Let Coach once again go over a play you need to be reminded of, to use when YOU think it is best.

One commenter in GC6 just reminded me of it.

It’s three little words: “in your opinion.”

The basics cannot be repeated too often.

If someone calls you a racist or a Nazi or a White Supremacist, you want a short, Mantra-thinking reply. Something that is, like the Mantra, so obviously true that it stops any debate or diversion the anti-white could make with it.

You simply state that “You mean that if I oppose genocide against my race it means that IN YOUR OPINION I am a (Nazi, racist, whatever).”

This also made me think how one word could do wonders for correcting history.

That word is “recorded.”

One historian pointed out that the Romans got soap from “Roman Gaul.” This is true. They used to scrape the dirt off with volcanic rock in their Baths. But it had been used by the GAULS since time immemorial.

What is true is that soap’s first RECORDED use was in Roman Gaul.

If you read the internet, over and over someone will quote that such and such a thing was INVENTED someplace in the Middle East. The problem is that 1) the Middle East was where all the researches were since Christianity became the official religion of Rome, and 2) the Middle East is EMPTY.

History is exactly opposite from our daily experience. Usually we don’t notice something when it is in a place we never go. Archeology CONSISTS of going places you never go.

History is lost in living lands, lands where a Great Civilization didn’t die permanently, and by some strange coincidence, where the population is still white. Living lands built right over their earlier civilizations. But the Middle East is like a skeleton. Cities are abandoned, the extensive irrigation Iraq had in its white Babylonian days are gone, leaving the a land of bare bones where nothing is buried.

With carbon dating and all the other technology, we are beginning to find the true age of Stonehenge and a giant wooden bridge across the Thames near London that dates to 1500 BC. If you read standard history, the barbarians couldn’t use the opposable thumb that far back, much less have built that bridge or have had the forgotten huge traffic such a bridge would be built for.

History comes from archeology and archeology dictates the history of technology.

And it is laughably wrong. Nothing is changing faster than history.

The ridiculous excuse for a history of invention could have avoided some of this by the simple use of the word “recorded,” as in “the earliest RECORDED writing is found in Egypt.” But the archeologist insisted, EACH TIME, that whatever they found in the bare bones of Middle Eastern white civilization did not represent what they found, but what was FIRST.

Basing history on what you happen to stumble across is not an intelligent error.

GC6 had a report about an anti-white who said, “What is this neo Nazi crap that is going around, “’anti-Racist is code for anti white?’”

H. Avenger reported this and his take was that it showed how they are on the defensive, another person pointed out how they just HAVE to get that word “Nazi” in.

My big take on this was that, without prompting, that this Mantra crap was “going around.”

That is the point of a real seminar, different people have different takes, look at it from different, but educated, points of view. The result is that we see it on all sides.

Which is one reason no Leader and no Orthodoxy can do what BUGS can do. We do not want a torchlight parade or a crowd of morons waving “The Thoughts of Chairman Mao” in the air.

Your Coach wants a team.

I explained before that Alcoholics Anonymous works best because it was not based on a philosophy, it developed in the life and death world of alcoholics. A team develops in the game.

You called me Coach for many years, but that is turning out to be a very true description. It is easy for me to work with people who have been IN THE GAME (No, Brits, not a pun!).

In fact, with people who are in there fighting I can listen with respect and sometimes awe. But before you get in there and USE the Mantra it is very much like a Coach trying to talk football to a pure nerd — I was a nerd who played football.

Even the play plans made by someone who has not played the game often made no sense unless you could picture being on the spot where those position squared are in the map. In a game, a Coach often asks a lot more than he gets or commands. He needs to know specifics that would not occur to somebody who was not in the game.

“Is the defensive halfback in there?” Meaning is he actually active on defense or is he saving his energy for the his time on the offensive where he can be a hero? A player can tell that from ten yards away, by how much he reacts to their faking a run their way.

The point is that we are developing different observations here, and no Great Leader can do that. Each person is in his own position,. Each person knows what works for him and what doesn’t.

The observation “What is this neo Nazi crap that is going around, “’anti Racist is code for anti white?’” rings a bell for me, the one who has been in other games like this. We have reached the stage where someone on the other side asks what this is that is going around. I have been this way before, and practically nobody else anywhere has.

I know this approach works because I have done it before. The point at which someone definitely on the other side asks what is this that is going around, even the first faint sign of it, is a critical signal to me.

But that is my JOB on our team. That’s why the Old Guy is still useful.

But it is also important for someone to use this to reinforce the point about “Nazi.” Other commenters were hitting on how to handle the White Supremacist crap.

The basics can NEVER be emphasized too much by those who are IN THE GAME.

So another observation, more general, is that I observe from Comments 6 and 7 that we are steadily FORMING a team.

In my 1976 book I described the establishments that had ruled America.

The planter aristocracy ruled until 1861. There was not a single president before the Civil War who served two terms who was not a Southerner.

Then what I today call the “old establishment” took over, aka, the military industrial complex.

The planter aristocracy was destroyed utterly in a war. The old establishment became the junior of our two-headed establishment, political conservatives

The new establishment I called the education-welfare establishment. That was in charge in 1976 and is in charge now.

One Oxford professor, a Member of the Royal Society, said it was the best summary of American history he had ever read.

Even the establishment critics were amazingly complimentary. The Library Journal recommended it.

There are wild factual errors in it, but in such a complete generalization, they didn’t matter. Nobody had any trouble recognizing the outline I was describing.

Never has anything split the National Review down the middle like that book. They had a review of it entitled “Read This One,” and they had a COVER article attacking me and including Pat Buchanan and other big names, in short, my clique’s strategy to appeal to the Wallace vote.

But, as always, with all that discussion the most important thing about the book got no discussion whatsoever. Having gone through the establishments of history, I was in a position to give an outline of the next one.

It even relates to the News!

The Japanese nuclear catastrophe is being used to the max by the Windmill Crowd. Their vision of the future is a stagnant, planned world with professors, aka Intellectuals, in charge.

Our first establishment went from Jefferson and Jackson to a plain group of slavocrats. The group that overthrew them in the end was not coherent enough to have a party until 1855, when the Republicans were formed.

Even in the 1920s you would have seen no evidence of the Mommy Professor regime on the thoroughly conservative campuses that depended on big money for their survival. Then it appeared, like the Republican Party, apparently out of nowhere and was in power a few years later.

What I predicted was naturally vague, but it was an establishment formed by opposition to a planned, stagnant world. Part of the planned, stagnant world program is a militant cutting of funding for scientific research, the space program, and any new technology.

And I have said, my job today is entirely to take hints like that and develop them while everybody else is screaming at each other about the length of Gaddafi’s beard.

Seeing the next establishment is a lot like chasing tornadoes. You can clearly see a tornado condition, you can see the clouds which are likely to extend to the ground in a funnel, but you don’t know until the funnel forms. But you can’t predict a Republicans Party or a New Deal specifically,

It always comes as a complete surprise.

So your “intellectuals” and professional commentators make their living sitting and discussing the latest weather reports.

While respectable conservatives were impressing their readers with untranslated French and comparisons of Marxism with free market authors I, as usual was a pain in the ass who wanted to get serious.

I fought the Cold War, literally, I SAW the Soviet Empire and the walls around it, the ones that predated and were not just the Berlin Wall.

A segregationist Southerner by the 1970s spent full time groveling and announcing his errors to the world and hoping to find a buyer.

I noticed that everything we had predicted happened exactly as we Alarmists had predicted. Unlike about all other Southern pros, I never told anybody once that integration was a good idea. James Jackson Kilpatrick, who had written a pro-segregation book, dismissed it all ten years later in a column saying “I’ve got rid of all my Southern prejudices.”

A reintegration in the generation before neoconservatives.

The Tea Party cows finally found their way to denouncing neoconservatives. EVERYBODY denounces neoconservatives. But neoconservatives are the ones who get PAID. So all paid respectable (redundant) anti-liberals stick to the straight neoconservative line and deny vehemently they are neoconservatives.

I saw no reason to be a neo anything.

I had been right and my side lost the war.

Not a new realization for a Southerner.

So I went to work to get rid of the entire Soviet Empire. There were at least two parts to this. First you had to be one of the very few who knew the weaknesses of the USSR. I went to the graduate school where the only people who saw the real Communist economies for what they were and fought the CIA, the established economists, everybody, and were dead right, taught.

I took Soviet Economics under one of Goldwater’s two top economic advisors, who went over there regularly and knew the score.

I worked in Intelligence, and found that the Soviet Union invented NOTHING while the United States had been scrambling to “catch up” with Soviet technology after the launching of Sputnik in 1957.

The Sputnik rocket was the usual copy of American technology and several like it were sitting in the US warehouses before Sputnik went up.

And, lastly, I knew that the only POLIITICAL combination that could elect someone who really wanted to get rid of the USSR and knew the score could be elected by overcoming the Bushes and Fords who refused to appeal to the ten million Wallace voters.

So I concentrated on that. I wrote the defining book on the Populist side. As the review in National Review said, “Mr. Whitaker is unique because his voice is coming from INSIDE the Populist Movement.” Everybody theorized about the Wallace vote. I spoke for them.

Once Reagan got through with the Soviet Union for eight years, there is confusion about the exact date when the USSR actually disappeared. One news program showed the Russian flag flying over the Kremlin instead of the hammer and sickle, but nobody on the street was sure what country they were in.

Dick_Whitman on 4/9/2011:
There’s a lot of logic in penalizing the anti-White financially instead of physically.

1) America will be able to pay of the national debt and foreign creditors.

2) Money can be used to encourage the creation of large White families.

3) Money can be channeled into innovative industries to help develop renewable energy.

But there’s also a more practical reason related to defeating the anti-Whites. Anyone who has studied international relations has probably read about the theory of democratic peace. This is the theory that claims that democracies don’t fight each other.

The point I’m getting at here relates to the transition period from non-democracy to democracy. Researchers discovered that the transition was faster and easier when the old (non-democratic) leaders were given a future in the new regime. IOW, the leaders who knew they were facing death were willing to fight it out to the end.

By relying on financial penalization, this will give many of the anti-White leaders an out and not push them to fight it out to the end. In fact, the earlier the anti-Whites come clean, the better it will be for them. Anti-Whites will be given opportunities to make deals if they agree to work for pro-Whites in bringing other anti-Whites to justice.

Of course, there are some anti-Whites who are in “too deep” and all the money in the world won’t be able to help them. Law and criminal justice is not my area of expertise so I won’t comment further on this.

To any anti-Whites reading this, I suggest you think (real hard) about how you can start impressing us. Because at some point it will be too late to come clean.

I had never heard the term “democratic peace.” But it is true that the last time two countries with freely elected legislatures fought each other was the Civil War.

My first book was, according to a Fellow of the Royal Society, the best summary of American history ever written. One major point it made was that the old establishment of big business surrendered to the new liberal “education-welfare” establishment peacefully, so the old corporate establishment still has the lesser role, but it still exists as conservatives and limousine liberals.

The South, on the other hand, was destroyed for generations.

A major point of the book was which way the education-welfare establishment would go, totally unyielding or fitting into a world where its policies, however absurd, would be pursued ruthlessly.

A money strategy also simply LASTS longer than the torchlight parades and trials dreamed of by so many Stormfronters. If each person who exposes anti-white action gets just a percentage of the CIVIL penalties it will be as lasting as the Holocaust Industry and Affirmative Action.

Thanks, Dick, this is an expansion on my suggestions, a thing I particularly appreciate.

People are often confused when they discuss when the legalization of Christianity took place in Rome and when Rome was declared officially Christian.

To us, even today, a couple of decades after the event, it is hard to say when Gorbachev legalized samizdat opinions and when the Soviet Regime actually collapsed.

Future historians will have the same problem with us.

For Political Correctness, the day it allows arguments against it to go public will not be very different from the day it collapses as thoroughly as the USSR has.

Nothing they say makes any SENSE.

That does not matter as long as they have their thugs and Thought Police in place.

But that is the problem with an isolated power group no one is allowed to disagree with. That is the strength of free speech and the fatal weakness of censorship. A group whose opinions only have to be lauded by others in the same group, behind a phalanx of suppression, gets sillier and sillier and sillier.

When it is exposed to light, it collapses.

By the time Christianity got so powerful that it was legalized, it had had to gain such a foothold in the population that outlawing opposition was easy. In fact, Constantine himself built more “pagan” temples than he did churches.

Constantine was called “the bishops of bishops” by those who formalized the official Nicene Creed. But he not only was no bishop, he was not a priest. He was, in fact, not even baptized. Constantine was bishop of bishops whose word was the unquestioned final appeal in doctrinal matters because he was the Emperor.

Constantine wanted the Christian Church united and then established as his ally in uniting the Empire. The real history would be fascinating to know.

At this remove, with the temporal provincialism of the History Industry, the fact that Constantine dealt almost equally with other major religions battling Christianity in his realm is simply ignored. But Constantine was making a transition, step by step, as we are, with forces that will be as forgotten as the Party Line will be in Moscow in a little while.

Even while the Soviet Union was still in power, Solzhenitsyn points out that “Nobody in the Soviet Empire takes Marxism seriously. The only people who take Marxism seriously are Western Intellectuals.”

Now listen, his POINT of saying this was that the minute you get rid of enforced censorship, the USSR is history.

He was dead right.

Our regime, like other dead ones who ended up leaning entirely on forms of censorship, is dead from the moment it decreases the pressure. It is not long before that which is developed behind a wall of censorship gets to where it cannot survive without that censorship, like a native species faced with superior import.

If being samizdat is whining, then we will whine the bastards to death.

In my youth I heard that a lot. Some guy was trying to act macho and he yelled for others to hold him back.

As you know, coaches are not particularly known for being delicate with their team. As I told you, when I did something particularly stupid, as my attention deficit would make me do, Coach would yell out, for every single person at practice to hear,

“Feel around you, Whitaker, maybe you’re still in bed!!!”

So I am gentle. Also, as I have pointed out before, the kind of person who gets all personally insulted and takes his toys and goes home is someone, as I have learned from bitter experience, that you do NOT want on your team.

The title of this piece is a good example of coach-type diplomacy when he is dealing with his team.

I get a negative feeling whenever I see someone give a web site and say it might be a good location for OTHERS to try.

Hold ME back! Just Hold me back!

One of the basic differences between BUGS and Stormfront is that we are IN the battle.

There may be cases where you hold back for a reason. Then GIVE the REASON.

You may want to consult with our team first. There are many reasons you may hold back, but the motto of BUGS is GET IN THERE! So you should explain why you are theorizing on an action site.

Feel around you.

Maybe you’re still in bed.