Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Everybody Assumes Blacks and Indians are Inferior

Posted by Bob on October 17th, 2010 under Coaching Session

At first, BBC programs were on PBS. The accents were so think that Americans usually couldn’t keep up with them. To the British, these think accents were part of the humor. How one speaks was always a hallmark of one’s identity and one’s clahss.

With syndication into the vast American market, these unintelligible accents disappeared. Our British readers would know if there is still a lot of that there, but Monty Python English is as understandable to an American audience as is American programming.

But Monty Python tapes were almost wiped before they were discovered and sent to America. It is my impression that any British show that stood some chance of getting into this market dropped the heavy accents, just in case.

In the case of IQ studies and crime rates, we have the opposite situation. Thinking over my tens of thousands of exchanges with anti-whites, I came to realize that in almost every case there was no FACTUAL difference between what I thought and my opponent thought.

American thought on other races is, in many ways, amazingly homogenous. Barry Goldwater used to joke, “People think I hedge on integration. I am perfectly consistent on it. When someone brings it up, I always say, ‘Where are you FROM?’”

Now we have few regional differences in accent on this issue. A person who is one generation from white trash and has gotten a college degree will be as fanatically politically correct as the British middle class is class-conscious.

The upper and lower classes in Britain are not at all reserved. But the middle class is painfully so. There are exceptions, but you can fairly well make that a rule. Likewise, the way a person talks on race has to do with his background.

But there is very little real difference among Americans when it comes to how they see the races. That is one reason IQ and crime studies are no longer of much use. There was a time when only Southerners had any experience with blacks in general and Yankees believed that they were all whites with paint on their skin.

That time is now forgotten. Today, all Americans know that blacks are different. It is not that they don’t know it, it’s that, as a matter of political correctness, they must deny it as a matter of, if you will, courtesy.

When a pro-white compares black gyrations as animal, he is being evil. But his opposite number will believe deeply that blacks or Indians are not responsible for anything they do that is wrong. They regard blacks and Indians as innocent, and that innocence is of the animal type.
When someone says that we are whites claiming to be victims, it never occurs to us that that is as blatant a racist statement as ever came out at a Klan rally. Why? Because we agree with it. It is part of the pattern of thought of whites, so neither the left or the right sees it as anything else.

Anti-whites talk about minorities in exactly the same way that the ASPCA talks about puppies.

So do we.

  1. #1 by BGLass on 10/17/2010 - 9:08 am

    ‘A person who is one generation from white trash and has gotten a college degree will be as fanatically politically correct as the British middle class is class-conscious.
    The upper and lower classes in Britain are not at all reserved. But the middle class is painfully so…you can fairly well make that a rule. Likewise, the way a person talks on race has to do with his background.’

    In America, the lower middle class (as opposed to the professional middle-middle business class) got hit maybe the hardest, the ones who were told they could “better themselves through education,” and who were, in that way, set up to receive the brunt of Gramsci’s ‘long march through the institutions.’

    Like the moms who got dumped in the 70s, the circumstances for the breakup of marriages they’d expected to last were destroyed—and then they were sent “back to school” on their own version of the G.I. Bill. The Weakest Generations’ G.I. thing was replayed for the ‘back to school divorcee’, and made to coincide with the gutting of the universities (for anything involving western civilization).

    Often they are cut down, but it is a very volatile group. They were doubly betrayed (once, in that the lives they’d had reason to expect in marriage, were destroyed); then again, when “education” delivered something so compromised— sell out what’s left of your family and children for the money to feed them and pretend to like it, or don’t and wind up with nothing. A nasty situation for those newly-minted-single-mother-taxed cash cows.

    Taxing double the population set the scene for now.

    But these folks should be given their due, imo, (instead of vilified for traitors) for what was done to them, and in this way, restored to their true life narrative, where they can be angry at the right people and more useful.

    The lower middle class –the step from ‘white trash’– has produced the most rabidly anti-white whites, maybe.

    And class and race really isn’t as interesting to the American left as Generations. They talk about race and class, but if they lose their power to take youth from their own parents, then they would be in trouble. Class and race are secondary. Generations and how they are worked with is something they never discuss. The silent thing.

    Deep down, a lot of those lower-middle-class single moms really have a LOT OF HATE, lol, and cracking denial.

    Also, they had been raised to be moms (to nurture, protect, etc.) and NATURALLY WANTED to go into “careers” (since they now had to have them) that would involve carrying on heritage and safety for kids (teachers, nurses, artists, etc.)

    In other words, the jobs to which they would be most inclined at first glance, would be the exact areas attacked by the left from the 60s on, like the shift from English departments to “Humanities,” and the inclusion of pseudo-sciences. And they were too stuck to protest, and also no one already existed to explain what was happening, maybe. And anyway, the girls hadn’t really had to go to these schools before, so what did they know? They didn’t know what to expect.

    This lower-middle-class, and especially those women, maybe, will be the last to break free. Slowly understanding what they were trained to do to the very children they were most motivated to protect and would have given their lives for, maybe too much for them. Many of them just keep trying to lie to themselves.

    Well, make that Triple Betrayal: b/c now they have lost their church mice savings, too.

  2. #2 by BGLass on 10/17/2010 - 9:21 am

    Also— whether they work in a field where that pc degree is required has a lot to do with whether they will retain the pc attitudes or not.

    This “recession” is “educating” (centrally offered free education) non-whites (as opposed to the white ex-soldiers of 1950, or the white women workers of the 1970s). The white children abandoned during that time were offered nothing. Those kids and their angry moms are out there. And the moms are often in early retirement, or “going back to school” AGAIN. So, they are not using the p.c. attitude to make a living as much now. It must be millions of people.

    Oh— AND they (and the children they were forced to abandon, selling out their own principles) are smarter than many people on t.v., statistically. Once they see it that way, there is hell to pay.

  3. #3 by Dave on 10/17/2010 - 11:49 am

    There is so much that is simply hard wired

    But the larger issue has to do with absence of behavioral standards in general and the layered veils of lies offered in excuse, and that is where the reign of Political Correctness is most vicious.

    Political Correctness must prevent any form of etiquette that upholds the dignity of persons that are genuinely owed it, so that dereliction prevails without fail. The minute Political Correctness permits even one instance of justice to transpire, its reign is over.

    This is the raw essence of bullying.

    It is essential to understand what is really going on – worldwide.

    There is a reason the cross-dressing abominations that inhabit courtrooms in black robes elevate the very lowest among us to equal and even better status over the very highest and the reason is that such treatments in the name of “equality” are the most effective means of abolishing any opportunity for genuinely righteous aims to prevail. That is why, for example, the black robed abominations found it necessary to desegregate schools in white countries and destroy white societies in Africa. Racial exclusivity was bound to produce righteous aims.

    Bullies by their very nature must run with the gutter rats. Anything that elevates anyone above rats must be eradicated.

    The tenets of equality are so very useful toward that end, especially when it is obvious to everybody that these tenets bear no connection to reality. Lawyers traffic in this kind of crap all the time, absolving themselves of any integrity whatsoever. An anti-white white lawyer can found to promote any treason against white people anywhere on earth. This treason is invariably advanced by verbal sewage usually taking the form of “international communitarian standards” and the usual trick of blaming the world’s ills on a legacy of “white colonialism”.

    They are the willing participants of bully systems. They are cowards with no integrity and behave no differently than the standard set by the WW II “Greatest Generation”, always willing to surrender and betray at the earliest opportunity.

  4. #4 by Dick_Whitman on 10/17/2010 - 1:30 pm

    I think it was Bob who pointed this out in one of his audio lectures, but it’s worth mentioning again.

    Every now and then a mountain cat in Colorado will come down from the hills and eat a little kid living in an exurban subdivision.

    Liberals will claim that it’s White people’s fault for encroaching on the cat’s habitat. The assumption is that the cat can’t help it, and this is generally correct for wild animals.

    Every now and then blacks will get mad, riot in the street, and pull White people from their cars and beat them.

    Liberals will claim that it’s White people’s fault for creating a “system of oppression” and that black anger just boiled over.

    To liberals the bobcats and the blacks are similar in that the assumption is that they both don’t have the ability to control their behavior. For the liberal blaming blacks for rioting is as absurd as blaming bobcats for eating kids.

    THEY CAN’T HELP IT says the liberal.

    Now if there was ever a case of “White supremacy,” this is it!

    If White people ever started rioting and started pulling blacks out of their cars for beatings, liberals (and respectable conservatives) would be calling for the blood.

    But bobcats and blacks (we are told) can’t help it when they do this? This is more “White Supremacist” than anything on Stormfront.

  5. #5 by Simmons on 10/17/2010 - 2:33 pm

    I assume everyone including Bob knows this, the Mantra presented in long form was in the CofCC paper “Informer”, written very well IMO by Christian Miller, but if not it is worth finding a copy or asking the CofCC to put it up on their site.

  6. #6 by seriouswon on 10/17/2010 - 3:23 pm

    I think this is the article you are speaking of Simmons.

Comments are closed.