Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

By Any Other Name

Posted by Bob on September 24th, 2010 under Coaching Session


I believe it was Carl von Clausewitz who said that “War is the continuation of diplomacy by other means.” Being a militarist, he liked to reduce everything to battle.

But the truth is that there is no difference between war and diplomacy. They are both means to the same end, and one prefers to take the least costly route to ANY end. War is what happens when less costly means give out.

Diplomacy has always been known as the alternative to war. In 1861 the North and South stopped debatint and took up arms.

But I note that our side is becoming very apologetic about this. When they say we are fermenting trouble, no one says that the only way to prevent violence is to put it all on the table. No, we tend to be defensive and talk only about how, technically, they have no right to shut us up because of the first amendment.

In other words, we are back to the time when our spokesmen talked about States’ Rights instead of defending the existence of our race.

Several examples come to mind. When we talk about our side, the left always says that, if we didn’t give in to them, the Communists will get the oppressed on their side.

But how often do we point out that the Weimar Republic had Hate Speech Laws, but all Hate Speech Laws do is what liberals used to say the right does, drive the resentment under cover.

We have GOT to stop thinking defensively.

When I said that I didn’t mind a web site going straight from the Mantra to anti-Semitism someone in General Comments 4 said they would agree since I said it. In short, they thought I was wrong.

Suits me. I don’t want a seminar where people feel obligated to agree with me.

What this sort of thing will be used for by anti-whites will be to show that any mention of the survival of the white race will be used for other purposes.

The answer to that is, “Of course it will!” If you suppress seething resentments they become the PROPERTY of those who want violence.

What is really frustrating is to see is that so many of us are unable to stop hiding under the table. Speech, diplomacy and war are different ways of handling disagreement.

Why can’t our people realize that without me reminding them?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by OldBlighty on 09/24/2010 - 8:29 am

    I have noticed that defensive political correctness, is creeping into WN parties, all over the globe.

    Certain things are not to be discussed publicly and our leaders smile in pictures with non-white folk, to prove they are not a racist, or a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    In business, a sure way to create an uninteresting product, is to make one that is the same as your competitors. And worse, submitting to your opponent’s ideology will not defeat it, it will only make it appear stronger.

    Watching my leaders play this defensive PC game, is like listening to fingernails scratching on a chalkboard. Please let me know when they start playing to win.

  2. #2 by Dave on 09/24/2010 - 10:05 am

    Racial conflict recognized or not is permanent.

    Our Established Religion of Political Correctness rests in the millennial delusion that the “inevitable future” holds a solution, when in fact racial conflict is insoluble and will not be resolved ever.

    There are rhythms and cadences to conflict and events are in the driver’s seat. The horizon where things could be managed was passed long ago and the entire white race was swept out to sea where white survival became the only issue.

    Every attempt the bondsman makes to escape his bonds increases his misery. But it is then the emissary of fate emerges from the shadows guarding a secret storehouse of weapons.

    That is how the future actually gets forged for white people, but no history book ever recounts it.

  3. #3 by Simmons on 09/24/2010 - 11:33 am

    Cults and the power of taboo, these effect all humans at all times. Even back in that ridiculous period of ante-bellum “we need our nigras for us to survive”, taboos were enacted by both sides and both sides resorted to force to maintain said stupidity.

    Frankly nothing outside of taboo is interesting today. IQ and crime studies are supposed to rouse us, boring, barely elicits a response from the Left.

    Hint for future leaders: Don’t bore people.

  4. #4 by fscott on 09/25/2010 - 12:05 am

    I am 26, old enough to see reason but too young to care. I talk now because, as I see it thats the best way to win. I dont talk because I want too or because I am to old to fight. I WANT to fight. We are ALL tired of not seeing our leaders put it all on the table.

    As usual I like Bobs wording of things. We would get much more done if the enemy of our people took the White Threat more seriously. They should know we mean buisiness.

  5. #5 by Dick_Whitman on 09/25/2010 - 2:17 am

    fscott,

    the worst thing anyone can do is fight, or engage in violent activity. In fact, violence is exactly what the anti-Whites want us to do. This allows them delegitimize pro-Whites as homicidal “racist” maniacs.

    The anti-Whites have the most powerful military in the world. Using violence would be fighting them at their strongest point.

    The weakest point of our enemy is their ideas. The anti-Whites have spent trillions of dollars in media and education to indoctrinate Whites into believing that “diversity is strength.” But despite these efforts, Whites still overwhelmingly ovoid diversity as much as possible.

    In Europe the anti-Whites have literally made it illegal to question their ideas, but for some reason, Nationalist Parties are growing stronger all the time.

    It’s also important to remember the Berlin Wall. The Berlin Wall fell because Germans decided that enough was enough. If Germans attacked the Soviet Border guards, or ambushed the East German police, the Soviets’ would have sent troops and cracked down on them. The worst thing anyone could have done is used violence. This would have allowed the State to demonize the opposition as “violent counter revolutionaries.” This would of possibly scared the people, and the people may have gotten behind the State to maintain order.

    I understand that it’s frustrating at times, but keep your head. If anyone talks to you about violence, or if you see someone encouraging violence on their website(including using innuendos), STAY AWAY FROM THESE PEOPLE!!!

    When the anti-Whites see the Mantra, they know “we mean business.”

You must be logged in to post a comment.