Anti-white: And there are non-whites that do not benefit from any programs or quotas, but just want an end to all kinds of discrimination and racism because it is wrong.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You Alzheimer anti-whites always pretend you never read this: “Quotes the mantra”

——————

Anti-white: There are more Whites in Africa than there are Blacks in Europe, there are more Whites in Asia than there are Asians in America, There are more Whites in India than there are Indians in Scotland.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): If you select it this way, ther are more Eskimos in America, too. But Europe and America will be a majority non-white by the middle of the century, and that is what you are for. As I said, YOUR intent is genocide, what you call “assimilation:” “Quotes the mantra”
——————

Anti-white: (Six-Man Race Shows the Value of Diversity – Stormfront)

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Let us assume the impossible: That instead of regurgitating the usual Diversity Poster, this guy could THINK.

My point was the six-man, all black race was exactly what we would expect to see in a real championship race. Look at the photos in each case in this standard and packaged Diversity Poster the same way:

Imagine a country made up 90% of the kind of people pictured IN EACH CASE.

In EVERY case, the ones made up of 90% whites would be where the brown ones would be going to get a better life. In the real world, it is the same as the six-man race.

It is easy to realize that the six black man race simply shows what blacks obviously do best.

You and Mommy Professor can talk until you are blue in the face about it is an accident that the six black runners you see are an accident, but no one is going do anything but laugh at you.

Blacks win the race. Mulattoes lose it. Get rid of the whites and the whole world looks like the colored countries where people do NOT want to go.

You do the standard Diversity poster and that is supposed to show that the fact that white countries are ALL where the brown ones want to go is somehow irrelevant because you are so Loving.

This is, speaking charitably, moronic.

If that’s a Brainy Spic, I’d hate to see a DUMB one.
——————

Anti-white: I would love for my son to marry a nice Panamanian girl… but if he wants to marry a Colombian, or American… what can I do about it?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Get real.

The only right being suppressed is the right of white people to have their own lands and you KNOW it: “Quotes the mantra”
——————

Statement: That is the nature of the liberal, the leftist, the anti. Hypocrisy, contradiction, and yes double standard as you said friend.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The anti-WHITE.

They are comfortable with “anti.”

Anti-WHITE makes a point: “Quotes the mantra”

——————

Anti-white: I’m researching White Nationalism and am interested to find out some answers to my questions.

1.) Do you believe that we did an injustice to the American Indians after we became a country? Why or why not?

2.) Do you believe we have have a financial obligation to American Indians and African Americans that were brought over during the slave trade?

3.) What do you think is the reason White Nationalist groups are developing very quickly in this country?

4.) How do you feel about White people who do not agree with your point of view?

5.) Do you believe it is wrong to hurt someone when they do not agree with you or if they are part of a minority group?

Thank you very much. I look forward to hearing from you.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): If each Indian tribe is paying reparations to the people they replaced whites might pay, too. If Inuits are paying reparations to the Nordics they replaced, it might be Okay. If the blacks are paying reparations to the Hottentots they forced out and slaughtered all over Capoid Africa, maybe so.

Do you know ANY real history at all?
——————

Statement: Russia/Eastern European are unmistakenly part of the European race, but they are not considered Western. Ultimately, what does that mean?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): It is a corollary to what I said:

Those who are obsessed with “culture” are enemies to our RACE.
——————

Anti-white: I’m white. My Dad’s Austrian. My mom’s American and she is of mostly English and French descent.

I was born with blond hair and blue eyes, but as the days went on my hair has turned brown.

That’s 100% the truth.

There’s no way of proving it unless I post a picture of myself, which I won’t. So whatever.

Call me a race traitor if you want. I don’t care.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You are, in short, a true traitor.

I pointed out that whites had done nothing that non-whites would not have done had they had the power. You said that was not proven.

You are saying that whites are genetically evil and need to be done away with.

That is not an intellectual position. That is a declaration of war and should be treated as such.
——————

Anti-white: you claim that every other race is more violent but white people have done so much violence and killed so many people. It doesn’t make sense.

Think about it, white people have caused destruction everywhere. North America, South America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East. is there any place that you haven’t wrecked?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Whites have committed no evils other races would not have done had they had the power.

Slavery was everywhere. What was shameful was that WHITES would sink to it.

ONLY white people ever felt ashamed of slavery or abolished it.

Whites have committed no UNIQUE evils. We have done many, many unique GOOD things. The device you are using now is one of them.

Adelheim’s basic work in finding and sending my arguments against anti-whites on Stormfront is important.

But BUGS will run these with new articles, because the first, of course, got no comments. A commenter tells me that Kelso’s whitenewsnow has some discussion of it, which I will look up. But for BUGSers, nothing about this is new.

But if you are being trained in using a weapon, you can learn all about the theory and how to take it apart and put it back together and its effects in action. But you still have to pull the trigger, and your instructor has to watch you do it.

I do not want this to make BUGS boring. So skip it if you like. But I do want BoardAd to put in the whole Mantra where I do. I want everybody to see that what works is repetition. You pull the trigger over and over and over.

There are only a few of these. Then Adelheim added some of his own replies using this method. To me, this is very important.

If this bores YOU, it is because you know about the Mantra. But if you are bored, the other side is driven up the wall. They can’t deal with it.

We are the ONLY source of the Mantra. NOBODY but BUGS and the shows set up by BUGS members ever mentions the Mantra.

There is a lot of difference between theory and practice. Some people may agree with the theory of hammering in the Mantra, but when they start doing it, they have an urge to expand it to be more interesting or look better.

The Bang! Bang! Bang! I advocate is the one I practiced. It is a tough discipline.

And it is a lot like Classical warfare. The Greeks beat the Persians because the Persians used a mass attack, while the Greeks held together. Rome perfected this technique, locking shields and going in as a solid block. They formed an early tank, the testudo or tortoise, by forming a square and using the central shields as a roof.

This was easy theory and terribly hard practice. In the midst of a battle, it is against every instinct. When the moment comes, some want to run and some want to hold back and some want to go beserker.

On the Field of Mars Romans practiced doing the same thing, together, for thousands of hours.

I would like to hear from BUGSERS who have practice in using the Mantra this way.

I am sure everyone on the Field of Mars would rather have been hearing tales of Great Heroes and practicing far more exciting tactics.

But it is critical for the few of us who have found the fatal dent in the enemy lines to show how we pull the trigger or lock shields.

Anti-white: “No one can “force” you to accept diversity.”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Then you describe the diversity we are forced to accept.
——-

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The “DUHH!” approach.

So you’ve never heard anybody talk about a race problem. You’ve never heard the white race condemned.

You’ve never heard anybody insist on open borders.

You’ve never heard anybody say the Final Solution to race is “mixing THE races,” when they mean only mixing races in predominantly white countries.

I am not even sure this comes up to the level of a good solid lie. It is certainly not a reply, and it is less than childish.

Mommy Professor will Let you get away with this crap, but you’re not with Mommy Professor here.

“Quotes the mantra”

————-

Anti-white: Hey now, we prefer to be called pro-humanity.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Stalin called himself a friend of humanity, too. “Quotes the mantra”

————————-

Anti-white: (writes a long rant about something)

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You haven’t read a word we’ve said, have you? If Mommy Professor didn’t say it you don’t hear it. I used to be a professor myself.

I just pointed out that whites who are anti-white are the most rabid of all. It make you feel virtuous.

Another thing you never noticed is something I repeat and you anti-whites complain I keep repeating it but you never address it: “Quotes the mantra”

————————–

Statement: Of course the anti-whites don’t seem to understand that 60% of Jews make up the student body of Georgetown or Harvard, and are considered to be “Whites.”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Jews are whatever they choose to all themselves at the moment, minority, white, religion, nation.

Anyone who contradicts them is ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.

“Quotes the mantra”
———————————-

Anti-white: I’m not a racist and I’m not a WN. I don’t hate white people and I’m not against whites preserving their culture and identity. I’m white.

What I’m against is this hatred that many white nationalists have towards people of colour.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): What you are is this: “Quotes the mantra”
——————–

Anti-white: (a long rant I am an Asian and I am shocked – Page 34 – Stormfront )

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): This seems to begin with a complaint that we do not FULLY allow anti-whites to speak out here and ends with a demand that we be suppressed entirely.
——————
Anti-white: …..

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Anti-whites are always spouting about how massive immigration and assimilation demanded of ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is just Freedom.

I am really ticked off at my comrades for NEVER telling the truth about this.

The same anti-white who spouts this libertarian nonsense knows very well that free speech does not apply to US, but I am STILL waiting for us to SAY so every time this crap appears.

They keep saying we can live in our own bunkers if we want to. Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, it is forbidden for us to do so.

But no one points this out.

As O’Reilly said, “There should be no all-white ANYTHING in America.”

At least O’Reilly SAYS it. That’s more than my comrades do here.

For all their “diversity” talk, the fact is that all-white areas are forbidden because people will MOVE there. If we had freedom of choice integration would be doomed in the long term.

That is the justification for our entire set of laws, the ones O’Reilly is all for and states so clearly. Why do my comrades let the anti-whites get away with this “Freedom” crap?

——————

Anti-white: I don’t believe this. I’m fine with as many Europeans emigrating outside of Europe and other European-majority regions. I’m part-South Asian in a country that originally had an Australian Aboriginal majority, so it would be hypocritical of me to deny this of other people of European descent (I’m also half-White).

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): All anti-whites claim that. But in the real world: “Quotes the mantra”

Simmons has been hammering on the importance of the term anti-white and it is time for me to chime in. I haven’t been on Stormfront for years, but I fought and I fought to get them to stop using terms like “anti” for the anti-whites.

It would be a shame if people with all our years of experience with the effectiveness of “racist” were to underestimate the importance of a basic attack word. “Racist” has been the greatest single weapon in the enemy’s arsenal. It is their attack word.

The attack word is the one that draws a reaction. For them it is racist. For us the attack word is anti-white. It sums up our reaction to their basic genocidal program. It is TRUE.

“Racism” is also TRUE. When the Founders declared that America was entirely about “We the People” they followed it with a 1793 Act declaring that the “people” they referred to were WHITE.

America was considered simply racial movement of the white race, the same one which, in wave after waved, brought Aryan groups, Iberians, Celts, Germans and Slavs across Europe westward into Europe. It brought the Dorian Greeks then the Ionian Greeks. It brought the Latins to Italy and then the Germanic Lombards.

This was well known, and it was a conundrum when Lincoln declared that America was a Proposition, not a people. The Constitution says it is a people. The legislation passed four years after the Constitution was adopted said it was a people.

A WHITE people.

So those who say “racist” are right. America was founded on racism, as they define it. That is what Lincoln-worshipping conservatives cannot face. That is why the word “racist” makes them change their diapers, because if America is NOT racist, it is just a bunch of words.

Conservatism cannot face true history, because it is as much a bunch of words, words twisting reality, as the left is.

Having explained why “racist” is effective because it is true.

“Anti-white” hits home on both liberals and respectable conservatives because it is true. Liberals are perfectly aware that what they say about whites, if said about any other race or any religion, would be genocidal hatred.

Even the rads regret the statement, “The white race is the cancer of humanity.” It was too blatant, and too true of their mindset.

Which is why anti-white is so effective. That one word changes the whole debate.

That one word sums up the whole debate.

That one word, like no other, gets ATTENTION.

They have no answer for it in their tape recorder minds because Mommy Professor never USES that word.

Good Work, Comrade Simmons.

Anti-white: Every man who says they’ve never thought of having sex with a colored
woman is just a plain old homosexual. You racist-homosexuals disgust me.
The big problem is that you racists are scared, because now, you are the
minority. You can hate religion, that’s your right, but just hating the color
of someone’s skin is so dumb.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Then why do YOU hate the color of OUR skin?

THIS is ENTIRELY a matter of “skin color:”

“Quotes The Mantra”
———-

Anti-white: Main stream ones, yes

i’m an anti-racst and i hate all racists including the KKK, NAACP, jesse jackson and al sharpton

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): But you only seek to DESTROY one race: “Quotes the mantra”
———

Anti-white: I don’t believe this. I’m fine with as many Europeans emigrating outside of Europe and other European-majority regions. I’m part-South Asian in a country that originally had an Australian Aboriginal majority, so it would be hypocritical of me to deny this of other people of European descent (I’m also half-White).

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Meanwhile, back on Earth: “Quotes the mantra”

——-

Anti-white: Race doesn’t exist…

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Allzheimer anti-white,a forensic pathologist must, to keep his job, testify that there is no such thing as race AND be able to tell the rae of a victim from a few scraps or bones.

If race does not exist, then why do you demand: “Quotes the Mantra”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): In order to graduate a forensic specialist must spout the Politically Correct line that there is no such thing as race. But to keep his job he must be able to tell the race of the most damaged victim of which he has only decayed scraps.

In every country with an established religion like today’s Political Correctness, scienists were
required to repeat the Party Line but ignore it in serious business.

Since anti-whites are tape recorders, they wouldn’t understand that. They just repeat it, they don’t think about it.
————

Anti-white: Are we in 2008 or 1800?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The answer to your question is that you are still in 1800, fighting the New England slave trade, while I living in 2009, where the real situation is this: “Quotes the mantra”
————

Anti-white: Where did I say that the immigration into Liberia or Botswana is white? Would you be kind enough to point it out? No? Thought so.

The point is that people move between countries and not all movement is necessarily to white nations.

I am sure that the movement into Singapore, which is into the top positions is not white either, but Asian.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): One more time for the Alzheimer anti-white:

This is about RACE. I repeat, I never said a word about all immigration being to white countries.

I repeat, Singapore could cut off all immigration tomorrow and no one would object. ALL white countries and ONLY white countries are REQUIRED by you self-stytled “antis” to bring in in OTHER races in huge numbers.

What’s scary is that this guy REALLY can’t anything he hasn’t had drilled into him. He is really is a Mommy Professor Tape Recorder. So I will play my record back to him: “Quotes the mantra”
————

Anti-white: Race mixing is just a result of conquest.. Look on all the Italians, the Spanish, the Russians..

Example All those Latinos are Part whites.. every last one of ’em..

You might call me a color race lover.. but we whites brought it onto to ourselves when we conquered these people/places.

Is it bad? I like authenticity, but i would say it is up to a personal choice.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): All crime is a matter of personal choice. “Quotes the mantra”
————