Someone asked me a few years back about the possibility of war with Iran. He found my answer dead accurate and has asked me about it in the light of present events.

Clausewitz said that  war was diplomacy by other means. From the only point of view Ole Bob has anything special to tell you, war is politics by other means.

You will note that Obama’s first act after the election was to go to Afghanistan. This got him out of the country AND appealed to those who had opposed him. It was a good solid political move, on which this advisor-expert congratulates THEIR advisor-experts.

As Howard Hughes pointed out in 1940, “Roosevelt wants to get into this war and he will get us into it.” Once FDR was reelected in 1940, Hughes began transition to war production.

Sure enough, Roosevelt finally got his war by an oil boycott against Japan.

Before World War I, Europe was an armed camp. Bismark, “If there is ever another war in Europe, it will come out of some damned silly thing in the Balkans.”

Neither Hughes nor the Iron Chancellor were looking at the thing from the point of view of Thoughtful Commentators.

In response to 9/11, Bush invaded Iraq. If a nuclear device is used in the US or Israel, the United States will go to war against Iran. Iran is first on our War List, as the Axis was in 1941 and as Iraq was in 2001.

But the idea that the CIA can create such an incident is hilarious to me, not because I laugh at Conspiracy Theories like a Practical Man is supposed to, but because I have seen those Keystone Cops in action.

Roosevelt created his incident entirely by himself, by imposing an oil boycott on a country at war, which is an act of war. I predicted something like 9/11 long before it happened, right here.

Iran is now number one on our list of countries to go to war with. I am a bit suspicious that Israel has not bombed Iranian atomic facilities. They may be betting on an Incident, or they know Iran could hit them back, or a combination of the two.

But no one can predict the Incident. Many times countries were number one on our war list and nothing triggered it.

What I have said here is simply a plain English statement of what you already know. Iran is a war waiting to happen.

Will it happen soon?

That, too, is political. Obama is not interested in foreign policy. Obama, or his group I should say, do not like the military. But after the last election, he is much more likely to react to The Incident the way Republicans would because it would commend him to the part of the electorate he needs to appeal to.

Respectable conservatives today have never met a war they didn’t like. Anything that lets them see a guy in uniform is as popular at the Republican Convention as it is in San Francisco.

Since the 1979 embassy seizure a war on Iran has been much more likely, but real Incidents are rare in history.

But all this is looking at things very differently from the way you will see them anywhere else.

When I was in Europe in the 50s and even the 70s, Hate Laws were barely extant. Some countries didn’t even have them on the books. Others only enforced them when there was violence.

Now when my latest book was found on Eric Fromme when he went back to Canada, it was seized by police and it took them two months to decide it was legal. People go to prison, not only for saying un-PC things, but in Germany the lawyer can go to jail for defending such a writer in court.

One advantage of me being around for so long is that I NOTICE the difference.

But I finally figured out WHY the Holocaust Denial campaign has gotten so extreme.

Science has caught up with the Holocaust. Not one single Holocaust myth survives which would not go down in a roar of laughter if scientists were let loose on it.

For example, many of the Mass Slaughter locations have been declared Holy of Holies because in so many cases there are no bodies there. One of the great proven facts in the 1990s was that the Nazis rounded up and slaughtered Polish officers in the Katyn Forest.

After the Iron Curtain fell, the first group of people on the ground found that those skeletons had Soviet bullets in them.

I haven’t heard the Katyn Forest Massacre mentioned since.

If you go on a tour of Russia, you are told where Germans killed a bunch of people. More than one tourist has asked, “Didn’t’ STALIN kill anybody?”

No. From 1941 to 1945 every mass grave was filled by Nazis.

But the fall of the Iron Curtain is not the real problem. When they analyzed the soap everybody knew was made out of Jews, it turned out to be vegetable based. I have not heard of a Jewish Lampshade in decades.

The hair of the Holocaust victims in the Eastern European death camps is obviously plastic.

No one in the 50s could have foreseen in what detail our present technology can get the dates of deaths and who caused them. None of us have heard of a single instance where the Holocaust claims were backed by recent science.

And if one HAD, we would have heard of it a thousand times.

We don’t want to let people get off onto the Holocaust, but among ourselves, this is a good thing to see clearly. Those laws are not aimed at those who DENY the Holocaust, but against anyone who DISCUSSES it.

Or STUDIES it.

The expert who was sentenced to six years in an Austrian prison for denying the Holocaust did not deny it. He said it existed, and some three hundred thousand Jews died in it.

The Holocaust industry is acting like any other industry whose existence is hanging by a string.

The tobacco industry is well know to have suppressed grants for serious studies of tobacco’s use on health. Everybody knows that now.

But the media only Follow the Money when they are ALLOWED to.

I just did a piece on why the fall of the USSR is directly related to the application of Soviet Law to Hate Speech in Europe. That makes me sure that a one week suspension of that law would bring down the Myth of the Six Million.

And it IS a Myth of six million, not denial. No one doubts that a Nazi regime is less than healthy for Jews. None of the people in prison for Holocaust Denial, or lawyers in prison for defending Holocaust Deniers, have denied that Nazis killed Jews. It is the law that one cannot deny that they personally gassed or shot at least six million Jews that gets you in prison.

Hence I propose that we start referring, not to Holocaust Denial, but to Six Million Denial. The Red Cross, which was everywhere else if not in the camps themselves, would be banned and the writers arrested who put out the on-the-spot report on the camps in 1948.

Some BUGSER needs to get an copy that report before it goes missing. BoardAd has a list of places to find it. Have any of the folks who are thrilling to the International Genius Conspiracy bothered to reproduce it on the web?

I think America is the only country on earth where you would not be arrested under international Soviet Law for reproducing it. Has anyone done that?

That report exists in other countries, in the records, but it won’t soon.

Right now we shouldn’t let people get us onto the Holocaust or slavery. In my thousands of conversations, I got back on message by repeating off the topic by saying, “Historically everything that government has sent people to jail for questioning has had something horribly wrong with it.”

I have had endless numbers of people try to get back on Mommy Professor‘s dialogue. But you know that is my specialty. No matter what they say I just repeat, “If you can’t allow people to do discuss it, something is wrong with the story.”

A Mantra Thinker is a broken record until you get back onto HIS subject.

You remember the scene in Jaws I when everyone was babbling and the old sailor dragged his fingernails across the blackboard to get everyone’s attention?

It WORKED.

Try to imagine being at a party, no matter how drunk everybody is, and the record is stuck. You hear “Jingle Bells, Ji,” “Jingle Bells, “Ji..” As long as anybody is still conscious, somebody is going to get that record out of that groove.

I remember repeating the same thing eighteen times because in that instance I said “For the eighteenth time…” But I know I have done it a lot more than eighteen times. Once again, like the application of Inquisition and Soviet Law to the Holocaust, many Americans say “Something is WRONG with any proposition that has to be protected by law.”

“I don’t KNOW what is wrong with it. I just know that something is wrong with any proposition that requires you to arrest people who DISCUSS it.”

Nobody can ignore a broken record while he is conscious.

But whatever else you say, leave in the broken record part:

“I don’t KNOW what is wrong with it. I just know that something is wrong with proposition that requires you to arrest people who DISCUSS it. All I know is that something is always wrong with a proposition that requires you to arrest people who DISCUSS it.

“Sure the government says it might cause trouble. They always say that. All I know is that something is always wrong with a proposition that requires you to arrest people who DISCUSS it.”

They start saying you are repeating yourself, that it isn’t proof to just repeat something. So I say, “Oh, yes, I repeat that something is wrong with a proposition that requires you to arrest people who DISCUSS it.”

“Yes, every time they jail people who DISCUSS a proposition, something is wrong with that proposition. And they ALWAYS say they are just jailing them because they are offending people.”

Staying on Message Squared. Everybody listening has gotten your point.

Everybody listening has gotten your point.

And for a Mantra Thinker, THAT is winning the argument.

Nothing is changing faster than history. I love history, but so much of the wonderful old books are simply outdated by basic discoveries. And not just hydrocarbon dating.

It used to be Heresy to even hint that American Indian Great Civilizations practiced cannibalism. Now we have studies on old human manure that prove it. It was not just there, it was routine.

One of the great proofs that there was not much Aztec sacrifice was the Spanish eyewitness account that, in their desperation, the priests sacrificed FIVE THOUSAND captives in one night.

The proof this was all a lie allowed Mommy Professor to laugh and say that someone with stone knives couldn’t possible do that in one night.

So some doctors used dummies to show how, if you go up under the ribs, as these experts with endless practice did, they could certainly take out five thousand hearts. It made a good documentary, and it also made Mommy Professor forget he had ever said otherwise.

You won’t hear about these Former Absolute Truths in PC because they are forgotten as soon as it is realized they are SILLY. If they say something silly, it is forgotten.

So no lesson is learned, because respectable conservatives are selected, among other things, to forget these embarrassments, too.

Only on BUGS would anyone notice this: the desperation of holocaust Law is reaching a crescendo at the very moment when historical bullshit is being torn to pieces by science.

The “Death Camps” used to be said to be in Germany. Eisenhower gave soldiers leave to go see the Death Camps. Anyone who said they were not Death Camps was arrested.

But this fiction only lasted so long. Then a German court, or Branch of the Inquisition, declared that none of the Death Camps soldiers were shown in the American, British and French Zones of Occupation were Death Camps.

Suddenly all the Death Camps were declared to be beyond the Iron Curtain.

Mommy Professors had wanted to be the first to analyze the soap made from Jews, the lampshades of Jewish skin, the Bones of the Martyrs.

There weren’t any in any of the camps they were permitted to go to and analyze. If there had been you would have seen them in every newspaper headline and in every history book.

So Eisenhower’s Death Camps became mere transportation centers, holding cells for millions of Jews, who , despite the wartime emergency necessity of railroads being bombed, someone had to go to camps behind the Iron Curtain to be bumped off when they could have been killed with a simple Luger bullet.

The Soviet Empire had no problem with possible disproof. Try to disprove a Marxist myth and they’d shoot you down. So, by the unquestioned accident of every Death Camp being safely behind the Iron Curtain, and the assumption that the Iron Curtain would last more or less forever, no further action was needed.

Then the Iron Curtain fell.

Suddenly the law at all concentration camps had to be the same law that protected the ones that had previously been protected by Communist law. So today a German lawyer who defended his client, IN COURT, against the charge of Holocaust Denial is still in prison for what he said in court.

Hate Law is now OPENLY Soviet Law, it is Inquisition Law.

But since no one but BUGS thinks in these terms, no one notices this simple cause-and-effect. An International Genius Conspiracy sells better.

The Crack down is not just the International Jewish Conspiracy in action. Compared to that and the Illuminati, BUGS is boring as hell.

But the declared Death Camps of 1945 were moved back to Soviet controlled areas until Soviet Law disappeared. And THAT disappearance, not the idea of an International Jewish Conspiracy, began with collapse of the Soviet Empire, which caused Hate Laws to go ballistic in the 1980s.

My doctor brother worked in a charity ward in the 1950s, and he would always say that they got better MEDICINE than the luxury hospitals did.

The reason for this was that back then you could try new drugs out on charity patients but not on those who paid up front. By the last few YEARS a drug is being judged by the FDA and the courts, it is as ready for use as it will be when they clear them.

So paying patients got drugs that were several years behind

Now everybody gets drugs that are years behind.

My point is that everybody knew this, everybody KNOWS this, but it does not affect policy. This is because of another point I keep trying to make: drugs are an institution, and no one is going to be concerned with what the FDA does except those who make their living from it.

Medicine is not practiced for doctors, it is practiced according to rules laid down by a much larger institution, the legal profession, what I would call the legal institution.

The legal institution employs three million lawyers DIRECTLY. Then are the staffs and the enormous power of the Courts.

People know that we elect a lot of lawyers, but no one seems to notice that only one “branch of government” requires someone to get professional approval. The judiciary may be independent of the voters, but it is not independent of the ABA.

People think they are very practical and they say “Follow the money” and then they don’t.

How much money does the NRA represent and how much money do three million lawyers represent? But that is not a “follow the money” subject because it is not on Mommy Professor’s agenda.

The car salesman asks, “What would it take to get you behind the wheel of this car?” because he knows cars and this car is the one for YOU. Yes, he’ll make a profit, but he’s doing it for YOU.

Nobody falls for THAT crap. But when it comes to anything regulated, no one gives a SECOND’S thought to who makes his living on it.

I mean it doesn’t come up.

At all.

When the Air Force was created, the new branch got the same fifteen four-star generals that each of the other services had. And the same forty-five three stars, and the same 135 two stars, and so forth.

If you combine all the pharmacists and doctors and especially lawyers who make their living from prescriptions, directly and indirectly, you have a total that absolutely dwarfs any of the major industries that Practical Men and Mommy Professor so wisely “follow the money” about.

But it never comes up.

There is more money in the legal drug cartel by far than in all the illegal ones combined.

But no one even thinks about following the money there.

I attack the Catholic Church and Calvinism with my usual reticence.

Yet I went to some trouble to be baptized in the Melkite Church.

Everyone in my family has left the Methodist “Church.” Yet I bitch about the Catholic Church and condemn Calvinists all the time.

This is not a contradiction. It is what the mountain climbers say about why they do what they do: “I climbed Mount Everest because it was THERE.”

Attacking almost anything that calls itself a church is a waste of time. How could you criticize a mainline Protestant denomination? Specifically, how could you attack their position on morality?

They don’t HAVE a stance on morality. If you already know what Mommy Professor says about it, you know what the latest Church Conference said, they just said it in the name of religion instead of Social Progress.

I attack Catholic doctrines because they HAVE doctrines. When I attack Calvinists I do not want anyone to get the idea that I am giving the mainline Presbyterians hell because they are hardly aware that such a man as Calvin even existed.

If there were a Methodist CHURCH my family would still be members of it. We have a number of my circuit-riding grandfather’s sermons and in my youth we were amazed to see “The Devil,” in caps, appear regularly in them. Even in the 50s none of us had ever heard Satan mentioned in a sermon.

I used to tell people that I spent six and a half days a week working in politics, so sometimes I went to church on Sunday morning to see what the other side was doing.

None of this will surprise an American. Americans have always been very religious and very anti-clerical. In plain language, we go to church and we bitch about it.

Americans bitch about their churches all the time. But for Europeans I have taken around, the marvel was that there are so many churches in such young buildings, and even more so that those churches were built and are maintained privately. Europe’s churches are almost all relics maintained at state expense.

It is funny for people today to hear a line from an old movie where Lee Marvin is being baptized and the preacher doing it says he wants to “save him from the Presbyterians.” In my own family, my Baptist mother agreed to raise us in the Methodist Church, but only if we could delay baptism until we were the age of Consent, a basic Baptist tenet.

All this sounds weird today. Today there is only Ecumenicism.

But the generations that bitched at their own and other churches also FOUNDED those churches. Today churches are sort of included in new suburban areas. They are rebuilt to modernize.

I cannot climb a mountain which is not there. I cannot bitch about a doctrine that I cannot FIND.

Someone once told me that it is frightening to follow a loved one into the Emergency Room when there is shouting and someone is pounding on their chest.

But there is another thing that is worse. Following a loved one into the hospital when all is calm.

When all they can do is move the sheet up a few inches.

Catholics and real Calvinists are important to our history and I attack them and beat on their chests.

But what is worse is when someone like me does NOT attack a church. The soul has departed.

LAWRENCE Brown wrote that one characteristic Western man does not notice about himself is that, for him, an infinite progression is natural. A child will ask why is there a fire, the adult will answer because there is a match, the child will ask why is there a match, the adult may tell him about supply and demand or about how the mechanics of a match work.

Then, of course, “Why do they work that way?”

Everybody else has always come up with an answer to shut the kids up, like hushpuppies at a fry:

“IT is the Will of the gods,”

“God moves in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform.”

“Aristotle said so.”

“Mommy Professor thinks so.”

“It is the Modern Point of View.”

It is the simple questions this is used on. Which is why only the West could have come up with supply and demand or Newtonian theory. Which is why Orwell said in his book 1984 that “Freedom is the right to say that two plus two is four.”

Stagnant societies NEVER discuss basics. They have one of the few fat men in their tribe sitting around teaching the “Basics.” Basic Truths were Absolem’s occupation, and the reason he was one of the few fat guys around.

But of course some young people would wonder if Absolem was so hot. So Absolem decided it was the gods he represented, not just himself. Some kids still contradicted old Ab, so Absolem gave them the benefit of his long memory. He said he remembered a person who had contradicted the Will of the Gods and had soon fallen off a cliff.

The invention of Heresy was the clincher. In Africa a belief in Hell is replacing the older belief that if you treated someone wrong, his ghost would come for you after he died, but either one is the basis of a major occupation. As in 1900 the few people who are fat in Africa today are priests of the old black man’s faith or the new white man’s faith.

Today, about the ONLY fat people in Communist Angola are commissars. They don’t depend on the next world; they don’t even bother to explain their faith. They have decided to drop all the next-world faith and go straight into Heresy.

Heresy is asking about basics, like the Mantra or like supply and demand or about heredity. Heresy is prohibiting someone from saying that two plus two is four.

One part of the Mantra refers to how a sane black man would react to exactly the same “anti-racist” policy if applied to black countries. You don’t get the point unless you go into the details.

Anti-whites insist on immigration into white countries which have not adequately mixed to be called brown. The exact equivalent would be if World Opinion split the island of Santo Domingo into two categories.

Santa Domingo is divided into two countries, the Dominican Republic, which is mixed race, and Haiti, which is black. The policy the Mantra refers to would force Haiti to be “ready for immigration,” as they are saying of Eastern Europe.

The policy no sane black man would ignore would divide every island in the Caribbean into “black” and “mixed enough.”

Such a map would have zigzags on it that would make a gerrymandered district look like a straight-line drawing.

The American Virgin Islands are definitely black enough to fall inside the Black Line at which the world takes charge to be sure they bring in immigrants AND assimilate with them. Puerto Rico, if it were independent, would be “brown enough” to lie outside the Black Line.

I need for someone who is familiar with the Caribbean to make up a partial map of the Black Line as it would be if the genocide were reversed. The point is that you could not make up a line like that and make it the Basis of World Opinion without any sane black raising hell about it.

Please don’t try to get it perfect. Just a few more verbal examples like splitting Santo Domingo will do.

The White Line seems to run across the borders between Turkey and Greece. The attitude of the world toward Greece cutting off immigration and, MORE IIMPORTANTLY, assimilation, would be instantly hostile.

The Black Line would run between the coast of Africa and Madagascar. Spain is certainly within the White Line but no one would even imagine World Opinion discussing immigration a few miles away from Spain south of Gibraltar.

The Black Line would be somewhere in the Sahara and about the top of Ethiopia.

My question is, what are the chances that the Black Line would go unnoticed if very single strip of land inside it, as in the case of Santo Domingo, were the focus of a world-wide “anti-racist” campaign?