Multiculturalism MEANS Multiracialism
Today, I stumbled across an article about how the American far Right hates soccer. The content of the article is unimportant, but the author concludes that soccer is becoming more popular in the United States because the United States is becoming more multicultural. He then goes on to list a number of NON-WHITE countries from which a new generation of soccer fans immigrated.
That’s when it hit me. It’s something we’ve known all along; after all, it’s all over OUR media (as distinct from the MSM), I just haven’t seen it put directly. Multiculturalism does not MEAN multiculturalism; it MEANS multiracialism.
People who advocate multiculturalism always speak in the context of people moving from non-White countries to White countries. Having a Danish neighbor doesn’t make your neighborhood multicultural for their purposes.
They SAY they are for multiculturalism, but they MEAN multiracialism. If we took them at their word, Theodore Roosevelt (having Dutch and Anglo-Saxon heritage) should be just as “multicultural” as Barrack Hussein Obama. But he’s not; at least not by their yardstick.
When I was in school, special “multicultural” curricula involved teaching the habits and history of non-White peoples, despite the fact that the folkways of Sweden are sufficiently different from Anglo-American folkways to qualify for multicultural study. They SAY they are for multiculturalism, they MEAN they are for multiracialism.
They SAY multicultural, but what they DO is multiracial.
#1 by shari on 06/23/2010 - 7:56 am
What they SAY and what they DO is genocidal. If the whites are genocided,who will care about multicult,multirace then? NOBODY will have any peace.
#2 by Dave on 06/23/2010 - 10:39 am
Yes, and multi-racialism means not having a country, a deed that already HAS BEEN FORGED.
Now the perpetrators are destined to reap what they sowed.
#3 by Simmons on 06/23/2010 - 11:38 am
Multi-racialism means in the end there is no “liberalism” for the white/jewish libs.
We are given anti-racialism anti-white ideology/politics because that is the coalition that the race traitors could assemble in such numbers to make themselves players.
Without being anti-white the white liberals have nothing, with multi-racial anti-whitism they will have liberalism for maybe another election cycle before this country is a 3000 mile wide Detroit.
I’m not even sure Sean Hannity can save liberalism?
#4 by shari on 06/23/2010 - 12:33 pm
Simmons, You have a way of putting it that makes me smile. “3000 mile wide Detroit” lol
#5 by Simmons on 06/23/2010 - 3:21 pm
Thanks Shari.
I honestly don’t think the “Guilt Cults” have much of a lifespan. Sure they have aligned with the non-whites to create quite an extractive monster upon our country, but they are an embarrasing joke protected by the taboos of PC.
Dave always talks about hate, I don’t think those stupid kids of those guilt cults have any idea of what is about to be unleashed.
Reminds me of one of the scenes from “Open Range” where the townspeople took after the bullies and gunned them down like dogs.
Guilt cult bullies are gonna catch it.
#6 by backbaygrouch on 06/23/2010 - 4:41 pm
Why the American Right should hate soccer escapes me. It beats basketball, though watching horses run around ovals is better. In the event the case for the opposite was made this week in an Alternative Right article, Black Men Can’t Kick. See link. http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/zeitgeist/black-men-can-t-kick/
#7 by Berserker88 on 06/24/2010 - 12:50 am
Seeing aryans as all the same be it english or dutch, wouldn’t that be borderline mantra thought? We have a tendency to separate ourselves from nation all the way down to our neighborhood. This trait is one of the things that makes our race so open to the way we are attacked. The lib left sees english, dutch, italian, and french as white. When THEY say WE are one people to advocate genocide they are applauded. When I say WE are one people to fight genocide I’m anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews
#8 by Scrivener on 06/24/2010 - 3:46 pm
Thanks, Bob, for putting this up.
Berserker88, you are right about the way they see us being close to Mantra thought. If they really MEANT multicultural when they SAID multicultural, there are more than enough different White folkways to qualify. But they don’t. They MEAN multiracial.
They SAY they are for a multicultural society. They MEAN they are for a multiracial society. They SAY they encourage a blending of cultures, they MEAN they encourage a blending of races (any blending of White cultures that happened prior to 1965 doesn’t count, you see).
What they want is genocide. They see us as one boring White mass. They want us to see ourselves as one, culture-less, identity-less mass. The bad news for them is that they are beginning to goad us into seeing ourselves as one people. Bad for them, good for us.
Because it IS all about race. It IS all about genocide. It is NOT about culture. Russian, Dutch, English, American, Afrikaner… it’s all the same to them, the only thing they care about is the thing that unites us, which is our race.
They don’t CARE about culture unless it can be used as a wedge to get Whites to give up more living space.
As Bob, I believe, and Horus have pointed out several times, if it really were about culture, then all races that practice elements of traditional White culture would be attacked. But they’re not.
The ACLU and the ADL don’t complain about Indian Christians in India, or Mexican Christians in Mexico, or Black Christians in Africa. They only complain about White Christians in White countries.
They say it’s about culture, but their actions betray them; it’s about race.
And White people are noticing. People who five years ago would have insisted that they were anti-racist are now making sarcastic comments rooted in racial realism.
#9 by Scrivener on 06/25/2010 - 10:00 pm
Over on Stormfront in the Opposing Views section, I used the above post to segue from a discussion about culture into the mantra proper:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t718142-7/#post8259879
#10 by Scrivener on 12/05/2010 - 12:18 pm
Lord Nelson just posted a much less clumsy way of getting this across.
One thing I always find myself saying while discussing something about mainstream Whites’ views on race and culture is that “our enemies understand this better than our people do.” That actually makes our job easy. If we want to drive our point home, we just have to look at what they SAY.
In GC5, Lord Nelson applied this reasoning to the problem of culture vs. race and came up with a much less clumsy way of making the point than I did above.
Lord Nelson is right, and his point is very simple. Simple is good because there are fewer words for the message to get lost in.
IF YOU OPPOSE MULTICULTURALISM, THEY DON’T CALL YOU A CULTURALIST, THEY CALL YOU A RACIST. We know this, and what’s more important, the people we argue with know this.
They know it’s about race when we try to defend our culture. Heck, they even TELL us that it’s about race when we try to defend our culture. It’s time for us to make sure Whites take them at their word and assume that when they talk of making our culture take a back seat in our country’s public life, the MEAN that they want our RACE to take a back seat.