Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Blog Market is TOUGH

Posted by Bob on October 21st, 2010 under Coaching Session


Back in my day, the professional commentators never even appeared in public before they had been vetted. Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather went up through the media bureaucracy to get into the small group from which their Anchor Man status was chosen.

Blog audiences are one hell of a lot tougher. You don’t have to complain when I let you down, though I would prefer it. You just don’t show up.

When I was getting dangerously tired, I took some time off and BoardAd, who knows my writings better than anybody else, would put in Blasts From the Past from a decade of writing and my books.

BoardAd called me back fast because our readership from dropping like a rock.

That was an IMPORTANT experience, and unlike the old Commentators, I had to THINK about it.

In the days when ABC, NBC, CBS and “Educational” TV were the only choices, people wrote thousands of letters of complaint. Rather could tell those people to go to hell if they didn’t like his East Coast opinions.

The blog world is, to say the least, a bit different. You have literally millions of choices and more every day. We used to need TV as our one choice for visual entertainment at home. But the blog world doesn’t even have that advantage. Most people use the Internet all the time and never look at a blog.

It reminds me of how Mommy Professor is always praising the Marxist countries because there “The Intellectual” is supposed to rule. A Mommy Professor wouldn’t last two weeks in a real Communist bureaucracy.

Dan Rather or Walter Cronkite wouldn’t last a week on a blog except for their Big Names. Phil Donahue tried a cable network show, Big Name and all, where he commented on politics. He was out on his ass in a month.

Everybody who goes on the Internet, like our White Rabbit, finds that he has to offer lots of news, no matter what he would LIKE to repeat. It is an astounding accomplishment that BUGS gets a thousands of hits and a steadily growing audience while sticking to my strategy advice and commentary.

For me, you BUGSers represent an accomplishment no big blog can claim.

And I LISTEN. Dan Rather could and did ignore thousands of complaints as a matter of routine.

But I don’t get that much warning. One commenter simply mentioned that, “Bob is very interesting when he isn’t talking about himself.”

You better believe I thought about that on and on and on: It warned me about the Old Man’s Disease of ruminating.

In the Dan Rather world, a thousand letters one way or the other didn’t matter much. He dealt in tens of millions and he was part of a monopoly.

In the blog world, you are here because you choose it. The Donahues and the Rathers went down like rocks when cable news came in.

BUGSers compliment me a lot. As I said, keep your mind on the COMPETITION. Nobody is here unless they really LIKE what I have to say. With millions of blogs and all else to choose from, it would be absurd if the people who read BUGS DIDN’T think I was pretty great.

Also, we are a considerate group of people. Psychopaths and sadists don’t show up here. A person who is genuinely worried about the survival of his race is the opposite of the kind of person who is only out for himself, or even the majority whose main worry is Popular Opinion.

So I study your comments. People who didn’t like Rather told him so.

It sounds trite, but it is a profound truth: I am dealing with people who CARE.

Not only do you care, you care about something the entire establishment is screaming at you NOT to care about.

To an old man who dealt in questioning people, you don’t have to shout at me or acidly criticize me for me to HEAR you.

And, since I know that you do CARE, I can dig out stuff I need to think about even when you are barely saying it.

When I say one of my crowd is worth thousands, I MEAN it. I am doing the arithmetic, not flattering you.

The blog market is TOUGH. I LIKE it.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Dave on 10/21/2010 - 9:28 am

    That the celebrities of the mainstream media are now held in such widespread contempt is a positive development.

    BUGS is the antidote to the rulebook based bully systems of cult identity politics and the whole propaganda apparatus that goes with them and particularly the rulebook based bully system and propaganda apparatus that is hell-bent to destroy the white race. That is why Robert Whitaker puts so much emphasis on Wordism.

    But now with the Internet, people are getting some instruction on how to defeat and cope with the rulebook based bullies and their cult identity propaganda. That is why Robert Whitaker and BUGS shine through the Internet like a cop’s 500 lumen flashlight.

    Who else, for example, is accurately identifying the Tea Party as a Leftist organization?

    This is historic stuff. As usual, when things are genuinely historic people fail to recognize it while it is happening. But BUGS is truly historic stuff nonetheless.

  2. #2 by Simmons on 10/21/2010 - 12:34 pm

    Humans love their cults, even we “white nationalists” just love our cults.

    Today some jew has tweaked all the cults of our side with some useless Naacp drivel, but our cults will form their groups and gripe, blah, blah, blah.

    The gold ring is out there within reach, but we won’t even dare.

    If someone from our side even dared ask to interview this Zeskind fella and ask him why he is anti-white, his little cult will fold. But no our leaders will tell us how good and how right they are and Horus’ lessons of Practical Politics will go unused.

    Paging James Edwards, paging James Edwards.

    But if someone dares remember consistently ask why he is anti-white, why he is anti-white, why is he anti-white, and then if he answers then answer MANTRA.

  3. #3 by Dick_Whitman on 10/21/2010 - 2:15 pm

    You can tell the anti-Whites are getting desperate with that NAACP “study.” If they’re scared of the Tea Party (a group that grovels like no other ) then maybe they know something that I don’t know? These are people(the Tea Party) who go out of their way to prove their commitment to White genocide, but this still isn’t good enough.

    It really is over for the anti-Whites. Of course, right before they fall is when they’ll be most dangerous. But this will only make it worse for them in the long run.

    The psychology of the anti-White is very much like the addict living in their addiction. People have trouble understanding why an addict would throw away his job, family, house, and money for drugs.

    Racially aware people don’t understanding why the anti-Whites are wiling to throw away their standard of living just to exterminate Whites through forced assimilation? Just like the addict, these anti-Whites only feel good when they’re taking part in the genocide of Whites.

    Just like the addict will sell his children’s Christmas toys, the anti-White will help destroy civilization because it’s the only thing that makes him feel good.

    What makes this problem even worse is that unlike addiction, anti-Whites are rewarded for their behavior. Imagine addicts being rewarded for losing their homes and blowing all their money. This is essentially the system we live in.

    Once the tribunals are over, there will be a need for a new mental health profession that helps anti-Whites overcome their desire to exterminate Whites. New graduate programs will be set up that teach this new discipline. The best candidates for this program are kids with liberal arts degrees and lots of student loan debt. They will get Masters degrees paid for by the same anti-Whites that they’ll be helping (and their loans will be paid in full by the same people).

    It will be ironic when the same mommy professor who taught them “Whiteness Studies” is sitting in front of them as a client.

  4. #4 by OldBlighty on 10/21/2010 - 8:24 pm

    Simmons:
    >The gold ring is out there within reach, but we won’t even dare.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choke_(sports)

    “In sports, a choke is the failure of an athlete or an athletic team to win a game or tournament when the player or team had been strongly favored to win or had squandered a large lead in the late stages of the event. Someone who chokes may be known as a choker or, more derisively, as a choke artist. Choking in sport can be considered a form of analysis paralysis.”

    “The opposite of choking is to be clutch. A clutch player or team rises to the occasion under pressure rather than collapsing.”

    Enough said.

You must be logged in to post a comment.