Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Mantra is About RACE

Posted by Bob on October 16th, 2010 under Coaching Session


When the Black Muslims were attacked by the FBI, they pronounced it “genocide.”

When it was found that the white man’s smallpox may have devastated Easter Island, it was called genocide.

Any use of genocide besides that in the Mantra, which describes the only real genocide going on earth, will be laughed at.

So when a charge is made of genocide against “white CHRISTIANS,” it will be put into the Joke Bin of Genocide. Christianity is not genetic. Religious decimation is a bad thing, but calling it genocide is exactly like calling pneumonia smallpox.

This always happens when you are spreading a hard, banned truth. It always gets a spin on it that makes it a lie. Only the hard truth itself WORKS. I have watched this happen every time I have gone through this process.

Interracial marriage is the Holy Grail of liberals and respectable conservatives. I must use Lord Nelson’s example again, because it is such a clear demonstration of how SUBTLE this disease is. As long as you get away from attacking Holy Assimilation, ALL the charges of heresy end.

So when Lord Nelson found there was less resistance to the idea of Europe “being overwhelmed,” even He unconsciously moved in the direction of lesser resistance.

But even respectable conservatives can talk about “being overwhelmed” while they talk about THE races, as if this were not a problem of our race alone.

What the petition to the UN about the “genocide” of “European Christians” shows is the pressure is on, the genocide everybody can see is beginning to cause rumbles. And the timing is not incidental.

But this petition to the UN has nothing to do with US. There will be plenty of people yelling “cultural genocide.” Every white nationalist party in Europe is going to come up with its variation. But all of them are going avoid the third rail.

The third rail, the one no one dares touch, consists of two parts. The first is the god of respectability, INTERRACIAL marriage. The second part is that this RACIAL assimilation is required ONLY of white countries and of ALL white countries.

To avoid this reality of genuine genocide, the people who have become “leaders” in the old situation will invent alternatives to RACIAL, like this “Christian” nonsense. The BNP says the only problem is the MOSLEM immigration.

And that is because the Moslems WON’T assimilate.

It is a bit tiresome to see commenters swooning over a complaint which has nothing to do with the Mantra. This is what respectables always do for the left, they make lots of noise, but they also change the subject.

It would be MUCH easier if we could just meld in with anything that sounds like the Mantra. But that is why respectable conservatives are so indispensable to everything bad that happens to us. They change the subject from one the enemy cannot deal with to one that it can deal with.

Get off the real, obvious genocide and slide over to religion or “being overwhelmed by immigration,” or religion, and you are on the enemy’s ground, and on that ground he has power to grind you right into the dust.

The only thing we have is that this is NOT cultural. This is not about “mixing THE races.” It is genocide aimed at whites and everybody, at some level, knows it.

Do not have anything to do with someone who tries to get some easy fix on the Mantra. Like respectable conservatives, they are an integral part of our racial enemies.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by BGLass on 10/16/2010 - 11:16 am

    There are some bogus, half-hearted attempts to make it seem the “assimilation” is about everybody; like a movie about non-white intermarriage, or a commercial about real Jamaicans with a real-live American blacks. But there has never been a black-Asian pairing on t.v., much less in every single commercial, no matter how many products don’t sell.

    If one imagines every single white-gentile-looking person with a black person on t.v. ( in every show and commercial) and re-do it (in the mind) as a black and Asian, it seems very strange— Although Asia is still 90%+ Asian. And virtually no Asians in America seem to be with blacks. Not even as friends.

    And no one has yet started the Chinese-World-Assimilation- Society, or Whites For African and Jewish Intermarriage Organization. Or Gentile Facilitation Group for Jews with Australian Aboriginal Partners. Or Gentile Group for Non-white Gentile Parents with Jewish Partners. Someone maybe SHOULD start those, if only to make the point, or out of a supposed sincere desire to help the non-whites who do not seem to mix very nicely with each other, the way “ALL” good people are taught to do. But they won’t.

  2. #2 by Simmons on 10/16/2010 - 11:17 am

    It is the last and “greatest” taboo. Nothing but taboo. This is our world the Indian reservation writ large.

    Always and I mean always refer to the Left’s and Respectables’ dogma as taboo and nothing but taboo.

  3. #3 by Dave on 10/16/2010 - 11:47 am

    Siegecraft is the art of overcoming sieges and the white race is under siege.

    The essential means of our siegecraft is to never forget that this is about race and the fact and reality of race and genetic racial inequality. It is about the fact there is no mankind and that the races vastly differ and are very distinct.

    Our enemies are ghosts. They are ephemeral because they are fixated on things that are ephemeral. But it is more than that. We must never forget their inequality, that is to say, their inferiority.

    To say the Mantra is about race is also to say it is about the genetically determined differences of race that have worked to threaten the annihilation of the white race in a world determined to jealously compensate for genetically determined racial inequality at all costs.

    This accounts for the intolerable jealously of our enemies. Their jealously implies a fear they are to be banished from the future and that the future belongs under an entirely different dominion that is destined to disintegrate all of the certainties of Political Correctness forever. All of them.

    The gnawing jealously of the ghosts causes them to obsess over the question of who (racially and unequally) is to be in possession of the world. And what (racially and unequally) is to ideologically dominate the future.

    The ghosts will avoid honesty in these questions with the whole of their will and to confront these questions from a racially exclusive standpoint means oblivion for the ghosts with the added punishment of eternal submersion for their jealously. That is why the ghosts cannot tolerate segregation. Any allowance of white exclusivity means that particular venue of exclusivity descends to threaten the ghosts through forward linear time.

    They brand their opponents heretics, but their accusations and defamations are sterile and impotent and they know it. You can’t get rid of the tangible substance of race. You can’t get rid of the fact of genetic racial inequality and the facts of genetically based inequality in general. Nor can you get rid of the impulse toward exclusivity based upon superior traits. You can’t get rid of the gathering of racially superior minds and bodies. Try as they may, these things have substance and the ghosts in their ephemeral existence are powerless against things that have real substance.

  4. #4 by BGLass on 10/16/2010 - 12:22 pm

    You can’t get rid of the fact of genetic racial inequality and the facts of genetically based inequality in general. Nor can you get rid of the impulse toward exclusivity based upon superior traits. You can’t get rid of the gathering of racially superior minds and bodies.

    Water seeks its own level. Reminded me of a book by Maxine HOng Kingston, the Woman Warrior, which was required school reading for some in the way back, and won awards, and in it, the whites (also, of course, the people who had to read the book in the schools) were described as ghosts by the Asians.

    Now form and function are reversed. The beautiful people had plastic surgery and they are intelligent BECAUSE they went to Harvard. It seems to only temporarily confuse this drive toward exclusivity based on (REAL) traits. People who are smart because they went to Harvard are seen as liars and anyone smart who went there is angry and embarrassed to have their own intelligence degraded by tricks.

  5. #5 by H.Avenger on 10/16/2010 - 4:16 pm

    Bob,

    In fairness to the lady that filed the complaint, she is differentiating in the assumption that “European Christian” in America would be a covered “ethnic group” under the law. She believes that there is a legal differentiation between ethnic group and race and nationality etc. Thus there would more than one correct way to write the complaint. Which is kinda typical “lawyer like” thinking.

    Basically, in talking with her via email. She was not being a respectable from Washington looking to avoid conflict….just a California legal eagle looking to cause a stink.

    I am not a legal eagle. So I have no idea. But keeping it as simple as GENOTYPE/RACE…..which is where we get the phrase Genocide seems to be best. Especially, since my business is White Rabbit Genocide.

    There is no rule saying that the complaint cannot be quickly copied and pasted with European Christian taken out and replaced with Indo-European GENOTYPE (whatever the correct legal terminology is for OUR RACE). She does not a have a problem with this. And that makes her anything but a respectable conservative. And she actually wrote her first complaint over 10 years ago. She feels the time is right for this right now. And of course, I agree with her on that.

    She wants lots of folks to send in these complaints formally. With that complaints formally filed at the UN. A lawsuit can be brought in any country that has signed on to the 48 Convention. So you don’t have to deal with the American legal system. You could pick and more appropriate venue in another country.

    Of course, the purpose would be to raise a big stink.

  6. #6 by Scrivener on 10/16/2010 - 8:30 pm

    BGLass on October 16th, 2010 at 11:16 am

    There are some bogus, half-hearted attempts to make it seem the “assimilation” is about everybody; like a movie about non-white intermarriage, or a commercial about real Jamaicans with a real-live American blacks.

    I was hit with that one in a thread in Stormfront OV, started by Adelheim at http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t747808/

    The anti-White argued that there ARE media portrayals of non-Whites as bigots if they oppose interracial marriage, and cited a few current movies.

    My response was “Yes, I am aware of at least a few of these. They do not represent the norm (at least not yet). It makes sense, though, since the goal seems to be to create a blended humanity in White countries and only in White countries. In order to get more Whites to race mix, it would be in their interest to condition a population of non-Whites to think of race-mixing as desirable.

    Interracial marriage between Whites and non-Whites is the Holy Grail of liberals and respectable conservatives. Those promoting it will go to any lengths to make it happen.

    Of course, anyone who knowingly instituted a program designed to encourage such racial suicide can be charged with crimes of genocide.

  7. #7 by wes14 on 10/17/2010 - 2:58 am

    Im going to a protest over a White Christian student that was expelled from ASU for refusing to take a re-education course on homosexuality after it was discoverd that her christian views didnt fit with the “tolerance” norms of the school. I was thinking about using a sighn that read somthing like :Only White Christians need to be re-educated, only White Christian nations need to be more tolerant, Tolerance = Anti-White.

    Would that fall into what your talking about in this article?

  8. #8 by Scrivener on 10/17/2010 - 11:36 am

    wes14 on October 17th, 2010 at 2:58 am
    …Only White Christians need to be re-educated, only White Christian nations need to be more tolerant, Tolerance = Anti-White…

    I would stay away from mentioning Christian more than once in your message. I know what you’re saying, but a respectable conservative will look at that and say “actually, it looks like tolerance is anti-Christian.” I know you’re probably limited with a protest sign if you want it to be quickly read and understood, though. I might try something like “Only WHITE Christians need re-education; only WHITE nations are expected to be tolerant; TOLERANCE is anti-WHITE”

    I think that would get your point across AND make it harder for people to assume that Christianity has anything to do with it.

Comments are closed.