Why is information produced?

The official media figure for male homosexuals is 10%. No one asks where it came from. It came from a Kinsey Report, Sexual Behavior In The Human Male, in the 1950s. The Kinsey study was known by all because it had lots of headlines in it for newspapers in an age when sex was not openly discussed much.

No one knows where this came from. Kinsey was himself a homosexual, and half of his study subjects were in prison. So when he reported that 10% of males were homosexuals, he also found that half of all males had had homosexual sex.

In the 1950s prison a solid majority of males had had homosexual sex. In fact, one of the reasons so many less prisoners today do NOT have this unwelcome experience is because we talk about it, and it can be reported.

The best estimate I have seen in a careful study of the subject estimated the percentage of male gays at about 1.4%. This was barely covered in the media, and it is unlikely that more will be financed.

The media and the activists like that 10% figure, so the boat is very unlikely to be rocked again.

I am an interrogator. It often struck me that the WWII types and soldiers since have a note in their voices when they speak of their worshipped sergeants, their first ones, that one only hears in a person who is speaking of an old love affair.

From one perspective the entire theory of basic training in WWII and long after was to make the recruits into the submissive females and the sergeants into the dominant males.
“Basic training” was sloppy and it consisted entirely of making young men accept sado-masochism.

It’s kind of odd, in a society where everything is interpreted sexually, that I am the one to mention this.

There was an island in the Pacific where the officer’s club consisted almost entirely of men who had been in combat and were going back in. They were the Greatest of the Greatest Generation.

The ranking officer there would regularly go to the officers’ club, get drunk, and assault junior officers. One young officer hit him back. Her was court-martialed and went to prison.

He went to prison because not one single Hero of the Greatest Generation would say, on the stand, that the senior officer beat on younger officers in that club all the time.

The officer who went to prison was a man who had been in combat, and a captain. Now try to imagine what would happen to recruit in Basic if he reported sissy boy activity against him by his sergeant.

Conservatives are constantly bitching about how liberals are getting absolutely absurd in their use of the word “racist.”

One liberal’s advice they quote was, “Pick a conservative and cal him a racist.”

But the respectables never talk about WHY liberals are now so blatant about the racist label.

They use it because it WORKS.

And they will keep using it because it WORKS.

We have a simple truth to get across: “I wish for liberals to say I am a non-racist but the only reason they will say that is because I am a groveling wimp.”

Liberals use the anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews gambit all the time because it WORKS. Whenever they use it, conservatives soil themselves and go into a fetal position.

If you found something that did that to your opponents, you would use it endlessly, you would openly urge your allies to use it. Liberals kept using the racist label on the Tea Party and the Tea Party put out tapes of their meetings to show no one used the N word.

It didn’t help.

Hey, dumbo, this is a WAR, not a high school DEBATE! Unlike groveling respectables, liberals don’t give a damn about you proving them wrong. All that counts is whether they WIN or not.

That’s why they always win over the respectables. The only time conservatives won was when they got over their fear of appealing to the “the Wallace vote,” a phrase the left used to scare conservatives away from the Reagan Democrats for many years.

The Republicans went back to moderation with Bush and became habitual losers again, doing the job the media feels a real conservative SHOULD do.

When Republicans looked like they had some cajones again in 1994, they won BOTH Houses of Congress. But once in office, they danced to the tune of the Democratic attacks again, and lost it again.

Republicans who won the smashing victory of 1994 went Inside the Beltway. They were listening to the Washington Post and the cocktail party crowd, which cowed them with the racist and radical labels on a day to day basis.

Only on their trips back to their districts, talking with people who weren’t the Big Shots they now dealt with, did they hear, “Why aren’t you CHANGING anything up there?”

They didn’t change even the trend to more government up there because the Big Guys inside the Beltway are Big Guys because they know how to manipulate wimps.

And if you wet yourself and praise Martin Luther King ensconced in the idea that liberals were always right the pros are going to keep using any label that WORKS.

Please read the first part, The Indian Industry, before this one.

The new theory that whites settled America before Indians did is very plausible but any threat to the idea that whites took America is a threat to the whole Indian Industry, which is based on our guilt for stealing THEIR country.

But saying the Indians first came here fourteen thousands years ago across the Bering Strait also threatens The Environmentalist Industry, which, it so happens, just lately became bigger than the Indian Industry.

You see, a whole range of species like the mammoth disappeared at exactly the time the Indians came over across the Ice Age Bering Strait land bridge. If the Indians did that, it severely damages the whole image of the Innocent Indians and it does violence to a major part of the Environmentalist Industry which, when it says “man” destroyed the environment, means the WHITE man.

This theory is getting a lot of acceptance because the Sermon at the end takes care of the problems of both industries. I am not saying this was planned, I am saying that when a theory does such a perfect job, I kind of suspect it as a detective does when he finds that one of his prime suspects happened to be out walking alone when the murder occurred.

White men first makes the white man the one who may have killed the whole range of species. That takes care of the Indian Industry and the Environmentalist Industry on one front.

But it is still heresy, because it threatens the whole “the evil white man took away Indian lands” on which all those casinos and guilt payments in the billions are based.

If the white man first settled America and wiped out the fauna, this leaves the implication that Indians drove those white men out of America.

This cannot be tolerated.

But the Sermon says that the European Clovis People didn’t wipe out the fauna, either. After developing in America for million of years, all that fauna and the white Clovis people were killed all at once by a weather catastrophe that occurred at exactly the time that the Indians were crossing the Bering Bridge.

Now you can see how I made a living doing political analyses no one else even thought of. Nobody comes at information this way.

I would be more suspicious of my own suspicions if the Sermon at the end of this documentary had not gone just one more step toward Political Correctness. It concluded that the weather catastrophe didn’t kill ALL the whites.

There were some whites left and they intermixed with the Indians. So, as bonus all gift-wrapped in the Sermon, America was BORN as a Melting Pot!

The Genome Project is only mentioned when one of its endless number of studies comes up with something the anti-whites can use. As a result, every announcement of Genome research has concluded that the Indians from whom we took America were pure Indians.

If the Bering Strait Indians had a lot of white blood from the original Melting Pot, the Genome Project will have to find those genes.

Norman G. Finkelstein’s book, the Holocaust Industry, impressed me because he is the only writer I know of who follows my question, “Why is this information being produced?”

The usual explanation of why all other Holocausts are ignored, including the greatest of all by the revered Mao Tse-Tung, is that there is a group of absolute geniuses with big noses who meet together regularly and rule the world.

“Why is this information being produced” just lacks the sex appeal of a single Conspiracy. But if you are doing political analysis for a living you can’t afford nonsense for fun.

The media concentrate on Jews because the Jews are critical to anyone who wants to make a living in the media. The Holocaust, among other things is, as Finkelstein details, an industry.

A major theme of our information-based society is what information people with money want to defend. You can say what you like about one of the many automobile companies that ceased to exist in the first half of the twentieth century, but you had better watch what you say when you discuss any Ford, including the T-Model.

Pre-Columbian America is discussed with the Indian Industry listening to every word. Indians receive billions every year from the government because “The white man took America from them.” The whole new and enormous gambling industry Indians alone are allowed to have without restrictions makes Indian history a matter over which a historian can end up in court.

The Indian Industry, like the Black Industry, is depended on by vast numbers of whites as a source of income. What happened in America fourteen thousand years ago is seen by many as a theoretical concern. But any twiddling with the idea that Indians are the natives is of immediate concern to a giant industry.

You will not see this discussed anywhere except BUGS, because no Indian Finkelstein has come forward to write about it.

Always before anyone who said that Europeans were here before Indians was instantly labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjewsjews — a term we need to use more — but now a theory says that and is being accepted with an astonishing calm.

This acceptance, or at least this debate, which would once have been simply met with a shriek of “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!” and then silence on the part of its proponent, can be explained only if you are practiced in the question of “Why was this information produced?”

As I mentioned in my last book, the disappearance of the mammoths and other species fourteen thousand years ago in America was once comfortably blamed on the simultaneous invasion of Man from across the Ice Age Bering Strait land bridge.

That information was welcome because it blamed this horror on Man. This was in full accordance with the Environmentalist Industry. If you don’t think in terms of Conspiracies, you see that no group agreed on it at once and plotted it out carefully

I see that this welcome bit of information was accepted, but, as environmentalism because that Italian playing an Indian with a tear in his eye over what Evil Whites did to His Land, Indians became different from the hated Man of the Environmental Industry.

It blamed the Indian, who loved Brother Buffalo so much, that as his first act in this new land, wiped out a major part of its fauna!

I have pointed out how documentaries usually end with the Sermon at the end, telling how the events it is discussing fit into the Party Line on history or whatever other subject it deals with. The Sermon at the end of this one was a work of art.

I get complaints if my pieces are too long, so I’ll explain this in The Indian Industry 2.

James Edwards of the Political Cesspool was denounced in June by Keith Obermann as the “the worst person in the world.”

I am trying hard not to be jealous, but it is not easy. I told John Ashbrook that one the great pleasures of working for him was that, in any political gathering or at any cocktail party, when I said I worked for John Ashbrook all the right people shied away.

Some years ago I also talked about James’ beautiful young wife. I know that thing about not coveting, but who can I fool?

There’s a reason we’re GRUMPY old men.

I don’t listen to James’ show because I don’t listen to ANYTHING. Honestly, after writing, giving and listening to thousands of speeches listening is a chore for me. But the Cesspool is obviously becoming an outlet for people who are famous but beyond the fringe.

Mel Gibson’s father, Hutton Gibson, has been on the Cesspool at least twice now, and the famous Arizona sheriff who makes his jailees live in tents was on, too.

There is a continuum of respectability in our society. We all remember how the militias screamed against all “racists” the moment they got a little publicity that was not wholly hostile. Respectable conservatives are the media’s ever-ready lynch mob against anything the left decides is intolerable to it.

That continuum is a practical matter. It needs to be discussed and the rings of that ladder named.

I have found that what really hurts our established religion is when one starts discussing the Politically Correct Order of Preference. PC required Women’s Liberation, but what if the woman who was raped was raped by a black man?

This is like quoting the California guy who asked, “Are we still boycotting grapes?” No respectable conservative would do that. No respectable conservative would discuss with a liberal the exact priorities of the preference ladder we all know about?

Respectable conservatives make their living avoiding anything that hits home like that. But I am the only one who talks about exactly what a respectable conservative avoids. It is perfect guide to what hits home.

The Ladder of Political Correctness for each group, the Ladder of Respectability, quoting the most slavish statements on the left. These were the kind of analysis by which I made my living.

The Ladder of Respectability tells you where liberals are hurting. They divert public hostility they can no longer ignore into the direction that hurts least. So they gave up gun control, and militia groups obediently began to denounce racism. To a person who doesn’t do this sort of thing for a living, this is a connection that sounds almost esoteric, but it is actually routine.

I had to know what legislation could be passed by our side and when. I knew exactly where and how they were backing down in one area to retrench in another. It is called strategy, and it is professional matter.

And when they give respectability or even attention, you have to talk openly about what they are going to want in return.

You see, they, too, have their professionals.

The political front is not called strategy for nothing.

I know James, and we talked about all this stuff years ago. He is a hale and well-met, smiling chap, but I hope the cold steel I saw back then remains beneath his charm.

We laugh and joke, but we do not play. This is a war, not a game.

Please let me know if what I am saying here bores you. It is not on our subject, but it is general history that will die with me.

Obama has raised the minimum wage. In the debate over this, no one mentions where it came from.

After the Civil War the Northerners who then owned all the railroads made agreements that kept industry up North, especially in New England. These agreements were a major part of legislative history no one hears about, and they kept the center of American industry slightly NORTH of the center of industrial production in CANADA!

As these railroad rates were slowly being equalized after the Republican defeat in 1932, industry began to move south. Nobody but me remembers that that was where the minimum wage got its majority vote.

Unions have no minimum wage workers, so people wonder why they are the biggest force in favor of it. Now it is to keep two minimum wage workers from replacing one union man. But in 1935 it had to do with the evening of railroad rates.

Unions were afraid that a huge part of their jobs would move to the low-wage South. So with the South having all the chairmanships ruling congress — all the seniority from when most of the few Democrats in congress were Southern — the unions demanded that the competition be limited by a minimum wage for Southern labor.

Mommy Professor teaches that it was Idealists and Intellectuals like him who gave thought to the working poor that caused the minimum wage.

Unlike Mommy Professor, I have KNOWN a lot of working people.

The most fanatical opponent of a minimum wage rise I ever met was a black man who worked on our brick plant. He didn’t drink and he fired the kilns and supported a big family.

Normally the “fireman” had to stoke the kilns every half hour or every hour. So he just slept in between. He preferred being in the plant to his crowded home and his family could come see him at the plant nearby.

There wasn’t a lot of entertainment in Pontiac, South Carolina.

So he was happy to put in a hundred hours a week when the minimum wage was a dollar an hour. He got $1.50 for the other sixty hours. That was $130 a week.

When the minimum wage went up to $1.25 we could not longer afford his overtime. He went down to 50 a week and had nothing to do the rest of the time.

The unions were right. Their area has been known as The Rust Belt for a long time. The minimum wage was passed to keep the flow of industry to the South down.

Our use of the term Mantra Thinking could sound strange to the Beatles in their New Age time with guru in the sixties or to the 90s New Age fad. To them a Mantra is something to clear the mind of all thought.

To them, the word mantra is from later, colored India. India turned brown, stagnated, and died. Those who have not outgrown their college education assume that Real Wisdom comes from the places that have turned brown, stagnated, and mummified.

The other use of the word mantra today is something that repeats and repeats, which is part of our program. But the phrase Mantra THINKING sounds strange in that use, too. They see a mantra entirely as repetition.

White India developed the aquatic rice that made regimented China one-fifth of the world’s population for the last two thousand years. Its Mantras were not Wise Ways blanking your mind or creating incomprehensible tomes, but a kind of thinking that took a low-yield land product and transformed it as utterly as the whale changed as it went from a four-footed small omnivore to the Blue Whale and dolphin.

This was the kind of mind that we now go to for its colored descendants’ poverty and mindlessness.

Everything we talk about here relates, and one can only understand this by seeing clearly that we are still Aryans, and we use the term Mantra in the same sense our white Indian relatives did.

Today the words Indian Mantra means something that sounds profound but is actually meaningless. It is meaningless because white India did not say this sort of thing as an end but as a beginning.

We call them axioms. We call them Basic Laws.

Yes, we repeat our Mantra, but we repeat it the way a person educating a people has to begin by repeating the alphabet. We do not feel that the end result should be people sitting and repeating the alphabet as a Wise Saying in a money-raising pamphlet.

The alphabet is a necessary repeat for one to enter the world of literacy. The Mantra is a weapon in itself, but it also frees the mind to see the world as a whole. When you see white genocide for what it is, you can begin to see a whole new world of thought.

Axioms lead to postulates. Supply and Demand are not the end, they are the beginning. I think our ancient cousins would have understood perfectly the Laws of Thermodynamics are not just words to be repeated as you sit there with a begging cup in front of you or to impress rich New Agers with.

To the gurus with the Cadillacs, the term Mantra Thinking would be a super no-no.

The New Age use of the word mantra reflects an awful tragedy.

If we “brown out,” I can see people calling themselves “humble scientists” sitting there repeating mysterious equations with their begging cups, or becoming advisors of their brown Raja in the name of the Ancient Wisdom that once went to the Moon.

The danger of going brown is seen only if we use real, Aryan Mantra Thinking which BEGINS with wisdom and proceeds FROM there.