Archive for September, 2010

How to WIN

They just found the Czar’s gold. The Soviet regime had been looking for it since 1917.

Today the media Party Line is that the USSR suddenly collapsed economically in the 80s. Actually, the only thing that was holding it up was petroleum exports.

Petroleum was well known before Lenin took over.

But the media still wants the impression left that it wasn’t the whole silly ass system that was held together only by force, but “mistakes” at the end.

Once Americans got in there, Afghanistan, which was considered a land about as poor in resources as Japan, we found, says BoardAd, that:

“The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe.”

Few of you remember the image of the Soviet Empire projected in the US during the Cold War. It was like our side’s version of the Jewish Conspiracy, a united, dedicated set of people working under almost infallible geniuses.

In fact, the group that the rapid economic advances of the Soviet Union that they reported to the UN and that the CIA threw its whole reputation behind was at the University of Virginia when I was in grad economics.

Craig Roberts was one of my fellow grad students.

I was on just about every front that actually brought down the Soviet Empire, from economics to the streets of Louisville on the making of the Reagan Democrats. It made me feel good when someone commented recently that I had been a major force in the Cold War victory.

What is important about this is that you must have a very realistic estimate of the enemy to bring him down.

I won’t bore you with too much of this because it would be lot of articles, some long. But at every weak point, I was active in the background. I want you to know that, when it comes to political warfare, I really am experienced in WINNING.

I was essential to saving the space telescope and Edward Teller came by our office to thank Congressman Ashbrook personally. It was Jerry Pournelle who told Reagan about the Strategic Defense Initiative that finally brought them down.

I am not interested in the public knowing about this. But I do want YOU to know it. YOU who are fighting this greater war for the survival of our race should KNOW it is very winnable and that your seminar leader knows what he is doing better than anybody else on this planet.

When I say the picture of the Great Conspiracy can ruin our efforts, I am harking back to the years I spent doing the same thing about the Great Soviet Genius.

The enemy has gaping holes in his lines, and the Mantra is our Strategic Defense Initiative.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

Little Jews

I mentioned before that Portnoy’s Complaint started with Portnoy proving he was a good man. But every instance of his being a good man was what he did for Jews.

Portnoy’s Complain, as I said, was a best-seller among Jews because it expressed their own internal psychoanalysis, and among gentiles because this as a new, unguarded frankness about Jews, a new thing to them.

A major theme every good Jew hears every Saturday is how everybody else is bad to Jews. If sermon after sermon in a church declared how evil the Jews are to everybody else, it would be suppressed.

Jews are raised on resentment. I have often said that today’s Christianity is just self-hatred and today’s Judaism consists entirely of feeling sorry for themselves.

The influence of churches on Western gentile thinking does not end when a person becomes a lapsed Catholic or an agnostic Protestant. New England’s rabid intolerance of and hostility to the West and the South, including that of the Kennedys, is straight out its Puritan background.

Harvard persecutes those who are suspected of believing in heresy as Cotton Mather did.

Jews do not leave their resentments when they leave the synagogue.

An American Jew invented the term “melting pot,”, Emma Lazarus declared America open to all other peoples, but in her time she was better known as a crusading Zionist, seeking a homeland for Jews only.

Franz Boas introduced the idea that all non-whites had a common cause with Jews. To him, anybody who was not a white gentile was the common enemy. He was a Marxist, but his thinking came straight out of his childhood religion, just as that of Harvard does.

Benjamin Franklin points out that, though he was a Free Thinker, he doubted he would have had his dedication to Morality and the Virtues if he had not been raised in a strictly Christian household.

Jews are dedicated to their own, as Portnoy details. It never occurs to him otherwise. Many great truths are spoken of only in jest.

And this truth is critical to us. Jews as a group are fanatically devoted to minorities against whites because resentment is their morality. They are ferocious when they get on the race issue because to them non-whites are honorary Jews, little Jews.

I think that is what made Germany go Nazi. German Jews were solidly Communist before Hitler entered politics. Even a Jew has written a book about how the sudden rise of Communism terrified the Germans and he blames that as much as the genetic Evil of Germans for Hitler’s rise. He got a lot of criticism, but the book got published.

Mantra Thinking sees what is actually there. White suicide as our morality owes more to our own Traditional Values, from Zoroaster through Saint Paul, than it does to the Jews. Latin countries were pushing “asimilacion” centuries before Franz Boas was born.

Jewish hostility, everyone must now agree that Jews are immune to simple Hate, is endemic.

We Christians must see and overcome our self-hatred. If Jews do not similarly overcome their hostility to those around them, they must be expelled.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

Our Ancestors Got Jews By Misrepresenting the Bible

In Portnoy’s Complaint about the first thing Portnoy did was explain was how he had been a good man. If he had been a Christian he would have talked about charity or kindliness or love of his fellow man. Being a Jew, all he talked about was what he had done for Jews.

Being brought up in an environment where the very definition of virtue for a 1950s Good Christian was what you as a white did for non-whites, and for a Southerner was to denounce or at least ignore the South or anything else you were loyal to. This was a whole new point of view.

In fact, a major reason Portnoy’s Complaint was such a hit was because it really did sound like a Jew really psychoanalyzing himself. Jews bought it because, warts and all, no one is more interesting to you than yourself, and others read it because it was a startling revelation of real Jewish thought.

This is why the Good Samaritan was such a shock to Jesus’ orthodox Jewish listeners. To them Samaritans were as Jewish as Luther in 1530 was a Christian to the pope.

It is not true that Jews do not forbid usury. They invented the prohibition. But usury was taking interest from other Jews, so they could do it in Christian Europe, whereas Christians were forbidden to charge interest to other Christians or to God’s People.

The Commandment does not forbid lying. It forbids bearing false witness against thy neighbor. This meant other Jews. So Jesus, as He did so often, took upon Himself the power to change the Commandments Himself, as He did when He and His disciples worked on the Sabbath and when He took the gigantic step of reducing the Ten Commandments to two.

Bible literalists love to quote Jesus as saying that He had not come to change a jot or a tittle of the Law and the Prophets so they can put the Old Testament on the same level with the Gospels. They NEVER quote His next statement after He reduced the Commandments to two: “This is the Law and the Prophets.”

Theologians are not always completely straightforward, to coin an understatement. The shortest book in the Bible, the Book of Titus, says to Christians, “If you are a slave, be a good slave.” It also says “If you are a good master, be a good master.”

The idea that Jesus was a social revolutionary in this world is absurd because Jesus, as CS Lewis uncompromisingly says, did not believe that this WAS the real world.

To mention this in church today would give a preacher the same heebie-jeebies that a Marxist would feel if he called the Party Line “orthodoxy,” or a liberal if he called Political Correctness, The Party Line.

Bible Literalists do not ever mention that He was demonstrating that He WAS the fulfillment of the Law and Prophets. He made that so clear when He drove the money changers from the Temple that He was finally arrested and crucified for it. Those people had their place in the Temple by every Jewish authority, because nothing could be in the Temple otherwise.

Jesus finally overruled the Authorities in the Temple itself, the official representatives of the Law and the Prophets.

Anti-whites love to quote Paul when he said that there were no longer any Jews or Greeks and so forth. They say he was advocating their program of getting rid of whitey. But he was also saying that Jews were no more the People of the Book than anybody else.

But we got Jews as a permanent Western population because of these selective quotations. Jews were allowed to settle in Christian countries where any other non-Christians, or the wrong kind of Christians, were burned alive.

Look at the instances I give above. A lot of people talk about Jews, but nobody dares notice why were HAVE them.

In the teeth of Jesus’ overruling the Old Law and becoming its fulfillment, in the teeth of His telling the Jews to their faces that no man comes to the Father but by Him, the People of the Book were taken into our society in huge numbers.

This is what happens when Christianity becomes Wordism

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Twelfth Anniversary

BoardAd reminds me that Whitaker Online began on September 12, 1998. For the first time, I will announce our WOL/BUGS anniversary on the right date instead of realizing it later.

I had been writing emails to a small group of people and one of them asked me to begin a blog for the Southern Nationalists. He got us started on the technical side, and there may have been fifty readers.

A good teacher learns more than his students do. I don’t think there is any other blog which has a tenth as much intellectual WORK in it as this one does. Everything has evolved, from my audience to my message to my whole approach.

If it were not so much against the political grain, the last twelve years could be the Montesque’s Essays of Blogdom, developing into the form of a modern blog just as the medium itself became general.

I can’t imagine anybody has learned as much from BUGS as I did developing it. As a graduate assistant in Political Science and then a professor of economics, I felt I had never really read the textbooks until I had to teach them.

The same is true of BUGS, on several levels.

The Southern Nationalist movement turned out to be a front for some Presbyterian theocrats, and it did the usual split. But I learned about blogs, and both sides in the split carried Whitaker Online, for which neither side ever forgave me.

All they were arguing about is ancient history. We are their only legacy, and it is one hell of a legacy.

In that long stretch of years, I couldn’t get my book out, surprise, surprise, it was a screed against the whole professorial class that tells people what to publish. One publisher took it on my credentials and then READ it, and then told me that they not only would not publish it, they were DESTROYING ALL CORRESPONDENCE relating to it!

There is such a thing as being TOO accurate!

I spoke at a New Orleans conference and found Stormfront. On Stormfront I was famous for cutting down the anti-whites but no one would use my arguments. That is the story of my life, so I used what I had, I EVOLVED what I had.

Twelve years down the road, we have a simple message and a group to spread it. Like supply and demand or Newtonian Physics, it sounds simple once you GET it. But the job of hammering it down and then slowly finding people who GET it has required thousands of hours of work by me, and even more by those who, for nothing but the Cause, did what I could not do.

It looks simple, in retrospect, but I have been a professional writer for many decades. One of the first things you learn about writing is that when a piece ends up looking so logical that the author just sat down and wrote what was on his mind, there is blood on the typewriter keys.

It is the easy flow of the professional writer that makes it look so easy. I don’t know how many people have said to me, “I can say things, but I can’t WRITE them” When a professional writer has rewritten his piece a dozen times, it is easy reading, it flows naturally, or LOOKS natural. Naturally people wonder why they can’t write exactly what they are thinking of exactly like that.

Gravity was around for billions of years when Newton came along. Everybody PRACTICED the economics of supply and demand for millennia, but nobody THOUGHT IT OUT until Adam Smith.

As In the development of WOL/BUGS, what you end up with looks like what you would have started with.

It’s OBVIOUS.

It’s SIMPLE.

What in the hell has Bob been DOING for twelve long years?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

Political Correctness is the Party Line

Does anybody remember the term Party Line? It was invented and used exclusively and openly by the Communist Party for decades. A Croatian told me that the word for it in Communist Yugoslavia was “political rectitude,” political correctness.

The Part Line on June 21, 1941 was militant neutrality between the Allies and the Axis. On June 22, 1941 the Party Line became militant anti-Axis. That was the day Germany invaded the USSR.

The Croatian did not realize until I explained it to him that political rectitude is political correctness. In English the term “rectitude” is too old fashioned for common use, but not in Croatian.

In Croatian, “rectitude” is relatively new. It is a Latin word. It was adopted very early in the Latin using West but later in the Slavic world. So we use it, and translate it from Russian, as “correctness.”

English is as far as I know the only language which adopted the term “Party Line.” The reason for this is obvious to us older folk. A party line meant a telephone line that several people used. You couldn’t call while someone else on the party line was speaking, and it was famous for gossipers to listen in on.

Political Correctness was entirely a Marxist term because other religions have other words for the same thing, like “orthodoxy,” but of course the term “orthodoxy” would be poison to a Marxist.

So they wrote each other about what is translated as “political correctness” or “political rectitude” which is translated into English from those letters dating back into the Stalin period as “political correctness.” The interpretations are not fooled by the nature of that term, but respectable conservatives show the usual cowlike blank face when one points it out.

Liberals don’t choose pet conservatives to point out that political correctness is the same thing as the Party Line, though every translator knows it. Party Line makes their direct association with Marxism too obvious.

Political Correctness is the Party Line. When Moscow represented the Party Line on Strategic Defense against Reagan, Teddy Kennedy committed treason so blatant it was actually reported after his death that he allied with Andropov to defeat Reagan on it.

It was a desperate and carefully forgotten campaign which united the entire left against what Kennedy called Star Wars. All the way from Peking to Saturday Night Line to Superman the Nuclear Freeze was a titanic campaign.

Jay Leno even talked about how the comedians had been mobilized in the solid leftist front. It is a secret kept only by conservatives who want liberal approval.

No translator is fooled. Jay Leno, no conservative himself, was not fooled.

No, one must have one’s livelihood on the line to miss that obvious point

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

Internal Consent

In the novel 1984, the all-powerful State went to the trouble of beating an arrested person down until he loved Big Brother.

THEN they shot him. But not before his mind was made pure. Not until he consented INTERNALLY.

And they said so.

The subject of Orwell’s novel asked them why, since they already had him on a death sentence for his speech and writings, they spent so much time and effort, even the time of a top Party member, torturing him and beating him down.

The senior Party member said that the essence of this horrendous tyranny was that they would not settle for outward conformity. They had to get IN the mind and make it consent.

The last words of the novel are, “He loved Big Brother.”

The essence of freedom is that one can be made to obey the laws, but not that you have to believe in them. An old hit song used to say, “You can’t arrest a guy for what he’s thinking.”

The 1964 Civil Rights Act brought an end to that. It said Federal aid was to be denied states that did not intend to integrate at the greatest speed they could manage. Anyone from a Southern State who did not guarantee that he was FOR integration risked sanctions, the least of which was the withdrawal of Federal aid, against its schools.

You won’t see this discussed anywhere else.

The Boston Southies were the only people I have ever met who had both a memory and a conscience. When I was up there handling their press relations, several of them told me that they had cheered when the Feds had enforced integration in the South.

Now the Southie’s children were being bussed. Now they understood what we were talking about.

What is unique is that THEY remembered it, that THEY brought it up.

They REMEMBERED it. They were ASHAMED of it. I have not run into such people since, and I had not before.

The star of MASH made a movie where he played a crusading liberal senator. A high point of the movie was when he exposed the fact that a Southern official had criticized integration in private conversation. The whole court said, “AAAH!”

When Senator McCarthy did that sort of thing it was condemned. Private opinions were sacrosanct. The fact that Robert Oppenheimer had only Communist friends was not to be used against him. You had to prove actual treason, not a mere admiration for Stalinists who were gobbling up the world.

The crime now is doing what I do, refusing to say that I have no concern whatsoever about the end of my own race.

Today the charge is “racism,” and racism means that you do not consent INTERALLY to the disappearance of your race. The last time we had that sort of demand for internal consent it was called the Inquisition.

Anti-whites are, literally, Thought Police.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments

The Mantra World

In the 1950s anti-whites would insist my racist stance was because I was a provincial. They would point out that the world population was overwhelmingly non-white, so Americans could not afford to concentrate on saving the white race.

Regular as clockwork, I would say what nobody else ever said, “That is exactly the reason I am a segregationist.. If we don’t fight miscegenation our race will disappear.”

Then, regular as clockwork, they would go from me being a provincial to me being an alarmist. As Senator Edward Kennedy said in the debate over removing the national origins provisions from the Immigration Act, “If we are being overwhelmed, we’ll just change it.”

They laughed their asses off at me when I predicted in high school that Federal troops would be used to enforce integration. They laughed at the idea that the third world would pour in.

Even then I knew how weak Europeans were. If America set the standard, Europe would open its borders. But at a time when the fight was over one black entering a Southern University, the idea of hordes of non-whites pouring in was laughed at.

So here we are.

Our language was not sophisticated but it was dead accurate:

“Give a nigger an inch and he’ll take a mile.”

“Integration is like pregnancy. There’s no such thing as a little pregnancy.”

What scared me was the MENTALITY I saw behind the race-mixers.

They used to argue that all that was needed was little bit of integration, let black students attend white schools if they wanted to. The courts got rid of THAT right quick. But I was known as Federal Troops when I predicted in high school that the Feds would have to send Federal troops at us.

No one remembers any of that.

And no one ever reminds them.

I spoke the Mantra in my early teens.

Those who fight the Mantra lean heavily on their own provinciality. They say they are only advocating open borders and assimilation in the countries where they live, so it is not an attack on the white race.

Many a self-styled British Patriot has wrapped himself in his flag and said he loves anybody who is British, whatever their color. You have to recite that crap to get promoted in the US Army.

But nobody in Japan is required to insist that he is for open borders. Nobody in Singapore says the world is welcome there. It’s funny how the “Patriots” are in WHITE countries.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

OUR Blog

A commenter with good taste said he or she was getting a lot out of backbaygrouch, (BBG)‘s comments and asked if BBG had a blog a of his own. He does. It is the blog you are reading now.

Take it from me, it would be a lot of work for BBG to set up his own blog. And tiny blogs tend to get tinier. I don’t think anybody but a monomaniacal would want a columnist’s job of writing a new piece each day for free.

This is Dave’S and Simmons’ and Sheri’s blog, too. They do more writing here than most private bloggers do on their own sites.

This group’s comments on the daily article helps, but I get a lot of joy looking at General Comments IV. There we have BUGSers who are actually out there in the field, trying out sites and different approaches.

White Rabbit and Trucker Roy are out there TRYING it, not whining at the rest of us.

White Rabbit, who is out competing for a more general audience, kindly reports to me from time to time. I hope he is not disappointed in my lack of replies, but his reports show that he is going about it in the best way, so what’s to comment on?

White Rabbit is surprised to discover that his site is getting to be “hep” among a lot of young people. I’ve seen that before, as when the conservative movement grew up in the early sixties.

Those responsible for the growth of conservatism brought in young people because they didn’t do the same old bitching about balanced budgets conservative losers repeated endlessly to earn their salaries.

White Rabbit is trying out new approaches, each of them involving a lot of talent and practice. He found that his audience doesn’t grow if he hammers on one issue, so he sticks in Mantra Thinking a lot where he can fit it in.

Which is the way all professional media get their political message across. And it can only be done by practice and experimentation.

After seeing me rail endlessly at News and Jews, WR was almost apologetic in saying that he had found that news sells, so he uses a lot of it. He does that White Rabbit and gets young folks because, his readers say, he delivers hope with his news. His spin on the news gives young people hope and attracts them.

There is no way I will mix WR’s work up with the News and Jews obsessives on SF.

I wear the White Rabbit tee-shirt and act like a proud grandpa, “This is one of MAH granchillen.” The fact that the baby had three other grandparents never comes up, at least in my dialogue.

It is due to my efforts that WE have a blog. So when the commenter asked whether BBG has a blog of his own, it is a compliment to the success of BUGS that he does.

In a team effort, you don’t have to take anything from another team member to feel good about what YOU did to make it possible.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

9 Comments