Mantra Thinking is painstaking analysis of rules we take for granted. Mommy Professor, from a Mantra point of view, is just a repeat of The Emperor’s New Clothes. So genocide is ignored because Truly Intellectual People refuse to ANSWER the Mantra and expect it to go away.

It drives them nuts that we simply won’t do like good respectable conservatives and stop repeating the question because they can’t deal with it and it makes them uncomfortable. The rule in this society is that Mommy Professor gives an answer if he can, but if he can’t, a person stops asking because he is too Sophisticated and too Reasonable to just stay there and keep demanding an ANSWER.

So those of the Politically Correct faith bitch about how they have heard all this before. In their world that is all it takes to make a point they can’t deal with go away. All they have had to do is tell the Buckley types that repeating a question is not Uppah Clahss, and not only will a Buckley never ask it again, he will lead the lynch party against anyone who does.

So, like the people in The Emperor’s New Clothes, conservatives drop anything that Political Correctness can’t deal with and, like the adults in The Emperor’s New Clothes, they join or even lead in denouncing anyone who states flatly that the old guy is naked.

A twin tactic is the “We already answered that” bit. For someone to point out that “Where Guns are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Have Guns” puts Political Correctness is an impossible position.

Every hijacking and mass shooting spree would have been stopped if ONE of the good guys had had a weapon on him, and we all know it. But no conservative who pursues this point is going to keep a job as a professional conservative.

No, we all know that if guns are outlawed only outlaws have guns, so if you want to be a commentator, you ignore that reality, you never mention. Mommy Professor’s kids just tell you that point has been brought up and answered somewhere in all the discussion.

So a professional conservative condemns those who mention this common sense. It has been brought up so obviously it MUST have been answered.

Politically Correctness is not intellectually challenging, and anybody who MAKES it seem challenging, which is the job of every professional conservative, has to make a business of ignoring common sense.

This is a Whitakerism.

That is, this is in no way a new point, but a very careful look into an old one.

In everyday conversation, you always look at what a person says a bit cynically. You know what he wants out of the way his story comes out. Some guy’s stories will always end up showing that the speaker is a Real Man.

Some will go along to show that the person telling it is irresistible to the opposite sex, and so forth. We know that, we use that every day.

But when it comes to our world view, we forget a basic point like this. When we take it into account, it becomes a Whitakerism.

When a society stagnates, all information says what, by a staggering coincident, it HAS to say. Every test on busing shows that there is an improvement for blacks and whites remain the same.

Since everybody knows what has happened in schools since integration got started, you cannot sell a test result that says everybody is doing stunningly better. On the other hand, you cannot publish a test result that says what Senator Jenner of Indiana said in the 1950s, “Integration is like mixing sugar with sh… It ruins the sugar and it doesn’t help the sh..”

So all the published tests show that having all those screaming black kids in with them doesn’t hurt white performance — teachers are instructed to make the white kids get used to the high decibel level — but the whole program requires that somebody benefit from it, so the blacks always are reported as benefiting.

The rest of the examples of this kind of fact production are so obvious we don’t even mention them. Profiling blacks works wonderfully in reducing crime for the same reason any profiling does: It works.

In fact, everything we read today is a Just So Story that always comes out the way it should. We know why, but only Whitaker PURSUES this fact, only Bob STATES it in actual conversations.

Only a Mantra Thinker THINKS about it.

Everybody else wants to ignore how trite our Truths are and talk about The Latest News.

But anyone who is serious is going to listen to any information with this reality in mind. If you are questioning somebody you have to be aware every minute of WHAT he wants to be true. You have to be on alert for WHY it wants it to be true.

And if he is too consistent, your radar had better be on.

That’s when we’re serious about a crime or Intelligence information. Or for that matter, a person’s real preference in automobile’s height.

But when it comes to determining the world’s future, we trade the latest news and never even consider the perfectly wonderful consistency of the information that is manufactured for us.

ANY information that is too consistent is unsatisfactory to an adult of normal intelligence.

If I am interrogating somebody and his answers too consistently say exactly what he WANTS it to say, I DO NOT BELIEVE HIM, simply because it is a part of a pattern I have seen before in hundreds of earlier liars.

The whole Out of Africa bit seems to be collapsing, but I didn’t believe it when it was popular. It was too consistent. It was too loudly announced.

I had exactly the same doubts about how every climatic problem was being traced to Global Warming.

But being right about such things is no good if I cannot get you into the HABIT of seeing in public discussion exactly the same thing you naturally watch for in any personal talk you have.

Don’t just say you KNOW the story of the Emperor’s Clothes.

Get Whitaker on them. Stop going into neutral on common sense when it comes to Mommy Professor issues.

In the Soviet Union about 1980 there was a giant warehouse containing hundreds of thousands of empty plastic circles, each about a yard across and containing about a quarter of an inch of solid material at the edge.

History does not record whether these hoops were finally destroyed, or whether, like so many Soviet-produced products, the warehouse is still standing there, collapsing in the open air and being overgrown with weeds.

Those hoops were put into the Five-Year Plan because Hula Hoops had become popular in America for a short time, tens of millions of them sold.

Marxism says that a socialist economy will plan how much of each good will be produced. What it cannot say is WHICH goods will be produced.

The ideal communist society which Marxism predicts as the end of its Scientific Historical Process is very similar to the Eden Adam and Eve habited in the Old Testament and which I described in “The Serpent Had a Point”. (URL)

A Marxist economy produces what market economies produce. When market economies put out millions of hula hoops, the socialist planners put millions of hula hoops into their Plan.

This is only an extreme example of a basic rule. Like the Garden of Eden, communism at its most ideal is sterile. It produces only what has been produced before. Things like the hula hoop or the automobile are not developed.

Like other religions, Marxism gives us a static Ideal.

We are regularly reminded that Moslem theocracies still live in the past. We know that the Papal States, before Italy annexed them in 1870, were stagnant and oppressive to an extent only matched by Czarist Russia.

What we are NOT told is that the USSR, under the Marxist theocracy, was unbelievably stagnant for three hundred million WHITE people at a time when consumer technology in the rest of the white world was moving steadily forward.

Hundreds of millions of white people did not produce one single new consumer product in the entire Communist period. In fact, despite the cheapest white labor on earth, they did not produce one single COMPETITIVE consumer product, old or new.

In other words, no one else seems to put Marxist theocracy right there in the category it belongs, with all the OTHER theocratic states of history.

A commenter said that I seemed to believe in some sort of “omniscience” in Catholic bishops, because in my firm opinion, every one of them was aware of boy molestation.

That is my firm opinion because a great number of bishops moved the molesters around, following Mommy Professor’s opinion back then that any crime was the fault of Society or the Church, not of the “so-called Criminal.”

I do not believe that men as smart as the average Catholic bishop would be unaware of something so well known. The point the Church makes, that this policy came straight from Mommy Professor is passed over lightly by the media and everybody else. This is a more important lesson than any other.

Another lesson here that MIGHT interest you is why I think Catholic bishops are smarter than Orthodox bishops:

In the Catholic Church, all priests in the regular rite are required to be celibate. Orthodox priests are allowed to marry, but only if they marry BEFORE they take their priestly orders. All of the few Greek Orthodox priests I know are married, and most of them finished seminary and waited a couple of years to get married before they accepted ordination.

In fact, a lot of priests in Eastern Rites who are affiliated with Rome, and are therefore Catholic priests, marry before taking their orders. There are, technically, a lot of married Catholic priests.

But in neither church can a bishop be married. So an Orthodox bishop must be selected from the smaller pool of priests who choose not to marry. So the pool from which bishops are selected is both smaller and probably qualitatively different in the two institutions

I am not as shocked as Catholics tend to be over this particular scandal, but as usual the reason I am not so shocked is not going to make anyone much happier about what I say about it. It will just get members of other denominations as mad at me as Catholics are.

Like any Bible Belter raised in a family that had a lot of people inside the churches, I was raised knowing that often those who think they know the world would be appalled if they actually realized what people get away with in the Name of God.

We found it amusing that New Yorkers thought that a Country Baptist like Jimmy Carter might be naïve about politics. We all knew that the two places where cold blooded politics and warm pretenses are most at home are in small Baptist churches, where the minister is elected, and in the Papal elections in Rome.

An occupation where one talks and worries endlessly about Sin simply cannot be a healthy place for an average human to have one’s spirit.

We all know that psychiatry is famous for producing or attracting mentally ill people and kooks, and anyone who has some experience with the world does not find this difficult to understand.

A Bible Belter who has been around a bit expects special sickness inside churches the way a city person expects it inside psychiatry. It may be necessary for someone to deal professionally with sin and for someone else to deal professionally with mental illness, but that doesn’t mean that their jobs won’t warp them.

Likewise, medicine was not discredited in the last generation when so many MDs worked themselves to death.

An institution is not what it SAYS it is. An institution is a result of survival in competition with other institutions. Every society has a religious institution, but if all you consider is its Wordist foundation with no consideration of this survivalist reality, You are living in La La Land.

If the two thousand years since the crucifixion teaches us nothing else, it makes it perfectly clear that there is nothing that has not been justified, nay, DEMANDED in the Name of Christ at one time or another.

There is nothing that has not been declared to be a Mentally Healthy Attitude by those who dictate mental health in society during that long period.

In dealing with institutions, reality has very little to do with the books they publish.

Profiling is not just part of law enforcement investigation, to a large extent profiling IS law enforcement investigation.

A profiler looks for a pattern. He does NOT look for fairness.

The profiler gives out a list of characteristic a perp has, height, weight, accent, locations where he tends to hang out, and every one of those characteristics apply to tens of thousands or even millions of other people.

That’s what profiling IS.

None of this is objected to, because the same public a profiler is being unfair to wants him caught, and is paying the profiler to help catch him.

If a serial murderer is the same size and weight and coloring as I am, it could make me some trouble at a roadblock.

I expect it to. I expect the cops to be on the lookout for people of my size, weight and color, and I’m all for firing the ones who don’t in such a situation.

You don’t have to be a regular watcher of COPS to realize that if a person’s skin is black, he is ten times more likely to have committed a crime. If a person of my general appearance has committed a crime, I expect it to cause me some difficulties.

I do NOT blame the police for that. I EXPECT, no, I DEMAND that in such a case people like me be stopped and checked out.

And I NEVER blame it on the cops.

I blame it on the felon.

On 9/11, Bush’s Secretary of Transportation was a Japanese-American. He declared that grandmothers of Scandinavian descent would be strip-searched every bit as much as foreigners in Arab garb.

The reason Mineta said he did this was his trauma at the treatment of his Japanese-American family in internment camps in World War II.

If a grown man has childhood traumas you put him in a nice quiet place, you talk to him and you give him sleepy pills.

You do NOT let his childhood traumas turn into national policy

Unless you’re a dumbass respectable conservative, of course. The reason people assumed that Moslems with a foreign accent were more likely to be terrorists is because Moslems with foreign accents DID all the 9/11 bombing.

So respectable conservatives demanded that tenth generation American grandmothers be strip-searched.

The reason police suspect blacks of committing more crimes is because blacks commit more crimes.

Nobody, but NOBODY, ever states flatly that that is why you profile blacks.

It’s the reason you profile ANYBODY.

In American football practice you can get the living bjesus knocked out of you by your own teammates.

If you are playing defensive backfield in practice, the people up on the line and the guys playing offense are studying and running the plays. You are just standing there, and your mind can wander.

Standing out there and letting your mind wander on during an American football game is a VERY dangerous pastime.

So if you are an offensive player and the play calls for you to go out and block the defensive back fielder, the coach expects you to make him remember not to skylark in practice so he won’t skylark in a game.

In short, the coach expects you knock the p… uh, perspiration out of him.

The goal of BUGS is to get you ready for the field. This means Zero Tolerance for muddy thinking, but at the same time it requires you to be teammates. Once again my title of Coach fits right in there.

If your football teammate does not knock the, uh, perspiration out of you when you are skylarking in practice, you can get permanently disabled in a real game. But if a teenage high school football player can learn this, we should.

In fact, you ARE doing this. I notice that in comments you knock the crap out of someone who strays from the discipline we need when we get out there in contact with the anti-whites. It is very hard not to take this personally on the receiving. It is very hard not to let it sound personal on the critic’s end.

But you do it very well already.

Our seminar is what the Coach calls “prep.” Prep = preparation to face the other side in a real game.

That is one reason for the often joked about slapping the ass of another player by his teammate. It is a rough comradeship, but the bonding is in fact strengthened by the fact that you are going to hit your teammate hard for prep, but the slap is a reminder that this is a unique form of trust.

You are allowed to hit your teammate hard, but only for prep.

We here are all Good Guys. But we are allowed to hit hard, because if we do not hit hard a person making a mistake will get hit a lot harder, we Good Guys all will get hit a lot harder, if you don’t hit them here in practice.

Used correctly, our prep is a special form of bonding.

But you must always remember that your criticism should hurt, but we trust you to do the hurting because we are all the good guys, with a special bond.

Prep means hitting hard but hitting carefully.