In the 2008 election, a leftist strategy was leaked which said “Find an opponent and call him a racist.”
Conservatives quoted this but it still worked beautifully. It worked because it is correct.
Conservatives base their American history upon the views of a man who knew his STATED historical view was absurd, Abraham Lincoln.
Everyone else knows it, too. You have to choose between the RACIAL views of our Founding Fathers or anything any of the Rousseau-Marxist Mommy Professors come up with.
Leftism is still based on the early twentieth century view that animals have no class system, no wars — “Only Man Has Wars” was a leftist hippie slogan, and no territory.
That nonsense is SHOT. But conservatives are even sillier. They posit a theory that everything liberals did until on or about January 1, 1970 was dead right, but at that moment it all went unaccountably wrong.
That’s insane.
National Review is full of praise for every liberal before 1970. It praises Lyndon Johnson’s policies rather than him personally because the people they follow, the liberals, can’t bring themselves to praise Lyndon.
This, by the way, is the true definition of neo-conservatism. The term has gotten a meaning of being Jewish or all for war, but the actual definition is neo, which means that it condemns the old conservatism National Review was founded on, and its conservatism, that is, its opposition to liberal proposals, is new, or neo-.
A writer in National Review was complaining that all the alternative histories end up showing how awful history would be if it were different. But that is the theme of National Review today. If Lincoln and Roosevelt and Johnson had not succeeded, the world would have been lost.
Only National Review would have a cover picture of Franklin Roosevelt and Churchill, saying They Saved the World. They did the same thing with Lincoln.
Would the world have ended if Britain had not declared war on Germany in 1939?
To question that is “racist,” according to National Review.
REAL neo-conservatism begins by conceding history to the Left. Its main voices are Jewish, but EVERYBODY’S main voices are Jewish. Everybody’s main voices used to be in New England.
So we can either feed our obsession or deal in reality. The reality is that neo-conservatism concedes history to the political left. That is the DEFINITION of NEO-conservatism.
Both of today’s official sides declare that all history was good until on or about January 1, 1970. So naturally all alternative histories that are PUBLISHED declare that any deviation from real history before January 1, 1970 would have been a disaster.
But can a person who concedes history to the left be a conservative?
#1 by Epiphany on 08/27/2010 - 7:02 am
It is really quite sad!
The Neo Conservatives are
Liberals. I think I can
perceive their strategy.
They have nuttier “Liberals”
now, to make them seem
sensible by comparison.
#2 by backbaygrouch on 08/27/2010 - 7:48 am
Around January 1, 1970 something curious started to happen. Whenever military or foreign affairs were the topic on network television the balancing act of having a Democrat and a Republican took a new twist. Gone were Congressman or Senators. The GOP was represented by an unelected Jew, a newly minted form of vermin called a neocon. And a con it was, and is.
The bottom up structure of democracy was turned on its head. A few network executives in NYC decided that the Republican party had to become safe for Israel. Ike had forced the Jewish state to back down at Suez. The GOP was suspect because it was White and mostly Protestant.
But even worse it was reviving. The Jewish friendly Democrat alliance that had dominated US politics since 1930 seemed to be weakening. Kevin Phillps wrote, “The Emerging Republican Majority” and Richard Nixon’s victory won with the Southern Strategy promised a power shift away from FDR’s coalition. Change was wafting across the fruited plains.
Following Lenin’s maxim that the best way to beat the opposition is to become the opposition, the neocons were parachuted into the Republican party. It was a top down coup. And it worked.
No neocon has ever carried a single precinct in a single election for the GOP. They are a parasite attached to the White base by a Jewish media cabal. They have no organic presence in the party. They, and their race traitor camp followers, exist for one purpose only: to make the right safe for Israel.
Neoconservatism is a Jewish racket, likely financed out of a money laundered rake off from American foreign aid to Israel. It is corruption in triumph. It does not well up from the heartland. It is the enemy of the American people, especially those descended from the nation’s founding stock.
This betrayal of America, of its people, cannot survive an understanding of the legitimate racial interests of Whites. The country and the race are intertwined. The Mantra makes the threats to the race, the White race, clear. The neocons fear Whites acting for Whites because Whites’ interests are in conflict with Jewish interests.
Jews are at war with us. We must go to war with them. The goal of the neocons is to prevent the latter while the former continues unabated, as it has since the initial persecution of Christians by Roman emperors at the behest of the rabbinate in the first century. The importance of the Mantra, its function, is as old as the Church in the catacombs.
BUGSers are operating out of a new catacomb – the Internet, that mysterious subterranean series of tunnels and caves that allows Whites to communicate with each other in a nation where Jews dominate all the industries that disseminate information.
In time we will find our Constantine who will in the clouds of an evening sky read the Mantra. In hoc signo vinces.
#3 by Simmons on 08/27/2010 - 10:09 am
Oh wo is us. Please people steer clear of the failed politics of the past century, we now have the Mantra and the attack word.
“Are you anti-white?” “By all accounts Mr. Chosenberg you have participated in several anti-white orgs. specifically targeting whites and their nations for genocide.”
But whatever, News & Jews has paid off so handsomely so let us all go back our WN whine.
#4 by seriouswon on 08/27/2010 - 11:49 am
Yes, even those who are too lazy(?) to say the longer Mantra can at the very least begin to speak of Anti-White problems. I think we could easily get respectable conservatives using this verbiage. We are on the brink…
#5 by OldBlighty on 08/27/2010 - 12:05 pm
Agreed. The style of politics pursued last century, was not only a failure, it was an utter disaster for our people, all over the world.
Now is the time to use the MANTRA to pursue those who agreed with our enemies, no matter who, or what they are.
#6 by Dick_Whitman on 08/27/2010 - 1:44 pm
bbg,
very well said. The neocons play the same role as the Mensheviks(1)did during the “Russian Revolution.”
The party was formed by a man named “Martov,”(2)after him and Lenin had a “split.” Martov’s real name was Yuli Osipovich Zederbaum. There’s something funny about these “Russian” revolutionaries and their propensity to change their names?
(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menshevik
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Martov
“M
#7 by Epiphany on 08/27/2010 - 2:58 pm
The Liberals made their
biggest mistake, by
turning against Israel.
Still, this could merely
have given the “Neos” their
chance to switch parties,
to infest the Republican one.
We should refer to them as
“Neos” for there is nothing
Conservative about them at
all. When the “Liberals” say
that one cannot criticize
the Muslims, these “Neos” are
in the forefront of doing
just that. This way, they
appear to be defying said Liberals,
when they are doing nothing
of the sort.
It would be really neat to
learn more about these “Neos”
and their weird little tricks
that they play.
#8 by Epiphany on 08/27/2010 - 3:00 pm
One day, people will
realize how they have
been manipulated and
tricked by the Neos!
#9 by Epiphany on 08/28/2010 - 6:44 am
Of course,
the Neos are not
Conservative at all.
They are merely Liberals
posing as Conservatives.
That is their vile trick!
#10 by H.Avenger on 08/28/2010 - 12:36 pm
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=127395437274160&v=wall#!/group.php?gid=127395437274160&v=wall
Rita is now posting BUGS Blog entries directly to the WhiteRabbitRadio FB page.
Just keeping the blog informed.
And thanks Rita for helping out.
#11 by Alan B on 08/28/2010 - 11:03 pm
Neo’s are followers of Trotsky’s revolution threw war. Neos have been accused of Nation Building, they prefer the advancement of Democracy by other means,typical wordist BS.
Respectable Conservative respect for past Democratic presidents coinsided with the public preception of the past leaders. Respectables praise FDR and the New Deal(Raw Deal) that in reality made the depression worse, yet the public believes he was a god. Respectables drool all over themselves to praise FDR’s knee jerk lust for war, we were the Arsenal of Democracy, FDR’s victory over Germany and Japan ended Dictatorial Rule and led to a rebirth of “Democracy” around the world. The Democrat McGovern would end the Trotskyite, Democrat relationship in 1972 when the Democrat Party became the pasifist party, Nixon won by a landslide and the Trotsky neos became Neo conservative Republicans or All things for Isreal,Open Borders, Free Trade, Open Immigration, War for Profit Party, aka Democracy. Those that dare say this are labled Antisemites, the respectable conservative will drool all over himself to be the first to back up that charge.