I, too, have run into people who will argue that the only way to get rid of the race problem is intermarriage, they never say The Final Solution to the race problem, for some reason, and when I recite the Mantra they say they never heard of a race problem.
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”
You certainly can’t dispute the first sentence, so they begin with the second.
You could TRY “a problem called racism. This problem of racism will be solved…”
I predict that a new automatic “DUHHH!” will be invented right there, but you can try it.
Also, the Marxist answer to the Mantra is that once again someone is portraying white people as victims. It goes unanswered. Why doesn’t somebody besides me point out that for somebody to say that people with white skins can’t be victims is as racist a statement as anything Hitler ever said.
Most people have no idea of Marxist doctrine, and the onus will be on him to explain it.
#1 by BGLass on 10/13/2010 - 8:26 am
Can one just say, ‘Everybody talks about race all the time.” And this thing with race, or ‘the problem with race’ (obviously the reason they need to talk about it 24/7) will be solved…’
That everyone talks about race all the time is indisputable. Less pithy, but inarguable, easily provable. And why would they talk about race 24/7 if it wasn’t a problem?
Then some will respond: well, the left tried to make a “problem” where there really wasn’t one (race) in order to accomplish other goals (money, power, whatever). The left makes race exist, pretends race exists, makes an issue of it, just to fulfill their agenda, but race doesn’t really exist, or it wouldn’t even we didn’t talk about it.
But be that as it may– it’s well documented that naming brings things into being, in the sense of self-fulfilling prophecies, so even things that were simply made up do wind up having real effects and consequences in the world, and the effect of making race a divisive issue has become an issue of genocide, even if you refuse to acknowledge that it started out as real or not, and if you really believe it’s just some leftist “social construct.”
Fine. But whatever the case, its effects have become real and visible in the world. You can hear it everyday. Africa for the Africans…
The word ‘issue’ is never disputed, since it’s a liberal word. “An issue with race,’ will always be blindly accepted, why ‘issue’ makes so many people puke.
#2 by Simmons on 10/13/2010 - 1:09 pm
Being anti-white does not, nor will not solve the problem of “racism.” Leftist logic spun about itself. Dealing with cultists they have little capability of thought but they can be turned upon themselves.
#3 by Dick_Whitman on 10/13/2010 - 1:51 pm
Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for EVERYONE!
White people are supposed to accept that they have no right to pursue their own political, cultural, and economic interests. Whites are told they must live according to the rules of “individualism” while everybody else (blacks, hispanics, Jews, Muslims, Asians, etc) are free to live by tribal rule-sets.
Whites are blamed for every evil in history, but then, if they attempt to defend themselves from this accusation, are told that Whites (as a people) don’t even exist.
To atone for their evil history, Whites must celebrate their own demise (“diversity is strength”) and accept mass immigration from the “developing world” into White countries and only White counties. Whites must then “assimilate” these immigrants into their communities, families, schools, work places, churches, and genetic material.
What this is is genocide by forced assimilation.
Of course, anyone who opposes this program of genocide by forced assimilation is a “racist,” and therefore ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.
The people who call Whites “racist” claim they are “anti-racist.”
What they are is anti-White.
“Anti-racism” is a code for anti-White.
#4 by backbaygrouch on 10/14/2010 - 2:55 am
The race problem can only be solved by intermarriage. That is the agenda. Take it from one of the high priests of the race industry. In Roger K. Newman’s, Hugo Black A Biography, Justice Black is quoted on page 550:
“The racial problem won’t be solved in my lifetime or yours,” he said in 1961, “It won’t be solved until there’s intermarriage.”
There it is, straight from the jackass’s mouth. The race traitors believe there is a race problem. They want to solve it. They believe there is only one solution which is to mongrelize Whites.