The fact that something has acquired a name does not make it new.

What we have recently begun to call Stockholm Syndrome has been all over forever.

Every drunken father who spent his life beating his family and was loved by that family for the times when he had a little mercy demonstrated what we now call Stockholm Syndrome. The people Stalin DIDN’T send to the Gulag the night before were sincerely in love with him.

Respectable conservative behavior toward leftists has been straight Stockholm Syndrome for well over fifty years while I have observed it. Leftists have no mercy, and conservatives are lucky if they get off with just being called racists. On the other hand, Buckley was so flattered that Professor Galbraith would associate with him it, made one sick to read him glory in it.

Nowadays I get the impression that if Christopher Hitchens visited National Review the male staff would rape him. He said some honest things about the Clintons during the controversy and conservatives keep praising this rather mindless Marxist to the skies.

Stockholm Syndrome has been around the corner with every little toady who ever came to love his buddy because the bully didn’t hit HIM.

People who find Stockholm Syndrome novel are exactly like someone who read Newton for the first time and said, “Gee, I never noticed this gravity stuff before!”

But people do not analyze what they have no name for. We always knew political correctness was required by leftists. But it was not really discussed generally until the standard Marxist term slopped over into everyday discussion.

The fact is that one can prevent people from thinking about something by not giving it a name.

One’s brain, like any computer, is limited in the number of steps it naturally makes. So if every time one hears someone say political correctness and that person does not know it is a standard Marxist term, one must go through that extra mental step, and the process stops there.

The establishment sets a limit for how much any conservative who wants to make his living on his respectability can go. Twenty years ago one could debate Martin Luther King’s politics. The day came when anyone who wanted to make a living as a “conservative” had to grovel when the Great Name was spoken.

When a paradigm like this changes, you are ruined if you don’t know it and you are ruined if you mention it. This is the environment I made my living in.

The day that something becomes verboten for a respectable to say is a lot like the Israeli Lobby on Capitol Hill. Everybody knows that you never mention it, only respectfully and as little as possible. When you do mention it you talk about it as if it were just one of many lobbies.

But if you ever really BELIVED the Israeli Lobby is one of many lobbies you could never get a job anywhere near a congressional office. Anybody who doesn’t make the facts about that group part of his everyday thinking would have to be a genuine retard.

In the case of knowing exactly when a respectable disavows the stance his side made a quarter of a century ago, there is nobody who is a practicing professional on either side who talks about it, and there is nobody on either side who is smart enough to get a job who doesn’t recognize it.

The exposure of the conspiracy to give false data between the environmental “scientists” was a shock.

It was not shock that they were doing it. Fake science to back PC conclusions is routine. If Political Correctness needed frogs to have hooves a thousand PhDs in any field would line up and swear that frogs have hooves.

What astonished me was the EXPOSURE.

Now we find that Fox News in Britain, the country where that exposure of emails took place, has been exposed as reading emails and other confidential stuff. It could be that the PC pros were on that from the time somebody nailed those British “experts” from their emails.

Or not.

That exposure really derailed the Global Warming freight train. The word was already going out to respectable conservatives that they could no longer publicly deny Global Warming.

It could be an indirect connection. That exposure could have made the PC, meaning the entire academic community and its allies, very sensitive on the whole business of anyone who looked into their real communications.

Either way, I have a strong suspicion that Fox, especially the part of Fox that happens to be in Britain, paid the price.

I warned you that being at the front against PC is dangerous.

The amateurs on our side cannot even remember the main points of the Mantra, but our Swarmers can tell you that their opponents are repeating them flawlessly.

Not one of the people who interviewed me could remember the Mantra as well as all our opponents do.

They can quote our Swarmers, but whatever our tens of thousands of amateurs say blows away with the wind.

One commenter asked how to answer the “whites took their land” bit.

We have been over that dozens of times here.

First of all, any argument of that sort is JUSITIFYING genocide.

Am seeing a lot of this in BUGS, with anti-whites getting away with the simplest things.

For example, I do not see anti-whites who complain about our repetition getting what this sets them up for:

We won’t stop saying it until you ADDRESS it.

We can’t have an adult discussion with you until you stop outlawing and start debating what we say.

You have only a small window of opportunity, and it makes me sick to see you forget to follow up on them.

And, for the hundredth time, all nations are nations of immigrants.

All nations are created by immigration.

All nations are destroyed by immigration.

Too many of you are beginning to sound like respectable conservatives, only there to answer THEM.

Maybe we could use some reminders here by someone besides me.

The instant anyone brought any of the points you have such trouble with, I would just tell the truth: “You are justifying genocide.”

Get with it, gang!

The Alamo lost the battle and won Texas Independence.

The three hundred Spartans — actually Spartiates — lost their battle and saved Greece from the Persians.

But all of them died.

Those environmental “scientists” who told each other in their emails about how they were doing the usual Politically Correct cheating on their data got exposed.

Almost from the first, I have told you that, while our side has no idea how effective Mantra Thinking is, the other side is made up of pros. They will not forgive and they will not forget if we are as effective as we can be against them.

Being in the small group that reverses the tide of battle is always risky.

As I said, the Torchlight Paraders on Stormfront would have panicked and run if they saw the present match up.

The handful of Swarmers — which to a political amateur is contradiction in terms –is in a real battle while others who sit aside and beat their chests are playing a very juvenile game.

And every BUGSTER who is not on the front is in the rear.