Praise from the praiseworthy!

Derek Black told me on the phone that the Mantra is a marvel.

Derek Black told me about his success with the Mantra.

He also told me frankly what older movement leaders will not say: He tried to avoid it.

To a leader, the Mantra is too much like copying Bob Whitaker. But, unlike others, he told me frankly that genocide sounded too standard. He tried the white race is being overwhelmed, he tried a dozen things.

But what I appreciate is that he TOLD me so.

There is a lesson in the example he gave me of his successes with the Mantra.

No one comes up with an answer, because the damned thing is almost a tautology.

But what he DID get was gratifying to anybody who has spent so much effort and emotion dealing with anti-whites: He got FURY. The example he gave was a frustrated anti-white white who yelled, “You’re accusing me of GENOCIDE!”

Please note here that in the end what the guy was upset by was how the Mantra made HIM look.

And in that, ladies and gentlemen, is the lesson you must carry with you into battle.

They pay billions just for a bunch of respectable conservatives who will not mention how SILLY their ideas are, who will treat them with respect.

We have all noted how anti-white opinion appeals to people who aspire to Uppah clahss status. But having noted that, we forget it.

Mantra Thinking goes into lessons we learn in one place and APPLIES them across the board.

Showing respect for them is a lie and it is subversion.

The Obama election was a bunch of children wanting to vote for Jackie Robinson. He immediately tried standard liberal big-spending crap that has failed totally.

We will probably never recover fully from that.

But it was NOT an intelligent mistake. They wanted a young Negro and that prospect, being the Generation of the Negro President, brushed all else aside.

A straight liberal economic solution in a crisis. It is like a person who has just broke his leg in three places running a hundred-yard dash.

But no cost was too great to be part of proving they were NOT racist. No cost was too great to get a Jackie Robinson president and feel SO good about it.

But if you call it anything BUT a Jackie Robinson presidency elected by a drooling public, you miss the entire point.

The difference is that in 1947 the first thing the anti-whites did was to make SURE Jackie Robinson had something to contribute that couldn’t be questioned.

In the case of Obama, nobody with his standard and packaged liberal program would have been elected if he had been white.

Embarrass them.

If the billions they allow respectable conservatives each year is not enough to prove to you how important this subversive respect is to them, you are truly out of it.

I hate to add this, but this has to be done intelligently, not just letting your temper go.

Irony, not name-calling.

Just let everyone see how SILLY they are.

The words are heresy. But anti-whites can be confident that no one but Ole Bob will use them.

China’s population comes from an invention they got from India: aquatic rice. A single acre can produce five metric tons, 11,000 pounds of rice, and in China they have two growing seasons each year. In the break they can even plant a few other crops.

An acre produces sixty pounds of raw rice every day!

But aquatic rice was developed from the wild rice that grows on dry land. It was developed in India.

You know about Kung Fu, that Oriental Mystery fighting that made the old TV show? It was born in White India.

In fact the Kung Fu masters in China claim that the man who brought Kung Fu to China pierced a hole in a cave wall with a glare from his BLUE eyes!

Any educated Buddhist will tell you matter of factly that the Buddha himself had “eyes the color of the blue lotus.”

The Aztec God Quetzalcoatl was not only fair skinned but he had a BEARD, about which the Aztecs only knew about from that one legend.

If you see a people squatted about ruins, they are brown. Anti-whites insist that the “barbarians” squatted about the ruins of Rome and the Roman villas of Britain. But the fact is that the houses we live in today are amazingly similar, not to the villas, but the houses the so-called barbarians built.

Romans planned on a great growth of population of Britain after they took it over, but it never happened, because the Britons already got as much out of the land as the Roman could.

The houses we build today look a lot like the ones in the Asterix comic strip than like Roman houses. The pants we wear would not be strange in Old Northern Europe. A person dressed as a Roman today would be a freak.

The anti-whites used to always talk about “the color of the skin.”

OK, instead of arguing obscure points of physical characteristics, let’s TALK about skin color. Stop REACTING and use Mantra Thought. As a professional economist, I noted that nothing correlates as well with economic advancement as does skin color.

Once again, in our boredom over constantly dealing with the anti-whites’ standard five or six statements, we ignore the intellectual joy that the few realities they throw in there could give us.

White India!

White India gave us our numbers system, called “Arabic Numerals” because they came to us through Arabia. I would not like to try to develop Calculus using Roman Numerals.

Eighty percent of China’s population and our numerical system, and God only knows what else, came to us from a place historians never even mention.

A place only Mantra Thinking would ever adventure in.

Why is information produced?

To aid historians Chinese technological history consists of proving that the Chinese did things first. That is why that information is produced, as evidence against white inventiveness.

But a Mantra Thinker doesn’t stop there. He doesn’t have a wussy fight with anti-whites about their version of history. A Mantra Thinker sees that there is a giant lesson looming BEHIND that piece of propaganda, information he would not have known about if the anti-whites had not produced it for their own purposes.

No one else seems to notice this: China had a printing press, and nothing happened. China had black powder, nothing happened except fireworks. One interesting little book I read discussed the interesting fact that Japan actually got the gun from Europe and then forgot it.

If you don’t waste your time quibbling with an anti-white over stuff like this, you can see whole avenues of history and other subjects open up that would never have been available to you if political correctness had not dictated that, in this case, some facts are revealed that would not otherwise have been.

Facts are ALWAYS dangerous to their side.

But only if you USE the facts for something besides just contradicting whatever bullshit they are pushing with it and look into them on your own.

In the case of gunpowder, the reason it is so important to US is because it destroyed the absolute power of castles. Constantinople’s walls, which had held for a thousand years, were destroyed by a German who brought cannon to the Turks.

Printing in China made some playing cards. It bought on the Reformation and ended the Era of Chained Books in Europe.

In fact, a traditional Chinese historian would be puzzled by the breathless announcement of anti-whites that China had a mechanical clock — ONE mechanical clock — long before they appeared in the West.

Knowing the history of his own people, the Chinese historian would say, “SO WHAT?” But it will be a cold day in the Eighth Circle before anyone on our side besides Ole Bob would bring that up.

Mantra Thinking can give you whole vistas that are fascinating. The important point about Chinese invention can bore you sick with its “SEE? The Chinese are the smart ones.”

OR

It can give you a whole clue to a mystery no one seems to even NOTICE.

Nothing is more boring than listening to the same seven or eight arguments repeated endlessly by the anti-whites. You owe it to yourself to enjoy the facts they allow to get out. The real history of the world is in that incidental information.

We all realize that the primary campaign for the nomination is very different from the electoral campaign. That is one of the first rules one learns in politics.

But the big lesson is, with most people the lesson stops right there.

A Mantra Thinker will START with a rule in one area, and test it out in other areas.

As soon as you start doing this you realize that a rule set is critical in others. One of the major reasons potentially successful movements fail is because the way its adherents choose the people they will pay attention to is totally different from the process by which they would choose leaders and speakers who would be successful in making the movement public.

Communism is sort of a total inversion of this rule. From the first Lenin had his eye on complete power.

The whole history of Communism is that it has been brilliantly, expertly SOLD but, once in power, it is a disaster which, if it were not so horrible, would be funny.

The actual Soviet economy was a horrible joke, planting summer wheat in winter, setting glass quotes by the pound so that it came out in useless thick slabs, then by the square meter so thin that it shattered as soon as they picked it up. Because America had a hula hoop craze, the Soviet Union produced millions of hula hoops, all if which ended up in warehouses.

But at that time EVERY SINGLE PAID SOVIET EXPERT was declaring that the USSR was rapidly gaining on the United States in per capita income, just as NOT ONE SINGLE SOVIET EXPERT predicted the fall (No, the one you heard about didn’t, either) of the USSR.

Which means that the left was very good at weeding out those who got paid as “Soviet experts.”

Outside of the University of Chicago and the University of Virginia, the latter of which was “cleaned out” by a new liberal dean, every economics department in America and especially in Europe declared that the Soviet Empire and the Chinese economies were advancing by leaps and bounds.

I saw those figures in the official UN statistics under “Centrally Planned Economies.”

After it fell, all economists admitted that the maximum size of the Soviet economy was about half that of the Netherlands.

Suddenly everybody forgot there ever was a debate on this subject between the whole economics profession and those of us at UVA.

If the left were a hundredth, a HUNDREDTH, as good at RUNNING countries as they are at selling their stupid programs, they would have been running the world for a century already.

I hope that when I am out of the picture my kind of thinking will have heirs.

The Mantra has heirs, but Mantra Thinking requires a more general discipline. It consists of not just quoting wisdom but taking it apart.

For example, anyone who studies politics knows that when a person is trying to be candidate of his party, he must appeal to a different constituency than he does once he becomes the candidate of the party. The people who vote in a party’s primary are a very different crowd from the electorate as a whole.

The only time this reality was really discussed was when liberal Republicans built their entire careers on misinterpreting it.

But it is nonetheless a serious consideration. A pro has to run a different campaign for the nomination than he does for the general. That is why his most embarrassing moments are when opposition researchers on the other side quote remarks he made during the primaries.

But most people know this rule about politics but do not analyze it further.

If you do the Mantra Thinking, and you generalize this rule and DISSECT it, it can make the difference between victory and defeat. It applies to every movement and every cause. It is a matter of life and death to every cause.

What are chances that someone who rises to the leadership of a movement will be the right person to WIN THE BATTLE it is fighting?

The people INSIDE a movement who choose the leaders, actively or passively, are entirely different from the general population or the power group on which the whole cause depends.

I have yet to see anyone even NOTICE this vital rule outside of open electoral politics.

What about the East Tennessee meeting Derek Black is setting up?

All the National Alliance Conventions in New Orleans and the American Renaissance conventions that followed them did well because they had a lot of hellaciously good speakers. The crowed showed up to get a show, and they sure as hell did.

Many, many books were sold.

East Tennessee will be comparative flop if those are the standards. Sam Dickson is one hell of an entertainer, but what I have to say may be as dry as dust to people who come for entertainment.

I had one speech, once, in New Orleans and since then not one single convention of any kind on our side has asked me to talk.

This doesn’t give me stage fright. If you have given a lecture on basic economics to a hung over class at eight on Monday morning for years you get very hardened to it.

But I doubt Derek will read this, and I am anxious that he not compare this meeting to the rousing ones his seniors put together.

It is probable that a meeting that concentrates on what is needed for victory in the general fight will not be repeated if it is judged by the standards of meetings that were set up to entertain.

For a long time the media made a big thing of pro-life being all-Catholic.

Long before I was born, anti-Catholicism was referred to as “the anti-Semitism of the intellectuals.”

Professors have an instinctive hatred of Catholicism of the same kind as people in general have a natural dislike of Jews and Anglo-Saxons have a natural dislike of the very word “French.”

Whole books had been written on this prejudice of the unprejudiced by the Tomesters. National Review had article after article pointing out that this was just plain prejudice.

I took a step that was more effective than any of those. I wrote a one-minute speech for my boss titled, “Media Picture of Pro-Life as Catholic is an Insult to Protestants.” The speech pointed out that John Ashbrook was a Baptist, and his pro-life record was indisputable.

He was insulted by the idea that only Catholics were pro-life.

You had to be an expert — PAID like me to prove it, maybe — to see how this totally befuddled an establishment that had just put out a major book showing how many congressmen were Catholic and how they voted.

The way our enemies signal defeat is by simply not bringing something up again. My particular victories were of this sort, so they were unnoticed. Only other pros wowed it.

This is another function for which respectable conservatives are absolutely invaluable. Just as a professional respectable must know exactly when he must denounce a position he once had, he must know when a subject has been lost, and therefore can be buried, by the regular media.

In another less political case I stopped a verbal freight train. It was the period when earlier human ancestors were being discovered almost every month. But every single popular article on such a new find went something like “It has been discovered that the earliest man was not in X, as has been thought, but in Y.” or, “A discovery in Y…”

The media is bad enough in its constant attempts to screw up anthropological reality, but this one was too gross to pass up. I could contradict it and my record of published Letters to the Editor is very good, but where would I put it? My point would have no authority as a letter in a standard publication. If I sent it to Science the media would never notice it.

So I sent it to Science News, which was the publication which had millions in circulation and the one that journalists use so as not to be entirely ignorant of science which is not spoon fed to them for political purposes.

I wrote one letter to Science News pointing out that every time a popular magazine reported the latest discovery it said that was “the earliest man.” I pointed out there, where popular readers would see it, and where it would have to pass scientific criticism, that if “the earliest man” has been discovered four times in the last year, a reasonably intelligent reader would expect the reporter to add the words “to date.”

When you read it, it is hard to make this couple of paragraphs into anything huge, but it was. “The earliest man” man disappeared where before it had been ubiquitous. I chose the exact length of letter the editors liked and the exact publication where it would hit home.

This one action has more effect on our specific war than the actions of the most Decorated and Suffering soldier did on the outcome of any war.

If you want to brag about it, Suffer. If you want to win a war, use targeting and wording, and take it seriously.

One of our commenters made a valid point we all expect.

But remember that a major theme of BUGS is that we are to take a SECOND LOOK at every basic.

In reply to one of my articles about the Alamo, one commenter pointed out that we have it easy, because we don’t have to be out there in the miseries of the battlefield. That is a good point, but now let’s do a Whitakerism. Let’s take a SECOND LOOK at it.

This point contradicts everything we desperately need to keep in mind.

A war is decided before the first shot is fired. It would be hard to find an instance where the actions of man in uniform, however heroic and brave and suffering, ever made the slightest difference to a war’s outcome.

As CS Lewis pointed out in his introduction to The Screwtape Letters, he thinks of all the Evils of Hell taking place, not in the Pit with the heat and the screaming, but quiet, efficient offices with thick, spotlessly clean rugs.

That, Lewis points out as I am here, is where the real, massive Evil takes place on earth.

He sees Screwtape is in the Executive Suite, not down there where the heat is with a pitchfork.

Screwtape refers to a Demon appearing as an Angel of Light as a standard parade-ground exercise.

Long before the first Medal of Honor Winner sees action, the war has been decided by men in coats and ties.

In fact the Alamo and the three hundred Spartans were necessary precisely because decisions had not been made in the Executive Suites. Texas could have been conquered while the debaters in the capitol were holding up any effective defensive action.

Exactly the same was true in ancient Greece. Athenians had stayed off the battlefield while the Persians invaded because they were celebrating a particularly important religious holiday. The Persian hordes would have conquered all of Greece if the Spartans hadn’t died to give the Executive Suite time to DECIDE.

In fact, both the Spartans and the Alamo’s defenders were perfectly aware that they had to DECIDE to die simply because they had to give the guys in a clean safe place time to make a decision. THEY certainly understood the point I am making here.

If you want to BRAG, you talk about when you had on a uniform and how you were stuck in the mud or the ice. If you want to WIN, the real fight is where it always was, with those who see the issues long before the first shot is fired, those the soldiers, who are merely filling in the diagram already drawn for them, so despise.

If you want to BRAG, slog it out in the field. If you want to get in on the REAL fight, it is right here in the air conditioning.

Get off the “I SERVED” crap of the Weakest Generation. They gave a third of the human race, now down to a fourth, to the Communists.

Their only excuse is that it was hard work.

When a particular comment reminds me of something I want to warn you against, it sounds like I am coming down on the commenter. Coaches are not known for being particularly subtle, so please take this once and for all: I am not calling for an apology from the person who made the comment. In fact, worrying about the comment itself takes away from the general point I am trying to make.

One my articles was inspired by someone asking how to answer someone who said whites were guilty of taking other people’s lands. I used this to make the point that you were generally forgetting basics.

This basic was to ignore the crap and point out the guy is justifying genocide.

In football practice if a player asks Coach about a basic he has forgotten, the coach will call everybody over and repeat his question and make the general point. In that environment he makes it very clear that he expects others to forget the same thing.

I do the same thing with a general article. This was not written to condemn the question, it was used as an opportunity to make the point generally.

The coach does NOT want to discourage his team from coming back and asking him questions. He has to assume that everybody worth having on his team is tough enough to hear the thing aired in front of everybody who can benefit.

The point was, as I said, forgetting the basics is a very usual problem of people in the heat of the fight.

I want you to understand that the BUGSER who asked the question did exactly the right thing. He came here to ask what to do.

That’s what we’re HERE for, gang.

If you care enough about the winning the game you will expect the coach to be a bit rough.

A SWARMER asked about what he should do because he spend his time posting, and didn’t have time to report each and every posting.

He then went right ahead and answered his own question. He made a report, brief and to the point, about the things he was doing.

Another SWARMER declared with exclamation points that he had tried too many points too fast and failed.

Once again, he solved his own problem. BUGS is probably the only site where pro-whites are interested in a mistake like this, rather than in some ideological obscurity.

Like the first example, this SWARMER solved his own problem: He saw his error, declared it, and went back into the fight.

I am sure you would like to believe there is some All-Knowing Leader who could do it all right if he were in your place.

My Lord, I wish there was a guy like that!

Bob Ain’t Him.

So you have the next best thing. You have a place to discuss your activities with others who are doing the same thing, and speak the same language, a language of experience.

Let me indulge in what the world drove an old guy to: Self-pity.

I spent many, many years going from site to site, from convention to Convention, trying to get people to who could talk to me in Mantra terms.

None of them ever seemed to have convinced anybody, but they had not put the slightest energy in how to do it.

I hope some of you can appreciate SWARM the way I do. Those of you who are becoming good at this, try to put yourself back into the position I was in, when there was absolutely no one to talk to about real strategy.

Ten years ago no one in the movement would have understood what the hell you are talking about in SWARM.

As Frodo asked Gandalf, why did the Evil have to come in MY time?

Bob is not Gandalf, and even Gandalf had no answer.

The fact that something has acquired a name does not make it new.

What we have recently begun to call Stockholm Syndrome has been all over forever.

Every drunken father who spent his life beating his family and was loved by that family for the times when he had a little mercy demonstrated what we now call Stockholm Syndrome. The people Stalin DIDN’T send to the Gulag the night before were sincerely in love with him.

Respectable conservative behavior toward leftists has been straight Stockholm Syndrome for well over fifty years while I have observed it. Leftists have no mercy, and conservatives are lucky if they get off with just being called racists. On the other hand, Buckley was so flattered that Professor Galbraith would associate with him it, made one sick to read him glory in it.

Nowadays I get the impression that if Christopher Hitchens visited National Review the male staff would rape him. He said some honest things about the Clintons during the controversy and conservatives keep praising this rather mindless Marxist to the skies.

Stockholm Syndrome has been around the corner with every little toady who ever came to love his buddy because the bully didn’t hit HIM.

People who find Stockholm Syndrome novel are exactly like someone who read Newton for the first time and said, “Gee, I never noticed this gravity stuff before!”

But people do not analyze what they have no name for. We always knew political correctness was required by leftists. But it was not really discussed generally until the standard Marxist term slopped over into everyday discussion.

The fact is that one can prevent people from thinking about something by not giving it a name.

One’s brain, like any computer, is limited in the number of steps it naturally makes. So if every time one hears someone say political correctness and that person does not know it is a standard Marxist term, one must go through that extra mental step, and the process stops there.

The establishment sets a limit for how much any conservative who wants to make his living on his respectability can go. Twenty years ago one could debate Martin Luther King’s politics. The day came when anyone who wanted to make a living as a “conservative” had to grovel when the Great Name was spoken.

When a paradigm like this changes, you are ruined if you don’t know it and you are ruined if you mention it. This is the environment I made my living in.

The day that something becomes verboten for a respectable to say is a lot like the Israeli Lobby on Capitol Hill. Everybody knows that you never mention it, only respectfully and as little as possible. When you do mention it you talk about it as if it were just one of many lobbies.

But if you ever really BELIVED the Israeli Lobby is one of many lobbies you could never get a job anywhere near a congressional office. Anybody who doesn’t make the facts about that group part of his everyday thinking would have to be a genuine retard.

In the case of knowing exactly when a respectable disavows the stance his side made a quarter of a century ago, there is nobody who is a practicing professional on either side who talks about it, and there is nobody on either side who is smart enough to get a job who doesn’t recognize it.

The exposure of the conspiracy to give false data between the environmental “scientists” was a shock.

It was not shock that they were doing it. Fake science to back PC conclusions is routine. If Political Correctness needed frogs to have hooves a thousand PhDs in any field would line up and swear that frogs have hooves.

What astonished me was the EXPOSURE.

Now we find that Fox News in Britain, the country where that exposure of emails took place, has been exposed as reading emails and other confidential stuff. It could be that the PC pros were on that from the time somebody nailed those British “experts” from their emails.

Or not.

That exposure really derailed the Global Warming freight train. The word was already going out to respectable conservatives that they could no longer publicly deny Global Warming.

It could be an indirect connection. That exposure could have made the PC, meaning the entire academic community and its allies, very sensitive on the whole business of anyone who looked into their real communications.

Either way, I have a strong suspicion that Fox, especially the part of Fox that happens to be in Britain, paid the price.

I warned you that being at the front against PC is dangerous.

The amateurs on our side cannot even remember the main points of the Mantra, but our Swarmers can tell you that their opponents are repeating them flawlessly.

Not one of the people who interviewed me could remember the Mantra as well as all our opponents do.

They can quote our Swarmers, but whatever our tens of thousands of amateurs say blows away with the wind.

One commenter asked how to answer the “whites took their land” bit.

We have been over that dozens of times here.

First of all, any argument of that sort is JUSITIFYING genocide.

Am seeing a lot of this in BUGS, with anti-whites getting away with the simplest things.

For example, I do not see anti-whites who complain about our repetition getting what this sets them up for:

We won’t stop saying it until you ADDRESS it.

We can’t have an adult discussion with you until you stop outlawing and start debating what we say.

You have only a small window of opportunity, and it makes me sick to see you forget to follow up on them.

And, for the hundredth time, all nations are nations of immigrants.

All nations are created by immigration.

All nations are destroyed by immigration.

Too many of you are beginning to sound like respectable conservatives, only there to answer THEM.

Maybe we could use some reminders here by someone besides me.

The instant anyone brought any of the points you have such trouble with, I would just tell the truth: “You are justifying genocide.”

Get with it, gang!

The Alamo lost the battle and won Texas Independence.

The three hundred Spartans — actually Spartiates — lost their battle and saved Greece from the Persians.

But all of them died.

Those environmental “scientists” who told each other in their emails about how they were doing the usual Politically Correct cheating on their data got exposed.

Almost from the first, I have told you that, while our side has no idea how effective Mantra Thinking is, the other side is made up of pros. They will not forgive and they will not forget if we are as effective as we can be against them.

Being in the small group that reverses the tide of battle is always risky.

As I said, the Torchlight Paraders on Stormfront would have panicked and run if they saw the present match up.

The handful of Swarmers — which to a political amateur is contradiction in terms –is in a real battle while others who sit aside and beat their chests are playing a very juvenile game.

And every BUGSTER who is not on the front is in the rear.

Our new Swarm format allows me us to count the number of Swarm, and separately the number of separate people making them.

What is critical here is the demonstration of a point I keep ,making: In our seminar you learn the difference between real political struggle and what most people see it as. Most people see politics as torch light parades or the thousands at a rally when The Candidate shows up at a news clip rally.

Compared to their effect, our numbers are miniscule.

If you read the Swarm you will see more than one commenter saying that he noted a link and they SWARMED it.

On the other side, they are bitching about the repetition of the Mantra and swearing they are going to explode when it is repeated AGAIN.

Yet the total number of people reporting in is far less than a hundred in the time since the new format took over.

That’s no torchlight parade. That’s no cheering TV rally clip.

But it IS a Swarm.

This is a simple and critical point.

It is the Alamo and the three hundred Spartans, hopefully in reverse.

How did a hundred and twenty men with muzzle loaders hold off five thousand Mexicans coming in wave after wave? A single real assault weapon today could put out more fire than all those men combined.

I have a strong suspicion one reason was that about every time one of those muzzle loaders fired, a Mexican fell.

Yes, it was a small front, but still, how were tens of thousands of Persians not be able to bear down three hundred men?

Because the three hundred men were Spartiates. They spent their entire lives learning nothing but battle.

Our numbers in Swarm are greatly inferior to either the Alamo or the Thermopylae.

This is a total contradiction to all the Stormfronters who think in terms of a Torchlight parade of millions or a March on Rome. They are puffing and blowing while our Spartiates, our Texans, are a handful in there doing the job.

If the Torchlighters had been at the Alamo or Thermopylae they would have run.

That is why BUGS has more effect, by far, in a month than all the Stormfront chest-beaters have in years.

Every time we shoot we hit one of Santa Anna’s invaders.

Everything here is connected.

One commenter made a point of saying “DUHH!” — “If all is mantra why does Bob discuss all these other stuffs?”

Because the Mantra will need years to sink in, and I won’t be here when it does.

Inertia is a major factor in all large, stable societies just as it is factor in large table physical bodies.

And of course I mean relatively stable societies. Even the universe is only relatively stable.

But I have seen things move in power politics and they are very much like the same rules of motion in large planets. A natural satellite may be in a stable orbit for a billion years and then begin to fall out of it. Compared to the agonizingly slow process by which it became unstable in a billion years, the next step is fast.

In a million years it will be wildly unstable. Then a thousand years will see as much change as all that before.

Any pro in power politics will tell you that when you have repeated a telling phrase until you are sure everybody has heard it a hundred times, 99% of the population will have no inkling of it.

Then, after you have given up, like Mussolini’s March on Rome, it will suddenly burst forth.

So I am trying to tie things together for you, and to have you set to think out a program when the change hits.

I don’t want anyone to say “DUHH!” when the time comes.

Right now all public whites claim to represent everybody. They are clinging to the old colonial white supremacy inertia, so it is naturally exactly that that they denounce.

When the day comes that discussing the survival of our own race becomes permissible, the colonial age will at last be over. As usual, this actuality is a complete contradiction to everything that we take for granted today.

The anti-white whites have a feeling that they are the total moral superiors of every other group. If you want to appeal to blacks or Hispanics or Orientals, you have to appeal to the INTERESTS of blacks or Hispanics or Orientals.

It never occurs to the anti-white whites that their fixed idea that only whites naturally sacrifice their existence without thinking of it is an assumption of moral superiority that would make a slave holder look democratic by comparison.

This will take a LONG time to sink in. But it is part of what the Mantra carries with it. And when the implications hit, we are going to have to start thinking ahead.

If you actually read what I said in “A Simplistic View of History” you see that it would be termed anti-Semitic and banned outside the US. But its outstanding trait is that it makes Jews into human beings.

European law requires the assumption that Jews, unlike any other race on earth at any time, are incapable of normal human actions and reactions. So in my historical view they are in the same category as original settlers, the Americans those original settlers turned into, not the New England Brahmins who took over the country from the other white native Americans.

But Jews are, according to everybody’s law outside the US and the US laws if liberals and respectable conservatives had their way, incapable of any human act which might be taken as normal for anyone else. My history would be perfectly legal if it had stopped with the New Englanders. Even liberals would not have objected.

Only respectable conservatives would have denounced the idea because the ruling group that was closest to them was the old New-England based Robber Barony.

The complication required of someone to write in Europe and stay out of jail is truly childish.

In fact, adulthood is measured by how far you get away from the idea of a knight errant and a fair princess versus the evil ogre. European law requires you to live in that world, the Jews are perfect and the white goyim are evil. If you gave that sort of analysis in any other area of life your family would receive solicitations from retarded homes.

That is why I keep telling you that you avoid specific policy suggestions. Instead, you use any such demand as a springboard to demand, once again, that we first be allowed to DISCUSS the issue before we make policy proposals.

Presently the situation is exactly like one in which someone says to you, “We live in a world of Dungeons and Dragons. If you deny that you will be arrested or lose your job or both. What is your proposal for this world of Dungeons and Dragons?”

You aren’t really needed. Respectable conservatives get paid big money to do THAT proposing.

The general outline of American history goes thusly:

Northern Europeans took it from the Indians under the English flag.

Americans took it from the British.

New England then took it from the Americans.

Then the Jews took it from the New Englanders.

Now the minorities the Jews used to take it from New England hate Jews, openly and with a passion.

What we call conservatives want the country back in New England hands. Those we call liberals want it back in Jewish hands.

Here is the Whitakerism: You can get more out of analyzing the few sentences above than by reading a hundred tomes.

But reading tomes isn’t WORK. You can just sit there with your mouth open and go through words. Every second of taking a few short sentences like this apart and fitting or contrasting them with reality is WORK.

WORK for which Mommy Professor has crippled us.

History talks about the Virginia Dynasty. For its first 36 years of our existence a man from Virginia was president. John Adams, the only exception, was appointed by Washington and he was the first single termer.

That is a whole generation of Virginia presidents. But Mommy Professor never points out that Virginia had one fifth of the United States, a bigger proportion than California and New York combined.

Political Correctness goes back to the Revolution and indicates it was fought entirely in Massachusetts.

Yes, I am a dedicated idealist and I sincerely believe I do not do things for revenge.

But if revenge is a by-product, I can’t help it if it goes down easy.

For a person who loves his own race, it is torture to spend year after year dealing with the same nonsense, over and over. They spread the word that racial IQs were “proven” to be the same, when there was no real hint of it. They repeated “the Great Black Civilization” crap.

Half a century ago I applauded when Stokeley Carmichel said, “If I hear six million Jews one more time I’m gonna puke.”

Every Yankee I knew insisted that the most brilliant person he ever met was black.

Please note these are just a few examples of hundreds.

It makes you very, very tired to deal with the same nonsense over and over and over, while the person saying it to you is the hundredth who has.

But then it got creepy. The hundredth person thought he had come up with it, just like the twentieth did. When it came to originality, you might as well have been dealing with a retarded goldfish.

But Bugs Swarm is now repeating the Mantra. And the problem with the Mantra is that it is TRUE, unlike those repetitions I was tortured by for so many years.

Swarm Commenters describe the screams of pain from the anti-whites as they hear the Mantra and the phrase, “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” over and over and over and over.

It feels so good to see them getting theirs.

It is also interesting that those of us who have been in this fight through the decades always got tired because we had to repeat the standard simple truth against each repetition of a standard false statement.

Those who are bombarded with the Mantra have no way to answer it. So they are trying to deal with it the way they have dealt with any questioning of their policies: by shouting them down, or telling respectable conservatives they sound like bigoted rednecks, or telling each other in the publications they control they will no longer stand for such “extreme” statements.

What is ironic is that the main argument of self-styled Marxist Revolutionaries is now to have the media denounce real opposition as “extremist!”

Hit ‘em again, gang! They are screaming in pain, and it warms Old Bob’s scarred heart.

You’ve heard the old phrase, “If I get two and they get two each and they get two each…”

Yes, that would work beautifully. So why doesn’t everything work perfectly that way?

This is the kind of thing you can only learn in a place like BUGS SWARM.

If you are only into news reports and theorizing, you have never held a meeting where nobody came. One SWARMER mentioned in passing that he had gotten six people to using the Mantra. Creator said he had four people in Iceland.

Real politics is a guy showing up in the gray of dawn at a shopping center where nobody is there yet. Real politics is trying things.

I have set up those campaign rallies you see on television. It is one hell of a lot of work, in the very middle of a major campaign, to get all those people to show up and cheer for the candidate. That is where all these “torch parade” types get their idea of politics.

But by the time you can get out and work your butt off to get that rally going, almost all the real deciding has been done. It is a horse race between a standard Democrat and a standard Republican. The real power is shown LONG before those two show up.

I can tell you this endlessly, and have, but you can’t SEE it until you have gotten into something like BUGS SWARM and seen how this works in action. Real politics is OVER before the parades and the campaigns.

When John Ashbrook died in early 1982, almost all of my real work in his 1982 Senate campaign was already done.

Even standing at a factory gate and getting in front of workers singly heading out, which is the last one would expect a world-wide celebrity to do, is big time compared to the early days planning — and NOBODY wants you in the planning if you’re never been in a real live campaign — and the endless false starts.

As a general rule, the more power you can SEE the less there is. You can get a lot of people to work for ready money or a state-wide candidate who is leading. But by then the choices have been so narrowed and decisions made that the actual election is minor.

Years and years and years of deciding what will be decided is where power lies. I can only mention a couple of things, like saving the space telescope, that I can actually point to. The rest is influence. The people in history books are like the anchor men on television: They don’t know much and they don’t influence anybody, because they are hired for their attitudes as well as their looks, voice, and ethnicity.

If you got six people repeating the Mantra, nobody here in the real fight will declare you a hero.

In a country with a thousandth of the population of the US, Creator’s four hitting right at the base is a legion.

I wrote a piece warning about wobbling into words like “displacement” so one won’t have to look like somebody who repeats an old word like genocide.

The reason “genocide” is old is because it is accurate. Worrying about how you look is one major means by which anti-whites get you to wobble off the real subject.

If you want to know how this REALLY makes you look, remember that respectable conservatives get all girly and giggly when a liberal tells them they are not like other conservatives they have talked to, that this respectable conservative is different from the rest.

I call displacement a Wobble Word. This is part of our discipline. Displacement is more a property rights word. In the actual argument you will find that anti-whites are anxious to get off the racial right to exist and welcome a chance for you to wobble into a discussion of property rights, like how we displaced the Indians.

DON’T WOBBLE.

Also I noticed someone decided to out “humanism” as a synonym for anti-white. I did the press work for fundamentalist textbook protestors and I am well aware that “humanist” is THEIR buzz word.

There are plenty of churches out there. There is only one BUGS.

BUGS is NOT part pro-white and part whatever your favorite Wordism is. When you use these pages to push something that is not the pro-white message, you are wobbling into areas Bob’s Underground Graduate Seminar is NOT dedicated to.

Anyone who indicates he has not gotten out there into the actual fight is just theorizing outside of the real fight.

It takes very little time for someone who has been in the actual battle against anti-whites to know they LOVE it when you use something like displacement or change the topic to religion.

This kind of discipline comes quickly when you have been reamed by the other side a few times when they caught you wobbling.

When you bought a new Ford car off of the assembly line around World War I, you got a free copy of Henry Ford’s book, The International Jew, with it.

A lot of Jews probably bought the car and then sold the book for a quarter.

As I understand it, it was threats of giant libel suits that caused Ford to back down.

As you doubtless know, Hitler said that “Ford,” he didn’t know the rest of his name, was the only American who understood the Jewish Problem.

In one of the ten thousand security checks I had to go through — though I may be exaggerating slightly, my Adjudicator was a conservative Jew. Looking at my background he asked in passing if I was anti-Semitic. I told him the truth, that in Politically Correct terms I definitely am.

Jews, as group, have attitudes. All groups have general attitudes. In fact, people will point out that some Jews are anti-Semitic, but all they are doing is using the exception to contradict the rule. The only reason an anti-Semitic Jew stands out is because there is a general Jewish attitude which is NOT anti-Semitic.

In general, you expect someone named O’Hara to have a special attitude toward English pretensions to high virtue in their history. You would be astonished if France, which is west of Germany, never allied with Poland, which is east of Germany.

The oldest treaty in existence is on clay, and it was country A and Country C forming an alliance against Country B, which was between them.

Once again, this a world view which is as alien to pro-whites as it is to anti-whites.

The reason for this is because we have let the other side impose their world view on us. We shout anti-Semitism while they shout pro-Semitism, but neither side is looking at the real world.

The debate about anti-Semitism is miles from reality, like our constantly trying to deny the racist label they throw at us on racism.

Whatever you label it, there is Western white attitude towards Jews and there has been a Jewish attitude toward Western whites. But we begin by talking about a conspiracy and they begin by saying any attitude we have is anti-Semiotic.

No attitude? Good God, we are talking about two groups who have been cheek by jowl for two thousand years!

You do not start discovering Jewish hostility as some kind of late conspiracy. Jews are in outer space if they insist that Jews have been hated but have never ever responded with hatred themselves.

If you are going to make any sense at all, you have to have a basic world view that makes sense.

I have written over four thousand articles since Whitaker Online started in September of 1998.

But I am no longer in charge of the articles that mean most to me. If I read the count aright, there are still less than a thousand BUGS SWARM comments. BUGS SWARM keeps me going, so this is not entirely a complaint.

But it breaks my heart that BUGS SWARM is nota giant list of you reporting where you copied and pasted.

The strategy statements in BUGS SWARM make me want to stand up and cheer. All those years when I was trying to get The Tome People onto nose-to-nose phalanx fighting any tiny variation in their discussion with the other side would throw them right back into endless explanations no one would quote.

And even those were not even a handful. NOBODY understood Mantra work. In my first ten years people would watch me tear up the other side and convince listeners, they would brag to each other how good I was, and then they would not hear one single word when I tried to explain it to them.

One Ole Bob simply cannot be a SWARM. What we have is a LOT better than back when I was almost the only effective person in Stormfront Opposing Views until Lord Nelson and a few others came along YEARS later.

I doubted myself, despite the years of successful paid expertise I took in with me.

But I think that now I finally understand that what I was trying to do was a bigger job than I thought it was.

I was not just trying to get in points that I could demonstrably win with. From the time I coined the phrase “respectable conservative” I was introducing a complete mindset that was as alien to our good guys as it was to the bad guys.

Our two-headed establishment — I first used that term publicly in a 1976 book — liberals and their pet opposition of respectable conservatives — look at the whole world from a Mommy Professor prospective.

The same was true in the Opposing Views on Stormfront. Their side was arguing that we were racists, and our side was obediently DENYING that they were white racists.

It is, quite literally, a cultural shock to realize that the only race that genocide is really being aimed at in the real world is the white race, and it shows the power of the other side over OUR minds that as we were having genocide practiced against us, we spent all our time denying we were advocating genocide!

BUGS SWARM is not just the only group that is handling the debate correctly.

BUGS SWARM is the only group that realizes what the debate IS!