Senior staff spent a lot of time on the House Floor. We were technical support on particular legislation and there were usually plenty of seats unoccupied, so it was easier for the congressmen to have us right there.
But when something had the whole membership down there, a lot of us would sit in the Jefferson Room or watch on the TV in the office.
But my position was as an idea man. So by the time something I was working on got the whole House membership there, it was a general issue and I was not needed down there. I would sit in the Visitor’s Gallery, if there was a seat, watching the whole House fighting over an issue I had started rolling.
One of those times another staffer sat near me in the Visitor’s Gallery, and he said, “You got this started, didn’t you?” The two biggies I remember were when I got Ashbrook to get us the weekend when anti-space types were trying to end the space telescope. Another was when I got the organizations in there to stop the IRS from enforcing its self-made rule to force race quotas on private schools.
But there were a number that only I thought of. On the above two, by the way, we won four to one on the Floor with almost the entire membership voting.
The staffer I just mentioned sat near me on another such full House vote, and he said, with some wonder, “You got THIS started, too, didn’t you?”
That made me feel good.
These votes were a lot like the Mantra. I grabbed a subject that regular conservatives would have let slip. Please note that the removal of the Hubble Telescope was going through when I stopped it, and when the whole thing actually got to the Floor, it was beaten about 340-80.
We trounced them by the same margin on the IRS race quotes.
And on most of the things I got to the Floor.
In other words, once I got hold of it and put in plain English, they couldn’t defend the position they were sneaking through. I did that for a living. So the Mantra took me YEARS to plant, and those who try it run right over the opposition.
The opposition can only try to keep it from reaching the Floor.
But at first, in every case of these House issues, I had to work my tail off to the point of passing out sometimes to get people off their asses. General Comments 5 is the fruit of a number of years I spent by myself trying to get the Mantra across.
You should be encouraged by the fact that this is not an accident. I know what can win, even if the entire elected representation and their staffs do not.
I also know how hard it was for the few others on the Hill who Got It each time. They were not as used to the complete blockheadedness of the entire membership and staff they worked with. Some of them quit, but I still won.
Hence my nervous breakdowns.
The next time an issue came from me, everybody had totally forgotten I had gotten it started. It is a very important rule: Some people DO things and others live by taking credit for them.
Instead of being bitter about this, I found it useful. If the other side had KNOWN it was me, they would have watched me like a hawk. So I traded credit for real power, as I have said here many, many times.
I can’t imagine a more powerful position to be in. For you, I cannot imagine a more frustrating position to be in. You are hitting at a target and the entire media is dedicated to keeping anyone from knowing you are doing it.
This is a great time, when you are realizing how helpless the other side is when you have the Mantra and accompanying arguments down pat. I can hardly sit still when I look at General Comments 5.
But this is the phase I went through in those earlier cases, when an enthusiastic group had taken up the cry. But the enthusiasm hit a brick wall every time. People do not take frustration well.
Next year the second phase will begin, when you have been doing this for a year and the novelty is wearing off. It was no fun on the Hill for that enthusiastic group to run into one respectable conservative after another who just DIDN’T GET IT.
That is the time when the enthusiasts start saying, “Well, we tried but it didn’t work.”
I have been through that stage many, many times. But if I kept them at it, it ALWAYS worked.
Your job is to get the Mantra in there.
DON’T TRY TO KEEP SCORE.
The only problem there is now is YOUR getting tired of hitting the message and seeing no obvious results.
Those are the times that try men souls…
#1 by Genseric on 02/13/2011 - 8:12 am
Was it not Ronald Reagan who said, “You can accomplish much if you don’t care who gets the credit.”
Genseric uses the Mantra in 3D. It helps to stave off the effects of not being able to see tangible results on the internet. That is for the real warriors and gluttons for punishment among us.
The last time I engaged an anti-White, in person mind you, I could see her head start to implode after I broke down illegal immigration inside the Mantra.
It truly is an iron-clad argument not to be fucked with. Use accordingly. On an individual level, the law of unintended consequences DOES apply to The Mantra as well. And there is no telling what reaction a person might have when you take their World view, shake it violently, rake it over the coals, and kick it ass over tea kettle.
Thank you for the gift that keeps on giving, Bob.
#2 by Genseric on 02/13/2011 - 8:31 am
There is this nursery meme I learned a long time ago. It goes something like this:
Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.
Well, everyone knows that The Mantra has proven this to be False. The anti-Whites are on their heels, folks. And it is being done with WORDS.
#3 by OldBlighty on 02/13/2011 - 10:40 am
I have typed genocide so often, in the last few weeks, it is beginning to scramble my brain.
But then I see a Jewster from the North West Front, post a Mantra video and it gives me hope.
White GeNOcide
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VohM5StJlFQ&feature=related
After 30 secs you’ll see a familiar face.
#4 by dungeoneer on 02/13/2011 - 10:59 am
I will see the enemy chieftains dragged through the streets of Rome.
#5 by Simmons on 02/13/2011 - 11:11 am
I’ve long asked myself for a short succinct definition of Mantra logic. I think I have it now.
Mantra logic is the dissection and destruction of the “assumption” that exists in all ideology and theology.
Eg; The ASSUMPTION that there is no human nature.
The ASSUMPTION that anti-racism is exactly that and not just anti-white.
Notice how our N&Jers and Crime and IQ professors never attack their counterparts’ assumptions? Wonder why their effectiveness is basically zip?
On another thread one of our professors lectured me about Stephen Pinker’s Blank Slate with the assumption that Pinker is a nice man who means well. Pinker is guilty of promoting our genocide therefor I assume he is not a nice person. You decide folks is Prof. HP right or little ol’ me?
#6 by Simmons on 02/13/2011 - 1:28 pm
I assume HP is a “Body Snatcher” conservative who uses the “culture” out to appear respectable and get a good grade from ol” “anti-racist” prof.
Bob has warned us repeatedly of the “culture” out.
HP nothing personal, you are just wrong.
#7 by Dave on 02/13/2011 - 1:51 pm
Simmons,
You hit the “nail on the head” in your comment about assumptions. It’s yeoman’s work to keep BUGS on track.
It is just like when AFKAN said, “They draw the lines and then paint inside them”, a perfect expose’ of Wordism.
The whole of society is just a lot of pretending that human nature doesn’t exist, which is the very reason I have such contempt for cops.
#8 by OldBlighty on 02/13/2011 - 11:21 pm
“They draw the lines and then paint inside them”
When I read Mommy Professor pro white blogs, I am constantly thinking, their lips are moving, but nothing is coming out.
Compared to BUGS, Mommy Professor trained “intellectuals” are shadows. They aren’t even in the game.
#9 by BGLass on 02/13/2011 - 7:59 pm
“….I’ve seen women literally stop when I used the phrase “Genocide of White Children,” and I have not seen an emotional response with using “White Genocide” alone…”
Moving to another level of abstraction, as you put it, is to ask for names of their kids and a picture, then use the name; that makes it very specific, (make it personal.) If women stop at ‘of white children,’ try using “your little Timmy.”
—it’s the reason I have trouble at moments, listening to Horus, this making it personal. He talks of the evils of ANGLO banking, how these folks have got to be wiped off the planet. Being Anglo, in part, and having been around mexicans who especially frame debate of the hate object as Anglo (an ethnicity, or part ethnicty, of many)— and having seen real damage (murders) on the basis of such— I can’t help but hear such remarks as genocidal, as adding to the genocidal tone that affects and has incited against a white group, and which could make me, family, friends a victim (again).
Just fyi and I do know it is not intended. Anglo is not just evil bankers…it is an ethnic group, just like others. But it is so constantly linked with evil, and this is so unconscious, that it is deep conditioning, it does and can incite, and with real effect. I do wish some other word could be used, other than this which I’ve never heard in a positive light, and which has led to murders.
#10 by Wandrin on 02/13/2011 - 11:09 pm
“Some people DO things and others live by taking credit for them.”
If you plant an idea and allow other people to take the credit they are more likely to run with it.
@BGLass
“He talks of the evils of ANGLO banking, how these folks have got to be wiped off the planet.”
For various reasons beyond our control – partly history and partly because it’s a useful misdirection for the other side – the anti-anglo thing will get a lot worse. People of anglo descent around the world need to bear that in mind and be prepared to stick together if it gets out of hand while playing a team game in the meantime.
Hollywood for example will increasingly be playing to that particular bit of divide and rule as a misdirection. It’s just one of those things. If we end up having to fight everybody then we end up having to fight everybody. C’est la vie.
#11 by Frank on 02/14/2011 - 12:07 am
@BGLass
Horus began by using the term “Anglo-American Banking” as I recall. I don’t know why he picked this terminology, but perhaps it’s because of the “Crown”+”NYC” axis of financial power. It is a bit confusing because it sounds like he’s pointing a finger at “Anglo-Saxons” as a biocultural entity.
Regarding the term “Anglo” as used by hispanic types as a claim to name and a claim to defame white people … you should check out that topic on http://www.resistingdefamation.org. Try the following page, which discusses the slur of “Anglo”. http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/slurs9.htm
The basic message is that “ANGLO” is NOT shorthand for “Anglo-Saxon”, but a claim of supremacy by latino-types to name the diverse white european american peoples and lump us all into one generic “other” from their POV.
Never accept this slurring without an attackback to set them straight. Don’t call them names, just use some passive-aggressive techniques described at RD. Accuse THEM of supremacy and ask what mental disease they suffer from that allows them to suppress the wonderful diversity inherent in the European American demographic.
This stuff works a little differently than the Mantra, but it’s on the same wavelength as Simmons’ definition above (excellent btw!) in that it QUESTIONS their ASSUMPTION to have a RIGHT to NAME US and DEFAME US with their distortion labels. In other words, turn the energy of their words back on them.
#12 by HP on 02/14/2011 - 12:58 am
No, Simmons, you have got ME 100% wrong. See my followup to your post on the previous thread. And Steven Pinker is a typical cowardly Jewish “intellectual” who sees the truth but refuses to face it because it would invalidate his belief system. WHERE did you get the insane idea that I thought he was a “nice man”? Human culture is derived from biology, which is to say RACE; I’ve never said or thought differently. Why are you misrepresenting what I say, am, and believe?
#13 by OldBlighty on 02/14/2011 - 2:46 am
@HP
“because it would invalidate his belief system.”
With the above statement you have made an excuse for his behavior, thus absolving him of all responsibility.
We are saying these people knew exactly what they were doing. It had nothing to do with “belief systems”. For them it was always about attacking white people.
You need to read the Mantra as many times as necessary, until this concept sinks in:
“EVERY white country and ONLY white countries”
Like white genocide, the blank slate theory was intended for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.
#14 by Gavin on 02/14/2011 - 2:51 am
Wow, I have accused people of being brainwashed before but after reading your post I realize that doing this absolves them of guilt. Do you think it would be best to just accuse them of being anti-white and never let them off the hook.
#15 by Frank on 02/14/2011 - 10:38 am
Absolutely Gavin!
NEVER let them off the hook. Leave the hook and some nastily prickly barbs in them so their anti-white-ness festers.
When they attack us in whatever manner, NEVER be “nice” and let them off the hook psychologically. Play for keeps.
#16 by OldBlighty on 02/14/2011 - 3:08 am
Responsibility kills cults.
Simmons has made this point several times in the past:
@Simmons
“BBG I believe it to be true that Jim Jones had to be forced to drink the poison by his armed cult minders. Wordism being a manifestation of cult behavior, cults being formed to avoid responsibility.”
@Simmons
“The Soviet cult went from dominating the imaginations of the world’s masses to the memory hole in a small time frame. Not even Team B respectables and Jerry Ford could save it.
Cults fall apart upon insistent questioning, the Soviet cult being no exception.
In the good news department one wing of the CofCC has tried to interview people from the SPLC, of course the SPLC backed out.
Cults fall apart at insistent questioning. Mantra questions which assign responsibility kills cults.”
#17 by HP on 02/14/2011 - 5:33 am
How is calling him a coward “excusing” Pinker’s behavior? I have read everything Bob has written on-line, all the way back into the 90s, and listened to every one of his radio shows, and I have never heard him say that calling someone an intellectual or moral coward is somehow “excusing” his behavior! And how do you know that Pinker doesn’t really BELIEVE his own leftist nonsense? Doesn’t Bob say that political correctness is a religion? And are ALL priests, of ANY religion, really cynical, manipulative non-believers, in it out of hate and/or greed? I’ve READ Pinker’s book; have you? I’m not “absolving” Pinker of anything, least of all responsibility. He is certainly guilty of posing as a “scientist” yet subordinating the facts to his political beliefs; that is a CRIME in my book. And as a liberal Jew, he is automatically and axiomatically anti-white; that goes without saying, or should.
You people are too defensive. You need to lighten up. You are jumping to all sorts of assumptions and conclusions and attacking someone who is NOT attacking you. Okay, you know how to fight; but do you know how to make friends? I have been a “lurker” on Bob’s site since before BUGS came into being. In fact, years ago, I corresponded briefly with Bob. I don’t remember much of what was said, and I’m sure he doesn’t, either; but I DO remember him saying to me that he had tried his hand at writing science fiction once (since that is an interest of mine) and he described them jokingly to me as being about “rednecks in space.” I would still very much like to read those stories, Bob. If you ever run across them, how about posting them on your main site?
You know, despite Bob’s urging people to “think for themselves,” there’s a kind of “groupthink” here that is a little disturbing. You folks have drawn the wagons close in your tight little circle, are quoting from Authority (“Bob has warned us….”) instead of from fact, and are anxious, it seems, to conduct ideological inquisitions on a putative “newcomer.”
I’m sorry I ever posted here. I only did because Bob said he got few comments on the human nature revolution, and this is a subject of great interest to me. I think I’ll go back to lurking, and you guys can carry on. Good luck to you.
#18 by OldBlighty on 02/14/2011 - 8:31 am
@HP
Are you pro white, or pro white genocide?
#19 by OldBlighty on 02/14/2011 - 10:20 am
From what you have written here, it is obvious you have read nothing Bob has written. And I’m sorry if it terrifies you, that whites are working together in an effective manner. lol
And are you refusing to answer my question?
Refusing to answer that particular question, tells us everything we need to know about your intentions.
#20 by OldBlighty on 02/14/2011 - 12:24 pm
“How is calling him a coward “excusing” Pinker’s behavior?”
You ignored my quote:
“because it would invalidate his belief system.”
You are calling him anything other than what he is, which is anti-white. Every “anti-racist” I have interrogated has been been anti-white. They always have one standard for whites and another for non-whites. They always justify and celebrate white genocide.
“And are ALL priests, of ANY religion, really cynical, manipulative non-believers, in it out of hate and/or greed?”
Does it matter? Are intentions a defense in any court of law? If you do the crime, you do the time. There are no excuses for genocide.
“You people are too defensive. You need to lighten up You are jumping to all sorts of assumptions and conclusions and attacking someone who is NOT attacking you. ”
We are defensive? We corrected your use of words (word usage is vital) and instead of taking it on board, you started this tirade and stomped off.
“rednecks in space.”
This comment made me wonder about you.
“You know, despite Bob’s urging people to “think for themselves,” there’s a kind of “groupthink” here that is a little disturbing.”
To me this looks like a divide and conquer tactic. Classic psywar tactics.
“instead of from fact, and are anxious, it seems, to conduct ideological inquisitions on a putative “newcomer.””
You were corrected by those with real world experience and you chose to take it as a personal attack. If you must always be right, then you are of no use to BUGS, because you cannot be taught, or learn from experience.
At BUGS we test what works in the field. If it doesn’t work in the field, it is discarded. Holding people responsible for their actions works. Making excuses for them, or blaming something else, does not.
“I’m sorry I ever posted here”
If I have mistakenly come to the opinion that you are anti-white and are here to stir up trouble, I apologize.
#21 by shari on 02/14/2011 - 8:03 am
HP, How can you have a friendly conversation with those who push the the genocide of white children? Fighting is what bugs is here for, not making friends. I think you lurk, looking for a weak spot.
#22 by Simmons on 02/14/2011 - 10:36 am
HP your professor speak was what we have read for decades and it accomplished nearly zip. Sorry, but you still don’t get it, the left pushes a “null hypothesis” and our professors attack it as if it is legitimate, therefor in a backhanded way support the left.
Mantra attacks and deconstructs the ASSUMPTION.
Stephen Pinker does not want to brown a Jewish nation, only white ones.
#23 by HP on 02/14/2011 - 3:12 pm
I will say this, and then I will say no more, and you may interpret my silence any way you like; you will anyway.
Later this year I plan to publish one of my science fiction novels, and I will probably have a website to promote it. Since my fiction is what Kevin MacDonald calls “implicitly white,” I thought it would be nice to display a pro-white message, and I had planned to use a banner with the short form of the Mantra with a link to Whitaker Online. Why an “anti-white” like you seem to think I am would want to do that, I have no idea; but I’m sure you can come up with a suitably twisted and backwards explanation.
But this was when I naively thought that the Mantra was a TOOL for fighting white genocide. I was not aware until I began posting here and received such naked hostility that the Mantra had itself become a religion, with Bob the Messiah and you, his self-appointed disciples, as “priests” who feel it necessary to conduct inquisitions to determine the ideational “purity” of anybody who drops in to say something. I was unaware that the Mantra was the One and Only True Way, The Light, and, in a word, The WORD.
And as a 57-year-old free-born white American and Southerner, I do not feel obliged to submit myself to ANY interrogation by a bunch of self-appointed priests of yet another Ideological Religion. I thought Political Correctness was bad enough, but damned if I’ll put up with “White Correctness” or “Mantra Correctness.”
So I am having second thoughts about promoting the Mantra on any website I may have in the future. I may still do it; but this has been an unpleasant eye-opening experience for me. And if Bob Whitaker himself wants to address me, I will respond; but otherwise, I have NOTHING more to say to any of you, now or evermore. I regret ever having posted here; I won’t make that mistake again.
#24 by Gavin on 02/14/2011 - 7:10 pm
HP,
I don’t know if there was that much outright hostility. Communication does not always come across as planned on the internet. The writer may write one way and it may be interpreted by the reader as something different. For the record, I enjoyed reading your posts.
Saying that you are having second thoughts about promoting the mantra doesn’t seem to me to be such a smart move for a pro-white. Even if everyone on BUGS were to tell me that I’m stupid and should go away I probably would still post the mantra because I don’t post it for BUGS, I post it to benefit my people.
I know that I sometimes have a very sensitive “trigger” for anti-white rhetoric and sometimes this results in friendly fire. It may be the case for some of us that we are arguing with anti-whites so much that we get stuck in interrogator mode even if someone is not anti-white. I try to prevent myself from doing this.
So whether or not you comment any more is your choice but not using the manta out of spite wouldn’t be a good thing for anyone.
#25 by OldBlighty on 02/15/2011 - 1:16 am
“But this was when I naively thought that the Mantra was a TOOL for fighting white genocide. ”
Here we go again. More psywar tactics. Are you now saying it is the opposite?
“the Mantra had itself become a religion”
Its one attack after another.
“I do not feel obliged to submit myself to ANY interrogation by a bunch of self-appointed priests of yet another Ideological Religion”
You keep calling Bob’s Mantra a religion. You sound like us when we attack Political Correctness. Yet your target is pro whites.
“I was unaware that the Mantra was the One and Only True Way, The Light, and, in a word, The WORD.’
What did you expect on this website? This is a website for spreading the Mantra. What else should we promote? Everything and anything? If we did that, would it still be a website about the Mantra? DUH…
The olive branch has been held out to you several times, yet you have continued to attack.
I now believe my initial assessment of you, was entirely correct.
Goodbye HP.
#26 by Simmons on 02/14/2011 - 7:29 pm
HP it is you who unfurled the professor speak, kind of like slitting your wrists and jumping into a shark tank if you ask me.
OK so your smart and you went to college wrote term papers so tight you could bounce a quarter off them, that’s good. You got your chops busted, so what.
Good luck with the book, link back so we can check it out, maybe make some sales. But don’t pull this I’m gonna take the ball home stuff.
#27 by dungeoneer on 02/14/2011 - 9:45 pm
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2011/02/11/mantra-thinking-and-the-human-nature-revolution/#comments
HP:
“My point is that saying “the blank slate is bunk” isn’t going to change the minds of anybody who believes in it. I could present reams of evidence showing that Christianity is as alien and toxic to the white race as race-mixing and intermarriage; but none of you Christians out there will accept it, because you don’t want to hear it. And the smarter you are, the higher your IQ, the better you can rationalize it, and defend it, even if it is just plain wrong.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrzXLYA_e6E
@dungeoncrawler55 “Do you think White countries are prosperous by accident?”
Yes, it i an accident….read some history.
Read “Guns germs and steel” by Jared Diamond.
Of course, only if you are interested in true historical facts and knowledge, which is obviously not the case since otherwise you wouldn’t be here talking complete utter gibberish !
I am just tryin to help ya….
nevertheless123 1 day ago
nevertheless123 1 day ago
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@nevertheless123
“Read “Guns germs and steel” by Jared Diamond”
“Diamond called the headhunters of New Guinea the “world’s smartest people.”
You “anti-racists”(anti-Whites) believe that rubbish??????
dungeoncrawler55 1 day ago
dungeoncrawler55 1 day ago
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cheers Simmons,I was in tears as I posted that.
Don`t bother looking for any replies LOL
As for the Blank Slate “defenders”/”believers”,two words:
Comrade Lysenko.