““I hope our BUGSTERS understand the stellar quality of this kind of commentary”
I do, and I am NOT an intellectual. When I first read the Mantra, I thought it was too simple and well…too mantra like. Then I realized, that the mindless quoting of mantras is the only weapon the anti-whites have! They quote their mantras on TV, in the movies, on the radio, in the newspapers, all over the internet, etc. In other words, THEY HAVE NO ARGUEMENT! An amazing revelation, the emperor really does have no clothes. We are not battling intellectuals at all, they are just sissies who are deathly afraid of getting punched the mouth and losing their status. Remember Geraldo’s insecure posturing against some so called White Supremacists? Imagine, we the most valuable and creative race on the planet are being driven to and fro by mere words and shadows. Sure, the threat of violence is real, but only because too many people draw their sustenance from fleecing the sheep; it is these people who are the real enemy and they mostly come from our camp. Thus, this is the true beauty of the Mantra…it exposes those who look like us as the traitors they are. All hail General Whitaker for this brilliant strategy!
And on a personal note, thank-you Sir for equipping the average Working Class White with the weapon we need to fight back.”
I very much appreciate the compliment, but you are anything but average.
And Trucker Roy really IS a trucker.
The stated requirement for Bob’s Underground Graduate Seminar, BUGS, is “For those who have outgrown a college education, whether they had one or not.” As with so much we discuss here, this sounds simple but is full of meaning. Most people who are able to “speak for the working people” use that as a sign of their humility.
In my public career I spoke for working people, that is, I wrote press releases and organized marches of grassroots uprisings against busing in Boston and Louisville and against Education Establishment textbooks in the public schools in Kanawha County, West Virginia.
I listened very carefully to what they wanted to say and wrote THAT down in the press releases. I was successful when they said that what I wrote was what they had said. We finally couldn’t take on all the grassroots that wanted us to help them and I had to make a living.
But nobody, anywhere, said I did not speak for the working people. In fact, the Communist Daily World had a major article bitching about how we must have big financing, since THEY couldn’t get into the wildcat strike areas we operated in!
THEY couldn’t get invited to more real workers’ movements than they could handle as we did.
But what is missing in me is the humility this is supposed to show, the kind where a politician puts on overalls and shows how he can get down — though the word “down” is seldom stated — with “regular folks.”
I am much smarter than the average working person. I am also out of the league of those who call themselves “educated.” That’s not very humble.
Talking to somebody who calls himself “educated” is like running the hurdles. You know exactly how their brains have been trained and you jump over their particular superstitions. It’s WORK, and by the time you have talked to the ten thousandth “educated” person who has exactly the same wired-in “educated outlook,” the novelty is worn out like a million-mile tire and you can feel the road right through your butt.
BUGS is dedicated to using facts everybody knows and language everybody can understand to fight a mindset it takes thousand of hours of dog-like training in school to implant in people.
Our whole society is set up to say that one who has missed college or grad school or a new thirteenth grade can’t go head to head with someone who has. The person who hasn’t and who presumes to debate is seen as trying to justify his inferiority.
And that sense of inferiority is the biggest single weapon of anti-whites. Nobody would take their crap seriously for two minutes if they didn’t have degrees.
This is a theme of history. People refuse to see reality because the guy who talks class is of the Better Class or has on a robe and talks in Latin or speaks in unknown tongues only The Initiated know.
You weren’t allowed to question the predictions of priests who got them out of the stars or fish intestines because YOU couldn’t read the stars or fish intestines. You are completely drawn off the fact that the “education” to read fish intestines is not the POINT.
The POINT is whether those who use those methods come up with anything. But ten thousand years ago people were so feeling inferior about not being able to read fish intestines that they did not point out that those predictions were random.
Astrology, “education,” fish intestines, the Class System, they are all the same thing.
All they do is keep people from putting what the priests say in plain English.
#1 by Epiphany on 08/29/2010 - 6:59 am
Well, eventually they will
discover that the nonWestern
Cultures, championed by the
Multicultural Left, are actually
even more sexist, male chauvinist,
and misogynist, than this one.
Once that happens, the Radical
Feminists will jump ship!
It would be most exciting to see
the Radical Feminists and the
Multiculturalists at each other’s
throats. That day will come very
soon. Both are against the
White Man. The Multiculturalists
hate him for being White; the
Radical Feminists hate him for
being a Man.
I cannot see much future for the
Political Left, in any event! Soon
we shall began to see what happens
when the Liberals see their nonWhite
immigrants for what they really are.
I think Liberals are actually afraid
of the NonWhites– afraid of being
called “Racists.” This is really
quite bizairre.
Also, these Neos serve as a False
Alternative to the “Liberals”, who,
have begun to take the side of the
Muslims. The Neos wish to claim
that one should take the side of
the Israelis, instead. This, of
course, is the most fatal of fatal
nonsense. We do not want to be
slaves of either the Muslims or the
Jews– we do not wish to be anyone’s
slaves at all.
#2 by Epiphany on 08/29/2010 - 7:52 am
It is so true!
The Political Left just
chants Mantras, and
meaningless slogans, at you,
whenver they disagree with
you. They chant them louder
and louder. It is the only
thing that they can do!
Yes, and they babble about things
like “The Patriachy” and “White
Privilege”, which do not exist in
reality. I am sure that they
get that nonsense from somewhere.
I am sure it is all about intimidation
in any event.
#3 by OldBlighty on 08/29/2010 - 8:18 am
I also want to thank you for the MANTRA and your other works. Without them we were defenseless against this assault on our very existence.
Sure, we were allowed to argue and quote facts and figures all day long, but in the face of screaming maniacs, we may as well have been naked.
Now that we have a verbal sword and shield, it is time to go out and destroy our enemies.
#4 by BGLass on 08/29/2010 - 9:16 am
“…I think Liberals are actually afraid
of the NonWhites– afraid of being
called “Racists.”…
Many of them are motivated only by fear— of various forms of attack, name calling, but physical violence, too. The physical force to keep them in line (crime) is huge, also. Their “liberal” monetary stance (when they voice support of programs) is really BLOOD MONEY, if one listens. They are paying out, but in return want safety. Now they are “one of the good whites” and won’t be attacked (in their fantasies). Or in reality—as non-whites say, those whites are for our interests so leave them alone (for now).
(Some liberal whites are attracted by the arrogance, (they want to be arrogant, too, and feel smart,) and they deeply fear looking stupid, or inferior. Others think they can make a payout so as not to be attacked physically.
One tradeoff they often get out of this deal is white liberals have the most white environments to live in. Often this is pointed out. People show that liberals live in the 98% white areas. That their kids are in white areas, those areas are not as forcibly integrated, and so on.
Nobody talks about it beyond addressing the white liberal contradiction. (Supposedly for ‘diversity’ but never really are in ‘diverse’ environments).
Another reality is that the PTB allow this structure. These liberals are absurdly REWARDED for being PC (b/c they are working for pc and supporting, and yet getting out of it, a non-pc LIFE for themselves and kids, which is what they get in return.)
Until that ends for them, of course. Liberals have various motivations, but all boil down to fear of something.
White liberals are REWARDED for being anti-white by being given totally white environments to live in, quite frequently. So, they chose themselves (white environment for their personal family, for instance), by being anti-white (as it affects others.)
That’s why they’re called SELFISH so often, (although people don’t probe it further). They chose a white environment for themselves (liberal neighborhood) but are protected in this way precisely b/c they are anti-white.
People talk about “rich white liberals,” and “limousine liberals,” and say they are two-faced in that they do not practice what they preach. BUT IN REALITY that lifestyle is afforded to them BECAUSE of what they say/do.
It’s the opposite of how people usually talk about it. (Most see them as “being able to afford” the environment they are in. In reality, they are REWARDED for the work they do by not having their environment more aggressively attacked, quite frequently.
It’s that moment when “communist” Bill Ayers is asked a question by a journalist, as was shown to the world on t.v. during the election, and goes ballistic telling the guy to “get off private property.” His payoff for his politics was the exclusive neighborhood the public was shown, and he will call police and get a quick response to his private property, although a supposed avowed advocate of “the people,” and being “down with them,” (sporting an earring and baseball cap and crappy jeans, and so on), and supposedly against private property.
The right anti-white politics is sometimes rewarded by “liberal” communities (usually the most white in the nation). These are not seen as “a threat” and not as much effort is made to “integrate” them—or they can be the ‘last to go,’ as those whites may be seen as useful.
#5 by Alan B on 08/29/2010 - 11:36 am
My local paper has printed every Letter to the Editor I have written including, Multicultrailism is a Religion and Genocide against Whites, Hate laws are Anti White and many more, these letters piss off the loony left. I keep it simple and use simple common sense examples to make my point. I did recieve a letter from a reader thanking me for writing these letters.
Simplicity is the Genius behind Bob’s Mantra that says, the push for Multiculturalism for White countries and only White countries is Genocide against the White race. There is no defense against this statement, no wiggle room that can allow a Anti White to turn this argument into a debate that goes 100 percent off topic, etc.
#6 by Dave on 08/29/2010 - 1:53 pm
If the first door you walk through is not the right door, every subsequent door you walk through will be a wrong door.
Robert Whitaker is very good at showing the way to the right door.