About a decade ago I pointed out in Whitaker Online that our long political future will be as spokesmen for whites.

People on or side talked only of restoring White Supremacy. This is Temporal Provincialism. Let me give you an example of where their thought was stuck.

Mark Twain would say something like “All people hate noise.” A few pages, to repeat the point, he said “all white people hate noise.”

His assumption that so few non-white people would be reading his book that there was no distinction at all, he was just saying the same thing in a different way. That was a VERY different world, and it isn’t coming back.

Whites were never Supreme in the way that word is used. Non-white countries let the white man set up governments which the white man considered necessary, but the union of what we call Iraq was utterly meaningless to them.

Today’s United Nations is famously a collection of colonial administrations out together by and for the European countries.

Whites were Supreme in the colonial world because they needed the labor and raw materials that were in colonials lands. But those materials were used for purposes the colored man did not understand and a major purpose of the whole exercise was so that European countries could compete with OTHER European countries.

White Supremacy was a term developed to indicate that what we needed came first. But the life of the colonial peoples was not, certainly outside the cities, wrapped up in the white man. The world in which every colored man devoted is entire thought to what whites told him was invented by Marxists.

At least half of the colored world had never SEEN a white man.

To Mark Twain, the white world was THE world, though he groveled over the recent existence of black slavery with the best of them.

White Supremacy is the echo of the Marxist outlook which is now in control. White Supremacy is an expression of the Mankind World View.

But the world in which THEIR White Supremacy ruled never existed. There is and never has been a single world of all races, either for the Marxists and the “Christians” to unite with their respective Holy Writs or for the White Man to rule over.

As a practical practitioner of power, I see what the Marxist, the Christian and the White Supremacists do not see.

I see a people without a voice. That is what any political practitioner looks for.

In the real world of power, White Supremacy makes us not only silly, but powerless.

The South was destroyed by a simple arithmetic change in the American electorate: There were four major parties instead of two in the 1860 election. Lincoln got forty percent of the popular vote, but total towered over each of the others.

Whites have no potential if they keep trying to be the majority in a field of White Supremacy and anti-whites. But, like the Republicans, our position changes entirely if we become the largest and richest minority.

The importance of this simple piece of arithmetic is never mentioned, but it is the most important thing in the world today, just as it was 1860 and at many other times.

We are not Time Provincials. We want to represent whites as whites become inevitably more and more self aware while they become a set of islands in a colored sea.

The entire two generations of Northeastern rule, of Northern industrialists and rail rates set to keep industry out of an impoverished South, began with one small statement: “No more slave states.”

“No more slave states” was as defensive a slogan for the North as the Mantra is for whites today. It did not jump into instant popularity. The Free Soil Party got less than one percent of the vote at its best.

But “No More Slave States” was a radical slogan, one which was clearly used by spokesmen for the North. The Mantra is a now-radical statement of exactly the same kind.

Comments on my demand that we hit the heirs of anti-whites forever, the way the left chases ex-Klan and Nazi people forever, have concentrated on the justice, aka, revenge aspect.

There is nothing wrong with that, but that is not the whole picture. Revenge is a part of human nature, simply because any social animal that does not revenge itself for its wrongs is unlikely to survive.

Jesus denounced human revenge, but the revenge for sinners that he counted on made the human sort smaller than an electron compared to the sun. If you had faith, justice would be done, or overdone.

I would find it hard to take property away from young people who were themselves dedicated pro-whites. I find it hard to remind people who have seen the genocidal program for what it is that they STILL were dedicated to parts of the worse program in human history.

But there are a lot of things I have had to do I didn’t like. I am not Jesus, and even his “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is very much a part of THIS world.

I have suffered a lifetime standing alone against these people, and revenge is not my motive. But I admit that, as a human being, I would feel better when I have to leave this fight, hanged or committed, if they had to PAY for it.

Having said all this, let me remind you that this program is a PRACTICAL matter. We have seen this method of never forgiving action, and it WORKS. We face it every day, but, as usual, we LEARN nothing from it.

Rounding up people and punishing them for political crimes lasts until the government ceases to be an absolute and open despotism. But having people get rewards for looking up what well-to-do people did that requires fining their offspring will last forever.

Meanwhile, the idea that these people’s actions will be regretted as long as human beings want rewards makes it more worthwhile for US. I want the person who defended genocide of our race to have his words and acts looked up and regretted until the end of time, because this is not a disease that will go away on its own.

I cannot imagine any other method that would do the job.

This is quite a switch from usual thinking in such matters. We always think of the Holocaust as being perpetuated by Jews with a grudge. In the real world there are vanishingly few who lived through the Nazi period.

If someone belittles the Holocaust they do not get a letter from a hundred-year-old man, but from a person who makes his living in some branch of the Holocaust Industry.

That is why nobody ever gets a letter when he ignores the millions who died in Stalin’s War Against the Kulaks. Stalin himself told Roosevelt that that was a more vicious war than the one he almost lost against the Germans!

But there is no Kulak Industry. Both Hitler and Stalin are eclipsed in numbers by the Chinese who starved and were exterminated in things like The Cultural Revolution. But even if that were not exempted by the fact that it was left-wing slaughter rather than a right-wing one, who would bother with it?

There is no Chinese Peasant Industry, either.

The only thing that works is PAYING people to be Professional Never-Forgetters.

For once, let’s use a lesson from actual history that actually WORKED.

National Review had an article on Cuba in which it mentioned that about 75% of that country’s population has Negroid blood. A Cuban American wrote them to say that it was more like 65% or less.

In answer, the writer of the article pointed out that the 65% figure and lower related to pre-Castro Cuba. He actually used the term “white flight” in relation to what had happened since 1959!

I remember it very well in its first stages at Fort Jackson in Columbia, where we were used to Puerto Ricans in uniform speaking Spanish. But it caused a lot of comment when people began to see people who looked like us, including a lot of blonds, who were in uniform suddenly starting to speak Spanish to each other.

The first wave was very white indeed.

In Cape Town it was very hard to tell many Coloreds from many classified without a score card. But up in Trek Country, Transvaal and the Orange Free State, the whites were very white indeed.

Oxford Geneticist CD Darlington, F.R.S., pointed out to me that even in the 1960s, Californians tended to be blonder than people in the East. This was the kind of observation he was condemned for, despite his membership in the Royal Society.

Hence, as David Duke points out, the old term California Girl.

The same man who is fanatically anti-white, if he has been in Spain, will talk about the beautiful women from Scandinavia.

This is what anti-whites mean when they say ours is a racist society.

Unless they are kooks like the Carter daughter, females almost never get their hair died black.

Including black women.

This is a lot like the death of the assumptions on which all legal thought today is based. Wordists are enormously powerful, but their assumptions about social animals having no territory or wars or class systems are dead and that takes its toll in the long run.

The natural fact of white supremacy also wears away even the seemingly unassailable power of anti-whites. Whitening creams still sell in India. No one has bought a darkening cream since we discovered that tans cause cancer.

Many blacks have admitted they were naïve about integration. They honestly believed that it was only official barriers that caused “racist” attitudes. And of those, few actually ADMIT it.

Those who moan realistically about how racism is endemic are right. They moan because they see their effort as, in the long run, doomed.

Because I am not a temporal provincial, I see what they are looking at. Those who spend their time wallowing in what we have lost and how things are now can raise money because most people are like them.

They get big organizations, and they are welcome to them.

BUGS is aimed at the future. As in any war, defeat is the lot of anyone who cannot think of anything but the present losses.

Wordism cannot allow freedom of speech because Wordism is based on a particular set of opinions. That is what Wordism IS. Discussion of differing opinions makes a Wordist society unstable.

A society based on loyalty to race can allow freedom speech. But it cannot allow freedom of LOYALTY. In America before the Slave Generation a person whose basic outlook was a hatred of his own kind was considered sick. Now it is considered the highest morality.

That is because we are now a Wordist society.

Ardrey destroyed the whole basis of Wordist society in African Genesis. His basic thesis is disputed, but the points he made about natural behavior destroyed he Rousseau’s view of the world forever.

The idea that animals have no property, no borders, no wars, no territory and no class system would be laughed at by any literate person today. But our society is based on those exact premises.

The right set of words will unite all mankind. The right of words will remove class distinctions. The right set of words will remove borders. The right set of words will end conflict. Every debate is about the right words we should use to reach those ends.

It follows from these outdated premises that America has nothing to do with the people who happen to be here. What America is All About is American Principles.

Principle is the code word of Wordism.

As Ardrey pointed out, loyalties in all social animals are complex, and man’s is the most complex of all. He described a normal man from Georgia in the 1960s, who would have loyalty to his state, his country, his race, his family, his college football team, his high school team, and on and on and on.

Wordism says a human being should have NONE of the feelings a social animal is born with. He is only interested in Principles.

Our society is based on ideas that are as dead as a Flat Earth.

When you suppress any instinct it comes out another way. Whites are not indifferent to their own race, they can’t be. So whites HATE their own race. There is every bit as much awareness of race today as there ever was. In fact white countries that never thought of race before are now obsessed with it.

So the first question is, why is our entire world view based on assumptions that died two generations ago?

People who write news and commentary always miss the point.

Which makes me feel funny when I read over what I wrote and wonder why anybody had to SAY that.

I wrote a piece about how environmentalists are trying to stop the development of fusion energy. As I think about this the point becomes more and more obvious:

Those who want a planned world don’t want changes. This becomes obvious to the point of absurdity as one thinks about the word “planned.”

You can’t plan anything that keeps changing.

In the 50s and early sixties, the United States could have closed its borders at very little economic cost. We produced what we consumed, and what we imported was just a little cheaper than what we produced.

So it was natural for there to be no question what the USSR had to do to “catch up” with the US. They tried to replicate our production, sometimes in a very humorous way.

But then the US began to import a lot. Worse, countries like Japan and Germany prospered by producing what they could use or sell and importing what they needed to do it.

Soviet planners had nothing they could replicate. Americans and Germans produced what their market wanted so the same goods were wanted by other countries. Soviet planners never produced a single consumer good anyone would buy anywhere else.

Pretty obvious, eh?

Don’t look for this in any other place.

So environmentalists want to stop fusion. One of the reasons is that all that collider money could buy more fifty million dollar yachts for Whale Wars and the poor, but the other is that planners don’t like change.

If you want to know what people are really thinking, look at what they denounce. One who says liar all the time is a liar; one who says “hate” all the time is a hater. The standard word Political Correctness uses is Change.

Until very recently about ninety percent of the population everywhere lived on the land. Cambodia went Communist and outlawed cities. Mao didn’t like cities either.

Now why was that?

Because a planned economy requires stagnation. Back to the definition of the word “planned.”

If socialism had taken over in 1800, it would have addressed the wood shortage. All the wood was being used up. So coal started to be used.

Why?

Because wood, being used up, got very expensive.

Skipping lightly over a hundred other examples of the obvious, we come to environmentalism. Ninety percent of the population used to live on the land so they could eat. Then the population moved to the cities where industry was.

Socialists were ready to plan the Permanent Peasant Society, as Pol Pot did. They were ready to plan the Modern Industrial Society. Those are gone, so now they want Mommy Professor to run the Save Surface Earth.

But with fusion energy or whatever develops next, we won’t need Surface Earth. Underground or in space, people will move, as the white world always has.

I cannot tell you exactly how that will come about, but the point is that I cannot tell you and that is the way it should be. Mommy Professor cannot say that. Mommy Professor has to know what society is and forever will be, or it cannot be planned.

Exactly the same is true of those who demand Traditional Values.

Fining race traitors’ fortunes keeps up the punishment and provides its own incentive.

We could even give some of the heirs a chance to make up for what was done to get their inheritance, to some extent. I don’t want to bankrupt those who were not in on the actual crime, but no one should benefit from their forebears without paying out of that sum for their crimes.

I do not want to live in any kind of police state. I doubt that Kennedy wanted to live in a Communist state. I would have stayed out of World War II. The disastrous policy was fighting Hitler and allying with Stalin.

You don’t have to be Communist to be pro-Communist. They used to describe a Communist as “a liberal in a hurry.” Liberals used the Communist Threat exactly the way they use the Holocaust today, to argue that if we didn’t give blacks all they wanted they would go Communist.

The South would have been in a lot better bargaining position against integration if the Nazis had ruled Europe.

The Genius Conspiracy buffs never take this into account. Ted Kennedy’s father was Ambassador to Great Britain and he openly praised the Nazis. He was a right-winger and he thought that would push the whole world to the right.

As a man who made a lot of his fortune selling liquor during Prohibition, Papa Kennedy certainly had no use for a police state of any kind. It was strictly politics.

At the end of World War II, the only loudly anti-Communist voices were those of democratic socialists.

The American right was not really anti-Communist for a couple of years after the War. Their leaders like Robert Taft wanted a return to Normalcy. They wanted the United States to get out of foreign affairs. Their leader in this in the Senate, Vandenberg, famously changed sides after a couple of years when he saw the Communist threat.

So, in this forgotten period of history, why was it the democratic socialists who were fervently anti-Communist and the Taftites who wanted no involvement? That violates all the rules historical amateurs have set up.

The American right did not see the Soviets as a threat. After all, it was couple of years before Roosevelt’s agreement at Yalta to give half of Europe to Stalin became reality. For a couple of years after Castro took over anybody who said Castro was a Communist was ridiculed.

That is forgotten now. The accusations that Roosevelt had given Eastern Europe to Stalin were considered near treasonous. That is forgotten now. The desperate all-out effort to save the Soviet Union with a Nuclear Freeze is forgotten now.

Robert Taft was not pro-Communist. He just did not see the USSR as something we should deal with. The War was over. We should come home.

So why were social democrats so loudly anti-Communist?

Because the social democrats believed that revolution worldwide was on its way. They were social democrats because they believed that. So the choice was between a democratic socialist world or a Stalinist world.

To understand this odd anti-Communism on the left and isolationism on the right, you have to have NOTICED it. Then you have to have some idea about how real people think without building a Conspiracy around it.

A world view based on Conspiracy is a form of Wordism. You start out with good observations, get caught up in them, and then everything has to be squeezed into a fantasy world where everything has to fit inside your Book.

To put it bluntly, a Wordist is a nut.

Many times when the South was being invaded by Federal troops I wished fervently that Hitler was still in Berlin. But I never had the slightest wish to live UNDER him.

Most of the people who used swastikas on Stormfront never spent a single day under an authoritarian, much less a totalitarian, regime.

One the other hand, Mommy Professor WANTS Communism, because he think people like him rule it.

He wouldn’t last a week.

None of this fits into a Conspiracy Book. To deal with reality, it helps not to be nut.

In the real world, there is a saying, “If you want to drop a subject, appoint a committee on it.”

It is VERY important to me that when the Mantra takes hold, you will NEVER let them forget the anti-white campaign.

Right now the Internal Revenue Service pays a reward to anyone who exposes tax fraud. For the least indication, like where to look, you get one percent of the total take. If you put the whole case in their lap, you can up to five percent.

Before the Libertarian howl goes up, let me remind you that police cannot work without informants.

People do not write letters blaming ninety year old men for Nazi atrocities because a committee sends them to do it. They do it for MONEY. Norman Finkelstein coined the term The Holocaust Industry, but it is not news to any of us.

And it WORKS.

I will be dead long since, but this is critical to me. I am trying to save my race, and if you are not practical about it, you will be heading down the old respectable conservative “Liberals are fine people, honestly mistaken“ line.

We have lived our lives under the anti-white regime that never takes that attitude toward any pro-white.

And it WORKS.

The active anti-whites will be mostly dead by then. But their hundreds of billions or trillions in assets will still be here. For the next century and more, anyone who looks up and finds racial crimes the way Wiesel does with Nazis will get his percentage of the take.

Above genocide against US will be a crime that will be paid for on and on and on. Informers will be looking this up pretty well forever.

And that money pouring in will be used to tell about it, to warn against it, to encourage whites to have children.

We learned NOTHING from the Cold War, because it is militantly forgotten and forgiven. We live in a post-Hitler world pushing white genocide because it was NOT forgotten.

If white leaders can refuse to use the Mantra, I can easily see them taking the easy way out and joining the establishment with all forgotten and forgiven. They would be happy there and join in the steady slide back into anti-white action precisely as post-Cold War America is sliding back into socialism.

Like America, we might not lose a war, but we ALWAYS lost the peace afterwards. There is a reason for that. Don’t do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

When you win the war is the time you must continue it, or you will lose it again.

PAID informers for traitors.

NEVER FORGET!