B. U. G. S.

When BGG was telling me about his history, he explained that he was a 1955 fan of National Review because of its Catholic cast. I came in as a segregationist. Between two of us real old-timers, this is a standard piece of information.

There was no conservative movement, so we each came in from a point of view. Atlas Shrugged was a sensation back then, as were libertarian movements of different sorts, so a third old timer would, as a matter of course, explain he got to National Review from the “libertarian side.”

As I say, for 1950s conservatives like me and BGG, this is a standard bit of information. Later people simply say they are “conservative” because they joined when it was a coherent whole.

One of the founders of the Jewish conservative publication Commentary said back then “To say one is a conservative Jew today sounds like an oxymoron.” As usual, a Mantra Thinker can get more out of that one sentence than he can out of a book studying the Jewish mind.

Certainly neoconservatism has demonstrated to the most simple-minded that the Jewish version of conservatism is fundamentally different from the kind Northern Catholics like BBG and Southern Protestants like me developed.

Neoconservatism is fanatically anti-white, just as “pro-life” has become.

This is why no one should be turned off by our commitment to the STRATEGY of white survival. What BBG and I had in common was our deep loyalty to our OWN roots.

In Mantra terms, we were not traitors.

And what Mommy Professor lived on in the 50s is exactly what he lives on today: The deep-rooted tendency of our people to equate morality with self-hate. There were many Northern Catholics who hated the South and/or Protestantism or were so committed to the Democratic label that they never considered the movement BBG and I took an immediate liking to.

This is important history, because we face much the same situation today.

The white race has enemies on every front. We are in a battle with everyone whose only loyalty is to an institution. We are in a struggle with inertia, where the vast majority of people are anti-white because that seems to be the only game in town.

We, too, each have to have an entry point into the new movement. It 1955 it was called conservatism, which till then had been just plain dying out with a few old Southern Democrats and Northern Republicans left in Congress.

We are in exactly the same position. We call it pro-white. We have a single goal, even simpler than the one stated in the Sharon Statement that founded the Young Americans for Freedom: We are against the program to end our race.

This leaves out people who are so fanatically anti-Semitic that they have no feeling for the white race.

BUT this simple goal, like attachment to one’s roots that BBG and I and others shared, also provides a pathway for people to discuss what they are shouted down about now. It unites people who have our world view and retain basic human loyalties.

It is amazing how broad a movement can become if it starts out on the simplest level of decency.

David Duke emphasizes the role of Jews in the war against us. But David Duke would have a lot more people consider his views OUTSIDE the anti-Semitic groups if they were introduced to heresy by the shock of learning they are anti-white.

Southern Nationalism was on a roll twenty years ago, but its publications kept insisting on a melting pot South and how unracist they were.

What the hell is the point of forming a so-called “nation” if it is to be just one more Multiculture?

Southerners can have their say about our history by those who are breaking the Big Taboo by demanding the RIGHT to DISCUSS the survival of our race.

White genocide, as any leftist will tell you, is the wedge. They cannot allow it because once you allow one heresy to be expressed, ALL heresies get a new hearing.

They are absolutely right.

That is why ALL the heretics should join us.