Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Free Speech Versus Violence

Posted by Bob on September 2nd, 2010 under Coaching Session


Someone said in a forum that the one argument anti-whites had that he might consider is that pro-white statements might cause violence. Meanwhile the same anti-whites insist that the only way we can have peace is for the history of white oppression be a major topic in our schools.

When Kelso and I and others were visiting New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, the police were in force. When we spoke in a old church where an ex-cop on our side had raised the money for pro-white meetings, there were hundreds of threateners across the street.

I’m used to that.

When we speak on a campus, we are often blocked by ”a threat of violence.”

But the whole situation was summed up by one of the cops who showed up: “We aren’t worried about YOU.”

The “threat of violence” ALWAYS comes from the anti-whites. The question is not whether they will act like the thugs they are, but whether public officials should allow any point of view to be shouted down.

During the Cold War liberals always insisted that “We should settle differences by discussions, not by violence.” But every university prevents any discussion of white genocide by talking about “a threat of violence.”

What do you do when one side wants to speak out and the threat of violence comes entirely from the other side? Is this a key to a peaceful society? Is this a free society?

As usual, I am stating what everybody knows but nobody, including our side, ever SAYS. Why do our people dummy up all the time?

Speech is the human ALTERNATIVE to violence.

This is another reason the Mantra is so critical. The one barrier we have is that respectable conservatives have joined with liberals in saying that any questioning of anti-white views is to be met with violence.

Outside the United States, in fact, the government provides the violence. William Buckley endorsed Europe’s sending people to prison for denying the six million figure for the Holocaust. This is not even Holocaust denial, it is arguing the NUMBERS.

The Soviet Union sent people to the Gulag for any criticism of Jews. In Battleship Potemkin, a Soviet propaganda film, you will see a heroic mob beating a man to death for an anti-Semitic remark.

John Adams risked lynching by successfully defending the British soldiers accused of the Boston Massacre in court. He is considered a hero for that.

In fact, in every single case in history those who defended the right of speech against violence, especially the Communists, are declared heroes.

Except us.

But, just as in the case of all immigration and assimilation policy applying only to white countries, we dummy up about it.

By now, the anti-whites are terrified that something like the Mantra will be recognized as a legitimate point of view.

That is our job, and that is why it is so HARD.

And that is why all the time we waste on crime rates and US immigration policy and criticizing affirmative action is a boon to the anti-whites. If they can keep all discussion of white survival off the table, and in the Forbidden Zone, they will own the debate.

Another fact we never mention is that Hate Speech Laws didn’t stop Hitler.

The American position has always been that free speech is the only human alternative to violence.

Our side seems to have forgotten that completely.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by backbaygrouch on 09/02/2010 - 6:25 am

    During the 1972 election campaign I made the acquaintance of the son of a Nixon state co-chair. He attended and played football over at Harvard. Tensions on campus over the war in Vietnam had been running pretty high. He played a role in calming them.

    When an invited pro-administration speaker was threatened with violence the kid got together a few teammates and stated that they would provide security for the speaker and the good conduct of all attendees. The anti-war activists vowed the meeting would be shut down.

    Harvard Yard was facing High Noon. The wags in the residence halls were calling the looming riot, the Battle of the Football Helmets versus the Yarmulkes. But nothing happened. Guess which side, for all its bluster, didn’t show?

    Hint: The lecture proceeded as scheduled in a dignified atmosphere.

  2. #2 by Dave on 09/02/2010 - 10:24 am

    The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech because one can be made to shut one’s mouth but never one’s ears. But the irony is hearing is so far more important than saying. One can shut one’s mouth, but there are no ear flaps to shut one’s ears. God made things like that for a reason.

    Speech is one dimensional. But there are many consciousnesses in hearing and one sees far more through one’s ears, the one does through one’s eyes.

    There is no such thing as strategy, only attention to important details. Attention to important details comes through one’s ears where the whole of the world is. The mouth emits words which are written into books which are then worshipped. But all that cuts off the world. The whole of the world can never be found in a book and the whole of the world can never be found in speech. Only pieces of the world can be found there, just little bits and pieces.

    It does not concern me that the Leftists cannot hear and that there are many who want to suppress speech. The world is full of people who cannot see the hearts of others.

    That has nothing to do with my responsibility which is to hear and ears that can hear, really hear, are no small gift. But what about the menace of all those who cannot hear, who do not want to hear, who want to abolish speech and the hearing that goes with it?

    I am supposed to succumb to fear and resort to violence? Is it really true that violence is the alternative when speech is banned? In my view that makes violence far, far too respectable when it is in fact nothing but dereliction.

    Knowing that is connected to hearing, not to speaking. And that is also why the martial arts will lead you to defeat every time. The martial arts give respect to what is not owed respect. If the first door you walk through is not the right door, every subsequent door you walk through will be the wrong door.

    The Leftists and all the worshipers at the church of Political Correctness don’t know that. They also don’t know that ears are for hearing and that defeat is their destiny.

  3. #3 by Simmons on 09/02/2010 - 11:24 am

    PC is a religion, religions have taboos, PC is riddled with taboo of the worst sort that only a drug addled lunatic or a mommy type could respect (go to any lefty site it’s sad).

    Semis and Respectables respect these taboos, they are irrelavant dopple gangers destined to work the organic food patch the cult has.

    Every value and principle we had, guarded by a taboo or tradition lies in the mud, and for the life of me I cannot see why anyone of any character has any respect for the Left’s taboos.

    But the conservative masses plod on gleeful in their misery (Beck/Palin).

    Here is a clue folks, and we won’t have to write ten thousand books till we wear the left out. Joe Sobran of all people made this remark, “Blacks despise us because they know we could drub them within seconds, and they fear this.”

    “Mr. Lefty I am not interested in your taboos and I certainly do not respect them.” “We are going to move on from them.”

  4. #4 by seriouswon on 09/02/2010 - 1:27 pm

    What Simmons said reminds me of what Bob mentioned here a week or two ago…saying “I don’t believe you” to the liars.

  5. #5 by Dick_Whitman on 09/02/2010 - 2:27 pm

    Yesterday an Asian went nuts and took hostages in the name of “saving the planet.” He was mad at the Discovery Channel because they run programs that feature people with large families.

    No one on the news claimed that his actions were the result of environmentalist or liberal “hate speech.”

    Had his actions been carried out by an anti-illegal immigration activist, there would be panels of “experts” on the TV for weeks calling for “hate speech” laws and blaming so called “Conservative talk radio.”

    In fact, I just reviewed some of the major news outlets and they claim he was mentally ill, and not really an environmental activist at all. Another source claimed the media coverage was “anti-Asian.”

    How can it not be anymore obvious that anti-racism is anti-White?

  6. #6 by Simmons on 09/02/2010 - 2:49 pm

    Well it’s obvious the Ecoterrorism crisis is part of the Anti-white crisis.

  7. #7 by backbaygrouch on 09/02/2010 - 4:09 pm

    Sometimes the mask falls. Bob’s post could not be more timely. It should be in the headlines.

    “It’s a free country. I wish it weren’t, but . . . it’s a free country,” Patrick said on the “Jim & Margery Show” on WTKK-FM. “You know, you got to, you got to respect that freedom.” This statement was made yesterday by Massachusetts’ Black governor, Deval Patrick.

    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20100902tim_cahill_lashes_out_at_deval_patrick_over_remarks_on_glenn_beck/srvc=home&position=also

    White people can have liberty only as long as they are willing to fight for it. When people who are not White Christians get complete control of the levers of power thuggery will triumph just as it has across Africa and did when the Jews grabbed Russia by the throat and renamed it the USSR.

    These anti-Whites are still afraid of us, but they grow less so every day. White genocide will speed up as their power waxes and ours wanes due to the policy of displacing the White Christians of America with every other race.

    These people have no conception of liberty. But they still tremble before a clear statement of the issue. That is what Patrick’s, “You got to respect,” is all about. The Mantra is a distillation of the threat to our race. It beats them. It commands respect.

  8. #8 by Epiphany on 09/02/2010 - 5:58 pm

    I am sure that eventually things
    will turn around. It may take months,
    it may take years, it may even take
    decades.

  9. #9 by OldBlighty on 09/02/2010 - 6:40 pm

    >But they still tremble before a clear statement of the issue. That is what Patrick’s, “You got to respect,” is all about. The Mantra is a distillation of the threat to our race. It beats them. It commands respect.

    Its one thing to hear Bob say, the left are terrified of this issue reaching the public consciousness.

    Its quite another to present the argument to an anti-white, and bask in the silence as the full implications sink in.

    I’m sure they are thinking about the genocide hunters that never give up their quarry, even if it takes 50 or 60 years.

    “Will they be coming for me? If so, when?”

  10. #10 by Frank on 09/02/2010 - 6:56 pm

    Mantra Seeping into the Zeitgeist

    “Multiculturalism is just a euphemism for White dispossession, because only Whites are asked to tolerate other cultures, accommodate other cultures, efface and adulterate our own cultures in the name of “enrichment.” ”

    Article here: http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/09/the-ground-zero-mosque-controversy/

  11. #11 by Dick_Whitman on 09/02/2010 - 11:03 pm

    Hey Bob (and fellow BUGSTERS), I managed to get some BUGS thought on to Vdare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_090210.htm

You must be logged in to post a comment.