It only happened once and I honestly believe that nobody but me remembers it.

Maybe forty years ago, a group of Professional Commentators were sitting around in a Panel on national television. There was the usual set of liberals and a token Buckleyite.

A person called in and said, “But you are all saying the same thing!”

I can’t quote what was really important:

Their reaction to that statement.

All of these Professional Experts from Both Sides had a look on their faces that reminded me of the look two Medieval Theologians would have expressed if they had been having a debate about the Will of God and were immediately caught by their audience resting up from their labors in their favorite bawdy house.

The rest of the program consisted of these commentators reassuring each other that they were ALL very, very different and very, very DIFFERENT.

Their situations were very similar to that of the Medieval Theologians of different Orders. All commentators have developed opinions that are different enough to be JUST RIGHT. The Brothers in the bawdy house have dedicated their lives to developing fine points of theology that stay away from heresy and yet disagree to an extent that is JUST RIGHT.

But the whole JUST RIGHT is blown to hell when they are found with the whores. Their lives were devoted to subtle distinctions among The Righteous, and getting caught with wine in one hand a professional female’s breast in the other is like setting a bomb off in a small wooden house.

That one incident, and the REACTION to it, was a sort of confirmation of everything I devoted my life to.

And like every other Whitakerism, there is absolutely nothing new about it.

In the Emperor’s New Clothes, a story every peasant knew, everyone was warned that His Majesty would only look naked to those who were Subtle or Holy or Intellectual enough to see the clothes through this Illusion of the Ignorant.

Everybody KNOWS the story, but no one ever RECOGNIZES it when it is played right in front of them.

Political Correctness, The Stockholm Syndrome, the Weakest Generation, the Party Line, THESE ARE DIFFERENT NAMES FOR THE SAME THING!

There is nothing complicated, or different, about any of these names for the same thing.

If we THINK about it and get under all the labels and big words, it comes down to something every eight-year-old understands immediately.

It’s called Siding With the Bully

All of us have had experience with bullies from first grade. Stephen King features them in every book, which is one reason for his runaway popularity..

The World War II Generation was beaten into total submission to the bully in Basic Training. The theme of their lives was that they were nothing, and the guy with total power over exhausted teenagers in uniforms, the sergeant, was always right.

The most important parts of history are obvious but missed because of all our synonyms for Siding With Bully, The Stockholm Syndrome, Political Correctness and all the rest.

Liberals and respectable conservatives get paid to debate whether Hitler was special or just like Stalin.

This has nothing to do it.

The point is that Hitler LOST. Stalin simply cannot be lumped in with Hitler because he was one of the Victors.

Once again, while people get paid to debate some abstract point about history, the basis of history is simply siding with the winner. But siding with the winner and siding with the bully are really not different at all.

So those within the System spend a great deal of time showing they are professionals, and not justifying the winning side. They get PAID for this.

But WE are the fools. WE miss the essential point we always quote to show our own wisdom:

“God is on the side of the big battalions.”

All Southerners are used to this from the Civil War. Every kid is used to this from the host of worshippers the mean kid has on the playground.

You see Militant Obedience when you are out there using the Mantra, but it is critical for you to see it for what it is. Our opponents simply quote the bullies.

They honestly believe the bullies are right because the bullies rule the playgrounds.

Think this over and SAY it.

None of us claims that the Mantra is a SOLUTION to the crisis everyone sees right now.

The Mantra says that the system itself is the problem.

We refuse to discuss what is to be done about the white genocide that is part and parcel of the present system until we are allowed to openly discuss the problem itself.

BUGS is devoted to talking about the fatal weakness of the System today.

The System we all know has failed.

The System we all know is headed for disaster.

People say that Obama can be defeated if Republicans get their act together.

What they can’t say is that there is no act.

Republicans have failed. Democrats just fail worse.

There comes a time when one must start with the realization that all the normal, “practical” stuff has, in plain English, FAILED.

The whole thing has failed and everybody knows it.

What we do in BUGS is to discuss the system itself, not comparing one “side,” as the media call it, to another “side” of the same system.

We all know that America and Europe are becoming third world countries as we have a third world population.

There are a hundred perfectly valid reasons why no one in the present system would dare say that.

And the sentence above defines the system which is failing.

It is simple logic that when the system is failing the only solution is to go straight at the whole basis of the system.

In other words, to say what no one dares to say.

When everyone knows the system itself is failing, NOTHING IS WORTH SAYING THAT IS NOT HERESY.

The Mantra is a great beginning.

We all know that Bob’s greatest failing is his indirectness, subtlety, and just plain being shy.

So when you don’t fully exploit a point I am likely to smile weakly and simper some indirect criticism.

SO LISTEN, YOU BASTARDS!

When someone asks what a “white” country is, you tell them it is one of the countries they insist has an obligation to import huge numbers of third world immigrants.

THEY define it all the time.

General Wesley Clark defined what he would send American soldiers to die for: “There is no place IN EUROPE for an ethnically pure country.”

There is no place on earth for a Canada that is not multicultural, meaning multiracial.

Don’t get tied up defining something for them that THEY have defined.

I am very proud of the fact that our seminar members level with me.

Writing the piece called “Ends and Means” below I got right off of my original point.

So Genseric’s comment was:

“I am not afraid to say that this one went right over my head and slammed directly into the wall behind me.”

Genseric is right. I wonder what I was smoking when I let myself wander off like that.

Try to get in mind that I was once a Mommy Professor myself, and one is never fully cured.

The point of the article was supposed to be this: Anti-whites always are careful never to mix up a democratic socialist with a Communist, because a socialist may have the same GOALS as a Communist, but the MEANS he advocates make all the difference.

By contrast, anyone whose GOAL is to save the white race is routinely called a Nazi, even though our MEANS are exactly as different from Hitler’s as the British Labor Party’s were from Stalin’s.

To call someone a Communist, you must demonstrate that he advocates, or would happily countenance, the violent overthrow of the government. Further, you must demonstrate that he is in favor of a dictatorship, a “dictatorship of the proletariat” which we saw with Stalin and Lenin.

Hitler’s Brown Shirts used violence. Hitler advocated dictatorships.

I don’t. I’ve seen them and I don’t like them.

The article may have wandered off course because it occurred to me that this is not such an important difference as it was when I was coming up. Back then the Greatest Generation has just fought A War For Freedom and thereby succeeded in turning one third of the human race over to the Communists.

Back then, even honest leftists were afraid of how much farther Communism was going to go. So to a lot of people, the difference between a democratic leftist and a Communist was very, very important. So every college freshman got a set of lectures on the difference between a democratic socialist and a Communist, and you were considered unsophisticated if you confused the two.

But segregationists were unhesitatingly compared to Hitlerites.

The lesson is a bit out of date, but it is worth noting.

All socialists are not Communists, and everybody knows it. All racists are not Nazis, and that is a fact that is still worth taking note of.