Hurricane Katrina was a landmark that, as usual, no one noticed. It was the first time in history that foreign aid was a major factor in an AMERICAN disaster.
Historically it was the United States that provided aid when disaster struck, even the nan-made Civil War disaster in the Ukraine and Russia in the areas that the Communists controlled in the early twenties, when a man named Herbert Hoover ran the effort. Until New Orleans, ALL such aid was one-way, at least since the saving of Jamestown in 1609.
But when blacks took over New Orleans, it ceased to be what was historically known as an AMERICAN disaster. It became a minority area disaster.
Katrina was a window on the “no whites” future dreamed of by “anti-racists.”
There is, if your mind is broad, a connection between almost every subject, each discussed briefly and alone, in BUGS. I have repeatedly made the point that no one in this generation knows what starvation really IS.
Jane Fonda, who of course was raised in poverty in her father’s house, is constantly talking about starvation.
You may have noticed that not one of the endless “public service ads” demanding private donations for colored countries EVER mentions the word “starvation” any more.
They simply show what wretched conditions the average child in a colored country has to live in. New Orleans was simply this world phenomenon coming to America.
When the colored world includes Europe and America, we will once again learn what the word starvation REALLY means.
But this changeover is not recognized because all people want to talk about is the latest news. When I was young the debate was about how fast each country’s economy was growing. The brilliant Intellectuals and Idealists of the USSR were “catching up” with the United States.
Note the term “catching up.” The United States at that time had 2.3% annual REAL increase in PER CAPITA income. The only debate was about how much faster other countries were catching up.
According to Soviet figures, the USSR was coming on fast.
That was the WHOLE debate back then, how fast America was GROWING compared with the “centrally planned economies” and Germany and Japan.
Once again, the least noticed thing that has changed is the thing that has changed MOST.
All of the old assumptions about GROWTH have been dead for over a generation.
In other words, the predictions of us racists stopped being PREDICTIONS decades ago.
We predicted a decline, but as a matter of simple arithmetic we will learn to take stagnation for granted and then we will learn not to notice decline.
Why should we apologize for being right?
We said that the decline of the white race meant stagnation and then decay.
We were dead right.
Everything is right on schedule.
New Orleans is tomorrow.
#1 by BGLass on 10/20/2010 - 7:52 am
“…When I was young the debate was about how fast each country’s economy was growing….”
Now the words used deal with DEVELOPING the U.S. It’s said all the time.
Americans live in a DEVELOPING COUNTRY. It is described that way. Developing parts of it (to keep certain areas up with areas that have not yet declined). Developing and REBUILDING.
The introduction of bottled water en masse surely means the water will cease to be drinkable, just like the ‘third world.’
After Katrina, especially right after, what was noticed but not stated openly was the MANY disasters around the country that got little play, but that tiny bit was still in the public mind, and where NO HELP was extended. Floods in the midwest, rock and mud slides, coal miner tragedies, toxic sludge breaks, everybody’s possessions and homes lost, often lives as well, etc. Why do some get help and not others? That unconscious question was in many minds. Why do some get “documentation” (movies, fund drives, rescue, telethons, etc.) and others not. What is it—when a small group so openly decides who lives and dies? As they watched, people wondered that unconsciously.
#2 by Dave on 10/20/2010 - 9:58 am
The fact that per capita real incomes in America have permanently ceased to grow is profound in and of itself.
But there is something even more profound as multitudes fall into the abyss and that is the shedding of delusions and the growth of a militant frame of mind and way of being for our people.
Our enemies in their insanity, in their psychopathic certitudes, actually help foster this state of mind within us. Madmen and madwomen are unable to assess their effect on others. They are wholly focused in their narrowness.
Political Correctness really does not see what it is creating. The pain, suffering, and humiliations it inflicts have deep and broad consequences. They are unaware that they are ceding the world to us.
This, of course, is how it must be.
#3 by James C on 10/20/2010 - 12:14 pm
Dave’s comment reminded me of something I’ve read before.
“One can only understand the [enemy] when one knows what his ultimate goal is. And that goal is, beyond world domination, the annihilation of the world…
His nature compels him to that goal, even though he dimly realizes that he must thereby destroy himself. There is no other way for him; he must act thus.
This realization of the unconditional dependence of his own existence upon that of his victims appears to me to be the main cause for his hatred.
To be obliged to try and annihilate us with all his might, but at the same time to suspect that that must lead inevitably to his own ruin — therein lies, if you will, the tragedy of Lucifer.”