Everything here is connected.
One commenter made a point of saying “DUHH!” — “If all is mantra why does Bob discuss all these other stuffs?”
Because the Mantra will need years to sink in, and I won’t be here when it does.
Inertia is a major factor in all large, stable societies just as it is factor in large table physical bodies.
And of course I mean relatively stable societies. Even the universe is only relatively stable.
But I have seen things move in power politics and they are very much like the same rules of motion in large planets. A natural satellite may be in a stable orbit for a billion years and then begin to fall out of it. Compared to the agonizingly slow process by which it became unstable in a billion years, the next step is fast.
In a million years it will be wildly unstable. Then a thousand years will see as much change as all that before.
Any pro in power politics will tell you that when you have repeated a telling phrase until you are sure everybody has heard it a hundred times, 99% of the population will have no inkling of it.
Then, after you have given up, like Mussolini’s March on Rome, it will suddenly burst forth.
So I am trying to tie things together for you, and to have you set to think out a program when the change hits.
I don’t want anyone to say “DUHH!” when the time comes.
Right now all public whites claim to represent everybody. They are clinging to the old colonial white supremacy inertia, so it is naturally exactly that that they denounce.
When the day comes that discussing the survival of our own race becomes permissible, the colonial age will at last be over. As usual, this actuality is a complete contradiction to everything that we take for granted today.
The anti-white whites have a feeling that they are the total moral superiors of every other group. If you want to appeal to blacks or Hispanics or Orientals, you have to appeal to the INTERESTS of blacks or Hispanics or Orientals.
It never occurs to the anti-white whites that their fixed idea that only whites naturally sacrifice their existence without thinking of it is an assumption of moral superiority that would make a slave holder look democratic by comparison.
This will take a LONG time to sink in. But it is part of what the Mantra carries with it. And when the implications hit, we are going to have to start thinking ahead.
#1 by Roderick on 08/15/2011 - 9:15 am
Long time? I thought this struggle was only going to take a couple weeks. Dang. 🙂
Actually I have a quick question. With all your experiance of taking down closed societies, I was just wondering if there was an average length of time in which it happens. You know like from when you first started asking the question:
“If communism is so ideal, why do all capitalist countries need to build walls to keep people out while all communist countries need to build walls to keep people in?”
to when the Berlin wall came down. From what I understand these mantra techniques are event driven, not timeline driven but even then there must be a standard length of time in which it takes to have an effect.
#2 by Dave on 08/15/2011 - 10:08 am
The Wordist buffoonery of nonwhite independence movements is rife throughout the nonwhite world and you can count on your hands the number of nonwhites that see through it. That is because white people are universally admired and mimicked.
That’s also why it is vastly entertaining to watch black academics discuss Malcolm X. It is a minstrel show that is just as fun as watching chimpanzees at the zoo.
#3 by minervia on 08/15/2011 - 6:05 pm
I love all the information you put out there Coach. I believe we need as much information as we can get moving forward in this battle, and knowing our past best prepares us for our future.
I think I understand what you say about inertia. That we have been slowly demoralized over years and years and with the right sound vibration we will break free from that overnight.
“It never occurs to the anti-white whites that their fixed idea that only whites naturally sacrifice their existence without thinking of it is an assumption of moral superiority that would make a slave holder look democratic by comparison.”
Can you please explain the above sentence? Is it that Anti-white whites think that they are morally superior over whites because they are fighting for every cause except that of white freedoms or rights??