When the Black Muslims were attacked by the FBI, they pronounced it “genocide.”

When it was found that the white man’s smallpox may have devastated Easter Island, it was called genocide.

Any use of genocide besides that in the Mantra, which describes the only real genocide going on earth, will be laughed at.

So when a charge is made of genocide against “white CHRISTIANS,” it will be put into the Joke Bin of Genocide. Christianity is not genetic. Religious decimation is a bad thing, but calling it genocide is exactly like calling pneumonia smallpox.

This always happens when you are spreading a hard, banned truth. It always gets a spin on it that makes it a lie. Only the hard truth itself WORKS. I have watched this happen every time I have gone through this process.

Interracial marriage is the Holy Grail of liberals and respectable conservatives. I must use Lord Nelson’s example again, because it is such a clear demonstration of how SUBTLE this disease is. As long as you get away from attacking Holy Assimilation, ALL the charges of heresy end.

So when Lord Nelson found there was less resistance to the idea of Europe “being overwhelmed,” even He unconsciously moved in the direction of lesser resistance.

But even respectable conservatives can talk about “being overwhelmed” while they talk about THE races, as if this were not a problem of our race alone.

What the petition to the UN about the “genocide” of “European Christians” shows is the pressure is on, the genocide everybody can see is beginning to cause rumbles. And the timing is not incidental.

But this petition to the UN has nothing to do with US. There will be plenty of people yelling “cultural genocide.” Every white nationalist party in Europe is going to come up with its variation. But all of them are going avoid the third rail.

The third rail, the one no one dares touch, consists of two parts. The first is the god of respectability, INTERRACIAL marriage. The second part is that this RACIAL assimilation is required ONLY of white countries and of ALL white countries.

To avoid this reality of genuine genocide, the people who have become “leaders” in the old situation will invent alternatives to RACIAL, like this “Christian” nonsense. The BNP says the only problem is the MOSLEM immigration.

And that is because the Moslems WON’T assimilate.

It is a bit tiresome to see commenters swooning over a complaint which has nothing to do with the Mantra. This is what respectables always do for the left, they make lots of noise, but they also change the subject.

It would be MUCH easier if we could just meld in with anything that sounds like the Mantra. But that is why respectable conservatives are so indispensable to everything bad that happens to us. They change the subject from one the enemy cannot deal with to one that it can deal with.

Get off the real, obvious genocide and slide over to religion or “being overwhelmed by immigration,” or religion, and you are on the enemy’s ground, and on that ground he has power to grind you right into the dust.

The only thing we have is that this is NOT cultural. This is not about “mixing THE races.” It is genocide aimed at whites and everybody, at some level, knows it.

Do not have anything to do with someone who tries to get some easy fix on the Mantra. Like respectable conservatives, they are an integral part of our racial enemies.

History is a description of what happened. How a game of Monopoly is as much history as the life of a Pharaoh or the SevenYears War. But a history teacher who only taught about monopoly games he had heard about might be criticized.

Why is this information produced? History was produced because it told the story leading up to the present. It was supposed to tell us mistakes we may have made, how today’s society was built.

History has changed as its “why” has changed. The idea now is to be fair. But if there is one thing history teaches us, it is that fairness is NOT what history is made up of. A history that tried to give Equal Opportunity to all things that happened in the past would by hard to fit into the universe.

Black studies are of little use to person who needs basics in how the society he actually lives in works. He may learn more about the Jabuda practiced in Central Africa than he does about branches of the Unites States Government, but what has he learned?

He has learned about something irrelevant. All Black History can be useful for is telling the old tale of why one group lost and another one defeated it. It could illustrate the fact that the world is unfair.

Marxism teaches that the world is only unfair because of a purely human trait called exploitation. It further teaches that exploitation is a purely human characteristic because human beings are the only animals who have territorial divisions, where one animal has more than another animal does, where a class system exists, all for the purpose of economic exploitation.

Every single one of these superstitions disappeared like smoke in the last half century.

Marxism says that all societies are alike, all are there to exploit the poor and hold them down. We have discovered that no animal society exists which does not exploit the poor and hold them down. In fact, our custom of letting each male have a female is less natural than that of Islam where the alpha owns all the females and any sex the other males have is likely to be with each other.

In the Communist Manifesto Marx declared the ultimate heresy of his time for Communism: “Women in common!” Even a conservative today would find that wording a bit sexist. Clearly women were part of the property that was being taken from the proletariat.

For Karl Marx, History is the Alpha and the Omega. His entire theory was that history goes in one direction, and is based on one imperative: human exploitation. Unlike any philosophy, Marxism HAS an Alpha and an Omega, a Beginning and an End. To a Marxist, “communism” has the same holiness about it that Heaven has to Christians or Paradise to the Jews who believe in it.

For a Communist to refer to anything existing today as “Communist” is exactly like the Pope referring to a place as, LITERALLY, Heaven. A Marxist always refers to a country ruled by Communists as a “socialist” country. It is on the way to a heaven, communism, but when it fails it gives the same excuse any other religion does, it was Imperfect.

Neither a Christian nor a Moslem nor a Marxist is discouraged by the millions of heresies that have failed.

History is a helpless field of study. Black History exists, not to explain anything anybody needs to know today, but to hire blacks and give blacks courses they can pass. The information is invented, sorry, produced, because there is a demand for it.

This is again what everybody knows but no one can say without being professionally ruined.

Everybody knows that, too.

I, too, have run into people who will argue that the only way to get rid of the race problem is intermarriage, they never say The Final Solution to the race problem, for some reason, and when I recite the Mantra they say they never heard of a race problem.

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

You certainly can’t dispute the first sentence, so they begin with the second.

You could TRY “a problem called racism. This problem of racism will be solved…”

I predict that a new automatic “DUHHH!” will be invented right there, but you can try it.

Also, the Marxist answer to the Mantra is that once again someone is portraying white people as victims. It goes unanswered. Why doesn’t somebody besides me point out that for somebody to say that people with white skins can’t be victims is as racist a statement as anything Hitler ever said.

Most people have no idea of Marxist doctrine, and the onus will be on him to explain it.

There was an interesting discussion in General Comments, now 5, about the wording of the Mantra. One of the commenters has run into the usual problem of people saying they had never heard of a “race problem.”

The Mantra begins, “It is said there is this race problem,..” so naturally nobody ever heard of a race problem. I find this is normally the first reaction to almost anything.

For example, people use the term “since the invention of the wheel” as meaning the most primitive time. The comic strip B.C. supposedly takes place when snakes literally still had feet, before Genesis, and it treats the wheel as a new, the first, invention.

Until I point out that the wheel actually existed as a working device nowhere on earth but in Scythian Europe and for an indeterminate period in Asia. Now we find that Asians were also in contact with Aryans, and everybody has a different time that Egypt got the wheel.

But even accepted history, which insisted that everything including the opposable thumb was invented in the Middle East does not claim that they got the wheel there by any method but being run over by warriors in chariots.

But when I mention that it is interesting that the wheel is considered such an ancient invention, the person I am talking to gives me a look that could only appear on the face of an impossible mixture of a fish and a cow and says “DUHHHHH???”

Suddenly he has never heard anybody say that the wheel was a primitive invention.

Just so, the same person who said yesterday and many times before that the only solution to the race problem is intermarriage will, when you mention a race problem, give you that fish-cow look and say “DUHHHH????”

There are endless instances of this. I have seen people conclude a hundred times on television that the only true — they never say “final” solution to the race problem is intermarriage. If I bring up that conclusion, they will deny not only that they said it, but that they ever HEARD such a thing.

As you will see if you read Orwell’s 1984, you will find that those who control information also control how people think. So a person who normally talks about solving race problems with intermarriage will also deny that there IS a race problem. That is the way his mind has been trained to work.

You could ask the person if he honestly never heard of any race problem in the United States. But discussion is set up in such a way that you don’t usually get a chance, and if one of our people does get such a chance, they go off on the way THEY are taught to think, on black crime or whatever.

It took a long time and a lot of work to get us into this condition. It will take a long time and a lot of work to get us out of it.

Hitler joined the German Army and was a war hero, but he was not a German citizen.

It keeps being mentioned as an interesting sidelight that in his whole political career, he never got papers to make him a German, rather than an Austrian, citizen.

If he had run for office, maybe he would have had to be a German citizen to qualify. But he didn’t run for office. He put together a coalition in the Reichstag as a party leader and was appointed Chancellor.  I don’t know if he EVER took citizenship papers.

This may have been a matter of principle. Hitler regarded all Germans, including those Woodrow Wilson gave to France and Czechoslovakia, as Germans. He did not need papers to be a German.

This was not an unusual attitude. There are a number of members of the British House of Commons today who do not hold British citizenship. They hold New Zealand or Australian passports. I don’t know whether anyone from outside the Commonwealth can do that, but it isn’t the BRITISH Commonwealth anymore.

Reading the old Agatha Christie novels, I enjoy the fact that Englishmen were still allowed to use the word “foreigners.” But no American was ever referred to or thought of as a “foreigner.” An Australian wasn’t a “foreigner,” he was an Australian.

Brits had an opinion of Americans and Australians exactly like their attitude towards others who carried the British passport. An Englishman had a definite attitude toward “Scots,” but would have been surprised if you put them into the category of Dagos or Krauts, as “foreigners.”

Nobody is ALLOWED to think that way now. But we still do. To a native American, meaning a real native American, a Brit is a Brit and a Mexican is a foreigner. A Mexican may take out citizenship, but nobody will tell you quicker than he will that he is a Mexican.

If he votes the welfare of Americans versus the welfare of illegal immigrants, as the Democrats point out in California, he votes for his fellow countrymen.

The term “nation of immigrants” is doubly absurd. ALL nations are nations of immigrants. ALL nations are built by immigration, and all nations are destroyed by immigration.

When the Emperor Claudius conquered Britain it was, like Gaul, a Celtic nation. Under Rome, like Gaul, it REMAINED a Celtic nation all the way up through Scotland in Ireland.

When the Romans left, much of Britain became England. The Anglo-Saxons came in and took the land over. Only with immigration did the new nation develop.

When William the Conqueror took over England, it remained England. Only a small number of Norman conquerors came in, as was the case with the Romans.

We can date the period when the Celtic population came into Britain the same way we can date the period when the Germanic Angles and Saxons came in. England became England when the nationhood of the Celts in that region was destroyed by immigration.

My ancestors came here and took this land from the Indians. Celts are not referred to as Native Englishmen, nor are the people the Celts took the land from before. The Celtic Nation in England was formed by immigration and destroyed by immigration.

There are Indians in Tierra del Fuego, at the southern tip of South America. They were Native Americans long before the Indians we drove out were here. To get from the Bering Strait to South America they had to have lived in what is now the United States for generations.

Tierra del Fuego is a LONG walk.

If there are any Native Americas, they are down there next to Antarctica. Nobody walks to the next thing to Antarctica and STAYS there voluntarily.

All nations are created by immigration, all nations are destroyed by immigration. Papers have nothing to do with it.

Conservatives are constantly bitching about how liberals are getting absolutely absurd in their use of the word “racist.”

One liberal’s advice they quote was, “Pick a conservative and cal him a racist.”

But the respectables never talk about WHY liberals are now so blatant about the racist label.

They use it because it WORKS.

And they will keep using it because it WORKS.

We have a simple truth to get across: “I wish for liberals to say I am a non-racist but the only reason they will say that is because I am a groveling wimp.”

Liberals use the anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews gambit all the time because it WORKS. Whenever they use it, conservatives soil themselves and go into a fetal position.

If you found something that did that to your opponents, you would use it endlessly, you would openly urge your allies to use it. Liberals kept using the racist label on the Tea Party and the Tea Party put out tapes of their meetings to show no one used the N word.

It didn’t help.

Hey, dumbo, this is a WAR, not a high school DEBATE! Unlike groveling respectables, liberals don’t give a damn about you proving them wrong. All that counts is whether they WIN or not.

That’s why they always win over the respectables. The only time conservatives won was when they got over their fear of appealing to the “the Wallace vote,” a phrase the left used to scare conservatives away from the Reagan Democrats for many years.

The Republicans went back to moderation with Bush and became habitual losers again, doing the job the media feels a real conservative SHOULD do.

When Republicans looked like they had some cajones again in 1994, they won BOTH Houses of Congress. But once in office, they danced to the tune of the Democratic attacks again, and lost it again.

Republicans who won the smashing victory of 1994 went Inside the Beltway. They were listening to the Washington Post and the cocktail party crowd, which cowed them with the racist and radical labels on a day to day basis.

Only on their trips back to their districts, talking with people who weren’t the Big Shots they now dealt with, did they hear, “Why aren’t you CHANGING anything up there?”

They didn’t change even the trend to more government up there because the Big Guys inside the Beltway are Big Guys because they know how to manipulate wimps.

And if you wet yourself and praise Martin Luther King ensconced in the idea that liberals were always right the pros are going to keep using any label that WORKS.

Philippe Rushton is one of the tiny band of psychologists, like Arthur Jensen, who bucks the Party Line on racial IQ. He talked to me because I have personally known the people he quotes like Henry Garret and Wesley George and Carleton Coon when he was in Junior High..

If I can’t impress them with my intelligence I can wow ’em with my longevity.

Rushton told me that Carleton Coon, already about middle-aged, did parachute jumps for American Intelligence in World War II. It was too bad I never knew that, because I could have looked at his file in a couple of my old jobs.

I talked with Coon a number of times and corresponded with him. He never told me a thing about jumping in WWII.

But this is not surprising. Here is a man who was a Harvard professor, Curator of the Museum of Natural History, head of the committee which set up the anthropology exhibits at the Smithsonian Institution, and president of the American Society of Anthropology until he was forced out because he would not subscribe to a resolution which repeated the “Modern anthropology has proven that all races are equal in innate abilities” which was then required, as “Race is a myth” is today.

That phrase was in Almanacs and even comic books, “Modern anthropology has proven that all races are equal in innate abilities.” The president of the Society and certainly the world’s top physical anthropologist said that was nonsense.

You can see why he didn’t mention his WWII experiences to me. He had had a hell of a life before and after.

On the other end of the scale, I remember one of Mike Hammers or the fifty other Bulldog Drummonds and other Tough Detectives that were popular in the 50s describing himself at the beginning, the usual tough, big, non-nonsense and so forth and this sentence, and a broken nose I got in the War, not in the police action.”

At our recovery club, a group of full-time World War II vets expressed the same belittling attitude to Korean vets.

They were the opposite of Carleton Coon. They were lifetime drunks for whom the War was the only highpoint of their lives.

I noted that they poo-pooed people who fought in Korea, but they never said one word of the kind about the equally undeclared war in Vietnam.

Why? Because there were no Korean War vets there and there were a lot of Nam vets.

This was typical Paper Hat Bravery, the bravery of the guys who ran around in paper army hats and bragged about how they had fought a War Against Racism.

I read an article lately that talked about something it made me remember. Those who fought in the Pacific, like my uncles, did not talk about it. They fought longer and with a lot more casualties, but they also seem to REMEMBER it.

The Paper Hat Heroes all think of themselves as John Wayne portrayed them. For decades all they heard was how they had ended the Holocaust and Saved the World.

The Pacific fighters are reminded that, in its racial fury, America used the A-Bomb twice in Japan. Until I read that article, it hadn’t occurred to me what a total, chiasmic difference that made in veterans of the same war.

The full time vets have had no lives since and their idea of their own history is a pure product of the media.