Archive for February, 2011
Mantra Thinking Grabs the Anti-Whites’ Ladders
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/12/2011
Many people today see the pro-white’s fate today as that of an ancient bastion whose walls are being conquered.
Thousands of times in ancient warfare there was the same scene:
The enemy outnumbers us twenty to one, and some of us are fighting him as he comes across the wall on ladders pouring over our defenders. Most of us are away from the wall crying “All is lost!” Relatively few are so devoted that they will die on the wall just to delay the enemy, though those running away do not show up in Heroic movies.
Davy Crocket is doing all he can to beat the Mexicans off that are at the top of the ladders.
But we all know that once the fort is breached and it can’t keep off the ladders, all that is left is to die heroically.
But what if somebody snuck out of the Alamo and took advantage of the confusion of Mexicans trying to get onto the crowded ladders, and went in and jerked the ladders out from under them?
As long as you concede them the ladders, you are lost.
Stormfront tried for years to throw off the guys coming over on the ladders. The ladders the enemy used were on our wall, and we never gave any thought to the BASE of those ladders.
The BASE of the conquering ladders was based on the solid ground that we had to accommodate them, to be fair, to be decent, to treat everyone the same. We were arguing about “mankind” pouring into all white countries and ONLY white countries as if everyone had as much right to white countries as we did.
Everybody in SF seemed to think of himself as Davy Crockett, fighting it out hand to hand.
If you are only fighting the swarming masses at the TOP of the ladder, OF COURSE you are doomed.
The Mantra pulls the ladder out from under them.
When I use the Mantra the anti-whites look a lot like a warrior who is at the top of the ladder, seeing his forces overwhelming the wall, when suddenly someone takes the thing out from under him. He is holding on, his legs swinging, and he doesn’t know what to do next.
But I feel that a lot of commenters are still playing Davy Crockett. They can’t see Old Davy sneaking down in a Mexican uniform and joining those who are taking the ladders away.
They want to talk about how The World is Going. They want to yell that we are not defeated and go right on with the kind of fighting that got us into this fix in the first place.
Stop beating your chest. Stop trying to call those mewling runaways to come back to the wall.
Go where the action is.
Go grab the ladders.
Mantra Thinking and the Human Nature Revolution
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/11/2011
The whole basis of ALL Wordism is that human nature produces societies that are contrary to human nature.
All Wordism begins with Rousseau’s assumption that in nature all animals are equal, that animals have no wars, that birds sing to attract mates, but hold no territory against other birds.
Even Jesus talked about the birds as if they did not plan for tomorrow. Really? Watch the male get the best tree to attract his mate, watch the birds build their nests.
This is one of the most critical things you can learn from the Old Man simply because he is an Old Man. No one but me seems to remember how totally ALL the forms of Wordism, left and right, were developed when EVERYONE actually BELIEVED that in nature there were no borders, no class distinctions, no war.
That is why there IS Wordism. Wordism assumes that everything “wrong” with “society” is the result of our institutions, our going Away From Nature. Remove civilization, said Rousseau, and all of men’s evil habits would go away.
In fact Rousseau came up with our present assumptions that Noble Savages are just like animals, so they are guiltless and good. Rousseau invented the term Noble Savage.
He never SAW one, of course.
All the other forms of Wordism begin with this same assumption. Marxism says that the only thing keeping us from his idea of the utopia is exploitation. He began with the idea that animals have no class system and no exploitation.
Libertarians believe that if government were removed, people would go back to their natural instinct to be as free as the birds.
But birds are not free. Their nature controls their life to an extent even a Communist government would find hard to imitate.
No social animal has anything like equality.
This is Mantra Thinking. Mantra Thinking does not accept the details everybody is talking about. Mantra Thinking goes back to the assumptions everybody takes for granted.
ALL social science, ALL Wordism, is still in the 1950s before the total revolution about how social animals actually behave occurred and ALL our assumptions about animal and human nature became completely laughable.
I get almost no comments on this. In a seminar, your comments are your own, but the old prof would like to see more talk about how different the world looks when you realize that the ENTIRE so-called Intellectual Discussion is as out of date and as just plain SILLY as arguing how many angels can stand on the point of a pin.
The problem is, we all know the angels on a pin stuff is ridiculous, but we STILL take our outdated “discussion” seriously.
Is Loyalty a Sin?
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/10/2011
I pointed out that while every human being had always dealt with gravity, Isaac Newton did the Mantra Thinking and THOUGHT about gravity. I pointed out that every successful businessman back to Neanderthal practiced supply and demand, but Adam Smith went Mantra and THOUGHT about it.
I have talked about how no one ever fails to join in a discussion of “Is Eastern Europe READY for immigration?” but nobody ever THINKS about it. Why should Eastern Europe be ready for immigration and not much richer countries like Japan or Taiwan?
The Mantra THINKS about that and points out “Eastern Europe is White.”
We all learn about the Medieval struggle between Church and State and, like early men with gravity or traders with supply and demand, we didn’t THINK about it. We know why that struggle happened, just a men always knew about gravity and supply and demand.
It never occurs to us WHY we know.
The answer is simple: Church and State were two institutions competing for the same resources.
Backbaygrouch was a bit grouchy when I insisted that the Catholic Church was anti-white. But unlike others, he caught on immediately when I pointed out that ALL institutions are anti-white. All institutions compete for a limited resource:
Our loyalty.
We have watched Stormfront having a knock-down-drag-out fight about whether a person can be pro-white without being a Christian. We are wearily aware of all the people who want to destroy the white race because they are loyal to respectability.
The Reformed Church in South Africa switched sides on apartheid, just as Bob Jones IV did on the Confederate flag. Did either of them honestly believe that GOD had changed his mind on these issues at just the right time?
Rome declared Joan of Arc a saint after World War II. She had gone out and, in the Name of God, killed the English invaders, who were then also Catholic, for the sake of her King and country.
But the Catholic Archbishop of New Orleans excommunicated lifelong loyal Catholics who publicly opposed integration.
If you are to understand Christ, you have to view the institutions that claim His name as institutions, just as you must understand that the men who speak for religion are just men.
We all know that, but while we would say we know it, we don’t THINK about it.
Christ did. In fact the quotes we have from Christ himself show a deep, penetrating acceptance of human nature:
“Not all who call me Lord, Lord, will be saved.”
Not all who called him Lord would be right.
Each real church considers that it represents the true Christ. God knows what the rulers of the mainline Protestant churches believe, if anything.
But churches consist of mere humans and as no one has considered enough, each one is an institution which has survived in competition with every other institution. Realizing this evolution of institutions is every bit as important as understanding the nature of humans in general.
A Note From Your Absent-Minded Professor
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/09/2011
Mantra Thinking is looking at basics that one in Mommy Professor’s world would never look at. Once you get used to it, it is amazing how no one notices the truth of the so-called “race” problem, that it applies only to white countries and to all white countries.
But Newton also did Mantra Thinking. Through all the ages of hard work that had gone before, gravity was a force everyone was all too familiar with.
But Newton didn’t just NOTICE gravity he LOOKED at it.
Likewise in all the millennia before Adam Smith successful merchants all the way back before Neanderthal knew that what was most valuable was what was most rare. Men have made their livings buying things where they grow in plenty and taking them to places where they are not for time out of mind.
But Adam Smith didn’t just NOTICE supply and demand, he LOOKED at it.
These days the million of our Mommy Professors are a bureaucracy like any other bureaucracy, but it hasn’t been that long since someone who became a college teacher was FASCINATED by his subject.
A century ago they were known as Absent Minded Professors, because their minds were on mathematics or history or whatever they devoted their lives to. That is forgotten now, when there are so many of them and most of them did well in school so they just stayed there.
I hope I am throwback to the old fashioned kind of prof. I think Mantra Thinking is the most fascinating thing in the world. It fills all my hours. And, like an old-fashioned professor, I want you to be fascinated by it too.
For instance a documentary talked about how the trilobites died out in the Cambrian Extinction but have descendants, today’s ANTS. They just mentioned it in passing, but to me the idea is fascinating when you THINK about it.
A trilobite was a couple of FEET long. There was no land life then, so they were in the ocean. We don’t know if they had any social life at all, but it seems unlikely. So I love the sheer mystery of this. I dwell on it.
We do have a complete fossil history of how the whale began as a hoofed predator about dog-size. Became something like a hairy alligator breeding and living on land, and evolved into the whale as we know it now.
Back when the name of this forum was changed from blog to seminar, I talked at length about how this was about the only real seminar existing today. A seminar today is simply where graduate students learn to think and talk like members of the professorial bureaucracy.
Seminars used to be the place where one moved from student to talking about one OWN ideas of the subject he had mastered. It was the transition point between hearing and coughing up facts to the level of being a scholar. I explained at length, and it is still there if you want to look for some of it, that I give you points but you have to look at them from your own religious or non-religious, or any point of view from your own mind.
This is a real, old-fashioned seminar, and I am a real old-fashioned professor.
General Comments VI
Mommy Professor’s Puppet Privilege
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/08/2011
Back in 1976 I was on the Barry Farber show on WOR in New York City pomoting my first book. His opposition speaker, funny on how liberals never seem to require an opposition speaker, was a guy who said he hadn’t read my book.
This is standard practice. When the book about Jefferson’s supposed black children came out, they had several people discussing it and one was black. The black said he hadn’t read the book.
The one attack on my book on Amazon book reviews started with, guess what, “I haven’t read the book.”
One thing you notice about the white traitor and Vox commenting on BUGS is that they have not READ any of BUGS.
It never occurred to them to do so because Mommy Professor has told them what he wants them to say, and the last thing a group whose only strategy is screaming and outlawing the other side is going to want is that HERESY be read.
Vox really let that out of the bag when he said that “tinting,” meaning browning of our race, never hurt us.
I have pointed out at least twenty times that all of the countries that once had Great Civilizations have gone down for good, and they are all now BROWN. Even in Italy, the part of the country that stayed brown is the poverty region.
If you woke up from a dunk in a strange country that first thing you would want to know is the skin color. ALL “tinted” countries except those where whites found oil and paid the locals for it are poor and dirty.
Vox didn’t see that. He sure as hell couldn’t THINK of it.
So he declares an anti-white Lysenkoism. It is doctrine that white countries that have taken on black blood are just fine, in exactly the same way Lysenko ordered summer wheat to be planted in winter so it would “learn” to be winter wheat.
Everybody sees the color line, the “tint” line, from the Rio Grande to the Mediterranean. But, exactly like Lysenko, they are forbidden to THINK about it. That is the scariest part of tyranny, how people cease to THINK because they can’t risk it, sort of like that Twilight Zone segment with the little boy who punished people for bad thoughts.
So I think we will withdraw Mommy Professor’s Puppet Privilege. We will no longer allow anyone who has not READ our stuff to comment on it.
Some of what Vox says is fun, but none of it has anything to do with what we are actually doing. We already blame whites for their own troubles, and if he had read any of BUGS he would know that.
But, once again, the big advantage of allowing these two on is that they show that the totally mindless stereotype I keep talking about is NOT a stereotype. Even Vox blames US for teaching him Blonde is Beautiful.
Like all Mommy Professors, Vox puts blacks in a category with animals. Animals are not responsible, they are just trained.
What Happens When People are Trained not to THINK
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 02/07/2011
If you ever want an example of how Mantra Thinking applies to everything, not just race, this one is a good start.
A previous article talked about the professional environmentalists’ demand that the European nuclear collider be abandoned because of cost overruns. What hit me was that the article said “Environmentalists see this AS THEIR OPPORTUNITY to end the collider program.”
The collider is part of a long-term scientific program to solve the energy problem by scientific means rather than a world rationing program like that in the Kyoto Treaty.
Note the wording, “See it as their OPPORTUNITY…”. Since my 1976 book I have not seen anybody talk about the natural growth of the competition between bureaucratic state movement and hard science. This sentence shows that, while most people reading the latest thing from Oprah or Iraq never think of such things, it is obvious to those on the scene.
Environmentalism is against all scientific programs that might solve the problem they are trying to build a world-wide rationing system on. The collider takes up twelve billion dollars that could hire Mommy Professor’s social science graduates.
When I say it in plain English, it sounds absurd, but the author of the article cited above clearly sees the conflict and takes it for granted.
This is much like the fact that articles regularly discuss “Is Eastern Europe Ready for Large Scale Immigration Yet?” and it seems a natural subject. It would make everybody wonder what would happen if an article asked, “Is Taiwan ready for Large Scale Immigration?”
The response would be, “That’s up to Taiwan and it’s none of your damned business.” But everyone knows why such articles on Eastern Europe are taken for granted. In fact, they take it so much granted they never ask why:
Because Eastern Europe is WHITE, of course!
The average college graduate would say “DUHH!” if the question of Mommy Professor’s statism versus science — were brought up. The science reporter clearly sees it as an ongoing battle.
The day the Soviet Union collapsed all the socialists became environmentalists. Lysenko science now rules, as we can tell from the scandal of the so-called scientists talking about how they were cheating on data for Global Warming.
With all the talk about medical costs, how much of “medical” costs is spent on lawyers?
Not one person talks about malpractice. There are three million lawyers in the United States, and each one imposes over a million dollars of costs on this country’s economic system.
Does respectable conservatism ever talk about statism versus science or “If Medicare, why not Judicare?”
What do the respectable conservatives says on these real issues?
Nothing.
That’s what they’re paid for.




Old Blighty, Let’s Learn From the Mental Torture We Have Suffered
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 02/06/2011
When I wrote about no specific policy demands until we are allowed to talk openly about the whole subject of white genocide, Old Blighty asked,
“Are you saying those of us that want genocide tribunals, should not discuss our desire for them? I understand if that is the case. Practical politics requires discipline.”
Let me say first that the word “tribunals” gives anti-whites too much ammunition to call us dangerous. When I precluded the word “revolution,” I really meant just be sure you aren’t giving them ammunition.
In many cases what we are doing cannot be called anything BUT revolution. But words are our ammunition. Just be sure it doesn’t blow up in your face.
Almost every mistake I advise you against is one I have made over and over and over, ad nauseam. Frankly, the reason a warning bell goes off inside me when we discuss what will happen to them after because I like it too much.
One thing that most people do not realize is that people like me and BBG have been flayed mentally for half a century. We were not allowed to reply.
There is a term for that. It’s called mental torture. I have had to curb my temper all this time. Some conservative who blandly agreed to get rid of my race I had to treat as if I respected him if our cause was to survive.
After a lifetime of mental torture, it is a little hard not to love the idea of the other side getting theirs. For some of us who have suffered mental torture, it may be a necessary relief.
I have thought a LOT about what the punishment should be.
Although it is not to do what the enemy does as a lot of people like to say, in this case we could take the whole page right out of their book.
My idea is that we should make heirs and survivors, those billionaires and those large companies, pay MONEY for what is being done.
Think about it. Big, loud tribunals have a limited life span. But rewards for informants of just one or two percent of the money they bring in will last FOREVER.
I am very serious about this. You can take money from rich people more or less indefinitely.
BIG money.
Big, big, BIG money.
Fines are not considered punishment in the same way the word “tribunal” implies. I love the idea of a future where they live like we do, never knowing when someone is going to get to the heirs of one of their ancestors who put a paid ad in the New York Times and argue that they are therefore responsible for the whole history of that publication.
Informers are going to make arguments like that, and we will sit back and help them have their fun. The entire history of the anti-white movement will be known to everybody without our saying a word.
We can pay off the national debt just as a start, with all the Gateses and their like involved. The whole history of this whole thing will be exposed DAILY.
The point is that they want us to sound like totalitarians, because every time someone imposes a totalitarian regime they point to other tyrannies. But cutting taxes by nailing race traitors is not bloody. It is more a civil action than a criminal one.
But those of us who have suffered years of mental torture are well aware that a straight prison sentence can be a lot kinder than spending your entire life wondering when somebody, somewhere, is going to comedown on you.
There is even a certain joy in being a martyr to a cause, but we will not give them that. We will just turn a lot of billionaires into multimillionaires. You can’t attach a Nazi label to that, but it is far, far more permanent under its own steam and it will NEVER go away.
This is a lesson I got out of a lifetime of mental torture.
We don’t jail people. We don’t shoot people. We just make sure the dread lasts their entire lives.
Liberals did that to us, and it is very effective.
8 Comments