There is a great bruhaha about the fact that, in drafting the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote the word “subjects,” scratched it out, and then substituted “citizens” for it. Mommy Professor has become such a complete Time Provincial that that is a bit of news.

The decision to write the Declaration was entirely one of deciding not to be subjects of the Crown any more. Until then, the colonies insisted that they had “The Rights of Englishmen.” But they insisted that they were not subject to the Parliament, and only their own legislatures could tax them.

In other words, they were united with England not by Parliament, but as subjects of a the Crown. It isn’t surprising that, after arguing that for YEARS, Jefferson would have used the word “subjects” at first.

None of this will surprise our BUGS British contingent. In my youth, Brits far more often referred to themselves as “British subjects” than as “citizens.”

It may also be added that when Jefferson decided he was a citizen, he was not declaring himself a citizen of the United States. Until his inauguration as the first president, Washington always referred to “my country” as Virginia. Jefferson did the same.

In fact the Act of Union of 1800 with Ireland was not passed until twenty-four years after Jefferson wrote. Until a similar Act passed in 1708, for a century Scotsmen and Englishmen were in entirely different countries and each had its own sovereign parliament. They were British subjects, not British citizens, because they were British only in that they had the same king.

That was the world view Jefferson had lived in a third of a decade before 1776.

Historians are supposed to know all this, but it isn’t mentioned in the discussion of the change of wording in 1776 from subject to citizen. In the real world it is remarkable that Jefferson only did it once.

Even the term “United States of America” had been invented a year before Jefferson wrote that draft. The term “United States of America” was first used by Thomas Paine in his 1775 book, Common Sense.

It is not surprisingly that the term “United States of America” was coined by a Paine, who was born and raised in England and had relatively recently moved to America. As a foreigner, he saw “America” as a whole, just as Jews see “humanity” outside Judaism as a whole.

Alexander Hamilton only came to America in 1772 and he, too, thought of America as a single unit.

This was a very alien idea to Virginians, New Yorkers, and South Carolinians.

A Wordist cannot see this because he thinks that all men have always thought as he does, that a person is one individual in a world society. The problem is that each of the thousands of Wordist faiths sees all the other Wordists as aliens.

And all the Mommy Professors see the real Jefferson as an alien because his loyalties were utterly alien to THEM. Mommy Professor and other Wordists cannot see Jefferson as just sitting down to write a completely new definition of the loyalty of his fellow Americans. They think he was writing for himself.

Mommy Professor looks at the words Jefferson wrote at that moment in history as the only indication THEY CAN UNDERSTAND of his entire world view in 1776. If you ask anyone today what Jefferson was really thinking when he sat at the table in Philadelphia, they will honestly go to the words he wrote and dissect them one by one to get at his “meaning.”

So they think that the fact that he wrote subject and scratched it out shows a profound change in his thinking.

Jefferson was not writing his own Declaration.

Jefferson had been instructed by congress to DRAFT a declaration that America had declared itself independent, no longer subjects of a common Crown, no longer Englishmen Abroad.

That was hell of an assignment. He was NOT told, “Thomas, why don’t you write up your own personal World View?” He was told to write the best argument he could to the whole world.

And it had to be a document every single state delegation could agree to.

If Jefferson HAD written only his honest personal view of the world, he would have violated the trust put in him. But no historian today sees it that way.

A Wordist cannot understand history.

First of all, the fact that the BNP mentioned white genocide is every bit as important as you think. It is the beginning of Mantra discussion.

Lord Nelson found the way of least resistance when he talked in SF about our being “overwhelmed” by colored immigration. But what amazed me was how instantly he got my point when I said he could get off the point that way.

If you use “overwhelmed” you don’t have to criticize assimilation. And when you start saying bad things about intermarriage is when the manure hits the moving object.

It doesn’t take a trained interrogator to know that interracial marriage is the core. They start screaming at you. They go nuts.

That BNP article did not use the wimp-out term “cultural genocide.”

The prefix “geno” is exactly the opposite of “culture.” Cultural genocide is meaningless, as are most wimp-out terms.

In his novel ”London,” Edward Rutherford tossed in a few Politically Correct tidbits. One was his describing the coloreds of London as using the same English as the natives of the area of London they settled: race is not important, they are English by culture.

The BNP doesn’t mention, any more than Rutherford does, that coloreds are in England BECAUSE ENGLAND IS WHITE. They might get around to it, but we have to keep the pressure on.

Japan and Taiwan and the vast unused areas of Africa are not exempted from massive immigration because of their culture. People routinely ask “is Eastern Europe READY for immigration yet?”

If you ask “why should they be?” the one thing no one thinks of is “because they’re WHITE.” But that is the ONLY answer, so deeply grooved into our thinking that it is never considered, much less mentioned.

Right now the SPLC is raising money to get blacks into NORTHERN IDAHO! When it comes to immigration the color of the skin is EVERYTHING.

People who are afraid to cite such examples are terrified of mentioning Step Two: assimilation. But this is essential to genocide.

There will soon be plenty of coloreds to genocide our entire race in every white country. Genocide requires ASSIMILATION. Without assimilation there can be no white genocide.

Respectable conservatives might mention “cultural genocide.” But there is no genocide without “assimilation.”

Every white country and ONLY white countries are the targets of third world immigration AND assimilation. The COMBINATION is necessary for one to even use the word genocide.

This is an easy realization for them to prevent. Keep the talk on immigration and they might let you talk. It is the “assimilation” in the Mantra that makes them really go ape.

Is the BNP referring to the cockney culture as being genocided? I may be unfair to them in this, after all, they didn’t wimp out with “cultural genocide.”

It is a definite step forward.

But we must always remember there are TWO steps to white genocide.

I will never forget when the term “politically correct” came in. It was WONDERFUL!

It is hard for you to imagine how it was before that lovely term was accidentally adopted by liberals from Marxists. “Oh, God, the same old leftist crap!” or some other saying had none of the impact that wonderful phrase did.

In two words, one was able to cover a century and a half of leftists repeating the Party Line: Political Correctness. God, leftists got tired of it FAST!

On the Internet you saw endless contradictory explanations of where it came from. It always demonstrated that political correctness was the product of the Giant Right Wing Conspiracy. No leftist had ever said it.

To give you an example you can relate to, political correctness was in the same league with the leftist use of the word “racist!”

Weapon words do a job no amount of argument can perform. I would like for some BUGSTERS to notice some of the weapon words developed in BUGS. In our no child left behind society, Mommy Professor is deadly.

“News and jews” is another invention of a BUGS commenter I grabbed like a gold nugget.

Mommy Professor is deadly because it expresses something everybody knows about but can’t express without a lot of words, like political correctness. It stays with anyone who hears it.

“Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everybody” is too long, but it is in the weapon word category.

Multiculture is a weapon word. In one jab, it makes clear that there is nothing multi about this, it is substituting Mommy Professor’s prescribed culture for all the others.

A weapon word is a great discovery. But it must always be a breaking down of the truth. A NEEDED breaking down of the truth. Even racism has a factual basis in slavery, anti-Semitism, colonialism, and so forth.

But as far as I can tell, only here in BUGS have we ever APPRECIATED the genius of weapon words.

Some people tell me there should be some summary of BUGS concepts. I can’t do it. I am horrible at coming up with examples. But some commentators like Dave are careful to repeat our concepts, like temporal provincialism, to keep on topic.

I would appreciate it if you did your best to repeat our weapon words the same way. Let’s use BUGS terminology in BUGS as often as possible.