Archive for August, 2010

The Island That Has a Bill of Rights

I said in an earlier piece that enforcing a bad law rigorously is one way to get rid of it, but I stressed that was true in America. I am open to any contrary evidence, because I don’t LIKE this, but there really doesn’t seem to be any law today’s Europeans won’t support.

Knowing what the World War II Generation did to enslave America, a continent which had TWO such wars may be worse off. WWI barely touched America.

American and British laws were routinely changed by juries. The endless list of small crimes that one could be hanged for in Britain was effectively reversed by juries who would not convict a person who could be hanged for stealing a few shillings.

But today it is hard to imagine a British jury defying a judge in any way. I would be glad to be wrong if someone can give some examples. In America, too, juries consider themselves servants of the court.

The decision in the Crown Versus Pierce, where a judge ruled that in the case of Hate Laws, “the truth is no defense,” was the law under the Alien and Sedition Laws passed after the last huge Federalist Party victory in 1798.

But it was the LAST Federalist Party win because in 1800 the American electorate, not the courts, saved freedom of speech. It was hard to get convictions under that law — in America.

But the idea of a jury in today’s Britain disputing a guy in a black dress strikes me as impossible.

Would America pass the First Amendment today?

No other country on earth has what we call the first amendment.

I have pointed out that “since the invention of the wheel” is supposed to mean in caveman days, but when I point out how rare the wheel is, nobody remembers that phrase. Everyone says it, but nobody THINKS about it.

I have seen editorials reprinted from Australia bragging that they have no Bill of Rights and never will. In fact, all you find in American publications is a few columns like William Buckley’s endorsing European Hate Laws.

The Australian and Canadian reaction to mass shootings, which only happen where no honest person has a weapon, is to pass Draconian guns laws. I have heard of no instance where a jury has refused to convict anybody for trying to defend his family.

But I doubt you will see any of this put together in a few words anywhere but in BUGS.

In several states, including South Carolina, liquor laws were repealed by juries. In fact, while the rest of the state debated the law absolutely banning the per drink sale of anything but beer, Charleston had open bars.

The bars were kept open by juries. For a quarter of a century.

Try to imagine that happening with the cowed juries of today.

America is an island with its Bill of Rights. It is an island under assault.

But no one mentions that.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

Niggling

Mayor Giuliani brought down the crime rate in New York City, an seemingly impossible task, by enforcing the little laws. When bums are allowed to litter they tend to go on to outfight robbery.

Every Jewish comedian criticized this as “fascism.” Even Leno mentioned comedians as part of the liberal complex, so I’m not saying anything wild here.

It did, however, WORK. I would never have imagined it would work so well.

This is also, as the comedians said, a form of profiling. The guy who harasses people or openly throws paper on the street is likely to more serious crimes. They are largely minorities, of course.

In other words niggling enforcement of laws works, not because it is niggling enforcement, but because it is a cover for profiling those who, by the color of their skin, are clearly more likely to be lawbreakers.

But niggling enforcement has an entirely different beneficial effect on law abiding people in America.

In America, the best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it rigorously. When I came up absolutely everyone who was fashionable was for New York gun control. That ruined Rosie O’Donnell.

I think Zero Tolerance for Weapons has done the new generation a lot of good. Everyone knows about some little kid who was thrown out of school for carrying a plastic knife or something to school.

Gun control is a struggle liberals have lost big time. You know that because they don’t mention it any more. The cops really enforced it because they wanted to be the only high-school graduates who got to walk around with guns.

For people without inferiority complexes, having to carry a weapon is a bother. What really stopped pilots from carrying guns was not he knee jerk reaction to it by liberals. Pilots don’t have the cops’ inferiority complex and they don’t WANT to have to carry a gun.

So they don’t.

That was something most people didn’t THINK about, my continuing theme here. They were arguing over whether a man who had over two hundred lives in his hands should be ALLOWED to carry a gun.

Unlike flying a passenger jet, they said, a gun is a big responsibility.

On TV, the detectives are always taking off their coats and showing guns on them, which makes cops feel Macho. But a pilot has no need of that to get respect in HIS costume.

That’s how human beings think, gang.

If a cop doesn’t have his gun, he usually gets fined. If we want pilots to carry weapons, we will have to pay them to do it. Most lawmakers seemed to think they were “giving” pilots guns, and the pilots would have to take a course to learn how to use them on a plane.

I would guess that if you don’t know the mechanics of planes, training you in the use of guns on a place will be very, very hard. But the lawmakers were so fixated on guns they considered any kind of that magic word police, or Air Marshals, should carry the guns.

Walking in line to board a plane with my shoes off and my pants sagging without the belt, I have mentioned o others around me that the oil countries that sponsor terrorism should have to help pay for this crap.

I point out that if you ask any terrorist one thing he really wants, his answer will include making sure nobody on board is armed. I worked in a prison, and I have yet to find a single prisoner who is not all for gun control.

I have also never found a single prisoner who had the slightest difficulty getting a gun to commit a crime with, in New York or South Carolina. The gun that shot Reagan was bought in Hawaii and used in DC, two places which have gun laws that make that make New York look wimpish.

I have also never had a single passenger disagree with me about how the terrorists should help pay for this nonsense.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

The National Debate Market

I talked earlier about how much more effective it would be if, instead of complex debates, people said, “I don’t believe you.” Respectable conservatives get paid precisely to take total absurdities from our established religion and make them sound intelligent by debating them in detail.

No one could be a professional conservative and use the Mantra. In a debate on television, once you had made it clear that the anti-white position is simple genocide, how would you pass the remainder of the time?

I mean this as a serious question. How can all the professional proponents of our established religion allow people on who simply chop them up and leave dead air? Not to mention that, since it IS our established religion, real heretics are not allowed exposure.

We have this problem in dealing with Obama. Obama is doing precisely what he said he would do: being an old style leftist, for which the codeword is “Change,” The fact that it requires a code word shows how successful it has been.

What is wrong with it, the reason liberalism and socialism need a codeword, is simple, 1) it has been tried, and 2) it does not work. Obama is trying Change and it does not work.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. But you won’t hear any professional conservative putting it that simply. And that is why the argument against this stuff doesn’t work.

It is not plain and simple. It treats this nonsense as if it had a point. It is part of the pretense that the national debate has two sides. The fact is that the so-called national debate has one side, our established religion of Political Correctness, and a group which serves as its respectable opposition.

In short, there is one side that is discredited and another side that tries to keep it credited.

That is why there is only one side, and that is why the one side is our established RELIGION. It is based entirely on faith that what has failed, from democratic socialism in Britain to liberalism in the US to state Communism in a third of the world, has failed and failed and failed and failed.

Its failure is not the point precisely because it is a religion, faith without evidence and, in fact, faith contrary to evidence.

But until we start saying things like “This is a religion” respectable conservatives will be able to keep up the pretense, which makes them their livelihoods, that this discredited nonsense is a Point of View.

More than that, that it is THE Point of View against which those who are called “conservatives” are merely the opposition.

I also keep emphasizing how important it is to realize that our so-called “National Debate” and all the highly publicized Movements are a means for hundreds of thousands of people to make a LIVELIHOOD.

What is debated is as much a market product as your cereal.

When you look at this “National Debate” ask yourself the one important question: Why is this information produced? It is produced by a market.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

16 Comments

Supply Side Idealism

In Why None Dare Call It Treason I said I would talk about what happened to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who drew a major portion of their income from siding with the Soviets when the Soviet Empire fell.

This is a practical question, a question anyone who knows anything about real political science would wonder about. But since only Mommy Professors are in political science, they have no idea what makes real politics what they are.

A political science Mommy Professor sees these hundreds of thousands pf Cold Warriors as disappointed idealists. He does not see them as job-seekers.

Until Obama, it was hard to realize how many people’s job resume consisted entirely of “social activist.” I’ve SEEN them. In 1995, when the Democrats lost their majority in Congress and a third of the entire staff on the Hill went to the Republicans it was barely mentioned outside the Beltway.

Another wave of Idealists and Intellectuals hit the streets. Barely five years before, an even greater wave of pro-Soviet Idealists and Intellectuals hit the streets. As the USSR went down every single professional pro-Peace, pro-Soviet, whatever term you want to use, became an Environmentalist.

It is important to realize that intelligent Americans, no matter how anti-American, do have one trait in common: They MAKE their opportunities.

Watch out now, I may be tooting my own horn, but I come from the Belly of the Beast. If you want an easy life in DC, you go to Harvard and join the CIA or the civil service. Totally contrary to popular conception, Capitol Hill is not a place for time-servers.

One man who wrote a popular book called “Workaholics” points out to his New York audience that, contrary to their beliefs, New York was not America’s workaholic center, Washington was. For a New Yorker to take second place in anything “tough” is like a World War II veteran admitting anyone else was in a REAL War.

But I could show up at Capitol Hill offices at 2 a.m. and the place was lit up like a Christmas tree. John Ashbrook caught me in my office at 2 a.m., took one look at me, and said, “Bob, you’ll work better if you’re ALIVE. Get out of here.”

So I have to tell you that the activists on the other side were nothing like what you would think of as Washington bureaucrats. A senior staffer who lost his job at the age of fifty would go out and MAKE himself another one.

This would never occur to anyone as part of the growth of the Environmentalist Movement, the swelling of the militant Anti-Racist Movement.

I was right there, so as the USSR fell I dreaded what would come next from those people who had opposed me in the Cold War.

No political science professor is ever going to think of the tens of thousands of people in the political real world the collapse of a leftist cause brings. A new supply of activists, what he calls Idealists, causes a surge in other movements.

Call it Supply Side Idealism.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Why None Dare Call It Treason

It is now official that Ted Kennedy was working with the Communists, while the Cold War was still on, to defeat Reagan.

Old but true: “Treason never prospers, for when it prospers, none dare call it treason.”

Incidents like this are simply forgotten. But the Kennedy incident was part of what I advisedly call a titanic movement when the entire left pulled out all the stops to save the Soviet Union.

The Strategic Defense Initiative was invented by Jerry Pournell, a science fiction writer He is from Louisiana and therefore in my objective opinion a genius. Its aim was exactly what it accomplished, to destroy the PSYCHOLOGICAL equality of the USSR as a Superpower.

The USSR had stolen enough nuclear and rocket capability to be able to assure that it could cause tens of millions of deaths in a United States without any defense against ICBMs. But the very idea of competing against the United States in developing ANYTHING was impossible for the USSR.

The technology needed to be part of MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, was in place by the seventies. In fact, the old bomber-based MAD would have still worked before 1960.

The much-touted Sputnik of 1958 which showed the Soviet lead in space was done by a rocket Americans had had in their warehouses for years.

You won’t see any of this elsewhere folks. For me, knowing it is like a mechanic being able to replace a sparkplug.

This is why SDI, which Kennedy called Star Wars, was a death blow to the USSR’s Superpower status.

The titanic effort I spoke of involved every resource the Left had, from moderate Republicans to comedians. A TV movie was dedicated to it, which was enormously publicized but a total flop.

The last Superman movie was dedicated to it, which is why it was the last.

The day SDI was announced, the Soviet crumble moved into a collapse. Its economy was already crumbling, its invincibility lay in entirely in its nuclear capability.

Russia could have fielded more nukes and more troops without too much trouble. Just cut rations a bit.

But the USSR had no scientific capability, certainly not at the Star Wars level. Firing a bullet someone taught you how to make is one thing. Developing a technology to shoot down a bullet is a whole different ball game.

A ball game they could not play.

The giant initiative which involved the mind-boggling power of the entire left argued that 1) SDI was a waste of money, it wouldn’t work, and 2) It would work and cause nuclear war: the Soviets would attack us while they still could before SDI was completed.

At the same time the Left argued that Moscow was for peace.

This was a massive initiative on the part of hundreds of thousands of Americans for whom supporting the USSR and making all dirty tricks out to be American Intelligence dirty tricks was all or a major part of their livelihood.

One of the funniest statements Reagan made, a joke no one was allowed to catch, was saying we would share research on SDI.

He was aware of the same thing every president since Roosevelt had been aware of: There WAS no “Soviet research” to share with. Their only research that mattered was spies.

This Nuclear Freeze Movement was so huge it had to be eclipsed by the fall of the Soviet Empire to get it out of the history books.

Yes, Senator Kennedy did leave a record of working outright with the Soviets, but nobody is surprised.

And what happened to those hundreds of thousands of professional pro-Communists?

You won’t see THAT discussed anywhere but here, in a later article.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments

Working Without Thinking

Your doctor, your preacher, your lawyer and your accountant are in a position to give you orders. So is your “superior.” No one gets all his orders obeyed.

On an organization chart, the guy two ranks up routinely calls a “subordinate” to find out what should be done in a particular area. My boss — note the lack of quotes — John Ashbrook, was called for an interview by his state’s largest newspaper — the Plain Dealer.

He told the writer that I would call with what he had to say, gave me the number, and he had no idea what he had said until the the Sunday paper came out.

Hindenburg was commander of the German forces in World War I but it was pretty well know that Ludendorff ran the show.

It is understatement to say that an organization chart doesn’t tell you the real story. Everybody says he knows that, but I notice that every succeeding Administration in Washington, no matter how militantly it goes in, is tamed in each Department by the career staff getting them all tied with a “reorganization” instead of with changing policy.

In other words, as usual, everybody KNOWS the chart doesn’t tell the truth, but when faced with a situation where this fact is crucial, he hasn’t THOUGHT about it.

I keep telling people that “the President really doesn’t have any power.” He is so tied down by fiscal reality and election reality that his opinions don’t really make that much difference.

Real power is the ability to make the world the way you want it. How much does the president have that ability? He is only able to balance considerations. He even gets those balances from his advisors.

No matter whether they are called monarchies, anarchies, democracies, or dictatorships, all real governments are oligarchies.

Reagan was criticized for working forty hours a week. He had stepped into the presidency after governing the largest state in the country for eight years, and he knew the limitations of a chief executive.

When asked about Reagan’s forty hours, I would say, “When a hand reaches for the Red Phone at three o’clock in the morning, I don’t want that hand shaking with fatigue.”

I knew a self-made multimillionaire who said, “If I HAVE to work more than forty hours a week, I fire somebody.”

Ben Franklin has been quoted down through the centuries as the ultimate advocate of hard work, “early to bed, early to rise” and so on. If you actually read his short autobiography, it sounds startling modern.

Franklin said, yes, he got a reputation for hard work by waking everybody up in Philadelphia pushing his wheelbarrow down the street at six o’clock in the morning.
He points out that what was important was not being there at six, but that “ I became KNOWN for it.”

It was public relations. If anybody THOUGHT about it, why the hell would a PRINTER need to be pushing a loudly rattling wheelbarrow down the street to work every morning?

But Franklin knew damned well that, then or now, no one who wanted to preach would THINK about it.

They didn’t.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

He Ignored the Danger Signs, Promote Him!

When a crisis occurs people rush to pay the experts.

But a crisis is usually by definition a failure of the experts.

Let us say you are in combat. You only realize there is an enemy weapon in a particularly place because some of your men got killed by a shot from it. Obviously you need to know more about the location where that weapon was located, so you bring in your people who were scouting that area because they know more about that particular area than scouts reporting from a different area.

But you don’t give them a medal.

Highly paid and well-known experts in our society are usually those who have let the most casualties occur in their area..

I predicted on September 11 and 12, 2001 that not only would not one single intelligence officer even be personally criticized for what happened but that all of them would get a boost in rank and pay. At the time, when people were screaming about the intelligence failures, that seemed impossible.

Today, it is utterly forgotten that anyone ever asked for any explanation for the criminal failures of 9-11.

White agricultural experts and white farmers are considered about the least exciting people in our society. Nobody even knows that, for the first time in human history, there is more than enough food for everybody on earth and when starvation comes it is not accepted passively anywhere on earth.

Farmers and agricultural science have succeeded on a monumental scale. So they get no attention.

A crisis is a FAILURE. We treat failure, especially colossal failure, as the reason to promote people and increase their budgets and put them on talk shows and read their books.

Usually one of the greatest signs of success in a political system is when people don’t bother to vote. In our world where we worship the Root Canal a low turnout is seen as a disaster, a reason to have political experts write books on the failure of the system.

When the American political system was at its most stable commentators were constantly bitching about how few Americans voted compared to the Election Day March in Europe.

Europeans didn’t vote because they were concerned. Quite the opposite. Almost all Europeans considered voting a Duty. They went to the polls unanimously and cast the same vote for the same party.

Americans only bothered to vote when they didn’t trust the rest of the electorate.

Compared to the Communist countries, even the Europeans had too small an electorate. North Korea once reported that one hundred percent of its ballots were cast, presumably including by those in comas.

But no one questions whether heavy voting is a healthy sign. The scouts who didn’t find that gun that killed their comrades will not receive praise. But experts who do exactly the same thing have ensured themselves promotion and book sales.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Masturbating for Money

One of the giant “Green” movements of our time involved the terror of burying plastics that would last thousands of years. No such panic was raised about putting rock in the ground, which is there for millions of years.

A fund-raising against rock would be seen as silly. The Plastic Panic was Idealistic and Intellectual.

More important, the Plastic Panic made money.

It has begun to occur to the most amazing people that there is nothing Idealistic about old white women having to be strip-searched and all of us taking off our shoes and belts at an airport. What DID occur to the public was that pilots should have guns up front.

They don’t.

Those who get paid for panicking fought it, and pilots don’t want something else to worry about. The Pistol Panickers have essentially won that battle. The only person with a gun on a plane will be a terrorist.

When you’re still young and fresh to the political game, this insane business can bother you. You see the Public Interest and you decry those who waste our resources on nonsense and worse.

But when you start asking, “Where does this information come from?” you calm down. Fundraising is based on the latest news, the latest moan of misery.

The slogan of money-raising and new legislation and all the rest is “something must be done.” So our “solution” is very much that of boys is when they cannot attain the Playboy models.

They do SOMETHING. In any headline crisis, hundreds of thousands of people are paid to do SOMETHING.

The somethings are very similar, except that the one the boys engage in is harmless and costless.

Any crisis brings forth hundreds of millions of billions of dollars. Never yet have experts, the people who let the crisis occur in the first place, ever le a crisis go to waste, any more than any heterosexual boy has ever thrown away an old Playboy.

This would normally be seen as a joke, comparing boy’s masturbation to the deadly serious business of Crisis Management.

The reason you see it as a joke is because you do not speak the language of politics fluently.

It IS funny, but only if you recognize who is the butt of the joke. The gang in the Medieval Clown’s getup is the public, which always listens raptly to the opinion of anyone who has let a crisis develop in the very field he has been paid a fortune to be an expert in.

Doing Something is for little boys who find a hidden Playboy Magazine.

Doing Something is not for adults.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments