There is reason why the Book of Judges is followed by the Book of Kings.
As the Soviet Union wobbled, its component nations threatened to secede. There was a series of cartoons portraying Estonia as a bunch of Confederates, all drunk and singing Dixie. The columnists made it clear that the Soviets didn’t know about a free country, that you were not free to just pull out.
Lincoln would get you.
That month of hilarity went right down the media Memory Hole.
Estonia DID secede, and almost every republic followed it.
One of the endless things the media did not know was that the Soviet Constitution included the right to secede. The Soviet Constitution, adopted in 1936 under Comrade Stalin, made the US Constitution look oppressive. It gave total freedom of everything, including the right of any component republic to secede.
Nobody in the USSR was fooled by the Soviet Constitution.
At least nobody who survived.
You survived only if you knew that the 1936 document was being interpreted by Comrade Stalin.
A couple of years earlier Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. The Weimar Constitution allowed the Chancellor, with the President, to declare a state of emergency and make himself dictator. During the First and Second World Wars, Britain did the same thing. There were no elections and no Parliaments. A multiparty Cabinet took over dictatorial powers.
So when President Hindenburg died, Hitler held an election, actually a referendum, in making himself also President. He stated flatly that “This will be the last election in Germany for a thousand years.”
In other words, Hitler obeyed the letter of the Weimar Constitution, not the original intent. The original intent was not in line with the New Order. When he held both offices, he simply imposed a perfectly constitutional emergency rule on Germany.
Forever.
The reason no one in the media was truly aware of this right to secede was because it violated the position on which America is supposedly based, the “one nation, indivisible” line.
Not that long ago the President of China visited the White House. He demanded that, since the United States had recognized a One China Policy, they should either allow China to rule Formosa or that the portraits of Lincoln in the White House be taken down.
Nobody shouted Liberty, Equality and Fraternity more loudly than Robespierre.
He interpreted those words and enforced his interpretation.
Which is where the Terror came from.
The Gettysburg Address simply erased the Preamble to the Constitution and substituted the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Any history professor who says that is likely to be fired in the name of Academic Freedom.
Once I say that, everybody nods and says we all learned that in school.
So why doesn’t anybody but me SAY that?
#1 by Scythian on 06/05/2011 - 11:58 am
My loyalty is to my family – my nation – my race; I’m a tribalist – nationalist – racist. Loyalty to a “proposition” is treachery to my family – my nation – my race. Treachery to my race is treachery to my family and all my ancestors who gave birth to them. No “proposition” can blind my loyalty. Split loyalties are no loyalties at all. My family is my race, my race is my nation.
#2 by BGLass on 06/05/2011 - 6:05 pm
my race is my nation.
idk. imo, sometimes, this word “race” becomes so broad it might as well be “christianity” or communism or whatever. As a word. Particularly true, if one has subsumed, shed, denied, disavowed some genuine and real ethnic reality.
Like when an sub-white group (any one) who’s really screwed another, suddenly goes, “we’re all white here.”
Frankly, who would trust it? Just being real. You might work together, make alliance, etc., maybe even ‘get past the past,” but when people make repeated scars, then say, ‘we’re all white here,” and ONE SUSPECTS (as does happen) they are just trying to squirrel out of being accountable, (not saying here, but saying generally) it’s often not credible.
White ethnic sub-groups must be upheld somehow, or racialism just means vibrant subgroups ceasing to exist, ceding their own reality, their idenitity, their story of history, to some other sub-groups.
#3 by Scythian on 06/05/2011 - 8:27 pm
BGLass, I agree wholeheartedly. What I’m saying is that my nation is the natural extenstion of my family and my race is the natural extenstion of my nation – anything else and the family, the nation, and the race cease to exist.
#4 by James C on 06/06/2011 - 9:09 am
I suspect that “O.R.I.O.N.” is a particularly American idea, a reaction to constantly being told that “we’re ALL Americans”.
The old nations have their white nationality to fall back on. It’s pretty unmistakable what English, or French or German IS and has always been.
On the other hand the enemy has been pretty successful at redefining America as just a proposition and location.
“The Indians were the FIRST Americans”
Without a Whitaker-like epiphany about WHO Americans were and ARE, it’s easy to see how a person with healthy instincts can ditch the whole “nation” concept and seize upon the only thing that REALLY matters – race.
Then you realize it’s all been an enormous lie, nothing but poisonous propaganda. We DO have a national identity in addition to the larger racial one.
As always it’s the redefinition of words – Semantic Correctness obfuscates the truth.
#5 by Mademoiselle White Rabbit on 06/16/2011 - 4:35 pm
I’m not sure that my generation really knows what the American (white) identity is. For all that there are an awful lot of Fiztgeralds or Sheehans in a given area and plenty of Trianos and Bertinellis a few counties over, there are still plenty like myself who fit the “American mutt” label that was once little more than an anti-white’s war cry.
With a 1/4 WASP, 1/4 French Canadian, 3/8 German and 1/8 “Northern Italian (but really: German)”, it’s pretty impossible for me to identify with any kind of ethnic narrative. So of course it’s instinctive, especially after being a racial minority for a handful of my formative years, to grasp at White as an umbrella term which means allies/heritage/kin.
Bob has a distinct heritage that comes from being Southern and, if I’m not mistaken, Irish or Scottish – and then being raised as such, around others being raised the same way. BGLass has a firm grasp on the WASP Protestants because they are her people. Even though I’m at best a second or third cousin to them ethnically, I listen to them and feel like they’re a grandfather and an aunt, because there is no one who speaks for my “immediate” family, but they both have decided that in this day and age there is the need to speak for all of us, nephews/nieces and third cousins once removed alike.
What do I (and the millions like me who were raised with no history, no folk) have? Horus thinks that someday soon we might all be speaking Russian, and that suits me fine. My worry is finding a white homeland. But – I don’t suppose that all of those Russians really want non-Russians in their homeland, and that’s their right. I don’t want Russians, or WASPs, or the Scotts-Irish blended out of existence anymore than I want white people as a whole blended out of existence. But it’s a peculiar thing, being fed a false national narrative of “We are a melting pot” and turning to find that, as a microcosm of the greater White family, you really are a melting pot.
Some ethnic groups will cling to “my race is my nation” because it lets them avoid having to admit fault. But for those of us who have been raised without a clan, we say “my race is my nation” because we have nothing else to cling to. How do we define American as anything else when we can’t define ourselves?
#6 by Genseric on 06/16/2011 - 5:06 pm
For myself, European-Americans sums it up quite nicely. As an Irish-Kraut mutt, I reserve the right to identify with whatever suits me at the moment. On a day-to-day basis, I prefer to identify myself as being part of a larger, soon-to-be cohesive group many refer to as European-Americans.
Everyone knows what you mean when you say that. It means White. And there is MUCH to be celebrated about ALL of us. Trueborn European-Americans are the real TEA Party anyways.
If you go the PLE route, European cultural centers are next on the list. They will help establish those centers from which we teach our children about our common ancestry. Nothing gets suppressed.
No greater love than for my people and our nation,
Genseric
#7 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 5:44 am
Not sure what your meaning is here. Are you saying that by promoting the idea of One Nation, One Race one is promoting a proposition that assimilates one European (White) people into another?
Or are you pointing to the seemingly endless supply of unreconciled White-on-White conflicts over the course of World History? Both?
Signed-A German Copperhead,
Genseric
#8 by BGLass on 06/06/2011 - 9:15 am
I know— why I added ‘not saying here, but saying generally.”
My own struggles are no one’s problem: But a fundamental thing to me (outside spreading mantra) is how on earth sub-groups, previously pitted against each other like in wars, come to terms. For neither can be obligated to inherit, process, adopt (etc.) someone else’s mythology/group self-story, which is what –otoh– seems necessarily to have to happen. Like, the Croatian-Serbian thing. (American south tends to side with orthodox here).
Eg; The american south will never give up the war. (Horus’s spot on the confederates pissed me off for a few reasons, (no personal offense, just talking about how it affects me if I’m honest) but also, b/c confed flag is not a symbol of “white” (although that too)—but he’s putting the black, yankee take on everything onto it. The sub-group the flag represents is a real sub-group. It likes its groupness. Horus destroyed that— and did the ‘we’re all white here,’ thing, (coming from the “conquerers,” hearing “we’re all your family now… as he said, ‘yesterdays enemy is today’s family member…” It pretty much affected me like watching a diversity commercial.
I have a yankee neighbor who thinks this way. The people whose families actually died in the war don’t really appreciate it, but no one is going to tell him. One day, they’ll just cut him off, maybe.
It’s better to take in one’s own part in whatever war (and be like, whoops maybe that wasn’t the brightest thing), if you want to make alliance.
otherwise, it’s just like weaseling out of any accountability.
When people say, ‘we’re all white here,’ under such circumstances, the response really— is “well, some seem whiter than others.” Idk.
Eg: a lot of young ulster-scots in u.s., with such a rich heritage that they have not been taught, have been so vilified that they just think they are irish. this is fine with the irish and other groups. But back in history, there is more to say, (and the traces of that history hang on visibly, making things not make sense).
Also, Northern euro groups seem more pushed to adopt the history of others, also more inclined to consider others’ pain, etc. The S. European white immigrants have never gotten too upset over the plights of southern whites, until their own schools were integrated, (etc.)—until they’re getting hit.
Northern Euro prots in U.S. seem most inclined to —how to say– view themselves FROM ANOTHER point of view, (to live inside the Reality of others about them). But this could just be b/c they were really the only truest object of many attacks
This —in a sense– is the “negative conditioning” Horus talks about.
Now, it may LOOK like they are “believing” some t.v. sound byte. (In other words, they are silent and dissimulating). Nodding, playing the game. They may even believe it (some other history of themselves) on the surface.
But one wrong word. And then they turn.
They decide they will no longer play in the game where your Reality is theeee Reality. They will say, ‘here is my Reality, and we are going to play by that now. Your game is over and you are stupid.”
The whitest of white people get sick of playing the white one.
The second they call it, (this is to “call” the character and reality of the other groups— in fact, to judge them), the other group is simply over. Persona non gratis.
Other groups, for this reason, often feel betrayed by them. They say, “I thought we were friends,” etc. (Never realizing the N. Euro was just dissimulating, which sometimes they didn’t know themselves).
#9 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 5:49 am
Follow The White Rabbi # ?
#10 by Scythian on 06/06/2011 - 11:27 am
Put it this way BG, I’ve seen the rebel flag flown in corners of Europe you could not imagine; they aint southern tourists and they aint about to surrender their nationalities – these are real europeans who wouldn’t dream of flying the EURO flag.
#11 by Scythian on 06/06/2011 - 11:30 am
Imagine living in a country where they tell you to worship your enemy – or you’re ruined. This smells of tyranny to me, and that is how I see Lincoln monsterous “memorial”, a constant encitement for war; Scipio Africanus would not have approved.
#12 by Scythian on 06/08/2011 - 4:00 pm
Imagine a gigantic statue of Milosevic in Sarajevo if Yugoslavia was preserved through armed aggression – which was the intention. William ‘Tecumseh’ Sherman: “I will make Georgia howel”, i.e. a scorched earth policy – everyone is okay with that why? because it happened before WWII? And Sherman was actually an admirer of the South and I believe did not want to abruptly end slavery. I highly doubt Sherman would have approved either.
#13 by shari on 06/06/2011 - 1:14 pm
How on earth sub-groups pitted in wars come to terms? I don’t know. What hurts and can’t be fixed is the hardest. Being in a family and being poles apart from some members of that family is my conundrum. Drives me nuts!
#14 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 5:20 am
Once the PC political elite did away with the God part of “one nation under God,” nationhood became an implied thing of the past as well (the human/people/personal/RACIAL aspect of the country). Now, it’s just a country comprised of a collection of Propositions (constitutions). The “indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” part was simply tertiary. It’s just a matter of time. Let us not forget that They initiated it.
Because that’s about as unpopular a thing to say as you can find. As you’ve said before, “They get paid NOT to say it.” And to anti-Whites who ask “Well, then why would the founding fathers write two articles in such stark contrast to each other,” I say, “They wrote what they did in the Preamble to the Constitution because they wanted to clarify what they, as a cohesive group of European-American people, had said to The King through the Declaration of Independence.”
Silence is acceptance. We will not go softly into the night.
History has ALWAYS been a spoil of war,
Genseric
#15 by BGLass on 06/07/2011 - 9:50 am
History has ALWAYS been a spoil of war,
Why ‘we’re all white here’ can get on my nerves. Revisionism really means: the losing side of some war is trying to say something.
Like, Germany and u.s. south are pretty strong revisionsims. They have some real energy in continuing to hang in there and say another side. Now, you hear too— Ukraine famine/ Boer S.A./ Christian Serb/ Palestine, etc. Now, there are plenty of wars where “revisionism” is not an issue– the losers are pacified more and shut up enough.
Even the droning t.v. shows on Germany and south in u.s. are not enough to stop it (and these are impressive sustained programs of spin with a whole channel for it, history channels).
This is why southerners get pissed about “we’re all white here” in areas with overwhelming yankee influx. They just want to “be accepted.” To be liked. To not feel tension about their role in the war. They say, ‘that was a billion years ago.’
but they do not know stakes in the revisionism issue, and make the southern job in that even more hard.
Like millions of foreigners saying “we’re all german here,” and invalidiating (and making impossible) the revisionism.
And so their presence becomes an act of war without them even knowing it. They ensure the truth cannot be told, which is why they are pawns sent there, in a way.
when they want just to be “liked,” in the face of what is lost, it’s like they are like blacks just wanting to drive in nascar. “they want what they want for what they want it for.” But the cultural aspect is buried and lost forever and they are a part of that.
The other side of history, though, is just interesting, if nothing else.
As you say, silence is acceptance. The already-winner just continues to win. In the south, yankees inadvertently help this process, just as german-flag-waving immigrants do. They are people with no usable memory.
#16 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 10:48 am
Well, as a Copperhead from way up North, I hope you won’t hold that against me. And it might ease some Southerners’ minds to know mine was a family who was torn to pieces over the war (every major American war for that matter), in Kentucky and the Carolinas. Also, I used to live in the South. Many of us have.
I hope my being here (and there) doesn’t hinder greater revisionist efforts, like BUGS, on the whole for the reasons you stated. Besides, I think everybody who wants to can see that we are ALL losing now because of people like Lincoln.
Poles apart from ‘most people,’
Genseric
#17 by BGLass on 06/07/2011 - 9:55 am
Yes, it really is exactly like a home, shari. A fight has occurred and some family member winds up owning the reality. Everybody else knows it’s a lie, from another point of view, so a family dinner always threatens to have an explosion and silenced revelation.
#18 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 12:16 pm
Welcome to the
Confederacy!Let us not forget one other, arguably more, important piece of paper this Country was founded on. It was, in fact, our first articles of organization. And Constitutionally speaking, The Articles of Confederation are still binding today and are MORE relevant now than they have ever been before.
The inherent right of States to secede from any such Union (States’ Rights), which Bob speaks of, were cast aside in 1788 and replaced in the name of centralized government, federalism. A government who has the centralized power to override and dictate to states such as Arizona, “Not so fast” on things like third world immigration. Without the unanimous approval needed for ANY amendment and after many a secret, closed-door session, they gave us a NEW United States Constitution.
On September 13, 1788 they effectively did away with Article 13 of the Confederacy.
Meanwhile, White children are still being displaced in their own countries and their sisters and brothers are being conditioned to Choose diversity over national unity. They call these programs of assimilation of the third world, illegal immigration, and interracial marriage between Whites and non-Whites anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
If you want to thank someone for Centralized Government, thank Alexander Hamilton. If you want to thank someone for White Genocide, thank your anti-White neighbor.
And no piece of paper, however Old or New, is going to stop these people and their programs designed to destroy White children.
#19 by James C on 06/07/2011 - 1:13 pm
Speaking as another credentialed Southerner, I find the statement “we’re all white here” to be the fundamental principle in operation.
The South wasn’t taken down because it was agricultural or because it was to the south, it was attacked and subjugated because it’s soul was too white. The same thing with Germany.
Wordists can’t very well impose their Universal Truth on the world if there exists an independent nation of non-believers.
As long as a powerful, independent rival like the Confederacy or the Reich exists, the wordists will spare the yanks the full force of their dogma. If the North had tired to integrate blacks into the schools in Boston in 1860, there would have been no need for secession.
If Roosevelt brought in 40 million Mexicans in 1933, Charles Lindbergh would have been president Germany would have had another ally against Russia.
Once the external threat is dealt with, only then does the disease vulture come home to roost.
Whites born in the north today deserve no more blame for Lincoln than white kids deserve blame for Indians or slavery.
You can hold onto your history and unique identity and still assess the situation objectively and strategically. The fact is we’re all under attack for being white, descendants of yankees & confederates; RAF pilots and Luftwaffe pilots.
We’ll sort out our family issues once we deal with the maniacs trying to murder us all.
#20 by Genseric on 06/07/2011 - 1:43 pm
Concise. Matter-of-fact. Pro-white.
Gotta love it!
The facts that “The Civil War has never been reconciled” and that “World War II has never been reconciled” can NOT be logically disputed.
#21 by BGLass on 06/10/2011 - 10:52 am
“…..Well, as a Copperhead from way up North, I hope you won’t hold that against me. And it might ease some Southerners’ minds to know mine was a family who was torn to pieces over the war (every major American war for that matter), in Kentucky and the Carolinas. Also, I used to live in the South. Many of us have.
I hope my being here (and there) doesn’t hinder greater revisionist efforts, like BUGS, on the whole for the reasons you stated. Besides, I think everybody who wants to can see that we are ALL losing now because of people like Lincoln….”
Of course that’s all true. Looking for the pithy quick ways of explaining such a thing to both ‘sides’ so they neither lose their own reality, either.
Had a mentor once who would hammer home, ‘the point is never to bury various realities, but to bring differences forth and make them both visible and productive.” to me, that’s true diplomacy.
#22 by BGLass on 06/10/2011 - 11:14 am
“….Whites born in the north today deserve no more blame for Lincoln than white kids deserve blame for Indians or slavery. You can hold onto your history and unique identity and still assess the situation objectively and strategically…”
Placing blame has never been of interest to me. It’s a true waste of time, obviously, imo.
But unbeknownst to me before this second, I apparently just assume the anti-white tone, hegemony, ethos, reality, etc, whatever) will end. So, unconsciously, I wind up looking forward to where we will go after that. In some ways, whites seem very not “onto” how they play together— all the good-cop, bad-copping and so on.
#23 by BGLass on 06/10/2011 - 11:18 am
“….We’ll sort out our family issues once we deal with the maniacs trying to murder us all….”
Lol, think that’s the assurance I’m always looking for. So, winning doesn’t have to mean just being locked in the German and white trash dissimulation dog-house for all eternity.
— and thanks you all. One can learn quite a lot here.
#24 by Genseric on 06/16/2011 - 5:19 pm
As we can from you.
Thank you for your writing, BGL.
#25 by shari on 06/16/2011 - 6:59 pm
I have the a like situation as Mademoiselle and Genseric. Growing up in nowhere outwest, I have both yankee and confederate forebears. I’m a mutt, but I’m a white mutt. I do have those who go back to the colonies and others who came in the 1900’s from the British Isles. I don’t think that I’m really all that much mutt. But there are still problems.