You have to be my age, and have a memory, to realize how totally the gun control argument has changed.
I remember when any discussion of crime on the networks went, without a pause, into how hard it was to get effective gun control laws. That was the ONLY crime control measure liberals approved of so no one expected any other to be mentioned.
The whole change has been the one we have been trying to effect. The Corporate Culture of the NRA was the corporate culture of respectable conservatism. All the NRA talked about was the Right to Hunt.
I am NOT kidding you. That was IT.
FINALLY, some “radical” pro-gun organizations started talking about self-defense. Only when the competition got fierce did any conservatives, least of all the NRA, start to MENTION self-defense.
You see, if they mentioned self-defense, liberals would make fun of them. As soon as they started liberals began saying that the NRA wanted to hand out submachine guns to grammar school kids. This made them LOOK bad to the only people who mattered to them.
Which takes us right to Simmons blasting at AmRen. When the NRA would not mention anything but hunting, they had no effect at all. While AmRen takes up all the publicity space and never mentions assimilation and immigration are only for white countries, they take up space and LOSE.
After a decade or so of being forced to talk about self-defense instead of hunting rights, the first response of a majority of Americans to mass shootings has been to give the heave to anyone who demands more gun laws and to point out that one person with a gun could have stopped the maniac.
But as long as AmRen and the BNP take up all the space for argument and avoid the effective ones, this breakthrough will not take place. At least half of he 22,000 gun laws in the US can be laid directly on the old NRA’s doorstep.
Simmons is right on target. The only way to have a decent society is NOT to have a safe, kept opposition group.
AmRen, respectable conservatives, mealy-mouthed “National” parties. They are more costly than outright enemies.
We have very, very little chance to respond. The last thing we need is for that space to be taken up by wimps.
#1 by Berserker88 on 06/24/2010 - 10:59 am
When I talk to people outside of the WN movement the MANTRA is golden. They can open their door or go to a mall and SEE it. They can google white dating and get page after page devoted to interracial dating, google any other race dating and you will find countless pages for blacks to meet blacks and jews to meet jews etc. Everyone sees it but nobody says it. When it is said its as eye opening as a punch in the face. I’ve spoke of the MANTRA to fellow WN, it opens their eyes too, only its a blank stare. Those who should get it usually don’t.
#2 by Dave on 06/24/2010 - 11:40 am
We certainly see this with the Tea Party. They are running colored candidates.
Their message is that we are overtaxed, the deficit is too big, the subsidies to Wall Street need to end, and that the welfare state has to be downsized, but don’t touch social security and Medicare, in other words, the pure and unadulterated Establishment nonsense of a fake opposition party.
The great advantage of BUGS is that it equips you with a discernment that the great majority lack, like the distinction between the BELIEF in and WORSHIP of the CONSTITUTION, and the real constitution.
That distinction deserves a “mantra” in and of itself as we can see clearly how the Establishment promoted CONSTITUTION RELIGION co-opts opposition in the same way “the right to use guns to hunt” co-opted the NRA.
As AFKAN has said about the Establishment, “They draw the lines, and then color within them”.
A successful “mantra” is nothing but a communication technique that furnishes a simple approach to tearing down BELIEF to convey a realization.
It is the militant’s most important task.
#3 by Simmons on 06/24/2010 - 12:19 pm
The good Ol’ NRA even that fat head Moore said as much, wishing it would go back to training kids how to shoot a squirrel gun.
AmRen, CofCC, V-dare are facing the chokepoints in their lifespans. Supposedly AmRen just conducted a successful fund raiser so they might pass thru and continue to amaze us with IQ studies and crime stats safely rebutting their cherished academia. The other two seem a bit shaky and I sense destined to the ash heap alongside the confederate reenactors at the LoS.
I blame Craig Bodecker for the fate of the losing three I just mentioned. The man went off script and dared to ask what exactly is racism, with no respect of any taboo whatsoever.
AmRen can hide its wealthy patrons behind a stack of books from that hideous word “racism”, the losing three only manage to get their patrons branded while offering no protection or benefits.
Bodecker revealed a weakness of the taboo, but the slowwitted on our side continue on, getting their supporters stigmatized by a damn word without even trying to defend them from the bullies. They have failed so now their supporters are hiding in even more obscure orgs, such as Occidental Dissent and AltRight.
The big winner will be that group that protects its constituents from the word “Racist”, the others will be on the ashheap.
#4 by Simmons on 06/24/2010 - 12:27 pm
So how?
The first group that starts to interview the anti-white cult leaders using Mantra questions will expose the cult for what it is. This will destroy the taboo and hence will shake the world, but its a big step and so far Jared, Nick and the rest have faltered. Most will fail and fail miserably with Nick probably ending up in jail because he does not believe in himself or his people’s right to exist in a world free from these psychopaths and genociders.
The ADL, SPLC and other Mommy Prof. depend on our squeals of our plight to justify their existence to their cults. But what they fear is the Mantra question, “Why do you pursue a policy of genocide? And why do you expose your supporters to complicity of responsibility to this crime?”
Some of the blind pigs (I say that affectionately) of the NW movement are inching towards asking those kind of questions at the writer Jim Kuntlser’s peak oil blog. True they still like to quote IQ and crime studies, but things are a changing.
Sorry for the lengthy diatribes I don’t have enough time today to distill them down.
#5 by H.Avenger on 06/24/2010 - 3:21 pm
Simmons,
I like Bodecker as well. Furthermore, I have heard James Edwards point out the obvious.
That is why you newcomers should continue to read BUGS. BUGS and Company will deliver. Kinda like that old Country Preacher that would burn your ears off …..telling it like it is.
“YOU’zzzz all going to hell for this nonsense!!!”
#6 by Scrivener on 06/24/2010 - 6:03 pm
Sites like AmRen and VDare serve their purpose. They led to my awakening to the fact that race is real and it matters, and they can do so for others.
They are a gateway to another manner of thinking. A stepping stone on the path out of a brainwashed stupor.
And I give permission for the ACLU or the SPLC or the ADL to quote me on that. Maybe it’ll shame AmRen and VDare to talk openly about the fact that anti-racism is just code for anti-white, and that they SAY they are trying to solve the race problem, but they’re really talking about a final solution to the White problem.
#7 by Wandrin on 06/24/2010 - 8:08 pm
The weird part is when people don’t do the safe stuff – like calling white liberals, genocidal anti-white racists. In the multicult you can call white people anything you like.
#8 by Simmons on 06/25/2010 - 12:22 pm
V-Dare, AmRen of course have their purposes but one of them will probably survive by hiding its donors from the “racist” charge and the other won’t, and will probably fall to the knives of the guilt cult called “anti-racism.”
If anyone wants to see how the losers lose to the anti-white cult then click over to Kuntsler’s blog and there one will see a couple of our guys respond to an anti-white cultists long empty diatribes with AmRen quotes equally lengthy.
And damn the internet I cannot log onto that site and put an end to the whole deal with a sentence or two.
We’re dealing with a guilt cult, nothing more, maybe a few brains who script it and millions of dupes intimidated into it. Logic of quoting AmRen articles has no effect on them, they are ruled by emotion, fear not logic.
#9 by Alan B on 06/26/2010 - 8:09 am
The NRA will defend compromise with the Looney Left right down to the last private firearm or donation, which ever comes first. Like the Proper Conservative, the NRA seeks respectability by playing by the rules of their opposition, all bark and little bite. One other thing, we had a tragedy here in town, as the media called it. Two teenage black thugs tried an armed robbery and wound up shot dead by the black store clerk. The real tragedy for the media, the clerk was not white, what else could they say! BORING!