Archive for June, 2011

Wordists’ Gut Feeling is Anti-White

A Politically Correct person sees the white race as the only barrier to his world. China and parts of Southeast Asia are Communist, Japan had a large Communist Party vote for decades after World War II.

The only flags that still have a hammer and sickle on them are in Africa, and there are still several “People’s Democratic Republics” there.

No predominantly Protestant European country had a large Communist vote at any time since World War II, even in the catastrophic conditions immediately after the War.

In the 1960s the New Left had lots of support on campus, of course, but its firmest opposition came from the American working class, the class it claimed to represent.

The only real democracy that ever voted itself Communist, by the way, was San Marino. San Marino, population about 13,000, is a real country in the middle of Italy, but unlike Liechtenstein, which is rich, San Marino is dirt poor like the rest of south Italy.

Oddly enough, Mussolini allowed San Marino to be Communist. An invasion would have made the Vatican nervous, and SMOM, another independent country located on the second floor of a Rome office building and recognized by several countries, represents a lot of money that would not have liked it either.

But when Germany invaded the USSR, San Marino loyally declared war on Germany but not on Italy, so Mussolini gave GERMAN troops leave to cross its territory and occupy the place.

Sometime in the 60s there was what the media called a “counterrevolution,” only leftists had revolutions, in San Marino that overthrew the Communists. I have no information on it except that the fighting largely took place in a warehouse, so the front line was not very wide.

Adherents of the Politically Correct faith see the white countries as the only real obstacle they face.

Others love the little colored folk because they are adherents of Classism rather than Wordism. William Buckley was a Wordist Catholic. Another factor is that he spent his childhood in Mexico, and my guess is that he dreamed of a world that was not only made up of brown little sincere Catholics, but a world in which would-be Uppah Clahss people like himself would rule over a passive brown population.

All forms of enslavement, dreams of truly obedient masses who will do the Wordist’s will without question, see non-whites as the ideal.

Ancient Greece cities were all based on a huge slave population, but they condemned Sparta for its slavery. The helot slaves of Sparta were GREEK. It was the enslavement of GREEKS that was the subject of so many orations against Sparta.

European Catholic countries had enormous Communist votes. Like the universities, the film industry in all European Catholic countries was solidly Communist. For the Moron Minimum, I guess I have to except Franco’s Spain and Salazar’s Portugal.

It would be interesting to correlate the Communist vote in Catholic countries to the color of its skin. The Mommy Professor Factor would have produced them in the more college-educated white population, but even with that, there was a solid and undeniable correlation between living standard and color of skin throughout Europe in the 1950-1990 period before colored immigration got going.

A book called Importing Revolution talks about how the Left gave up on white working people by the time we got what even the media suddenly called “Reagan Democrats” instead of “Wallace Democrats” in the wake of the 1980 landslide.

But the instinctive preference for the slave makers , their gut preference, is that white skin disappears.

That didn’t begin with the Reagan vote.


Please Report Links in Swarm

I SUGGEST it would be a good idea to just let us know of some of the links where here you have been active.

Just a link is encouraging, because this is what I am devoted to, getting YOU out there fighting and trying out things, like the word “Provincial” and how to use it.

We are not the government, I don’t want detailed written reports on everything.

Just remember that every time you copy and paste a link you have worked on just put the Mantra in, it gives Ole Bob a boost.

Those big jobs on YouTube give me a hell of a boost, though I don’t mention them specifically.

But every time you get out there, it is important to me, so let the Swarm know.


Use the Word “Provincial”

Tell people who answer that they are for ALL races that that is a provincial point of view.

This is culture shock, and it is also perfectly true.

If you only look at the world as America, or as Britain, or whatever country you live in, you think your idea of “tolerance” is a local issue.

Only by lifting your eyes from this purely provincial obsession can you see the general picture, the World View, that the Mantra presents.

Like the Mantra itself, this is a real shocker. The LAST thing any anti-white expects is for someone to accuse him of PROVINCIALISM. Mommy Professor told him this was True Internationalism, an objective view of the whole world.

Properly used, just that one word, “provincialism,” can rock their world.

And, as our strategies here all are, it is a way to tell the simple truth.

After you put in the Mantra, most of the opponents who are actually capable of being convinced of our point of view will mutter that they are not anti-anybody. That is where you should try starting with a sentence saying that that is what a person with a provincial point of view often thinks.

The BUGS Swarm needs to try this out and see how to make it work.


BUGS is the Basis of a General Resistance

When BGG was telling me about his history, he explained that he was a 1955 fan of National Review because of its Catholic cast. I came in as a segregationist. Between two of us real old-timers, this is a standard piece of information.

There was no conservative movement, so we each came in from a point of view. Atlas Shrugged was a sensation back then, as were libertarian movements of different sorts, so a third old timer would, as a matter of course, explain he got to National Review from the “libertarian side.”

As I say, for 1950s conservatives like me and BGG, this is a standard bit of information. Later people simply say they are “conservative” because they joined when it was a coherent whole.

One of the founders of the Jewish conservative publication Commentary said back then “To say one is a conservative Jew today sounds like an oxymoron.” As usual, a Mantra Thinker can get more out of that one sentence than he can out of a book studying the Jewish mind.

Certainly neoconservatism has demonstrated to the most simple-minded that the Jewish version of conservatism is fundamentally different from the kind Northern Catholics like BBG and Southern Protestants like me developed.

Neoconservatism is fanatically anti-white, just as “pro-life” has become.

This is why no one should be turned off by our commitment to the STRATEGY of white survival. What BBG and I had in common was our deep loyalty to our OWN roots.

In Mantra terms, we were not traitors.

And what Mommy Professor lived on in the 50s is exactly what he lives on today: The deep-rooted tendency of our people to equate morality with self-hate. There were many Northern Catholics who hated the South and/or Protestantism or were so committed to the Democratic label that they never considered the movement BBG and I took an immediate liking to.

This is important history, because we face much the same situation today.

The white race has enemies on every front. We are in a battle with everyone whose only loyalty is to an institution. We are in a struggle with inertia, where the vast majority of people are anti-white because that seems to be the only game in town.

We, too, each have to have an entry point into the new movement. It 1955 it was called conservatism, which till then had been just plain dying out with a few old Southern Democrats and Northern Republicans left in Congress.

We are in exactly the same position. We call it pro-white. We have a single goal, even simpler than the one stated in the Sharon Statement that founded the Young Americans for Freedom: We are against the program to end our race.

This leaves out people who are so fanatically anti-Semitic that they have no feeling for the white race.

BUT this simple goal, like attachment to one’s roots that BBG and I and others shared, also provides a pathway for people to discuss what they are shouted down about now. It unites people who have our world view and retain basic human loyalties.

It is amazing how broad a movement can become if it starts out on the simplest level of decency.

David Duke emphasizes the role of Jews in the war against us. But David Duke would have a lot more people consider his views OUTSIDE the anti-Semitic groups if they were introduced to heresy by the shock of learning they are anti-white.

Southern Nationalism was on a roll twenty years ago, but its publications kept insisting on a melting pot South and how unracist they were.

What the hell is the point of forming a so-called “nation” if it is to be just one more Multiculture?

Southerners can have their say about our history by those who are breaking the Big Taboo by demanding the RIGHT to DISCUSS the survival of our race.

White genocide, as any leftist will tell you, is the wedge. They cannot allow it because once you allow one heresy to be expressed, ALL heresies get a new hearing.

They are absolutely right.

That is why ALL the heretics should join us.


Between the Respectable Conservative Lines

When blacks began moving into white areas in the North and property prices dropped eighty percent, everybody with money sense smelled money.

Generations before Jesse Jackson began his blackmailing of businesses for contributions by threatening black boycotts, people were making millions by “block busting.” A block buster was “integrating” housing by bringing in a black and making the area from an all-white neighborhood to an all-black one, and that was all the media covered.

But for every time the media’s beloved Idealistic Activists busted a block, they quietly went to hundreds of other all-white areas and applied the good old blackmail. As in any blackmailing scheme, those who paid first got hit last.

Back then, unlike the Poverty Law Center, you could not find out, least of all from the media, how these Idealistic Activists with no skills or talent were living in huge expensive houses in the suburbs.

But where money is involved, there is always another factor. There is always violence. Jesse Jackson did not invent civil rights blackmail. He was merely the first time respectable conservatives had the guts to talk about it.

One of the many things respectable conservatives get paid for is never questioning that all those rich peoples’ dollars that supported professional blacks in the NAACP and so forth was sincerely given. Respectables considered themselves frightfully brave just for using the term Limousine Liberals.

We are speaking of tens of billion of dollars — 1960 dollars! — depending on where block busting by blacks was targeted. As usual, as soon as I mention it, the whole basis of that assumption looks as naked and silly as it is. Rich people did not give money to organizations which had an enormous control over tens of billions of dollars in the economy entirely on the basis of their political ideals!

But you have to be a Mantra Thinker to see this, and that is why I so often point out things that NOBODY else pointed out for decades.

Urban Renewal very quickly became Negro Removal. The Johnson Administration had the black vote no matter what, but contributions could be encouraged from people who had money by aiming Urban Renewal towards removing the population that caused all that blight.

Today there is a lot of media attention on the harmless sweet Yuppies who are moving in and redecorating the center cities.

Respectable conservatives join the liberal media in agreeing this is just so SWEET. But I seriously doubt ALL those blacks are moving out on a purely voluntary basis.

It is like the takeover of all local newspapers by Big Media chains. If all the local gas stations were being taken over, Big Oil would be examined closely, and nobody would believe there was not one dirty deal involved in the whole country. But there is no question of a question that every single local newspaper sold out voluntarily.

Back in the 1960s, a conservative newspaper called the Atlanta Times challenged the far-left Atlanta Constitution. Things got serious. So the Journal simply announced that no company that advertised in the Times would be allowed to advertise in the Journal, and the Journal not only had plenty of money, but it was part of a national chain.

So the Journal kept its monopoly by brute force.

I happen to know about that, but it was not exactly a national media item. Buckley certainly never mentioned it.

The very people who shout most about how one must be suspicious where money and power are involved observe total media silence about money and power that support Mommy Professor’s causes.

It’s one of the things respectable conservatives do for a living.

1 Comment

The “Common Ground” Bullshit

One of the fundamental things a Mantra Thinker must insist on is that he refuses to agree on anything where discussion is limited. Respectable conservatives get paid to do the opposite.

Respectable conservatives get paid to agree that all men are equal or all the other “common ground” they have with Mommy Professor, up front.

We all know that Stalin, Hitler and Lincoln simply used phrases that had been agreed on in their respective Constitutions to completely destroy those Constitutions. Actually, Lincoln used a phrase from the Declaration to replace the Preamble to the United States Constitution, but the principle was the same.

America was very specifically dedicated to one thing, “Ourselves and OUR Posterity,” so Lincoln just substituted “All men are created equal” for it. At least Stalin and Hitler used the actual Constitutions.

The point here is that what the Buckleys called “common ground” is simply handing the whole game over to the enemy.

Agreeing with ANY Mommy Professor “principle” is exactly the same as baring your soul to the police without a lawyer present. Everything respectable conservatives ever agree to is used against us when the trial begins.

We have as much in common with Mommy Professor’s so-called principles as a man accused of murder has with a cop who is out to convict him no matter what.

You NEVER have a DISCUSSION with an anti-white. He is trying to keep the talk about “common ground,” but the only common ground is territory that is presently populated by a white majority.

What is non-white belongs to non-whites. What is white also belongs to non-whites. That is the “common ground” on which respectable conservatives have to agree if they are get a pay check.

There is no discussion with anti-whites, liberals or conservatives, because they limit any such discussion. If I am stupid enough to agree that a fair fight consists of my having to have one hand behind my back, then I am a moron who will also agree to some kind of “common ground” with those who restrict what I say, by law if possible, but always by shouts, ruining careers, and siccing their pet apes on you.

The fight does not START until both boxers have agreed to the basic rules.

Anything you say can and WILL be used against you.

Make them LISTEN to the Mantra and agree to NOTHING.


If You Can’t Take a Label, Stay Out of the Debate

When I was a boy out in the sand hills, I didn’t know about any denominations except Baptists, my mother’s family, and Methodists, my father’s family, and the general category of “holy rollers” that we could hear a mile away on Sunday night as we sat outside.

I guess I was about five when we went to a Lutheran wedding out in Lexington County, which was once German-speaking. About that time I realized that every Sunday, in the Apostle’s Creed, which all of us knew by heart by age three, in the list of things we declared we believed in was “The catholic church and the communion of saints.”

By that time I was truly aware that a Methodist is not a Catholic. But I didn’t understand what the Trinity was, either, nor did most people.

That was my fist lesson in the critical difference between a word that is capitalized and one which is not.

Through the years it became second nature to realize that while a Catholic priest will refer to ‘An Orthodox priest,” he is convinced that he is the one who is orthodox. That “Orthodox priest” will call him a Catholic priest, but he is absolutely convinced that the only truly catholic church is the Orthodox faith.

“Episcopal” just means a church has bishops, but the Methodist Episcopal Church had as permanent a rule by bishops as did the Anglicans, the Catholics, and the Orthodox.

The names of churches are a study in themselves. Most churches, and most political parties, bear names which they once fervently objected to. “Methodist” was originally an insult. “Mormon” was originally an insult. “Quaker” was originally an insult.

Especially in America, the time came when a Catholic got tired of being ridiculed for eating fish on Friday, stood there, crossed his arms, and said, “You’re damned right I’m a mackerel snapper and I’m proud of it.”

That happened so long ago in the Methodist Church that practically no Methodist is aware that it was once a term used only as ridicule by their enemies.

Vanishingly few of the Loyalists who proudly called themselves Tories were aware that the a “Tory” was originally the term for a highway robber in Ireland, and was used as an insult.

Vanishingly few of the proud “Whigs” in the same war were aware that Whig was a Scottish word for a highway robber, with exactly the same evolution.

Which may be an important lesson about those groups who stay the course.

There are so many churches and political and other groups who proudly bear the names their enemies hurled against them that it may be that a group simply does not survive for long if a label can make its adherents back down.

Respectable conservatives all whine and grovel when labels like racist or isolationist are used against them.

No group that can be cowed by a label should be in the vicious game of political power.


That Old Time Religion

In a reply to a Catholic nun’s letter, CS Lewis pointed out that he was Anglican and not Catholic because the Catholic Church had divorced itself from the true Medieval Church. The fact that he never explained that statement has driven a couple of generations of his biographers nuts.

One of Lewis’ “Four Loves,” his intellectual and Christian soul mates, was J.R.R. Tolkien. After helping bring Lewis into the Christian fold, Tolkien was very upset that Lewis did not join Tolkien’s Catholic Church.

Lewis never really explained this. In fact, in his Mere Christianity, Lewis stated that one should pick a denomination, but he had very little interest in what that denomination was. In “Screwtape Proposes a Toast,” he ended by Screwtape’s pointing out that the most delicious souls in hell were those of those who hated other even in Hell because one group was entirely Puritan and one group all pilgrimages and ceremony.

So how DID Lewis define HIS denomination? If he had elaborated in that one letter, a lot of his fans and biographers would have been spared the funny farm.

Those souls were in Hell because they had a religious obsession. They were there because they held their religious obsession AGAINST EACH OTHER. The wine Screwtape was delighting in was made up of the pure hatred of one type of Christian for another., not of the doctrines themselves.

Neither Puritan nor Papist was in Hell because they were Puritan or Papist. In fact Lewis makes it very clear that he expected to see the Papist Tolkien and many of the people he had heard described as “Puritan” up there with him.

This, I think, is the boat a theologian will miss. It is easy to lose truth in a stack of books.

A stack of books produces a Truth, something supposedly provable and therefore enforceable.

The Truth is unchangeable, but the truth changes all the time.

You cannot serve two masters. Either you follow truth wherever it leads you to or you adopt a Truth which depends on the facts you have remaining immutable

And if there is one thing we know, it is that this world is not immutable.

That is why theologians have such a hard time with the different denominations, and Lewis had little or none.

No one knows whether the early martyrs of the Church were heretics or not. We don’t know the position of many of the saints on theological points that were later declared essential to salvation.

All we know is that they did what they thought was right and depended on Christ.

If that’s enough for sainthood, it is more than enough for me.