The exposure of the conspiracy to give false data between the environmental “scientists” was a shock.
It was not shock that they were doing it. Fake science to back PC conclusions is routine. If Political Correctness needed frogs to have hooves a thousand PhDs in any field would line up and swear that frogs have hooves.
What astonished me was the EXPOSURE.
Now we find that Fox News in Britain, the country where that exposure of emails took place, has been exposed as reading emails and other confidential stuff. It could be that the PC pros were on that from the time somebody nailed those British “experts” from their emails.
Or not.
That exposure really derailed the Global Warming freight train. The word was already going out to respectable conservatives that they could no longer publicly deny Global Warming.
It could be an indirect connection. That exposure could have made the PC, meaning the entire academic community and its allies, very sensitive on the whole business of anyone who looked into their real communications.
Either way, I have a strong suspicion that Fox, especially the part of Fox that happens to be in Britain, paid the price.
I warned you that being at the front against PC is dangerous.
The amateurs on our side cannot even remember the main points of the Mantra, but our Swarmers can tell you that their opponents are repeating them flawlessly.
Not one of the people who interviewed me could remember the Mantra as well as all our opponents do.
They can quote our Swarmers, but whatever our tens of thousands of amateurs say blows away with the wind.
#1 by c-bear on 08/19/2011 - 10:26 am
Just the other day I was blown away by a news report on one of the national networks that was still talking about global warming like it was still the newest fad. I spoke out loud, “They are totally ignoring the facts!” I immediately had to correct myself, “Well, DUH!” They almost always do that. Why am I so surprised? That is just what they do for a living – professional PC whores. But even professionals slip up sometimes: I vaguely remember hearing the term, anti-White, on one of those networks (I think Fox) last week. The article was then ,almost immediately, cut short. YESSS!!! I wish I would have recorded it for you Bob. I’m sure you would have been just as excited as me.
#2 by Genseric on 08/20/2011 - 10:52 am
Dick Morris used anti-White on Hannity & Colmes in 2008 (following link cued to pertinent spot). He did so shortly after the Clintons took great offense to losing the nomination to a black man; a one B. Oblameya. Are you saying that you have witnessed a more recent usage of anti-White? On Fox?!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyVWFrTZBDA&feature=player_detailpage#t=112s
#3 by James C on 08/19/2011 - 11:41 am
I’d heard the term “anti-white” once or twice before the mantra. It was used in the meekest, most ineffectual way possible. Now it’s our term. Now when you hear it, it means what we say it means.
I think some Frenchman originally coined “racist”, but it was Trotsky who turned it into a weapon.
We don’t just have an arsenal of our own now, our weapons are viral.
#4 by Simmons on 08/19/2011 - 1:43 pm
I think Dave can address this very well, or our old buddy “FourMyle” who has personal experience being the outcast at work.
#5 by Lord Nelson on 08/19/2011 - 5:56 pm
Not sure if this is the right place to post this. But here is a comment by Simon Darby of the BNP that I think you will like:
——————————
“As I have said before there is a very dangerous generational aspect starting to move into British politics. Thankfully I’m with a political organisation that has always fought for a future for our younger people so probably like the vast majority of you reading this I regard myself as blameless.
However, there is one thing I will say concerning some of our younger people; the stark reality is that if you don’t possess the intelligence, will or courage to even assert your own identity and rights in your own country you cannot complain when you find yourself bottom of the pile.
It is a process known as natural selection and it is not confined to physical traits and attributes in a modern, Western society. Whilst young people can quite rightly point the finger of blame at the ruling classes they are going to have to realise that continuing to vote for them isn’t the most logical survival mechanism.”
http://www.simondarby.blogspot.com/
———————————
I love the last paragraph:
“It is a process known as natural selection and it is not confined to physical traits and attributes in a modern, Western society. Whilst young people can quite rightly point the finger of blame at the ruling classes they are going to have to realise that continuing to vote for them isn’t the most logical survival mechanism.”
———————————
It is so blunt and to the point that I wish I had writen it myself. And I too, feel this trend among young Whites.
LN