his life.

They are arresting militiamen, but militiamen are harmless to the powers that be. Militiamen go out with guns to enforce immigration laws but they denounce the “racism” which is the only reason for there to be immigration laws in the first place.

It is insane to have a law which forces a random sampling of humanity to be on one side of a border while another random sample is kept within that boundary. That is the reality Mantra Thinking begins with.

So long as the Tea Parties refuse to commit Heresy, no matter what they do they are irrelevant.

We begin where the Tea Party stops.

The DEA and the drug companies made sure that when Valium was introduced to replace earlier addictive tranquilizers it was cleared as being nonaddictive.

This is not a Jewish Plot, THIS IS NOT CYNICISM, this the way things work.

The reason all new drugs are nonaddictive is because there is another huge industry dedicated to proving everything big companies do is part of a Plot. If the DEA did not stamp drugs as non addictive at first, we wouldn’t have ANY new ones.

In other words, we begin with the observation that as soon as it becomes big business, Consumer protection becomes an institution. It hires people and becomes a power base.

As soon as anything becomes an institution it becomes predictable. So drugs are the predictable balancing of three institutions: drug makers, the DEA, and the Consumer protection Industry. The DEA and drug companies would not exist if new drugs did not come out, and therefore all drugs have to come out as being so perfect that the Consumer Protection Industry cannot veto them.

There is another industry, the media. That institution wants excitement. There is excitement in the Consumer Protection Industry, which can make so much of any addictive potential in any drug as to make heroin seem like rabbit tobacco.

Notice that there has not been a single mention of law or right or The Public Interest or anything of that sort in this discussion.

And this discussion is complete. I made my living in this environment for many years and everyone who is a professional understands what I have said.

The public has no place in this process for the simple reason that it has no interest in it. The 239 words above will not be read by anyone outside BUGS.

The public has therefore been replaced by another institution, the Consumer Protection Industry.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how the world works.

Outside the Consumer protection Industry is a group of people who are interested. But they are unusual, to say the least. Because anyone who is interested in this stuff for nonprofessional reasons is too unusual, they are so rare as to be 1) tiny in number and wholly disorganized and 2) obsessed.

Those few odd people out become obsessed with some knowledge they have gained. They read whole books about the influence of the Rothschilds or the Bilderbergers. Oddly enough, no one takes them seriously

So the public becomes the Consumer Protection Industry.

Now let’s say you make a living in this environment. A constituent calls you on Capitol Hill and points out that something is amiss. You draft a letter asking about it, sign it on the signing machine for your congressman or run it across his desk, and send a copy to said constituent.

Those who are addressed by this standard letter pay it the same attention they pay all standard letters. They work for people who are appointed by people who are elected to balance three groups, the DEA, the drug industry, and the Consumer protection Industry. They send a polite reply, which you forward to the constituent, explaining how interested they are and stating the policy worked out between the three groups that matter.

I have just told you the entire process, and you KNOW that is the entire process. This is not cynicism, this is making a living inside the beltway.

After doing this routine work I go home and watch television. Every person dealing with the public should watch a lot of television, because otherwise he cannot understand the people he deals with.

He sees on TV that the person who wrote that letter is overwhelmingly interested in how well a seven-foot freak can shove a large ball into a net compared to other seven-foot freaks. His only real interest in the news is not his own personal point of view, but where The Middle of the Road is this week.

The Middle of the Road is set by two institutions, liberals and respectable conservatives.

And that, people, is what happens Inside the Beltway.

Old London Bridge, as in London bridge is falling down, fascinates me. The one that is now in Arizona is the NEW London Bridge. The Old Bridge opened in 1209 and was torn down about 1830, when the new one, the one now in Arizona, was completed.

For six centuries, Old London Bridge was the ONLY bridge for almost all of London’s traffic. There was no other for many miles.

Having only one bridge was a problem, but what was REALLY a problem was that its main source of revenue was the shops and apartments ON the bridge.

Maybe the reason it fascinates me so is because the whole situation sounds so FAMILIAR. I worked for the government, remember. So here we had this structure that had a MONOPOLY over movement across the Thames into the world’s biggest city, and that one monopoly bridge was crammed with shops and apartments that were in the way.

If you were trying to go across the bridge in a wagon, you had to take into account that almost all the shops and apartments were JOINED at the top to get a few square feet of extra space. Also, with an overhead apartment that made one building leaning against another, to make it more stable. So most of the Bridge, even in bright daylight, was dark because of the overheads.

So the Bridge was a tunnel.

It doesn’t take much imagination to see why someone who dealt with government agencies would find Old London Bridge so familiar. There is only one way to get something done and you have to go through a tunnel between groups that LIVE there. They take every square inch they can, for their own reasons.

And as with London Bridge, the obstacles are not directed at you. Nor do the obstinacies have anything to do with your interest in getting across. In order to understand an agency, you have to forget its so-called “mission” and look at its internal politics, its internal experience.

The point of those who rented space on the Bridge was not to block it, but it was to get every square inch they could out of it. They got every square inch out of it that they could defend. Agencies are the same way.

Someone has said that “Government appointees are people who keep talking about making things happen and who hope and pray that nothing does.” That goes for Presidential appointees. It goes triple for career employees. Like most people, their interest is in drawing their salaries and going home.

I have been at an awful lot of Oversight Committee meetings, and this does not come up. They’re always talking about The Mission of the agency. That is like talking about Old London Bridge purely as a bridge.