Archive for May, 2011
I wrote an article repeating another couple of Whitakerisms, but it is up to BoardAd to decide when it should go in.
Whitakerisms are of course Mantra Thinking. If you tap on the new thing “Whitakerisms” on the right of this page, you will see that some 23 comments came in citing these statements of boiled down reality from over 4,000 of my articles here.
You will see that many of the commenters reminded us of some of these statements, and others hunkered down with them and chewed over exactly what kind of thinking this is. That, of course, is the real goal of this whole seminar, and it was a good exercise.
So please don’t allow the Whitakerisms thread to die until I stir it up from time to time.
This leads us to another Whitakerism. I have repeatedly pointed out that a capitalized word is always the exact opposite of the real word: capitalized Truth always means The Only True Faith which grinds simple truth under its heel; the classic example of Mercy is when the Inquisition burned people slowly to death in order to get them to repent and avoid the eternal fire of Hell.
A major part of understanding history is seeing the oppositeness of the exact same word, with only the first letter in the upper case.
When you understand that, you are ready to see why I reject with horror the idea of A, repeat, ONE Whitakerism, but I am discussing Whitakerisms.
Whitakerism are short and useful to you for putting into your thoughts a framework. A Whitakerism would be a book telling you WHAT you should CONCLUDE. A Whitakerism would be a road I built, as they say, with good intentions.
Each Whitakerism tells you a lot of roads, Wordist roads, lead to nowhere. If I am good at this, it may very useful as a compass is.
A compass is indispensable if you know how to use it, but it will never tell you where to go.
So click on Whitakerisms and see if it reminds you of useful points I’ve made in low these many years.
We may have a winner.
I made a couple of suggestions for a new name for GC-7. Some commenters loyally said they were pretty good, and they were right, War Room or Battling Outside BUGS would do in a crunch. But they are too contrived.
More important, they don’t come from INSIDE BUGS.
I keep saying that a winning strategy EVOLVES. GC-7 itself is a pure EVOLUTION. As the name implies, it is a place to put in thoughts which may have been inspired by my articles, but were so far off track that they would lead comments off of the article itself.
Over a half a century of political strategizing has made it second nature for me to try and then, what DEVELOPES, and then, instead of trying to get it back on my game plan, to adapt my game plan to what is going on.
So my two suggested titles may have been artificial, even War Room is I think stolen from a cable network, but I had to do SOMETHING to get you going.
Now a commenter in GC-7 has rolled out the term “BUGS Swarm.”
It is original, it is OURS, and I think it’s great!
I can almost see one of us as a bee who comes back and reports to the other bees through his body movements how to go get the honey, or maybe the person or bear who is a threat to the hive.
I am also very happy because it is original and it came from YOU.
I am fascinated by the Mantra strategic thinking going on.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
The problem is that, when something that has happened before in earlier societies occurs in our present we do not see it as the Same Old Thing. It is Here and Now.
Spengler is known for his theory of the rise and fall of civilizations, but, IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR, you will find the exact same theme in each succeeding country that is now brown and dead.
We al talk about how Political Correctness is becoming more and more like the Inquisition, and its Protestant equivalents.
The problem is that no one who says this thinks about it.
Recently two top experts largely discredited the Global Warming hysteria when their email correspondence revealed they made up their results as they went along.
When blacks working for the Washington Post and the New York Times respectively completely made up their news, it was a small scandal. One was only exposed because her series was up for a Pulitzer!
No problem. They just got caught, but they were doing it for the True Religion.
But no one sees all this the way, as a simple repeat of obvious history. In each society the priesthood eventually crowds a out all logic and all scientific advancement.
But no one in each society sees it simply as a repeat of the old story, because, like Political Correctness, the NEW priesthood is on today’s headlines or is the latest news in Rome, not connected with hoary old history books.
This is a Whitakerism: There is nothing new about our new religion. Unless you an readjust your thinking to realize the simple reality, you will miss the boat as every other country which was once in the forefront of the world and is now just another brown and stagnant backwater did.
The Whitakerism here is: They are not ALIKE, they are the SAME.
That is where “Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion,” comes from.
There is a absolutely no difference between those who expect “scientists” to warp everything to come to the right conclusion and the Curia which condemned Galileo.
Marxism states that truth is a political matter. This is EXACTLY the same as the Old Religion, which said that what Galileo saw and could show the Curia, was false because the Will of God said it could not be true.
Western science finally managed to cast off the abortion that was built up in the name of Christ and today’s science is unprecedented. But this struggle was barely won by science in an all-white society.
We are not doing something “new.” We are establishing a priesthood, becoming a brown people. We are doing EXACTLY what all the others did before.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Someone wrote me an email entitled “race mixing” and told me he had trouble with the argument that caramel colored children might be superior.
I have pointed out here at least twenty times that this has nothing to do with race mixing. If you use those two words, you have already lost the argument for the Mantra.
This is NOT race mixing. This is aimed entirely at white countries, and it is aimed at there being no WHITE race.
For God’s sake, gang, LISTEN!
Until I finally got some responses to my piece saying to counter the “There are no white countries” argument by simply pointing out that THEY define “white countries” by the fact that they single out EVERY white country and ONLY white countries for their “race mixing” or “assimilation” and for third world immigration.
The responses indicated you had some trouble with white countries.
You could alter the Mantra by saying “white MAJORITY countries.”
This is not a condemnation. The problem is this whole approach is a new way of looking at things. You will have as much trouble as anyone else in changing your whole thinking. I have been sitting here doing that for years, with your help.
But you have to do a lot of intellectual work to get your mind out of the present rut, just the way you are trying to get the other side to do it.
This is the difference between knowing that gravity exists and Newtonian Physics as an explanation for the movements of the entire universe. In getting rid of this “race mixing” nonsense, you are pointing out gravity.
But in order to really be a BUGSter, you will have to change your thinking, like Newtonian Physics had to change its entire view of the universe.
I keep explaining that our information is presently produced for every reason except the simple truth.
In order to change the world, we must see it in an ENTIRELY new light.
I am always terrified that enthusiasm may run out in GC 7.
I was in seventh heaven reading comments on my piece, “It is Time for Heresy!”
At age 70, I finally have my army!
The comments on the Heresy article and in GC7 are a dream come true for me.
At last, here is a group of people who don’t wander off into the News and Jews and general declarations. AT LAST, here is a group of pro-whites who are doing what I did ALONE for so long: explaining the simple TRUTH.
The trick is that there is nothing simple about it.
Just as there is nothing less “common” than common sense, there is nothing that is less simple than simple truth.
Even my many enemies admit that I am highly intelligent and have been there and done that, but I am still discovering new “common sense” ideas and new “simple truths” every DAY.
I have met many, many geniuses like William Shockley, who invented the transistor, and every one of them sounds like he just arrived on Planet Earth yesterday. They are always talking breathlessly about a new idea they have run into.
These real geniuses couldn’t be less like the popular idea of a Scholar, Mommy Professor’s Intellectual.. The Scholar is pictured as repeating Aristotle or Ancient Wisdom or Political Correctness. Real intellectuals are the exact opposite.
Our comments on “It is Time for Heresy” and GC7 are the same way.
No one is trying to impress anybody. There are no big words.
One thing that is funny is that we all look down on Conspiracy mongers.
But, in the truest sense of the word, we ARE a Conspiracy. We are in cahoots and in collusion.
We are a conspiracy to tell the truth.
And it IS a conspiracy. We are getting together and conspiring about how to change the world. That is the very definition of a conspiracy.
After all, the “secrets” of white advancement have always been so simple no one could figure them out. The Romans found that a hundred men who acted as a unit could defeat any number of men attacking randomly.
The “secret” of Western science is that one takes a basic idea and follows it with a rigidity no Eastern philosopher can even imagine. Newton took gravity and explained the universe, but it was because he excluded everything BUT gravity.
Face it, gang, YOU are the only REAL, WORKING Conspiracy around
I routinely point out to anti-whites that “He’s one of YOUR guys. He HATES whites.”
Please note that this is not pointed as a historical fact about Bob’s life or as a theoretical musing.
I am saying “IT WORKS, dammit. USE it!”
It is the SOP of respectable conservatives to insult and let liberals insult us, while they wax very near the border of homosexuality in their worship of leftists.
Why in the HELL are WE doing the respectables’ jobs for them?
Anyone whose program is to get the white race off the face of the earth, whether by libertarian open borders or Marxist demands for Black Power, is anti-white.
When did THEY ever hesitate to use the word Hate for an attitude hostile to the existence of another race?
I have seen it works, so I get it in there, “He is on YOUR side, he HATES whites.”
This puts them on the defensive. Anyone who advocates the end of his race SHOULD be on the defensive. But conservatives and the Weakest Generation have given US the habit of treating these walking abortions as if they were human.
The Baptist preacher who sees All Mankind as having the right to be in all white countries is as much my enemy as any screaming Maoist Commie.
But it is our habit to yell at the Commie and treat the Reverend like he means well.
They are the same until THEY prove they are not.
I hope I don’t have to go to the Moron Minimum here. The Moron Minimum is where someone will point out a guideline like the one I just did and then add, “But you don’t drive them off by screaming at them or calling them names.”
The Moron Minimum is when a speaker proposes something and then asks “Is it perfect?”
If I had put that into a speech for John Ashbrook he would have seriously questioned my sanity.
When you say “Is it perfect?” you are saying “What you would ask me is ‘Is this perfect?’”
No sane adult is going to ask any human being whether something he proposes is perfect.. It is like saying, “This is as simple as saying two plus two. Now, being ignoramuses, you are going to ask me how much is two and two.
“Two and two is FOUR!”
The Moron Minimum is something you do not accuse adults of not knowing.
About the time we developed speech, older men began to be asked to explain things.
The old men were more and more worthless as they aged for hunting or any of the practical things. They found that they became indispensable as they began to EXPLAIN things.
And nobody Googled them.
Why is this information produced?
The old men began to pour out explanations. They could name the gods from whose spittle the universe got its beginning. They could give you the True Explanation for everything.
Any old man who said “I don’t know” was risking his reason for existence. The moment anyone asked a basic Whitakerism: “Why was this information produced?” one has a whole world view of intellectual history.
History makes it very complicated. The first old men asked these questions evolved into shamans, priests, philosophers, Intellectuals, Authorities, and Mommy Professors. One thing we become aware of is that the Truth of today will not be Truth of tomorrow. But the explanation, as usual with Whitakerisms, is so basic and simple that no one dwells on it.
Least of all the shamans, priests, philosophers, Intellectuals, Authorities and Mommy Professors.
This information is produced for different markets in each generation. And each generation is absolutely convinced that Truth has been EVOLVING to the Ultimate Truth.
Which means the Truth you have now. In every generation, people use the term “modern thought” without the slightest idea how ridiculous that makes them.
And this is where we are stuck until we question the process itself.
But the moment you SEE the process for what it is, you begin to laugh out loud when someone says “modern thought.” Where do you BEGIN to contradict someone who says “The sky is purple?”
People will openly express rage at your “questioning their most deeply held beliefs.” But if questioning their most deeply held beliefs is offensive, a Whitakerism is declaring those “modern” beliefs to be totally absurd.
Whitakerisms make you very unpopular. One is making it clear that what people call “Their most deeply held beliefs” are actually as silly as the population in The Emperor’s New Clothes.”
No one is comfortable around you. You have totally abandoned the usual discussion of Both Sides, even radicals on Both Sides, all of whom think and talk about their “sides” on modern thought that is presently being discussed.
So Creator in Iceland is getting the Silent Treatment.
Get used to it.