Archive for February, 2011
One commenter pointed out that the BNP still uses the word “anti-racists” for anti-whites.
When we reach our next stage of development, such an atrocity will be greeted with a storm of objection.
But if you DON’T object you are part of the problem. Right now BUGS is where you report this sort of outrage, but BUGS is also not dedicated to sitting around and bitching to each other. This is NOT Stormfront.
You don‘t even need the citation. All you have to do is email or otherwise tell the BNP that this is an outrage.
Bitching and making a pest of yourself is not pleasant. But it is effective because it is not pleasant for those on the receiving end, either.
Working on Capitol Hill, I was impressed by how some monomaniacal “nut” could affect the congressman. Every congressman and every staffer knew that, if they said something bad about Elvis or ignored an issue they had no interest in and was not important, “Bill from Mansfield” was gong to send an outraged letter about it.
This is an entirely different picture from the one people, especially conspiracy types, have given each other of the real world. Their world view has congressmen enveloped inside the Beltway with rich donors and People Who Matter. So they tell each other that “writing your congressmen” is so much hot air.
So the letters don’t come.
I was at a tenant’s meeting the other day when our condo owners were complaining about the local utility company not listening to their need for the replacement of particularly important lights. I pointed out that each member of the State House of Representatives represents about 30,000 people, and about a thousand of them were right here in this building.
They had never done the math. A call from a state rep makes all the difference. But the old myth about how the government is run by a tiny group of Genuises kept anyone from thinking of it.
I knew a doctor whose practice had been severely limited by losing his driver’s license. I was driving him. We went to a state rep who is a barber and he, while still cutting hair, made a call that got the license back because of the doctor‘s and his patients’ special needs.
Any time anyone on our side uses “anti-racist” we can hit them with our whole message, and if we get the reputation of massing against it every time this atrocity is committed, it will do endless good in promoting our message.
Don’t try to write a masterpiece, just object to the use of this enemy term and throw in the Mantra and go on to whatever else you were doing. One of the big roadblocks to doing something is that you feel you have to do it perfectly and so you put it off. It is the ROUTINE that will make everybody aware of our message, and let “anti-white” spread around.
You don’t need the exact citation any more than an anti-white needs to read a book he is criticizing. Even if it turns out it never happened, you still would have made it clear that EVER using “anti-racist” is something you won’t stand for.
What is important is not correcting the error. What is important is using a complaint to make it clear you will no longer stand for this “anti-racist” crap.
The Da Vinci Code really caught Christians off guard because all of them, not just Catholics, had assumed that Jesus was a virgin. In fact the Church became more of a fanatical anti-sex organization than it was anti-sin.
In fact, the worst sins were almost ignored in a total fanaticism over not having sex.
Then, suddenly, someone actually brought to public discussion the question of why a young Jew in 20 AD would be fanatically against marriage and children.
It was bit of a surprise when I was watching a documentary on the history of the idea of Hell and quoted a Zoroastrian on the subject in the fourth century. The Zoroastrians had been talking about Hell since centuries before the Battle of Marathon. The Zoroastrians were burning down the Greek temples for being “pagan” when the Jews were supposed to be in Persia.
Like the fact that “Noah’s” Flood was in the Gilgamesh Saga, this sort of thing really shakes up the official theological version of history.
So what is the basis of this problem for the churches? It is simply that they got so wrapped up in tying every word of the Old Testament to St. Paul’s Christianity with its thoroughly sophisticated, Zoroastrian ideas that they got their history not only wrong, but wrong to the point where they ended up making a new institution that had very little to do with Christ OR Moses.
We are not theologians here. Our interest is in the HISTORY here. We have an exact parallel.
We begin by trying to defend our racial existence. Then we find that Jews are doing their thing for their crowd, and, as is usual among humans, Jews end up being our enemies. Everybody who borders on anybody else is a Traditional Enemy, France of Germany, Germany of Russia, Turks and Greeks.
From our point of view, this is an observation, Jews border on everybody and are rooted in a hatred of everybody, and everybody who borders on them, European or Islamic, tends toward a fanatical, and logical, anti-Semitism.
Then come the institutions built on top of this reality. Inevitably every white group that was originally aimed at our survival becomes as obsessed with Jews as the institution that claimed Christ became obsessed with spaying or neutering any intelligent man or woman it could recruit.
When I quote Christ to a Christian it is just not the same as Religion, where you quote an obscure Hebrew prophet in the Old Testament.
I am not even surprised to find groups that once were pro-white arguing that we all have to assimilate for a common front against the JEWS.
Or the Communists.
Or the Masons.
Or the Environment.
In the first century the intellectual environment, especially that of the intellectual St. Paul, was as permeated with the popularity of degenerate Zoroastrianism as the world of Karl Marx was permeated by Hegel’s Dialectic. Today, someone studying Marx really doesn’t understand this fashion he is writing about.
Studying Marx without knowing about Hegel is very much like studying the self-styled Christian institutions without knowing that, even when the Roman Empire was ten percent Hellenic Jews, the largest monotheistic religion on earth was that of the Magis.
So the Christian institution became obsessed with something those who read the Da Vinci Code don’t even know existed, the anti-life policy of the degenerate Zoroastrianism that, in its healthy phase, had been limited to Aryans and had a mulatto at its head when it was crushed by Islam.
The major point of a pro-Aryan religion became hostility to life itself.
Those who turn our movement into an OBSESSION with religion or anti-Semitism are not doing something new.
The quickest answer to the standard first response to race traitor, “But I am white.” is “Benedict Arnold was an American, what’s your point?”
My reply in OV on SF was uncharacteristically personal but just as short:
“It’s called treason, dumbass. It happens all the time.”
The point is to dispense with this and get on to the point.
About 2400 men were engaged in the Battle of King’s Mountain. The only non-American who took part was the “British” commander, Ferguson. The battle was between American Whigs and American Tories.
The battle was fought over whether the 1200 Whigs or the 1200 Tories were traitors.
Nobody bragged that he was destroying his own country.
To me, as to any decent white man, seeing treason bragged about is like seeing someone go to the outhouse to eat dinner. How WOULD you view a person who had his meals in the outhouse?
Would you actually ARGUE with him?
The story goes that a man went up onto a mountain and consulted with the Source of Truth. His people saw him as their leader and his going onto the mountain began with their celebration of his doing so.
But when he came back from the Mountain, his people were doing what everybody did. Instead of welcoming him back and listening raptly to what he had learned, as they had so unanimously sworn to do a week before, they had gone back to what everybody did, they had built themselves an idol and were worshipping it.
In 1969, after an unprecedented program, a man stood on the Moon. All the world watched breathlessly.
This was an epochal triumph, and everyone felt it.
When the astronauts arrived back on earth, we were back to arguing whether Truth was in Sara Palin’s Protestant distortion of the institutions built on her Protestant construction, National Review’s Catholic Golden Calf, different versions of Karl Marx’s proposed Universal Institution, the Libertarian Final Solution to All Problems, and so forth in their thousands and millions.
As one astronaut put it, “I expected to see the first man on the Moon in my lifetime, but I never imagined I would see the LAST.“
Moses must have felt the same way coming from the Mountain as this man felt after returning from the Moon.
Like Moses’ followers, we drifted right back to building and worshipping idols in a few days after he was out of sight.
Today the symbol of Science is a windmill. Around the windmill is an institution, a worldwide bureaucracy dedicated to stagnation and the ersatz morality they throw together each week.
One commentator said that repeating the Mantra is not the be all and end all.
My reply is that you had better be damned good, professional at this, before you try to improve on it. Regulars seminar members will learn, IN ACTION, how to get our Mantra message across in different situations or when they have more or less time than usual, BUT LET US NEVER FORGET WHAT THINGS WERE LIKE PRE-MANTRA.
Nothing would be easier than to slide back into the Stormfront, News and Jews, IQ Tests and Crime, immigration law crap that has damned near destroyed us. Just a little letup in our discipline and you will be asking those around you what happened to this rolling over the enemy we have been doing?
I’ve seen it happen. Granted the Mantra has never gone anywhere near this far in all the years I have fought for it. But time and again a few people would actually get the Mantra and then slide back to the old ways.
Our people are improving on the Mantra, but only the ones who have really mastered it. Very few of our top spokesmen really even understand it, and some who have interviewed me have gunked it up or admitted they really didn’t get it, though they said they were all for it.
I am delighted that the pros in our crowd are learning to be more elastic with the Mantra Message, but this is the first t time I have EVER felt someone had mastered it enough not to begin a rush back toward the old N&J bit.
Now that we have it, for God’s sake let’s not loosen our discipline.
Deciding to “improve” the Mantra before you have mastered the technique is one disaster I have been witnessing for years.
No one but Bob has been THROUGH this, so listen to me here. LEARN before you decide you are good enough to improve.
We are so many miles further along than I have ever been before that it is indescribable. I usually didn’t get as far as the “Don’t be so rigid” bit. I stayed at the “DUHH!” stage for decades.
They were LONG decades and I am the only one who went through them, so pardon if I pound away at this.
What is great now is that our old pros here are bragging that some of the huge number of new practitioners actually call THEM to order on Mantra discipline. It is great the new ones are doing it, it is equally great how the old pros recognize this as great.
Once you GET the Mantra, it is hard to understand why other people in the movement, DON’T. Believe me, I know that. But it is a reality. In fact, that is the very mental block that the other side uses, and it is a biggie.
They can talk to you about destroying our race without mentioning it. They only talk about Tolerance, Guilt, and the other stuff, and leave out the point that all this Tolerance and race-mixing is for white countries ONLY. No wonder our own people find this mental block so hard to overcome.
But before you decide to go back to piloting by the seat of your pants, you damned will remember the mental block we are up against.
It is true that under certain circumstances culture can make race unimportant. If a black, a white, and a dog are all chained in a dark cave their entire lives, they will not come out very different from each other.
White trash loves cruelty because it is the only way they can have power. It takes talent and intelligence to make people laugh. It takes an IQ below that of an animal to make people cry.
Communism managed to keep three hundred million white people and a billion Chinese at a third world level while Japan and Western Europe soared. Today everybody is talking about how fast China is growing.
If you take the white man, the black man, and the dog out of that cave, you can use any measure you want to and you will find that each of them improves at an astounding rate.
So Mommy Professor, who imposed the chains of Socialism in the first place, will rush to us with more advice. He will say that this proves that there is no genetic difference between a white man and black man, or for that matter between a black man and a dog, because all of them are improving rapidly, the dog probably faster than the other two.
To clinch this, he will point out that HITLER said there was GENETIC difference.
Now let us follow some money. Leftist billionaires have two places to invest their money, one side for charity and another side for investment. They will donate billions to Mommy Professor on the philanthropic side, but not one dime of their INVESTMENT money will go into the assumption that t a billion Africans are as good an investment as a billion Chinese.
I repeat, if China were black, nobody would be putting bets on her future prosperity.
But respectable conservatives are dumber than the liberals they worship. It was breathtaking when T. Boone Pickens violated the silly philanthropy versus investment rule and sunk two billion dollars of INVESTMENT money into the windmills and the bureaucrats’ solution Mommy Professor advocated.
Of COURSE he lost it all. No liberal billionaire would do anything that retarded.
I have said over and over through the years that no one whose first priority is economics has ever solved an economic problem. Hitler stated flatly that a problem he faced in leading a political party was that he had to come up with economic proposals, and he had never had the slightest interest in any economic theory.
So when the Depression came, only one new regime promptly solved it, and in the country known for having the worst depression of all.
Smallpox was not the first disease wiped out in white countries while it was still a major problem in Asia within my memory. Leprosy was wiped out in the Middle Ages by Europeans, who treated lepers as lepers.
In the 1960s lepers were still begging in the streets in Saigon.
No white countries were as unsuccessful, to say the least, than the Communist ones whose whole basis of life was an economic theology. The world has totally forgotten that Japan was a third-world country until after World War II.
Japan was the first country ever to have a per capita income equal to that of the United States a generation later.
China, meanwhile, was a third world country legendary for its poverty and went DOWN after the Reds took over. China was the bastion of pure Communist economic ideology and Japan had no economic philosophy at all.
Nixon once said, “We are all Keynesians now.” His history was wrong. He quoted the liberal line that economists had demanded a balanced budget in the middle of the Depression, as Keynes said they did. A friend of mine did his dissertation on that subject and proved that not one single economist at the time had advocated balancing the budget in a time of depression.
ALL economists in the actual 1930s advocated anything but a debt-based stimulus of the kind Hitler used to snatch Germany out of its depression. It was the bankers, and the Democratic platform of 1932, that demanded a balanced budget. The bankers had their theology out of economics.
But in a sense Nixon was right. Keynes’ big work was his General Theory in 1936. It was a theology of how government could keep the economy running right. In that sense, they are all Keynesians now.
National interest, race, and all the other considerations have been thrown out. We do not talk about racial survival, but only of affirmative action. We do not talk about having the immigration our national interest requires, but about the theology of “a nation of immigrants.”
Making a theology of economics, whether libertarian or Marxist or Federal Reserve “fine tuning the economy,” is always a failure, and for an obvious reason. Once you decide on an economic theology, you cannot just take care of the economy and go on. You have no choices if your whole philosophy dictates ONE approach to economics.
Hitler did have an economic theology. It was called Lebensraum, the idea that Germany had to take territory to survive. If Germany had concentrated on itself instead of expansion, it would have remained the success it was in 1936, when it alone had solved its economic problems.
This is why America cannot understand Islam. The US is absolutely mystified by people who are really upset about our siding with their enemy Israel. There has to be an economic motive behind it.
Socialists, Randians, economic conservatives, income distribution liberals, Tea Party types demanding an end to abortions and deficits, none of them understand why, in a world where all motivations are economic, a person will blow himself to Kingdom Come without some “practical” motivation.
And, chained as we are to two parties whose only serious basis is two conflicting economic theologies, we keep worrying over deficits until the next crisis makes us forget them and run them up.
The big push to take care of the Runaway Deficits which crested with Ross Perot first in the polls for the presidency against BOTH major parties was forgotten by September 12, 2001.
It’s Big News again.
Meanwhile, let’s talk about something that matters.
People come into the struggle and they leave for various reasons. I doubt Hunter or William will stop being white. Nor do I believe they will stop caring. Furthermore, being a dissident is a tough business and everyone needs a break every now and then.
WN are going through what Soviet Dissidents went through in the last stages of the Soviet Union. Who in the hell wants to be a Soviet Dissident? It was a recipe for a lot of abuse and generally they looked like masochists to the public. Of course, the public agreed with the Dissidents. That was the problem for the Soviet Union. The public agreed with the dissidents even if they did not have the courage to become one. The challenge was that saying the wrong thing in the Soviet Union and you would lose your job or worse….the Gulag.
Their struggle was very similar to ours. The white public will always agree with the average WN or Paleoconservative on almost every issue just as the Soviet Public would agree with the Dissidents on all the issues.
What happened in the Soviet Union to change things for the better? Well the big activity was in regards to something called Samizdat. Samizdat were basically the pamphlets or even little newspapers that carried their message. The problem for the dissidents was always the same. They mostly wrote their Samizdat to cater to other dissidents! And there was always lots of back biting etc. So how did they turn things around and help make history bringing down the Soviet Union?
A handful of the dissidents started listening to actual professionals who helped them fine tune their message to a razor’s edge. A small group of dissidents came out with a very similar message against the system. They basically learned to say WHAT they wanted to say without going to the Gulag. They stopped writing to other dissidents and starting writing for the public. This in turn spread like wild fire. Why? Because the public always wanted to be against the system. They always wanted to say something. Now they could do it without losing their jobs or worse.
The Soviet Union was soon gone and very few realized what had happened. Then the Dissidents became very famous and some even wealthy. But they never became famous for nitpicking and writing to other Dissidents. In fact, those facts are all but forgotten right along with the invincible Soviet Machine.
It hasn’t been long in historical terms since Ireland was the Poor Man of Northern Europe. The Irish considered not only England, but even LIVERPOOL, as paved with gold.
Others may not mention this historical fact, but the Irish are very, very aware of their own recent history.
So while the fact went unnoticed in the rest of the world, per capita income in Ireland is now higher than English per capita income for the first time in known history.
Nor have the Irish kept this to themselves as a secret. The English are considered to be very reserved. Those of the Land of the Blarney Stone are less reserved. They have a tendency to treat reservation somewhat less seriously than the English.
In fact, people from the Emerald Isle are more like Texans.
So the fact that Ireland is now richer than England has been ignored in Ireland the way Texans ignore their oil wells.
So why is this flip flop not something the rest of the world proclaims?
One major reason for this silence underlies the whole discussion of Culture versus Race.
A racial view of the world looks upon economics as an effect, not a cause. People do not invest in Mexico because Mexico is the product of Mexicans. That is a point of view that is absolute heresy today.
It is also true.
It is assumed that China, like Japan, will eventually approach a Western standard of production. It is not assumed Haiti ever will. It hasn’t been that long since China and Japan were on a par with Haiti. Asia was assumed to be a desperately poor place.
While Japan and Germany were performing economic miracles after WWII, China and Eastern Europe stagnated while sending out reports of economic growth under Five Year Plans that dwarfed those of Japan and Western Europe.
Those economic reports were a major part of public dialogue in the 1960s. If you looked up a country in the World Almanac, the reported per capita income was part of it. Communist countries were catching up with the United States.
But in the end, everything came out as we would have predicted, as I did predict. Once rid of the democratic socialism Mommy Professor advocated, India became a net EXPORTER of wheat. Without Communism, the relatively small population of Japan vastly out produced a billion Chinese.
The rule is that Orientals can copy and equal the West. White countries without Communism will naturally rise to be like other white countries.
This is an assumption that is as deep in our thinking as is the Mantra, and is never mentioned for the same reason.
If China were black, the expectations everybody has of it now that it is going into the market system would not be what they are. A billion Africans are going nowhere. A billion Chinese are assumed to be going far.
Nobody mentions that, just as no one mentions that all this “melting pot” crap only applies to white countries.
The fact that Ireland has achieved its economic status as a white country surprises nobody.
But it is also MENTIONED by nobody.
Except the Irish themselves.
Before founding Alcoholics Anonymous, Bill W went to Switzerland to see one of the world’s top psychiatrists about his alcoholism. He was told that alcoholism was something that psychiatry could not handle.
Now psychiatrists and talk therapists make their livings in alcohol and drug recovery. But their pricey talk sessions are accompanied by regular daily AA meetings. Even these talk therapists never claim that they deal with alcoholism. They say their sessions are a supplement, a search for OTHER problems alcoholics might have.
I had all too much time to think about why a bunch of amateur drunks built an organization which seems to be able to deal with alcoholism itself better than any professionals could ever claim to.
Once I began sponsoring people I came to the conclusion that the big difference between talk therapy and AA is that AA has EVOLVED in the real world.
If you are a sponsor and what you are doing doesn’t WORK, you will be in the emergency room or at the funeral to see the results.
The key here is that AA is based on evolution, not on theory. For most of a century members of AA have had to face every day the immediate results of what they are doing.
There have been millions of live subjects for this evolution.
There is no AA theory. A sponsor is on his own. The only score is on your conscience. Each alcoholic selects his own sponsor and I have turned down far more than I dared take on. I will never know whether my failures might have survived if they had had another sponsor.
But that, I have concluded, is exactly the point. You can never tell yourself, as a therapist can, that you did your best. A therapist simply makes sure he has done all his theory requires.
You attend the funeral and nobody can assure you did the best you could.
Evolution is the science of screwing up. It put hooves on early carnivores and they died out. Evolution still pins tails on human babies, and will continue to do so, but the ones with visible tails die out, so nature tries it again.
The Mantra evolved. I keep trying to explain to people that it developed from thousands of head-to-head encounters, rather than from a theory of what a good argument might be.
This is a hell of a lot harder than theorizing about killer arguments. That is the developing difference between BUGS and Stormfront. In actual conflict, be it changing minds or the result of failing to do what is called for, you cannot do what you planned on beforehand.
That is why General Comments 6 is becoming the heart of BUGS. Our field of action changes almost daily as desbots block the Mantra and new pro-whites find out what the real, daily limits on our action are. We evolve daily.
The one thing neither psychiatrists trying to deal with alcoholism nor Stormfront ever had was field reports.
And all the drilling on earth cannot prepare one for actual combat.
More and more of what I write starts with what one of you said in Comments, especially General Comments 5, to which there is a link at the top of this page.
In a seminar, the professor’s job is to get his students to asking the right questions and making the right points. When I see someone who needs correcting, one of you leaps right in and does the correcting.
Please know that Old Bob sees what you did and is grateful.
A few of you have been a bit upset that I dropped out of comments so completely. It is VERY important to me for you to realize how delighted I am when one of you puts another back on track.
I have admitted to you that I have an ego. I like getting the praise I am due.
I am just too old and experienced for the Silent Hero crap. The one failing everybody finds at my age is that they didn’t give people enough credit. I felt my bosses were too much above me to need my praise.
I was wrong.
So you deserve praise, but it would get us off he subject if I kept thanking each person who jumps in with the right thing at the right time.
The old Strong, Silent Hero is the subject of an entire movie or book talking about how wonderful he is. Being a flatterer is something that makes us sick.
But a flatterer gives praise that is NOT deserved. He has a reward in mind besides simply encouraging someone who merits and, being human, NEEDS to be recognized.
There probably are some Strong, Silent Types out there. But as one guy said to me, “A guy who doesn’t have much to say usually doesn’t have much to say.”
No, it wasn’t Yogi Berra, but it sounds like him.
My silence is consent. You are turning right into pros before my eyes, and it is the best reward I could possibly have for years of work fighting the good fight and hoping you would come along.
Now shut up and get back to work.
Anti-whites suppress any discussion of white genocide because Hitler talked about it.
If you outlawed discussion of anything that had been horribly misused in history every cross would to taken from every church. No one would-be allowed to wear anything that had a cross on it. Nothing has been used to kill and enslaved more tens of millions of people than Christianity.
If you used that excuse, every clergyman would be in prison.
If you outlawed discussion of anything that had been horribly misused historically, anyone who talked about the distribution of income would be in prison.
Stalin used the question the distribution of income to kill tens of millions, and Mao Tse Tung killed even more. Would it be all right then for a gang of thugs to show up and riot every time someone came to the campus to discuss income redistribution.
In Communist countries the word “fascist” is used all the time. In fascist countries almost all opposition was called “Communist.” That is exactly the way the “racist” is used today.
Freedom of speech is always suppressed with the excuse that it might cause trouble. Tyrannies like Nazism and Communism Always used somebody’s else’s totalitarianism to justify their own.
In fact, no suppression of free speech has EVER used anything but screaming some label to justify itself.
If no one stands up for the right of a person to openly talk about the disappearance of the white race we see going on around us, how long will it be before Political Correctness condemns their discussion of other issues?
It is critical to remember that the Mantra is not a debating tactic.
The Mantra is repeating back to anti-whites what they say all the time. If everyone took it for granted that every black country — NOT JUST AFRICA — were singled out for immigration, it would not take five minutes for everybody to realize this was an anti-BLACK measure.
Over and over I have given the example that singling out Iceland for immigration is like singling out Haiti along with all black countries. The other half of the island of San Domingo, the Dominican Republic, is already mixed blood, so it would be exempted from the pressure.
When I use the term Jewish Wet Dream I am REPEATING what an endless number of Jews have said to me and in public. They start with “I am Jewish, so…” and then they say that anyone wanting to preserve the white race is an enemy. “Race-mixing,” by which they mean WHITE-mixing, is therefore a Jew’s duty.
So when I point out that, from what THEY say, the ultimate in race-mixing, a blond girl and a black man, is a Jewish Wet Dream. They have said a million times that it represents one of their main goals in life.
Telling people what they just said is a very different form of argument than accusing a group of secret manipulators. It takes a think to “expose” such a Conspiracy. And it is as productive as accusing businessmen of wanting to make a profit.
The Mantra is the total application of the basic rule of Western science, the rule that made it the ONLY real; science on earth, Occam‘s Razor. Occam’s Razor says that you cut away the crap. Occam’s Razor says that you look carefully at the obvious cause of something instead of building a whole new World Philosophy on a whole new theology or philosophy.
Occam’s Razor is the reason we are using the Internet rather than banging on drums.
Commenters run into an endless stream of critics who want to get away from the basic point and talk about a World View. The one great barrier for us is the insistence that the Mantra will “cause trouble,” that the white problem is already being solved by being called the RACE problem.
So why bring it up?
Because you cannot deal with a problem until you have STATED the problem. What we want right now is for the planned extinction of our race to be RECOGNIZED as a PROBLEM.
The article “It’s Ugly!” pointed out that the product of a Jewish Wet Dream, a blond woman and a black man, was just plain ugly. The answer is that this doesn’t matter, that a kinky-haired, blue eyed black having to go through life looking like that means nothing.
All that matters is that, at the time of copulation, the Jewish Wet Dream couple was “in love.”
If you can take that crap seriously, that being ugly is nothing compared to the emotions of two people at one moment in time, one of us is a very sick puppy indeed.
A lady commenter said that blacks were mean to the blonds they marry. A chorus of commenters said that was not the point, so I was spared the trouble.
This is the problem with a real seminar. It is one reason they no longer exist. In a seminar, the young graduate students are deadly serious. Everybody really catches hell from time to time, so the young lady just ran into something all of us have to catch from time to time because we are serious.
It beats hell out of what they now call a seminar, which is young graduate students learning what they are supposed to say and vomiting it back. It is a continuation of grammar school, as is Middle School, high school, and college.
Mommy Professor’s “education” is one long grammar school.
If our lady commentator thinks about it, it is a hell of a lot better to catch hell at rare intervals rather than sitting there for hours listening to the grammar school Political Correctness drill year after year after year after year after year after year..
The point here is that the destruction of our race is more important than how a female race-traitor is treated or Love Conquers All.
In the more general context what the other commenters were saying was what we all said when Stormfront got into a debate about whether one could be pro-white and not be a practicing Christian:
“Why in the hell does one have to be loyal to an institution to fight for his race?”
On this front we have had some hot words about Catholic and Protestant behavior.
I use churches as the prime example of independent institutions, which doesn’t get mentioned in any classroom. Our race is being destroyed in the name of institutions.
It is VERY important to get the pro-white position on this straight: Loyalty to ANY institution is anti-white.
It is impossible for any person raised in society NOT to have feelings for some institutions. Even me. When someone says something nasty about the South, my back goes up like an infuriated cat’s. When Catholicism is just plain insulted, Backbaygrouch reacts as someone who has stood for that sort of thing for decades would be expected to.
I know more bad things about the South than any of its detractors. BBG knows more dirt on his church than outsiders do. But it is still a touchy point with us.
It always will be. But we all have greed and all the other Deadly Sins, too.
What we have done here is to take this loyalty to institutions out and see it is no longer moral when our race is literally being obliterated. That is the ONLY MORAL consideration.
The fight going on about a commenter’s sayings about Catholics and Protestants will not be settled by me or anybody else making some soothing remarks to soothe the feelings expressed.
The ONLY thing we must remember is that we are in a graduate seminar. We have outgrown our college education whether we had one or not. If a commenter makes statements that he or she feels are relevant, they are going to sound like insults to some institution.
But. Unlike today’s so-called seminars, this is a real one. It is up to the commenter to keep insults down. It is up to the other commenter to not let the whole thing go off in a defense of any institutions.
In short, it is a matter for grown-ups not Mommy Professor’s lifetime children being nice to each other. A real professor, now a vanished breed, would use this occasion to point out the real point of the real discussion: We must grow out of our loyalty to institutions.
I very seldom try to link BUGS with current issues. But Porch Talk is not connected with what just happened. I went from Porch Talk to using what I learned listening to the hardnest and most practical kind of current politics.
Porch Talk can be good advise in almost anything.
One example is my lone and successful initiative to get congress to stop the IRS from unilaterally imposing race quotas on private schools. The reason it is current is because Obama announced his intention to get a lot of his environmentalist programs that congress wouldn’t pass through by having regulatory agencies impose them.
Our most effective argument against this, as usual, was a basic. A regulatory agency only exists because congress cannot do everything. Article 1 of the Constitution says that “ALL legislative authority is invested in Congress.”
John Ashbrook asked each of the one in five minority that did not want to repeal those IRS regs, “Why don’t you introduce those regulations in congress?” It was very effective, like the Mantra, because it dealt with a point no one had considered in many years: regulatory agencies issue regs to CARRY OUT the mission given them in the legislation which created them.
When John died and Mrs. Ashbrook and Bob Dornan were left to debate the renewal of the ban on such IRS regs. From a four to one majority, they damned near lost. They were pitiful. As usual, they ended up compromising.
I wish you could have seen their floundering attempts to defend what John and I had beaten the crap out of the opposition on.
It wasn’t just the issue, it was the ARGUMENTS we had that got that four to one majority. I watched it on C-Span, and even I was impressed by how critical it is TO GET YOUR POINTS RIGHT.
What they desperately needed was me. I have seldom felt so helpless, as I had moved on into the Administration. But even I did not fully realize until that moment how absolutely critical it is to MAKE YOUR POINT AND MAKE IT RIGHT.
Both Dornan and Mrs. Ashbrook were totally devoted to what they were doing, but they didn’t have the intellectual discipline John and I had developed, and I watched them lose a lot for that reason.
Most people are not really aware that regulatory agencies are given only the powers congress hasn’t the TIME to regulate. They’re not legislative bodies.
Read any agency ruling and you will find, first of all, reference to the legislation that gave the agency the right to make that regulation.
But I doubt seriously anyone among the respectable conservatives will MAKE that point, much less ram it down the opposition’s throat the way they would have to in order to rein in the Obama Power Grab.
Senior staff spent a lot of time on the House Floor. We were technical support on particular legislation and there were usually plenty of seats unoccupied, so it was easier for the congressmen to have us right there.
But when something had the whole membership down there, a lot of us would sit in the Jefferson Room or watch on the TV in the office.
But my position was as an idea man. So by the time something I was working on got the whole House membership there, it was a general issue and I was not needed down there. I would sit in the Visitor’s Gallery, if there was a seat, watching the whole House fighting over an issue I had started rolling.
One of those times another staffer sat near me in the Visitor’s Gallery, and he said, “You got this started, didn’t you?” The two biggies I remember were when I got Ashbrook to get us the weekend when anti-space types were trying to end the space telescope. Another was when I got the organizations in there to stop the IRS from enforcing its self-made rule to force race quotas on private schools.
But there were a number that only I thought of. On the above two, by the way, we won four to one on the Floor with almost the entire membership voting.
The staffer I just mentioned sat near me on another such full House vote, and he said, with some wonder, “You got THIS started, too, didn’t you?”
That made me feel good.
These votes were a lot like the Mantra. I grabbed a subject that regular conservatives would have let slip. Please note that the removal of the Hubble Telescope was going through when I stopped it, and when the whole thing actually got to the Floor, it was beaten about 340-80.
We trounced them by the same margin on the IRS race quotes.
And on most of the things I got to the Floor.
In other words, once I got hold of it and put in plain English, they couldn’t defend the position they were sneaking through. I did that for a living. So the Mantra took me YEARS to plant, and those who try it run right over the opposition.
The opposition can only try to keep it from reaching the Floor.
But at first, in every case of these House issues, I had to work my tail off to the point of passing out sometimes to get people off their asses. General Comments 5 is the fruit of a number of years I spent by myself trying to get the Mantra across.
You should be encouraged by the fact that this is not an accident. I know what can win, even if the entire elected representation and their staffs do not.
I also know how hard it was for the few others on the Hill who Got It each time. They were not as used to the complete blockheadedness of the entire membership and staff they worked with. Some of them quit, but I still won.
Hence my nervous breakdowns.
The next time an issue came from me, everybody had totally forgotten I had gotten it started. It is a very important rule: Some people DO things and others live by taking credit for them.
Instead of being bitter about this, I found it useful. If the other side had KNOWN it was me, they would have watched me like a hawk. So I traded credit for real power, as I have said here many, many times.
I can’t imagine a more powerful position to be in. For you, I cannot imagine a more frustrating position to be in. You are hitting at a target and the entire media is dedicated to keeping anyone from knowing you are doing it.
This is a great time, when you are realizing how helpless the other side is when you have the Mantra and accompanying arguments down pat. I can hardly sit still when I look at General Comments 5.
But this is the phase I went through in those earlier cases, when an enthusiastic group had taken up the cry. But the enthusiasm hit a brick wall every time. People do not take frustration well.
Next year the second phase will begin, when you have been doing this for a year and the novelty is wearing off. It was no fun on the Hill for that enthusiastic group to run into one respectable conservative after another who just DIDN’T GET IT.
That is the time when the enthusiasts start saying, “Well, we tried but it didn’t work.”
I have been through that stage many, many times. But if I kept them at it, it ALWAYS worked.
Your job is to get the Mantra in there.
DON’T TRY TO KEEP SCORE.
The only problem there is now is YOUR getting tired of hitting the message and seeing no obvious results.
Those are the times that try men souls…
Many people today see the pro-white’s fate today as that of an ancient bastion whose walls are being conquered.
Thousands of times in ancient warfare there was the same scene:
The enemy outnumbers us twenty to one, and some of us are fighting him as he comes across the wall on ladders pouring over our defenders. Most of us are away from the wall crying “All is lost!” Relatively few are so devoted that they will die on the wall just to delay the enemy, though those running away do not show up in Heroic movies.
Davy Crocket is doing all he can to beat the Mexicans off that are at the top of the ladders.
But we all know that once the fort is breached and it can’t keep off the ladders, all that is left is to die heroically.
But what if somebody snuck out of the Alamo and took advantage of the confusion of Mexicans trying to get onto the crowded ladders, and went in and jerked the ladders out from under them?
As long as you concede them the ladders, you are lost.
Stormfront tried for years to throw off the guys coming over on the ladders. The ladders the enemy used were on our wall, and we never gave any thought to the BASE of those ladders.
The BASE of the conquering ladders was based on the solid ground that we had to accommodate them, to be fair, to be decent, to treat everyone the same. We were arguing about “mankind” pouring into all white countries and ONLY white countries as if everyone had as much right to white countries as we did.
Everybody in SF seemed to think of himself as Davy Crockett, fighting it out hand to hand.
If you are only fighting the swarming masses at the TOP of the ladder, OF COURSE you are doomed.
The Mantra pulls the ladder out from under them.
When I use the Mantra the anti-whites look a lot like a warrior who is at the top of the ladder, seeing his forces overwhelming the wall, when suddenly someone takes the thing out from under him. He is holding on, his legs swinging, and he doesn’t know what to do next.
But I feel that a lot of commenters are still playing Davy Crockett. They can’t see Old Davy sneaking down in a Mexican uniform and joining those who are taking the ladders away.
They want to talk about how The World is Going. They want to yell that we are not defeated and go right on with the kind of fighting that got us into this fix in the first place.
Stop beating your chest. Stop trying to call those mewling runaways to come back to the wall.
Go where the action is.
Go grab the ladders.
The whole basis of ALL Wordism is that human nature produces societies that are contrary to human nature.
All Wordism begins with Rousseau’s assumption that in nature all animals are equal, that animals have no wars, that birds sing to attract mates, but hold no territory against other birds.
Even Jesus talked about the birds as if they did not plan for tomorrow. Really? Watch the male get the best tree to attract his mate, watch the birds build their nests.
This is one of the most critical things you can learn from the Old Man simply because he is an Old Man. No one but me seems to remember how totally ALL the forms of Wordism, left and right, were developed when EVERYONE actually BELIEVED that in nature there were no borders, no class distinctions, no war.
That is why there IS Wordism. Wordism assumes that everything “wrong” with “society” is the result of our institutions, our going Away From Nature. Remove civilization, said Rousseau, and all of men’s evil habits would go away.
In fact Rousseau came up with our present assumptions that Noble Savages are just like animals, so they are guiltless and good. Rousseau invented the term Noble Savage.
He never SAW one, of course.
All the other forms of Wordism begin with this same assumption. Marxism says that the only thing keeping us from his idea of the utopia is exploitation. He began with the idea that animals have no class system and no exploitation.
Libertarians believe that if government were removed, people would go back to their natural instinct to be as free as the birds.
But birds are not free. Their nature controls their life to an extent even a Communist government would find hard to imitate.
No social animal has anything like equality.
This is Mantra Thinking. Mantra Thinking does not accept the details everybody is talking about. Mantra Thinking goes back to the assumptions everybody takes for granted.
ALL social science, ALL Wordism, is still in the 1950s before the total revolution about how social animals actually behave occurred and ALL our assumptions about animal and human nature became completely laughable.
I get almost no comments on this. In a seminar, your comments are your own, but the old prof would like to see more talk about how different the world looks when you realize that the ENTIRE so-called Intellectual Discussion is as out of date and as just plain SILLY as arguing how many angels can stand on the point of a pin.
The problem is, we all know the angels on a pin stuff is ridiculous, but we STILL take our outdated “discussion” seriously.
I pointed out that while every human being had always dealt with gravity, Isaac Newton did the Mantra Thinking and THOUGHT about gravity. I pointed out that every successful businessman back to Neanderthal practiced supply and demand, but Adam Smith went Mantra and THOUGHT about it.
I have talked about how no one ever fails to join in a discussion of “Is Eastern Europe READY for immigration?” but nobody ever THINKS about it. Why should Eastern Europe be ready for immigration and not much richer countries like Japan or Taiwan?
The Mantra THINKS about that and points out “Eastern Europe is White.”
We all learn about the Medieval struggle between Church and State and, like early men with gravity or traders with supply and demand, we didn’t THINK about it. We know why that struggle happened, just a men always knew about gravity and supply and demand.
It never occurs to us WHY we know.
The answer is simple: Church and State were two institutions competing for the same resources.
Backbaygrouch was a bit grouchy when I insisted that the Catholic Church was anti-white. But unlike others, he caught on immediately when I pointed out that ALL institutions are anti-white. All institutions compete for a limited resource:
We have watched Stormfront having a knock-down-drag-out fight about whether a person can be pro-white without being a Christian. We are wearily aware of all the people who want to destroy the white race because they are loyal to respectability.
The Reformed Church in South Africa switched sides on apartheid, just as Bob Jones IV did on the Confederate flag. Did either of them honestly believe that GOD had changed his mind on these issues at just the right time?
Rome declared Joan of Arc a saint after World War II. She had gone out and, in the Name of God, killed the English invaders, who were then also Catholic, for the sake of her King and country.
But the Catholic Archbishop of New Orleans excommunicated lifelong loyal Catholics who publicly opposed integration.
If you are to understand Christ, you have to view the institutions that claim His name as institutions, just as you must understand that the men who speak for religion are just men.
We all know that, but while we would say we know it, we don’t THINK about it.
Christ did. In fact the quotes we have from Christ himself show a deep, penetrating acceptance of human nature:
“Not all who call me Lord, Lord, will be saved.”
Not all who called him Lord would be right.
Each real church considers that it represents the true Christ. God knows what the rulers of the mainline Protestant churches believe, if anything.
But churches consist of mere humans and as no one has considered enough, each one is an institution which has survived in competition with every other institution. Realizing this evolution of institutions is every bit as important as understanding the nature of humans in general.
Mantra Thinking is looking at basics that one in Mommy Professor’s world would never look at. Once you get used to it, it is amazing how no one notices the truth of the so-called “race” problem, that it applies only to white countries and to all white countries.
But Newton also did Mantra Thinking. Through all the ages of hard work that had gone before, gravity was a force everyone was all too familiar with.
But Newton didn’t just NOTICE gravity he LOOKED at it.
Likewise in all the millennia before Adam Smith successful merchants all the way back before Neanderthal knew that what was most valuable was what was most rare. Men have made their livings buying things where they grow in plenty and taking them to places where they are not for time out of mind.
But Adam Smith didn’t just NOTICE supply and demand, he LOOKED at it.
These days the million of our Mommy Professors are a bureaucracy like any other bureaucracy, but it hasn’t been that long since someone who became a college teacher was FASCINATED by his subject.
A century ago they were known as Absent Minded Professors, because their minds were on mathematics or history or whatever they devoted their lives to. That is forgotten now, when there are so many of them and most of them did well in school so they just stayed there.
I hope I am throwback to the old fashioned kind of prof. I think Mantra Thinking is the most fascinating thing in the world. It fills all my hours. And, like an old-fashioned professor, I want you to be fascinated by it too.
For instance a documentary talked about how the trilobites died out in the Cambrian Extinction but have descendants, today’s ANTS. They just mentioned it in passing, but to me the idea is fascinating when you THINK about it.
A trilobite was a couple of FEET long. There was no land life then, so they were in the ocean. We don’t know if they had any social life at all, but it seems unlikely. So I love the sheer mystery of this. I dwell on it.
We do have a complete fossil history of how the whale began as a hoofed predator about dog-size. Became something like a hairy alligator breeding and living on land, and evolved into the whale as we know it now.
Back when the name of this forum was changed from blog to seminar, I talked at length about how this was about the only real seminar existing today. A seminar today is simply where graduate students learn to think and talk like members of the professorial bureaucracy.
Seminars used to be the place where one moved from student to talking about one OWN ideas of the subject he had mastered. It was the transition point between hearing and coughing up facts to the level of being a scholar. I explained at length, and it is still there if you want to look for some of it, that I give you points but you have to look at them from your own religious or non-religious, or any point of view from your own mind.
This is a real, old-fashioned seminar, and I am a real old-fashioned professor.
General Comments Archives
Back in 1976 I was on the Barry Farber show on WOR in New York City pomoting my first book. His opposition speaker, funny on how liberals never seem to require an opposition speaker, was a guy who said he hadn’t read my book.
This is standard practice. When the book about Jefferson’s supposed black children came out, they had several people discussing it and one was black. The black said he hadn’t read the book.
The one attack on my book on Amazon book reviews started with, guess what, “I haven’t read the book.”
One thing you notice about the white traitor and Vox commenting on BUGS is that they have not READ any of BUGS.
It never occurred to them to do so because Mommy Professor has told them what he wants them to say, and the last thing a group whose only strategy is screaming and outlawing the other side is going to want is that HERESY be read.
Vox really let that out of the bag when he said that “tinting,” meaning browning of our race, never hurt us.
I have pointed out at least twenty times that all of the countries that once had Great Civilizations have gone down for good, and they are all now BROWN. Even in Italy, the part of the country that stayed brown is the poverty region.
If you woke up from a dunk in a strange country that first thing you would want to know is the skin color. ALL “tinted” countries except those where whites found oil and paid the locals for it are poor and dirty.
Vox didn’t see that. He sure as hell couldn’t THINK of it.
So he declares an anti-white Lysenkoism. It is doctrine that white countries that have taken on black blood are just fine, in exactly the same way Lysenko ordered summer wheat to be planted in winter so it would “learn” to be winter wheat.
Everybody sees the color line, the “tint” line, from the Rio Grande to the Mediterranean. But, exactly like Lysenko, they are forbidden to THINK about it. That is the scariest part of tyranny, how people cease to THINK because they can’t risk it, sort of like that Twilight Zone segment with the little boy who punished people for bad thoughts.
So I think we will withdraw Mommy Professor’s Puppet Privilege. We will no longer allow anyone who has not READ our stuff to comment on it.
Some of what Vox says is fun, but none of it has anything to do with what we are actually doing. We already blame whites for their own troubles, and if he had read any of BUGS he would know that.
But, once again, the big advantage of allowing these two on is that they show that the totally mindless stereotype I keep talking about is NOT a stereotype. Even Vox blames US for teaching him Blonde is Beautiful.
Like all Mommy Professors, Vox puts blacks in a category with animals. Animals are not responsible, they are just trained.
If you ever want an example of how Mantra Thinking applies to everything, not just race, this one is a good start.
A previous article talked about the professional environmentalists’ demand that the European nuclear collider be abandoned because of cost overruns. What hit me was that the article said “Environmentalists see this AS THEIR OPPORTUNITY to end the collider program.”
The collider is part of a long-term scientific program to solve the energy problem by scientific means rather than a world rationing program like that in the Kyoto Treaty.
Note the wording, “See it as their OPPORTUNITY…”. Since my 1976 book I have not seen anybody talk about the natural growth of the competition between bureaucratic state movement and hard science. This sentence shows that, while most people reading the latest thing from Oprah or Iraq never think of such things, it is obvious to those on the scene.
Environmentalism is against all scientific programs that might solve the problem they are trying to build a world-wide rationing system on. The collider takes up twelve billion dollars that could hire Mommy Professor’s social science graduates.
When I say it in plain English, it sounds absurd, but the author of the article cited above clearly sees the conflict and takes it for granted.
This is much like the fact that articles regularly discuss “Is Eastern Europe Ready for Large Scale Immigration Yet?” and it seems a natural subject. It would make everybody wonder what would happen if an article asked, “Is Taiwan ready for Large Scale Immigration?”
The response would be, “That’s up to Taiwan and it’s none of your damned business.” But everyone knows why such articles on Eastern Europe are taken for granted. In fact, they take it so much granted they never ask why:
Because Eastern Europe is WHITE, of course!
The average college graduate would say “DUHH!” if the question of Mommy Professor’s statism versus science — were brought up. The science reporter clearly sees it as an ongoing battle.
The day the Soviet Union collapsed all the socialists became environmentalists. Lysenko science now rules, as we can tell from the scandal of the so-called scientists talking about how they were cheating on data for Global Warming.
With all the talk about medical costs, how much of “medical” costs is spent on lawyers?
Not one person talks about malpractice. There are three million lawyers in the United States, and each one imposes over a million dollars of costs on this country’s economic system.
Does respectable conservatism ever talk about statism versus science or “If Medicare, why not Judicare?”
What do the respectable conservatives says on these real issues?
That’s what they’re paid for.
When I wrote about no specific policy demands until we are allowed to talk openly about the whole subject of white genocide, Old Blighty asked,
“Are you saying those of us that want genocide tribunals, should not discuss our desire for them? I understand if that is the case. Practical politics requires discipline.”
Let me say first that the word “tribunals” gives anti-whites too much ammunition to call us dangerous. When I precluded the word “revolution,” I really meant just be sure you aren’t giving them ammunition.
In many cases what we are doing cannot be called anything BUT revolution. But words are our ammunition. Just be sure it doesn’t blow up in your face.
Almost every mistake I advise you against is one I have made over and over and over, ad nauseam. Frankly, the reason a warning bell goes off inside me when we discuss what will happen to them after because I like it too much.
One thing that most people do not realize is that people like me and BBG have been flayed mentally for half a century. We were not allowed to reply.
There is a term for that. It’s called mental torture. I have had to curb my temper all this time. Some conservative who blandly agreed to get rid of my race I had to treat as if I respected him if our cause was to survive.
After a lifetime of mental torture, it is a little hard not to love the idea of the other side getting theirs. For some of us who have suffered mental torture, it may be a necessary relief.
I have thought a LOT about what the punishment should be.
Although it is not to do what the enemy does as a lot of people like to say, in this case we could take the whole page right out of their book.
My idea is that we should make heirs and survivors, those billionaires and those large companies, pay MONEY for what is being done.
Think about it. Big, loud tribunals have a limited life span. But rewards for informants of just one or two percent of the money they bring in will last FOREVER.
I am very serious about this. You can take money from rich people more or less indefinitely.
Big, big, BIG money.
Fines are not considered punishment in the same way the word “tribunal” implies. I love the idea of a future where they live like we do, never knowing when someone is going to get to the heirs of one of their ancestors who put a paid ad in the New York Times and argue that they are therefore responsible for the whole history of that publication.
Informers are going to make arguments like that, and we will sit back and help them have their fun. The entire history of the anti-white movement will be known to everybody without our saying a word.
We can pay off the national debt just as a start, with all the Gateses and their like involved. The whole history of this whole thing will be exposed DAILY.
The point is that they want us to sound like totalitarians, because every time someone imposes a totalitarian regime they point to other tyrannies. But cutting taxes by nailing race traitors is not bloody. It is more a civil action than a criminal one.
But those of us who have suffered years of mental torture are well aware that a straight prison sentence can be a lot kinder than spending your entire life wondering when somebody, somewhere, is going to comedown on you.
There is even a certain joy in being a martyr to a cause, but we will not give them that. We will just turn a lot of billionaires into multimillionaires. You can’t attach a Nazi label to that, but it is far, far more permanent under its own steam and it will NEVER go away.
This is a lesson I got out of a lifetime of mental torture.
We don’t jail people. We don’t shoot people. We just make sure the dread lasts their entire lives.
Liberals did that to us, and it is very effective.