Dick_Whitman on 4/9/2011:
There’s a lot of logic in penalizing the anti-White financially instead of physically.1) America will be able to pay of the national debt and foreign creditors.
2) Money can be used to encourage the creation of large White families.
3) Money can be channeled into innovative industries to help develop renewable energy.
But there’s also a more practical reason related to defeating the anti-Whites. Anyone who has studied international relations has probably read about the theory of democratic peace. This is the theory that claims that democracies don’t fight each other.
The point I’m getting at here relates to the transition period from non-democracy to democracy. Researchers discovered that the transition was faster and easier when the old (non-democratic) leaders were given a future in the new regime. IOW, the leaders who knew they were facing death were willing to fight it out to the end.
By relying on financial penalization, this will give many of the anti-White leaders an out and not push them to fight it out to the end. In fact, the earlier the anti-Whites come clean, the better it will be for them. Anti-Whites will be given opportunities to make deals if they agree to work for pro-Whites in bringing other anti-Whites to justice.
Of course, there are some anti-Whites who are in “too deep” and all the money in the world won’t be able to help them. Law and criminal justice is not my area of expertise so I won’t comment further on this.
To any anti-Whites reading this, I suggest you think (real hard) about how you can start impressing us. Because at some point it will be too late to come clean.
I had never heard the term “democratic peace.” But it is true that the last time two countries with freely elected legislatures fought each other was the Civil War.
My first book was, according to a Fellow of the Royal Society, the best summary of American history ever written. One major point it made was that the old establishment of big business surrendered to the new liberal “education-welfare” establishment peacefully, so the old corporate establishment still has the lesser role, but it still exists as conservatives and limousine liberals.
The South, on the other hand, was destroyed for generations.
A major point of the book was which way the education-welfare establishment would go, totally unyielding or fitting into a world where its policies, however absurd, would be pursued ruthlessly.
A money strategy also simply LASTS longer than the torchlight parades and trials dreamed of by so many Stormfronters. If each person who exposes anti-white action gets just a percentage of the CIVIL penalties it will be as lasting as the Holocaust Industry and Affirmative Action.
Thanks, Dick, this is an expansion on my suggestions, a thing I particularly appreciate.
#1 by BGLass on 04/11/2011 - 9:35 am
The south is still being destroyed. Torah wisdom is that it takes 6 generations to wipe out public memory and we’re not there yet. Talked to a transplant yankee “home-schooler” (who knows nothing about american history at all and certainly not the civil war), who’s a “public” employee, also, (but mad about paying taxes, lol, what a psycho!), off to a “tea party” rally with their hispanic immigrant friends. Where would one even start?
The mantra, yes. Just bypass the psychosis. But it’s very hard to be that big of a person sometimes. These people’s subculture will not really hold and keep the culture I’ve held dear (the artifacts, oral history, lived, experiential trajectory to the country). Besides which, they are so multi-cult, they won’t even preserve genes either, probably. They have no interest in the children of the real founding fathers, even as they run to their “tea rally,” and just feed from the real children while believing they are ‘conservative.”
What on earth are they conserving? The right to delude themselves? To “home school” the exact same thing taught in public classrooms, while cutting down the southerners who can only afford the public schools, b/c they’re paying for the others people to “home school?” The whole thing is just such sick shit.
Sorry, but one can’t help but want something extra special and long term for the real children of the founding fathers and the southerns, appalachians and hoosiers. Even more money.
#2 by BGLass on 04/11/2011 - 9:47 am
One of the greatest problems with the civil war—- was that after it became a “propositional nation,” and the founders children dispossessed, the newcomers could never ever really be legitimate. Supposedly, this “leveling down” of what it meant to be “american,” would legitimate everyone. It really had the opposite affect. Deep down, everyone knows big money concerns just paid foreigners, essentially, to slaughter the americans. How can you have a genuine civil war— then call it a “melting pot,” lmao. You just don’t kill hundreds of thousands of people, then pretend you happily melted with them. Reality just doesn’t seem to work that way. Even after a thousand years, evidence of the reality lingers. They are fools to think they can totally wipe out reality, especially violent reality. Yuck. Half the “north” army really was fob foreigners and everyone knows it. They couldn’t even get a domestic army together, not really. And Lincoln directly used Marx’s people—why don’t they talk about that?
#3 by Dave on 04/11/2011 - 11:07 am
The system is already very skilled in the arts of politically motivated financial penalization, but the general public is entirely unaware of this and will remain unaware until the trigger is pulled on them and they discover how truly helpless they are to make good on their claims.
At present, the greatest abusers of financial privilege, the great university and corporate endowment funds are being left entirely alone. In other words, the funding sources of Political Correctness are being given unfettered privilege under entirely unchallenged tax shelters.
Instead, 403(b) and 401(k) retirement plans are being targeted for confiscation by the IRS and the public is so stupid they don’t realize that their only choice will be to sue their fiduciaries when the IRS seizes these funds for regulatory non-compliance.
Sovereign governments cannot be sued. The Bush administration adopted the attitude of the IRS that these tax exempt retirement plans that the public takes for granted are in fact abusive tax shelters. The IRS believes that there is one to two trillion dollars to seize. Onerous new regulatory requirements were put in place with extremely stringent administrative and audit requirements, and draconian penalties for noncompliance. The government is counting on the lack of knowledge of the administrators of these plans, and the impossibility of full compliance with its impractical rules and regulations.
Americans are indeed delusional. They have an unwarranted trust that their government would not undertake actions fundamentally damaging to their welfare and what their regard as their “property rights”. They could not be more wrong. Americans do not understand the nature of their dictatorship.
But my point is the institutional mechanism for the seizure of endowment funds is already in place. It would not be difficult in a pro-white political sea change to seize these endowment funds for noncompliance with the terms of their tax exemptions and only allow for the recovery of these funds under terms that were not damaging to white interests.
Mommy Professor, with a reformed mentality, would be happy to go along for the ride.
#4 by Scythian on 04/11/2011 - 12:16 pm
I understand the ‘Scipio way’; but still, anti-whites don’t deserve such generosity.
#5 by OldBlighty on 04/11/2011 - 1:53 pm
True, but we aren’t about punishing the anti-whites, we are about this:
“We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children.”
What I like about Bob’s plan, is it uses the traitor’s natural inclination, to do all of the work.
As Horus says, our enemy owns all traitors. They betrayed white children, for money and status and they will betray their friends and colleagues, when encouraged with a big carrot and a stick.
What I am looking forward to, is a game of musical chairs in reverse. Last ones sitting on the anti-white chairs, lose.
#6 by Dick_Whitman on 04/11/2011 - 3:35 pm
“Thanks, Dick, this is an expansion on my suggestions, a thing I particularly appreciate.” (Bob)
You’re welcome Bob. My own mind as been expanded quite a bit from reading/listening to your work.