Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Sixties Lesson I: Screaming at the Weakest Generation

Posted by Bob on January 25th, 2011 under Coaching Session

For those of you to whom the 1960s are ancient history, the Old Man would like to explain what happened then that we can make use of.

First of all, as I mentioned before, the headline radicals were almost all New York Jews, and they silenced the Weakest Generation which was then in control. Unlike young people today, the Weakest Generation associated screaming with What They Deserved.

The Weakest Generation still had a Stockholm Syndrome from the so-called training administered to them by sergeants who screamed in their faces. Basic training was to make “dog-faces,” obedient dogs or less than dogs. Actually no professional pet trainer, even in the early forties, would use those tactics on a dog.

New York Jews are a special breed. I remember that the most heated anti-Semitic diatribe I had ever heard when I was in high school — and I had heard the Klan — was from one of my sophomores I went to lunch with.

He used words that I had never heard before, but that clearly made kike or yid sound like a term of endearment.

It should be noted that sometime during his diatribe I came to understand that he was a South Carolina Jew and half of his synagogue was made up of immigrant New York Jews.

New York Jews were notorious, and we understood his fury. We could avoid them but he couldn’t.

When I was in grammar school the older kid who led us across the street from the school bus was hit by a speeding car that didn’t pay any attention to some hick school bus laws. The kid was lying on the ground white as a sheet, I mean really white as a sheet, with the muscles hanging out of his leg and screaming.

The long-nosed guy with the New York plates was actually walking around shouting, “How much is this going to cost me? How much is this going to cost me?”

It doesn’t take a Goebbels to dislike a person like that.

In public, the New York Jews in the sixties screamed and the Weakest Generation, which was at its height of power just then, instantly backed down. The more the radicals insulted them, the more they backed down.

Just like they had done with their sergeants.

  1. #1 by backbaygrouch on 01/25/2011 - 6:15 am

    A bit over a year ago biographer Walter Isaacson wrote a piece for the Atlantic to promote a book. The article highlighted division in the American Jewish community at the time of a 1921 American tour by Albert Einstein seeking the Yankee Dollar to satisfy a divorce settlement with his first wife.

    The tour was guided by Louisville raised Louis Brandeis by then on the Supreme Court. In dealing with the Russian Jews of NYC he wrote his brother, ” The Easterners—like many Russian Jews in this country—don’t know what honesty is & we simply won’t entrust our money to them.’ Einstein did not intend to be shortchanged by his own tribe.

    Bob’s high school sophomore pal would have recognized the divide. His litany of complaints colorfully echoed Brandeis’ judgement.

    The economic debacle America is living through is a direct result of a clique of New York Jews having a lock on the entire financial structure – Wall Street , the Federal Reserve and the Treasury. This stranglehold embraces the entire range of public fiscal and monetary policies and has penetrated much of private commerce and industry.

    Shsss. Just read the names and say nothing. You are not supposed to mention it or you are, gasp, an anti-semite.

    America needs to wake up and realize that “Jews in this country…don’t know what honesty is,” and as a sound policy “We simply won’t entrust our money to them.” Prosperity cannot return until such a time.” It should not take an Einstein to figure that out.

  2. #2 by OldBlighty on 01/25/2011 - 6:24 am

    Question for Bob: In the last article you coined a new word, ‘desbot’, for the robots that have been programmed to reject the Mantra.

    Can you tell us what the ‘des’ part is short for?

  3. #3 by James C on 01/25/2011 - 8:43 am

    OldBlighty – I believe desbot is meant to be a play on the term “despot”.

    • #4 by OldBlighty on 01/25/2011 - 9:00 am

      “a play on the term “despot”.”

      Oh that is very good. Robots that believe they own the truth.

      Now I understand why Bob mentioned the free internet movement. I’ve seen these creeps threatening people everywhere, with their “You are just hiding behind internet anonymity”, mantra.

      Only desbots have reason to fear speech that is free.

  4. #5 by BGLass on 01/25/2011 - 10:17 am

    The same Bible that killed all the indians, enslaved all the blacks, reneged on all treaties, gassed all the youknowwhats, is the exact same one we have now, so it was people who went bad, not the god. For way too long, I thought Religion was where we’d gone wrong!

    Like just yesterday, an article at Alt-right “Where Calvin Meets Mao.” One more endless self-flagellating self-examination like some disgusting monk whipping. What if, just after the war, with the men “bitch”-slapped into submission, our group was just seen as the power to beat and was attacked by way more people? They never mention THAT. All the stupid prots reel as if it’s some deep internal religious flaw of protestantism, alone, and nobody ever hits them, like there isn’t even life outside them. They go on and on like this, mostly just repeating jewish theories anyway, and it’s gross, like picking a scab in a restaurant, like nobody else even exists.

    We’re told jews have “monotheism.” But they do not in the Christian sense. They have one god, and it is the only god. Nobody else has a god, not really, no christian has a god, but jews will allow them to pretend they do. Other gods are useful fictions that can be studied and used for social control.

    “Look at what that dead goy did to my bumper!” is how it plays out on the street.

    Psychology has the lingo of “projective identification.” This is about how one is positioned in relationships. Even if no one COMES OUT AND SAYS you are subhuman, or you are a heretic, which means to me like that girl in the Exorcist, or whatever— you are forced to identify yourself as such, on a level, when interacting with a person who has those greasy little beliefs. You are positioned that way IN THEIR MINDS, and they are interacting with you on that level, and you feel something you can’t put your finger on that is very wrong, a more subtle thing than when you are dying and some guy is going on about his car bumper— but still, it’s the same thing, just more subtle.

    I don’t want to be subhuman OR a heretic, but I usually chose heretic if I have to be somebody else’s something.

    But it’s gross. We have sinned! Oh woe is me. How did Mao get to Calvin? Where did WE go wrong? We were attacked hard, you stupid idiot and now you’re doing it to yourself for them!

    Jews never question their god or themselves. They are born into exile (from land and god). God is pissed at them from the get-go. Now, they have new land, which means god loves them. In the torah, this is a sign from god to destroy other people (their gods, altars, groves, etc.) That’s what the Bible SAYS and everybody has read it. Somehow, even so, religiously, goys had no idea (they weren’t reading and thinking) what “giving land” would mean for them, in somebody else’s context, of a sign to attack other gods. (The inability to truly intake words is probably more where they went wrong, not Calvin, lol)

    The bottom line is: Calvin Rocks! Mao Sucks! Why was that guy picking our gross little scab for enemies to see, no offense to him personally! But: Mao Sucks! That’s all. Just Mao sucks! Calvin Rocks! Mao Sucks! In your opinion, I’m a heretic, but are you a white rabbit?

  5. #6 by shari on 01/25/2011 - 12:13 pm

    I have an idea that that screamers of the sixties, were the offspring of those who came up with the dogface method of training soldiers in the first place. Good Grief! Wouldn’t train dogs that way is right.

  6. #7 by shari on 01/25/2011 - 12:21 pm

    This is a go along piece,I think. The left is FIVE times as violent.

  7. #8 by BGLass on 01/25/2011 - 12:47 pm

    I went to only one meeting once. Stupid hippie-looking children ran in screaming “Fascist! Fascit!” Instinctively, I screamed back “Fascist! Fascist!” I didn’t even know what a fascist was! And no one had even had the decent politeness to warn me this sort of thing happened or that people took pictures (I went innocently having no ideas just to see what it was). No seasoned white activist joined in at yelling back–Even though they were twice the age of the children who I would later learn were called “antis”; after a minute, I wound up cowering in the corner with the other grownups waiting for police, and that was my one experience. Anyway, it wasn’t the antis themselves, but the state power and hefty apparatus one fears is behind them; that’s the fear. Cowed by kids screaming inanity—Lord!

  8. #9 by Simmons on 01/25/2011 - 1:20 pm

    I had my 11 weeks of USMC screaming, and frankly I thought it funny, the other stuff was what got my attention. Even by that time in my life I was becoming tired of the GG dogface crap (and trust me I was surrounded by GGs).

    In my turn to interject scattershot thought into the mix, I would say screamers fear authority, perhaps obsessed with authority.

Comments are closed.