There is literally a war going on just south of the Mexican border. Any time anyone gets killed on THIS side of that imaginary line from stray bullets, it is news. Then there is the question of whether Mexicans coming here will make this the same kind of country they have.
This is the kind of connection anyone who THINKS about the situation would make. But the job of the liberal-respectable conservative duo is to prevent such thinking.
As I said in the New Rights Papers a generation ago, the reason Mexican labor is worth several times as much when it crosses that invisible line is not magic. It is because, when a Mexican crosses into the United States, he works in a country that is NOT run by Mexicans.
This is a conclusion every respectable conservative points to as heresy. They say it is racism because it cannot matter WHO populates a country. All that matters is the pieces of paper the country is supposedly based on.
So libertarians believe in magic. They insist that there is no reason labor should be worth more on this side of the border.
How many times have you ever heard anyone ask WHY Mexicans have to come HERE for opportunity. We always hear that they are only doing it for their families, of course. There is no greed in Mexicans.
We also hear that the Mexicans are not at all responsible for the full scale slaughter going on where Mexican rule begins. The media are always saying that the whole blame is on Americans, because Americans “have an appetite for illegal drugs.”
Political Correctness is a religion, but it seems to me that even after being trained act the liberal seminaries we call colleges, this sort of cant would begin to pall. But all the people around me repeat this crap like trained parrots.
Why is it that the same labor is worth so much more when you cross the Rio Grande? The only thing that changes there is the jurisdiction.
Which is why they are all shouting that Mexico is having that war within gunshot of the American border because Americans are greedy for drugs. So why is the war on the Mexican side of the border?
Americans are impenetrably stupid about immigration. But a war of that magnitude and violence inside the United States would cause even the theologically-obsessed American morons to see that we don’t want Mexico here.
So the war is kept on the other side of the border and is never used as an argument against populating this country with the same workers who make Mexico what it is.
In the longer term it will be racist to say that outright war like that should not be inside the United States. That will take a while, but, like everything else I have predicted, it will come to pass if we let the present arguments go by without comment, as respectable conservatives are paid to do.
It is population, not appearences, that makes a country what it is
#1 by Dave on 01/19/2011 - 4:43 pm
The assorted greasy pigs and sluts that style themselves as America’s judiciary take their personal security for granted. Their nameless arrogance prevents them for understanding the risks to themselves that rise from their own ignorant BELIEF in Political Correctness along with their unearned security and comfort. Accordingly, they are situating themselves for a “Mexican drug war” they do not understand in the least.
There is a reason why Mexican prosecutors and judges roll over to the gangsters, which they do almost without exception. It is very basic: They roll over to the gangsters for their own personal survival and for the survival of their families. The Mexican government can engage in “security” charades until the angels blow the trumpet for judgment day, but there is not one police officer, government paid bodyguard, or member of the military that is going to put their lives on the line for Mexican officialdom. Why should they in a society where every strand of DNA in it is corrupt?
Don’t you think that Mexican prosecutors and judges live with that fact every breathing moment of their lives?
Yet here in America we have an Arizona Sheriff living just a few miles from the Mexican border who is so personally and spiritually corrupt and devoid of professionalism and so profoundly ignorant of the facts and risks to himself personally and to his own family that his FIRST response to a monstrously bloody attempted political assassination in his own jurisdiction is to accuse the law abiding civilian population of the crime and demand that curbs be put on free speech.
YOU CAN’T GET MORE CORRUPT THAN THAT. Yet this same Arizona Sheriff obviously feels absolutely safe in regard to his own personal security and the security of his own family. Go figure! And go figure for the officialdom of America as a whole!
Everything comes around in life and these ignorant fools are going to learn the meaning of the Mexican war they take so cavalierly. And that meaning will be VERY PERSONAL, as PERSONAL as it gets.
#2 by Gavin on 01/19/2011 - 4:56 pm
“In the longer term it will be racist to say that outright war like that should not be inside the United States. That will take a while, but, like everything else I have predicted, it will come to pass if we let the present arguments go by without comment, as respectable conservatives are paid to do.”
This is what I fear, that things will get worse. If we let things continue on, will they get worse and worse or will they eventually just build up too much pressure and explode, I don’t know. I am doing a lot to get the message out. I have probably got the mantra viewed by 6000-8000 people in the past two weeks. Hopefully I’ve converted at least 6-8 people and planted seeds for others.
#3 by BGLass on 01/19/2011 - 5:00 pm
A NYC politician was on t.v. talking about his vision: we collect money in taxes, then have enough to “bring in” the “best and brightest” from other countries— then with these brilliant minds bussed in from elsewhere (non-white) we’ll have the best country. He was jewish, of an age, and being “smartest” in a multi-racial environment and without the threat of gentile white “smarts” was his idea of what to shoot for in life. He was wearing his childhood dream on his sleeve. An kind of embarrassing public exposure, imo.
Same with Fox. Like, how Hannity re-lives glory days of the Roman Empire about to go get ’em some Muslims or something, even though that was a thousand years ago, lol, (and anyway, he’s Irish, so why did he allow somebody else to graft their history onto him, anyway?), then he discusses it with Jews who he thinks are agreeing with him, but who are Restoring the Temple in their minds. So, people play out their little psycho-dramas.
Any one of these would say, “What? Was a drug war ok when it was South of the Border? Isn’t it better that it’s here? In fact, shouldn’t we be thanking God for that? And why should Mexicans have to put up with that when we don’t? It’s only fair that we should allow them to have warfare here, also!” Maybe we could designate a foreign war area, maybe in the previous bible belt since those people are so annoying, and with even more tax allocations, we could…
#4 by BGLass on 01/19/2011 - 5:06 pm
Envy, greed, ego, but also fear of not being able to survive in a whiter world, or being able to compete well enough in it— some of the motives of anti-white.
#5 by Alan B on 02/05/2011 - 6:35 pm
Mexican Drug Battles:
Face facts, Mexico has always been an impoverished nation from the time of it’s inception. The Mexican people of today are brown skined, their White Spanish race of old destroyed by racial mixing between White Spanish, Indians and negros. The mexicans of today are only slightly better off that any country in Africa run by brown people. White money fuels the greed in Mexico, the violence was always there and if it was not drugs it would be some other thing for an excuse.