In General Comments (link at top of this page) one pro-white pointed out that one attack consisted of what pro-whites on SF are always saying: It’s too late to save the white race.

The commentator was too wise to fall into that trap.

This “too late” business is a prophet only tactic they have against the Mantra: getting off the subject. Look at the Mantra. What is says is that white genocide is a legitimate topic of discussion on what is a legitimate subject of concern to white people.

The Mantra points out that this would be a natural topic of concern for BLACK people under the same conditions. Like amateurs in Stormfront, anti-whites want to go straight into the hopelessness of it all, which shows why the SFers are amateurs: They make the anti-whites’ points FOR them.

Kicking into your own goal is a great way to lose.

The answer to this is, as I say, IN the Mantra. This is a legitimate concern of white people. What is the first thing an intelligent human being does when faced with a legitimate problem?

He DISCUSSES it.

Anti-whites use this “hopeless” business to SUPPRESS any DISCUSSION of a legitimate problem. We refuse to get into solutions — like the Final Solution to the White Problem they are pushing under the euphemism “race” problem — until we are allowed to DISCUSS our legitimate concern.

Right now we are saying we should not be called racists to gag us from talking about white genocide.

Another GC 5 pro-white quoted a anti-white as saying we were just whining. He said we are complaining because WE don’t have enough children. This is the same mistake Lord Nelson was falling into and immediately got out of as soon as I called him on it:

This is not just immigration and “being overwhelmed by numbers,” it is the fact that any time someone presses intermarriage as a “solution” he has in mind that one of the partners is white. “Assimilation” is being pressed as a Final Solution to the WHITE Problem, not the “race” problem.

Keep YOUR objective in mind. Those who attack us are NEVER doing it to DISCUSS white genocide, they are ALWAYS demanding that all discussion of it be SUPPRESSED.

Our goal now is to argue that we have a right to discuss this without being yelled at or arrested. We deserve the same public forum freedom of speech allows anyone. It is the thugs attacking and screaming down our spokesmen that freedom of speech is designed to stop.

Sixties Lessons 1 was that the World War II Generation, which had been made the weakest generation through government impositions on the entire population but especially by twelve million of what were once free young American males being put through basic training, could not stand up to the screaming Bella Abzug-Abbie Hoffman type screaming Jews who took over in the 60s.

Whoever stood in front of them screaming in their face was Authority to the Weakest Generation.

Sixties Lesson 2 is what happened when those screaming lefties attacked all of the Weakest Generation’s basic values. No previous generation of Americans would have tolerated what goes on our Mexican border or the Courts dictating to us the way they do.

But in a way the WWII sergeant was the Weakest Generation’s Mommy Professor. They left home for the first time and were taught what the Real World was like. The real world was getting kicked and coming up smiling.

Basic Training said that you had no right to any emotion or any opinion. This the twelve million took as adulthood, whereas childhood was being coddled. Eighty-year-old men brag that real life was learning how to make up your bed so tight a quarter would bounce off of it.

WWII sergeants had very, very little to teach anybody about Real Life. When they recruited in my youth, they would say that “You’ll never get rich” in the Army, but there will always be a bed and a cafeteria for you.

The military was, in short, for those who would settle for security. Most of the WWII vets I knew had never had a passport. That sort of thing was handled for them. What I am saying is that they were not the people most experienced with reality.

Just as Mommy Professor is almost invariably somebody who entered College at eighteen and never left it, sergeants were people who entered the army and never left it. Kids thought they were sophisticated, because they were at home on military bases around the world just as Mommy Professors are thought to be sophisticated because they are at home at Harvard or Oxford or an Asian university.

But it is not sophistication to be at home on different army bases or at different universities. They’re all the same.

So, like yuppies today repeating what Mommy Professor told them, the World War II Generation was beaten into making their “adulthood” into the macho crap slammed into them by some of the least sophisticated people on earth.

It is incredible that we have to TELL people that immigration and assimilation is for ALL white countries and ONLY for all white countries. But it is not so incredible if you remember that the whole concept of adulthood since the Weakest Generation took over has been blind obedience.

Both the sergeants and the Mommy Professors teach that adulthood is learning to obey, to repeat, not to think outside their box.

And since half of those twelve million used the GI Bill of Rights to go to college, they had a double dose of this fake adulthood. They went from drill sergeant to Mommy Professor.

No wonder they gave the world away.

For those of you to whom the 1960s are ancient history, the Old Man would like to explain what happened then that we can make use of.

First of all, as I mentioned before, the headline radicals were almost all New York Jews, and they silenced the Weakest Generation which was then in control. Unlike young people today, the Weakest Generation associated screaming with What They Deserved.

The Weakest Generation still had a Stockholm Syndrome from the so-called training administered to them by sergeants who screamed in their faces. Basic training was to make “dog-faces,” obedient dogs or less than dogs. Actually no professional pet trainer, even in the early forties, would use those tactics on a dog.

New York Jews are a special breed. I remember that the most heated anti-Semitic diatribe I had ever heard when I was in high school — and I had heard the Klan — was from one of my sophomores I went to lunch with.

He used words that I had never heard before, but that clearly made kike or yid sound like a term of endearment.

It should be noted that sometime during his diatribe I came to understand that he was a South Carolina Jew and half of his synagogue was made up of immigrant New York Jews.

New York Jews were notorious, and we understood his fury. We could avoid them but he couldn’t.

When I was in grammar school the older kid who led us across the street from the school bus was hit by a speeding car that didn’t pay any attention to some hick school bus laws. The kid was lying on the ground white as a sheet, I mean really white as a sheet, with the muscles hanging out of his leg and screaming.

The long-nosed guy with the New York plates was actually walking around shouting, “How much is this going to cost me? How much is this going to cost me?”

It doesn’t take a Goebbels to dislike a person like that.

In public, the New York Jews in the sixties screamed and the Weakest Generation, which was at its height of power just then, instantly backed down. The more the radicals insulted them, the more they backed down.

Just like they had done with their sergeants.

I just did a piece about how wildly expensive a few words can be. How much cold cash would Nike have demanded to stop using he words, “Just Do It?”

The term “Jewish Wet Dream” to describe the epitome of anti-white glory, a blonde girl and a black guy, takes a split second to say and tells a complete story. In order to denounce it, one has to talk at length about how Jews– in their open alliance with blacks — do not grin with pleasure when pro-white feelings are offended by this hideous and unnatural spectacle.

Any argument anyone makes only emphasizes the point.

Whenever any Jew starts with “I am Jewish and …” he is about to make an anti-white point. There is no reason why a white man who is constantly insulted this way would not have a grudge against Jews in general, the same way that Jews in general react negatively to white Southerners.

But you can halt that with Jewish Wet Dream, meaning we can be offended, too.

I used a term in another article that maybe useful and not take time from concentration on the Mantra. I tried hard to come up with a name for all the bots that are programmed to reject the Mantra — a fact on which I congratulate our very small army.

I called them desbots.

This is a term the whole Free Internet Movement could adopt.

When the billionaires parade around saying THEY don’t mind paying higher taxes, I call them what they are: Billionaire Bullies. The head of a small business, if it survives, becomes one of the “rich” those taxes are aimed at.

The owner of a successful restaurant will make two hundred thousand dollars a year, but it is only a matter of time before his business goes out of favor. Taxes are very important to him.

Taxes make no difference at all to Bill Gates, Senior, who regularly leads a group of billionaires to demand higher taxes.

By the way, I have news for those Bullying Billionaires. There is a provision for them to give money to the Federal Government on their own. They don’t need a tax law to do it. Ted Turner gave a billion dollars to the United Nations bureaucracy out of his own pocket when things were booming.

It was stupid of Turner, but he wasn’t demanding that the government make small businessmen be FORCED to give their survival money to the UN.

One person on General Comments 5 said he was having fun really working on getting the most out of our hit and run tactics in dealing with the desbots.

I agree. This is fascinating work.

When I was in their grad school the University of Virginia was one of the few economics departments that adhered to supply and demand. In fact, the Modern Economics of the other schools at that time would be laughed at today.

The basic answer was simple to us. We developed the field of Public Choice and two of my professors won Nobel Prizes in the field. Instead of backing away from supply and demand as was fashionable at the time, Public Choice extended the logic of supply and demand to political and other human behavior.

One of my colleagues there in the year before me became Director of Management and Budget. Another, Craig Roberts, became editor of the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal and went on from there.

My point is that this was a powerful bunch of minds that did not need complications to look smart. This is background to the following incident.

I was in the UVA grad school almost fifty years ago. A New Zealander who was part Maori asked what was wrong with intermarriage. For once a fellow grad student answered him before I did.

He said, “It’s ugly.”

I have never been able to improve on that.

The problem with what I call a Jewish Wet Dream, the black guy with the beautiful blonde that Hugh Hefner promotes so assiduously, is that it is ugly. The black guy is being sure that will be no more beautiful blondes from her.

People are always telling you loudly what Reality is. Some drunken guy at a convention kept screaming that “Mao said that power comes from the barrel of a gun!!” The guy in a bar nursing the last drink he can afford will tell you all about how everything is about money.

The term Political Correctness is purely and absolutely a Marxist term. The idea that everything is about money has penetrated our society so deeply that we don’t see its origins. But the whole world view on which Marxism is based, that social animals share all things communally and are equal so only man’s institutions make us unequal and warlike and so forth, all that has been obliterated like a horse that sat on top of the Big Bang.

Money is like water. It is enormously important if you don’t have any. But it would hard to distinguish Bill Gate’s life from that of a man with a thousandth as much money as he has.

Among desert Arabs and American Westerners, water has indeed been everything.

I once pointed out to grad student at another university that apartheid South Africa had a major immigration problem. Blacks were pouring in from all the Liberated States, and the Zulus and other indigenous groups were raising hell about it because it impacted THEIR wages and employment.

The grad student, a girl, stuck out her lower lip and replied, “The black immigrants are NOT approving of South African apartheid. They’re just there for food.”

My reply caused a lot of laughter among the students around us: “You know, when you’re starving, food can be pretty important.”

There was no serious hunger in Rhodesia. There IS starvation, the real thing, not just malnutrition, in Zimbabwe.

The African Liberation anti-whites were so desperate to achieve doesn’t get much attention now. It wouldn’t take much publicity for people to conclude that having a black leadership  becomes unimportant when food becomes everything.

Nature in humans has one real imperative. For dogs it is the production of offspring who have your smell. For eye-oriented humans, it is the production of people who LOOK like you.

When it comes to Hugh Hefner and all the anti-whites, with all my years of experience, I cannot improve on the two words, “It’s ugly.”

Many people still look at religions by quoting their texts. Since each religious institution, like each country, is the product of its PEOPLE, this Wordism leaves them stuck in Never-Never Land and unlikely ever to leave it.

The old Judaism grew up in the Middle East. It was one of the very few of the thousands of smaller religions that survived the competition as society became larger.

In the time of Herodotus all of the Middle East was part of Persian Empire. He traveled on the Persian Roads in the same way that historians tell us that European travelers went on Roman Roads.

To Herodotus, in fact, as to our own historians, the Middle East was the wellspring of everything. Herodotus devoted his studies to proving that Greek gods were derived from the Egyptian ones. In fact, in that way he sounds so much like a modern historian that it sounds as familiar as it is absurd.

Herodotus spent his lifetime desperately trying to hammer the Aryan Greek Pantheon into the totally alien Egyptian Pantheon, just as historians now try to hammer the progress of Europe into something called the Renaissance, which seriously tries to say that everything we do came from Ancient Books.

What we actually got from this Renaissance crap was things like a capitol and “classical” monuments that any Roman or Greek would have laughed himself to tears about. Our history looks as ridiculous as our architecture when we try to insist that Calculus had its origins in Roman Numerals.

In the Persian Empire religions took on the look of Zoroastrianism. Jews were not monotheistic until they became part of the Persian Empire:

“No other gods BEFORE ME” as any literate person notes by now.

Zoroastrianism is by far the oldest monotheistic faith, and was The Only True Faith. But, like Judaism, it was limited to a select people: Aryans Only. There were probably a hundred sizable Only True Faiths that grew up like Judaism limited to ITS Chosen People.

Today all Jehovans are desperate to forget Zoroastrianism ever existed. As I said in “Silence IS Consent,” that is the method institutions use rather than disputing their rivals. Once established, they burn the records and make up their own history.

We know that one-celled animals do not have “wants” in our sense of the word. Yet we also know that they will get away from water that is too hot or too cold. Institutions are exactly like that.

Like one-celled beings institutions are evolved by competition. The less successful ones die. But the result is the same. Institutions are very much alike and very predictable, because they compete in the same waters and you can predict what the survivors will be like.

If you can’t look at things this way the world becomes a Conspiracy. The problem with a Conspiracy was covered by Benjamin Franklin over two centuries ago when he said, “Three men can keep a secret, if two of them are dead.”

There is another problem with conspiracies. No one in the real world is that SMART. When you have spent your career watching people at the top scrambling to meet crises, the idea that someone has the whole world all mapped out is very hard to credit.

Institutions, like one-celled beings, come in a variety of types that compete for entirely different things. A lot of historians like to note that Odinism had a Trinity, Odin, Thor and Freya. That sounds good, but it is not clear and in any case Odinism at that time was COMPETING with another trinity called Christianity.

If Communism had its youth group, the Komsomols, Nazism would get its Hitler Youth. If Communism had its hammer and sickle, Nazism would get is swastika. Competing institutions look very much alike, just as one-celled beings do.

According to Islam, it will be Jesus who comes down to the Judgment. Islam is a mixture of its two main competitors and forerunners, Judaism and Christianity. Even Iranian Shi’ism is attributed to the special influence of Zoroastrianism and regards all other Moslems as heretics.

Those of us who are only really familiar with the three Jehovan religions do not realize how alike they are. We have real trouble understanding most religions where a specific God is nonexistent, as in Buddhism, or multiple gods as in Hinduism.

We have extreme difficulty with Political Correctness as a religion because it has a Satan, Hitler, and no Jehovah. We don’t understand the many religions that had their own Holy Prostitution exactly as we have our Holy Virginity.

We KNOW it, but we don’t UNDERSTAND it. Deep down we simply do not believe those were RELIGIONS, real religions, even though we know that their followers were as dedicated and faithful to them as we can ever be to ours.

We do not realize that the religions we know, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, look almost exactly alike to any other culture. Wordism takes the words so seriously it does not even see the obvious fact that, whatever the original Books say, these three institutions that survive by competing with each other are going to look as alike to the real world as different forms of Buddhism or Taoism do to us.

Each of our forms of Jehovism sees itself as The Only True Faith. In the competition, only the few that had that doctrine could survive. But in other societies not only is there no One True Faith, but each survives by NOT fighting it out to the death.

It depends, in short, on the PEOPLE, not on the WORDS.

The mainline Protestant denominations dropped precipitously in the last century while the population went up. The Catholic Church had a fairly heavy conversion rate until Vatican II when it decided to be as much like the obviously dying Anglican Church as it could be.

Evangelicals converted so many millions in Latin America they were on the way to becoming the dominant religion there. But the fire is out and they are doing their best to be just like everybody else. It no longer uses the fundamentalism because the people its leaders want to become, in part think it’s dirty.

What the leaders come to want is not the same thing that makes an institution grow.

So you see that institutions are a separate evolutionary study from everything we are used to looking at in our Wordist way. For any serious political knowledge, that blind spot is exactly like trying to understand astronomy while insisting that the earth is the center of the universe.

Wordism, after all, no matter what form it takes, puts words at the center of our universe.

The European Large Hadron Collider project is the one that has atoms smashing into each other so as to study the production of anti-matter. I understand this is part of the latest Dan Brown book after his DaVinci Code.

I happened to read of cost overruns in this project, and that “Environmentalists are using this as a reason to shut the project down.” The average reader probably had no idea that the environmental movement wanted to shut it down.

The LHC is pure research. Environmentalists waited until billions were invested in atomic power before they stopped it cold in the US. But it is not the environment that is the point here, it is the billions.

Today’s environmentalism has as little to do saving clean air and so forth as today’s socialism has to do with the welfare of the workers. In our day of ideological professionalism, old causes have long since been taken over by those who make them fronts for a particular ideology.

Note how casually the magazine referred to how environmentalists were pointing to these cost overruns to kill the LHC project. It was merely a report, not a partisan attack. What was interesting was that the writer of the piece took it for granted that no one would have any trouble understanding that the Green Movement opposes this basic research on new means of power generation.

But I am the only person who sees that report and THINKS about it. The connection between wanting a planned world and being against technology is understood, but most people don’t understand what you mean when you say it.

A planned world is a static world. Communism tried to catch up with America and other developed countries, and it was impossible. To any environmentalist “growth” is an evil word. But one thing no one on the left ever mentioned during the Cold War was the fantastic amount of environmental destruction under every Communist regime.

Only factories in capitalist countries produced pollution. Jane Fonda didn’t talk about Chernobyl.

You recognize these things as obvious WHEN I SAY THEM. But a practical dialogue about the real world is difficult unless we all get to the point where we no longer have to explain these connections in detail, a Point B in getting from Point A to Point C.

The Mantra is on the way to showing people that anti-racists are anti-white. When that is done, though the lead time will be very large, people will learn that a planned world movement naturally tends to be an anti-science movement

Complaints about how badly income is distributed have been legitimate since before Christ made them. But we all know that today, someone who talks about income distribution is almost invariably part of a movement that wants all the money to distribute for its own members.

You can’t discuss anything rationally without Mantra Thinking.

There is literally a war going on just south of the Mexican border. Any time anyone gets killed on THIS side of that imaginary line from stray bullets, it is news. Then there is the question of whether Mexicans coming here will make this the same kind of country they have.

This is the kind of connection anyone who THINKS about the situation would make. But the job of the liberal-respectable conservative duo is to prevent such thinking.

As I said in the New Rights Papers a generation ago, the reason Mexican labor is worth several times as much when it crosses that invisible line is not magic. It is because, when a Mexican crosses into the United States, he works in a country that is NOT run by Mexicans.

This is a conclusion every respectable conservative points to as heresy. They say it is racism because it cannot matter WHO populates a country. All that matters is the pieces of paper the country is supposedly based on.

So libertarians believe in magic. They insist that there is no reason labor should be worth more on this side of the border.

How many times have you ever heard anyone ask WHY Mexicans have to come HERE for opportunity. We always hear that they are only doing it for their families, of course. There is no greed in Mexicans.

We also hear that the Mexicans are not at all responsible for the full scale slaughter going on where Mexican rule begins. The media are always saying that the whole blame is on Americans, because Americans “have an appetite for illegal drugs.”

Political Correctness is a religion, but it seems to me that even after being trained act the liberal seminaries we call colleges, this sort of cant would begin to pall. But all the people around me repeat this crap like trained parrots.

Why is it that the same labor is worth so much more when you cross the Rio Grande? The only thing that changes there is the jurisdiction.

Which is why they are all shouting that Mexico is having that war within gunshot of the American border because Americans are greedy for drugs. So why is the war on the Mexican side of the border?

Americans are impenetrably stupid about immigration. But a war of that magnitude and violence inside the United States would cause even the theologically-obsessed American morons to see that we don’t want Mexico here.

So the war is kept on the other side of the border and is never used as an argument against populating this country with the same workers who make Mexico what it is.

In the longer term it will be racist to say that outright war like that should not be inside the United States. That will take a while, but, like everything else I have predicted, it will come to pass if we let the present arguments go by without comment, as respectable conservatives are paid to do.

It is population, not appearences, that makes a country what it is

The one big difference between my view of our opposition and that of the Leaders is that I regard our opponents as muddled morons. That is certainly the view of them our opponents want LEAST.

Respectable conservatives are actually chosen as the official opposition because they regard the established powers as Geniuses. They don’t even call them Evil Geniuses, as the far right does. Respectable conservatives look up to leftists.

As National Review founding Publisher William Rusher said, “People on National Review do not believe anything unless it is in the New York Times.”

Remember that respectable conservatives are the ones the left feels comfortable with. That term respectable is handed out like the New York Times Best Seller List, which is published before the sales statistics are complete or even begun. Respectability means one keeps within bounds that are comfortable to those who control the media.

This is not necessarily a conscious choice, much less a Conspiracy. It is based on what makes the voice of the establishment COMFORTABLE. That is strictly a judgment call, and least of all is it a Secret List agreed at midnight between Conspiracy Members.

Who would a liberal rather debate, Sean Hannity or Bob Whitaker? I would make it clear that he is out of date, a part of the herd. And not smart enough to challenge anything basic. Hannity would call them well-meaning, almost get into tears about their vast intellect, and say he would agree with them except that he Hears the Voice of God.

That is how you get paid the big bucks. You show the establishment that you make it look good to the yokels. It’s much like a magic act, where two different groups see two different things.

You make the yokels think you are exposing leftist error, but you make the leftists look good, too.

The reason there is so much competition for respectable status is because it PAYS. Respectability is worth big money.

But like all markets, it is subject to supply and demand.

I pointed out in another article that Senator Hollings let it all out about the Israeli Lobby owning Capitol Hill in his last major speech because he had sacrificed many years in the Senate by being a Southern turncoat , but for decades he had not even gotten mentioned for a Vice Presidential nomination in return.

Hollings’ problem was that the establishment has more Southern turncoats than it knows what to do with, and every day another thousand show up expecting to be rewarded for it.

From the moderate Republicans to the Tea Party, the competition for respectable status is vicious. Nobody tries harder than respectable conservatives to thwart grassroots upstarts, and there is no way a pro-white word will ever be spoken at a Tea Party rally, because those seeking respectability would turn them in faster than a Soviet informer.

Wordism makes it impossible top understand any REAL history. Real history begins with animal societies with their invariably rigid caste distinctions and willingness to die to hold their group’s territory, regardless of whether they themselves have a high rank or a rank which prohibits them from adding any genes to the gene pool.

Only a Mantra Thinker would even NOTICE this. Every Wordist begins with the idea that the Words he worships will make the world in their own image. Marxist or Libertarian or “Christian,” all of them see mankind as having no motivations of its own, in its own genes.

The revolution in biological thinking of the last half-century has passed by all the Wordists without the slightest notice. To them, there are still no territorial animals. To them, all the members of every herd are precisely equal.

One of the funniest claims of Wordists is that their form of Wordism will UNITE Mankind. But when mankind is divided into Wordist camps, he is at his most vicious. The only people who said “Better Red than Dead” were Reds themselves. They never asked the Soviets to follow the same logic.

The Constitution has a set of strict limitations on Wordism, precisely it was written when the experience of Europe’s Religious Wars was still fresh. But only a Mantra Thinker would NOTICE that.

There are a million Wordisms and a thousand more every day, and every single one of them declares that it has risen above mere factions and races and is Universal. It doesn’t take an advanced degree in math to realize that a million different groups can’t each be Universal.

But nobody but a Mantra Thinker could see the humor in someone who has converted to one of a million Wordisms declaring that he has abandoned division and has become Universal.

Just as anti-whites are not yet laughed at when they proclaim they are anti-racists, those who espouse one of a million forms of Wordism are not laughed at when they claim to become Universal.

YET.

There is a massive structure that will be shaken to its foundations when a general admission begins that a white person who brags that he doesn’t give a damn about his race is, to say the least, immoral.

The whole structure of Wordism rests on a foundation that became obsolete fifty years ago. And we are chopping at that foundation.

I have emphasized repeatedly that any respectable conservative can criticize current immigration policy, but every respectable must praise “assimilation,” aka, interracial marriage, to the skies. Genocide requires BOTH immigration and assimilation, and soon there will be enough immigrants to take out our entire race simply by multiplying and intermarrying.

The Respectable Conservative Solution is the Final Solution.

Mantra Thinking attacks the entire process. It is very easy to get so bogged down in immigration with all your “allies” so that you ignore the third rail, the real sore point, intermarriage, blood mixing.

Likewise when we talk about a similar Final Solution to the Black Problem, we tend to emphasize Africa too much. For the Final Solution to the Black Problem, the lines would be a lot more outrageous than that, and no example is more telling than The Haiti Line.

Haiti is almost 100% unmixed black. It has a higher percentage of pure blacks than any surviving white country has of pure whites, including Iceland. The Dominican Republic is almost 100% mulatto.

If Haiti were as white as it is black, the whole world would be demanding that it accept massive immigration. It doesn’t matter that it’s poor. Eastern Europe is a hell of a lot poorer than Japan, but the world asks regularly “Are they ready for immigration?”

If Haiti were white as it is black, the Dominican Republic which shares he Island of San Domingo with it would not be noticed by those who would screaming at white Haiti to bring in immigrants.

Just as asking Eastern Europe “When will you be ready for immigration?” is so routine no one thinks about why it is asked, no one would wonder why the Haiti Line was the one everybody talked about.

Mantra Thinking requires more THINKING than simply bitching about immigration or asking what if people insisted on Africa bringing in immigrants. Mantra Thinking requires some THOUGHT.

The New Year actually begins with the Winter Solstice on December 21 or 22, when our Northern Hemisphere is tilted at its maximum away from the sun.

That is the Yule, when once again we have seen longer and longer nights and the world seems to be losing the sun entirely. But at Yuletide, we celebrated because we knew that it was not the end, but the beginning, that the sun had begun coming back to us.

But for historical reasons, Yule became December 25 and the New Year became January 1.

You would-be astonished if you saw some of the old Roman calendars. They had a rigid order of days so that a month that was in winter a century before would be in midsummer later.

The old worshippers of the Classics used to like to say that we only advanced because we stood on the shoulders of the Classical Giants.

But the Classical Giants, in the most literal terms, did not know what time it was.

Our Yule, before we learned to worship the Classical Giants, was dead accurate.

None of which matters to us.

December 25 is the day we CELEBRATE the Birth of Christ. January 1 is the day we CELEBRATE the new year.

The old self-styled Intellectuals had nothing productive to do, so they debated the exact dates of the new year and the date on which Jesus was born. It turns out that, in the latter case, they didn’t even get the YEAR right.

So we pick a date and celebrate it. Too many of us don’t realize what that MEANS. It means that we have an awfully lot to DO. People who show off their Intellectuality by comparing Sources and debating Exact Dates are pitiful.

We celebrate the Birth of Our Lord once a year and we drink on New Year’s Eve. Then we go on to all the other things we are doing.

Debating the Latin and Greek sources of the new year and the Birth of Christ impressed the peasants. Mommy Professor uses the same sort of argument to impress the peasants today.

What else was there for ancient old Wise Men to DO? How was the average man in those days to know when to plant so he could survive? The priests knew the stars, they knew the DATE. No one else did.

It is hard to put yourself back in those days, but it was no easy thing to know when planting season, on which your life depended, came. The Egyptians and the Mayans actually believed the sun came up only because their Emperor made it come up.

We see it clearly, but what we celebrate on New Year’s is our liberation from that pure, unadulterated crap.

If we allow out children to turn brown they will lose that liberation

But for the world BUGS is dedicated to saving, Happy New Year.

And Happy New World.

The world we are here to save.

In 1992, for the first time since serious polling began, a third party candidate led BOTH national party candidates for the November election. His issue was the exploding national debt and his name was Ross Perot.

Our media selects spokesmen who have no sense of history whatsoever, so nobody has mentioned Perot’s obvious parallel to Sara Palin. Perot was an instant national sensation when Larry King asked him if he was willing to be president and he said yes.

To me, Perot’s leap to the top of the polls was what it really was, a historical first. Even George Wallace had only gotten within striking distance behind a hopelessly trailing Democrat in 1968. At one point it was Wallace 21%, Humphrey 29%, and Nixon stayed at 41 to 43 percent the whole time.

This was a historical first. But Perot went right out of range of both of them. It was a historical phenomenon.

Then Perot said his enemies had threatened to disrupt his daughter’s wedding and he withdrew. Having proved himself a cukoo, his attempt to get back in the race was fatally damaged, but he still got a lot more votes than anyone in the Political Science Department at South Carolina, where I went back to grad school for a semester, had thought he would.

Except me.

In 1992 even a proven fruitcake could do well in a match up between the kind of respectable conservative/liberal match up that the system regularly produces.

Perot’s breakdown and breakup was a relief to both liberals and conservatives. They have an industry going very smoothly which gives them all money and fame, and it is in solid, long-term balance, as any routine business needs to be.

I am unique in looking at it as what it is, a smooth-running industry. In this industry respectable conservatives compete with others to be most acceptable to the liberals and at the same time make the yokels think they are some kind of dreaded “Opposition.”

On most issues respectable conservative offer “opposition” until liberals declare that any further opposition is “extremist,” and then every respectable denounces anyone who takes the wrong side on that issue after that.

Respectable conservatives are the loudest in denouncing such “extremists,” since those “extremists” are the people who are aspiring to take THEIR place as the “opposition.”

Respectable conservatives get paid to protect present polities from being attacked at the root. Respectable conservatives, for example, are hailed as the Opposition on the issue of illegal immigration, but they are the first to denounce anyone who challenges the whole “nation of immigrants” crap, which dooms all effective immigration enforcement from the start.

But the national debt issue is a constant problem. Even the yokels can’t ignore numbers that are up on billboards. So that is an issue that breaks through the respectable conservative barrier from time to time, making a Perot or a Sara Palin big stuff for a while.

The national debt issue allowed to Newt Gingrich to make a political revolution in 1994, too. Clinton made him close down the government and whipped him.

Now we have Sara Palin.

One of the articles in my 1982 book, the New Right Papers was “Lid on a Boiling Pot.” The title says it all. It discussed the inability of a system based on liberals and respectable conservatives to deal with any BASIC problems.

Even those who were around in 1982 feel that the 1980s represented a time of relative cooperation between the “two sides” they have so comfortably established.

So every now and then a Barry Goldwater or a George Wallace, or a Ross Perot or a Newt Gingrich or a Sara Palin is allowed to take positions respectable conservatives find uncomfortable. So far this has worked.

A system as powerful and as successful as that in the United States has periodic outbreaks. But the yokels always take each outbreak seriously, “Now the Revolution has come!”

Only here will you see these outbreaks put together. Only here will you see them discussed as outbreaks.

So when someone asks me about Sara Palin, I am frankly too old and tired to explain the history they know very well to them.

I was with Wallace, but I knew very well that, wish as I might, he was simply a step in the movement to a conservative coalition. I was also responsible for saving the space telescope at a crucial moment because I saw that the Soviets were a paper tiger economically and their Empire would be trumped, as we finally did with SDI.

But there was not a single yokel who knew his economics, his Soviet economics, his political figures, and his science as well as I did. No one was with me in two of those fights, much less all three. No one understood the connection.

So when I look at Sara Palin, I am looking at the context we all lived through, but anyone who wants to be a professional commentator doesn’t talk about anything but the current sensation.

There is snow on the ground in South Carolina today. This is unusual, but if anybody acted like it was the first time there has ever been snow on the ground here, he would need treatment.

But the system pays people for that kind of insanity.

These articles often begin with an example, but when I get through writing and rewriting it, it ends up illustrating something unexpected.

This one begins with my stating again that two of my professors in grad school at the University of Virginia won Nobel Prizes. So where am I going?

Will I do a piece on how the real advances in economics were finally realized to be coming from the right? How about illustrating how smart I am?

Actually the critical point of this statement has to do with an entirely different point that has come up in BUGS. I often say that I want BUGS to be able to continue after I pass away or am finally put in the dingaling ward.

Some of our readers react to this like a member of my family would: “Is something wrong, Bob?”

No, nothing is wrong. This is a fight I would give my life for. I want the points I have worked out here to continue like any other soldier wants his side to keep fighting when he might fall during the battle.

A soldier makes sure his fall will not bring defeat, but he sure as hell does not plan on falling.

So I mention those two Nobel Laureates to illustrate an entirely different point.

Very few people reaching 70 know anything about the fate of their old professors. But I have read about those two because of their status.

One of those two Nobel Laureates, Ronald Coase, just reached the age of 100. The younger one, James Buchanan, is now 91. Both are still going strong, and neither is a health fanatic of any kind.

I looked up my dissertation first reader and he is  88 and still going strong. He is not only not a health fanatic, he is actually pudgy.

If those two profs had not won the Prize I would not know this.

Old Bob will be 70 on March 31, a mere child by comparison. And medicine will be better as I get older. I will do everything I can to make this good news for you and bad news for our enemies.

A couple of years ago Brian told me he was going to do a revamp on BUGS. I cleared it and forgot about it. Brian told me no more for months, choosing instead to work with pros like SysOps as he went ahead.

One day months later the old format was there. The next day the revamp happened, and I had to learn a lot of basic things again. I felt idiotic, but mostly I felt happy.

Can you imagine how the average vet pref or affirmative action small-time manager would have reacted to this?

“Why the HELL didn’t you keep me up with this?

Not me. I have never held a Big Title myself, but what I can do for you is to tell you what things are LIKE in the big leagues. I wasn’t the Big Guy, but I was senior staff.

The big guys expect staff to do it ALL, and it isn’t just because they’re being “My time is valuable” snobs.

Richard Nixon said that when he became President he misallocated his time at first. He had already been a congressman, a senator, and the Vice President of the United States, but he STILL took a while to realize how long it took him to realize the full importance of DELEGATING in that job.

Nixon said he spent one of his first nights in the White House worrying about an international civil aviation agreement that had reached his desk that day. Later, he had trouble believing he had done that. That agreement was reached by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) advising the State Department

The CAB was where I worked. We had a total of seven hundred employees. If the President tries to micromanage seven hundred Federal employees he will never sleep. The total regular civil service was two thousand times that many people, not to mention the Army, the Navy, and other folks.

When you get into the big leagues you must hire pros and let them do their jobs. I have psychological disabilities and have been a workaholic all my life. But I can get a lot done simply because micromanaging never even occurs to me. I was very happy to see Brian grab the initiative and run with it.

There is a new sentence at the top our main page. It says that anyone reading this should look at General Comments 5, which is where the news from the FRONT is.

Nice people will think this me being modest, pointing to other writers on Bob‘s site.. Actually, it is more valuable than that. It is me DELEGATING.

This is something the Old Man has to TEACH you: How we do it in the Big Leagues.

One General Comments 5 entry stated that he had read BUGS for six months before he went to GC5 and found it wasn’t just the Old Man’s Wisdom but a General Staff Center where those doing the fighting reported back to GC5.

That led me directly to this article.

Someone else in GC5 quoted a statement I must have made about how you need to take initiative: “In this war, if you don’t get orders, just go kill something.”

I read General Comments 5 closely. GC 5, at least so far, is people who are putting in the Mantra in places where they know it will be taken down. They don’t whine about censorship. Once you really get into this fight, you know that censorship becomes routine.

We are like other revolutionaries who would write on walls and put up signs in the dead of night in the full knowledge they will be erased and taken down in the morning.

This is exciting. This is ACTION.

Actually, delegation is not so much a matter of modesty as it is of GUTS. You have to take the heat when one of your people does something wrong. The micromanager is often just plain scared.

BUGS is small, but we are literally taking on the whole damned world.

There’s no room for micromanagement here.

Now go kill something.

When you have hit somebody with the Mantra and will not back away from their seeing it, a silence begins. It is the silence every experienced questioner knows, be he priest or policeman.

When you hit near the nub, you can tell generally where that nub is. The person on the other side begins to say he already answered that when he hasn’t or that it has already been dealt with, which it hasn’t.

This last is a good trick, because your refusing to stop making the basic point, over and over and over, gives him a chance to say that, somewhere in all your repetitions and his attempts to get around the point, there was an answer.

It is important for you to know this is a regular trick.

But it is also an example of Mantra Thinking. When I bring it up specifically we all know that when the police get down to the real thing, a felon will stop talking. He at least gets surly, as if talking hurts him.

And now we get back to the nub of Mantra Thinking: We all know it, but we don’t THINK about it.

By now we all know that no one is going to deal with Mantra, because it is so clearly true. So by now we should be thinking a little about the nature of the silence — and the silencing — which every guilty person uses when he is caught red-handed.

Silence sometimes takes the form of a scream. On every University campus is a resident group of thugs who will shout down the Mantra or anything that Mommy Professor wants suppressed. Like Al Capone, Mommy Professor will disavow all knowledge and have an alibi.

As I say, people all know something but they never THINK about it. They bitch about their taxes being high and they know that anyone saying anything disagreeable to the establishment will be shouted down, but it never occurs to them that they SHOULDN’T be financing a so-called university where all dissent is shouted down.

It took me years to get the Mantra into the form in which any possible response was already covered in the Mantra itself. After a couple of forceful repeats showing that was said in the Mantra and we’ve all heard it a million times, he retreats into silence and trying to change the subject.

I repeat, this is the same silence you run into if you are questioning someone and begin to show you know they did it and how you can prove it.

Getting them to confess is the next step. But no one is going to confess when he has the whole backing of those in power behind his lie.

When the confessing begins, the whole game will be up.

You know that things have reached a desperate pass when you see a Pilgrim-descended, hard core Yankee like backbaybaygrouch (BBG) and a Jamestown-descended Rebel fanatic from the Bible Belt like me in the same foxhole covering each others’ backs.

In Europe they consider this North-South thing a bit of a joke, compared to the national hatreds of France, Germany, and Poland, for example. But for those of us who live in our OWN national history, this is a big thing.

While we ask Europe to bury its national hatreds and work for our race’s survival, we are DOING it.

I used to tell Scots that they could call me a “Yank” if I could call them Englishmen. But they really don’t GET the comparison. It never occurs to them that calling a Southerners a Yank is just plain provincialism.

Another lesson BBG can demonstrate is how MANY ancestors a long-term American has. A European would be confused when a descendant of the Pilgrim’s is also a hard-core Catholic. This did not surprise me at all.

There is the impression, carefully cultured in the press, that all Americans are recent immigrants. But the Pilgrim was among a THOUSAND of BBG’s ancestors when you go back to 1620, and my Jamestown forebear was one of a thousand Americans who became my ancestors.

The Puritans lost all trace of their hard religious roots, so I assume that BBG’s later determined Catholic fathers and mothers formed so that he did not drift off into the rootless generality that caused the Pilgrim descendants to die off.

But the point is not BBG or me. The point is REAL American history. Whites didn’t really turn on each other until we had taken the entire country all the way to the Pacific in a joint effort. None of those people considered themselves immigrants.

They were conquerors.

And they were PROUD of it!

Even after the shock and hatred of the Civil War, no one took this “nation of immigrants” bullshit seriously. History books simply erased Jamestown from the books and declared that our America was first settled at Plymouth Rock in 1620.

Only since World War II has this “nation of immigrants” nonsense been enforced. Whenever we are shown pictures of the real America, we see photographs of the Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island.

What is particularly bad about this is the pure rude INGRATITUDE of it. O’Reilly brags that HIS ancestors never took part in taking land from the Indians or slaveholding.

The reason Bill’s ancestors were so pure is because the earlier white Americans had taken and made safe an area of three million square miles, and all O’Reilly’s ancestors had to do was take a boat over here.

Yes, the poor babies DID run into anti-Irish sentiment here. But they did NOT run into hostile Indians.

I read New York Jews talking about the awful third-class places on the ships THEIR ancestors had to take. What they NEVER mention is the Mayflower, which ran out of FOOD and had to land and which, like the ships Jamestowners came over on, took cat-sized rats on board and drinking water that was thick with slime , and rationed, as a matter of course.

I don’t know about BBG, but I find it personally insulting when an O’Reilly joins in the condemnation of my ancestors.

I ended “Our Third Rail” January 7th with this statement:

“No one is allowed to dispute the statement that the children of a marriage do not matter. The doctrine says that all that matters is that, at one given moment, the black and the blond are “in love” with one another. What happens to the children is absolutely forbidden for conversation.

“And for now some of us may have to settle for that or go to prison.

“But the bottom line is that the ultimate goal of anti-whites is not a colored majority, it to transform every white country into a COLORED country.

“THAT is Prize their eyes are on, and that is the Prize we seek to deny them at any cost.”

You and I are now very familiar with the concept of Wordism. But I cannot produce intellectual heirs if they do not realize that it is merely KNOWING things, but THINKING about them, EXPANDING on the basic principle the way Newton expanded on gravity and Adam Smith expanded on supply and demand, and Einstein developed the Special Theory of Relativity on the Theory of Relatively which had already been applied to sound.

We are pro-white, and we see whites become anti-white by distorting Christianity or becoming totally fixated on Jews or by becoming open-border Libertarians.

If I have any real intellectual heirs, they won’t just stop with noting it a problem PRO-whites have.

And, like almost everything I say about this THINKING process, once you open your eyes you can see it actually happening.

You cannot look clearly at Russian politics without seeing anti-whites being “corrupted” by Marxist ideology. American foreign policy cannot see it clearly, because Russians who oppose American control are a coalition of people our established religion cannot understand.

The KGB and Putin, once the ideals of anti-white militarism, are becoming chauvinistic and are side by side with the giant skinhead pro-white population. Russian nationalists, once the group our established religion considered their prime enemies in the anti-white struggle they waged for sixty years with their Moscow Comrades, now find the Soviet Power advocates lining up beside them.

Lenin once said, “It makes no difference whether the world has two billion people or half a billion people, so long as those half a billion are COMMUNISTS.”

Soviet Power advocates know Communism doesn’t work, and their enemy is the American-European takeover advocates. Their enemy, though they don’t know it yet, is the Multicult.

I have done a lot of talking with top figures in the Duma who are in the opposition. I am not important enough to talk to Putin’s ruling group. But no one there on either side finds saving the white race anything but reasonable.

There are few things that can make you see the absurdity of “all races are the same under the skin” like having fallen from Superpower status at the very moment when the coming power in the world is China on your border.

Russia used to be the anti-white’s favorite country. But only we can understand what is happening over there. Their Stalinist Wordists and their Russian Nationalists and their anti-Semites and their peasants and their people who see hundreds of millions of non-whites ready to flood in make a combination any old fashioned American politician would understand.

But the Multicult can’t even MENTION it.