Archive for October, 2011
Jewish — Something that is greenish is a little green, something that is bluish if a little bit blue.
So I dont understand how an Orthodox rabbi can be Jewish.
There has been a great emphasis lately on increasing our Swarm numbers.
When you get a big emphasis, you always have a threat to discipline.
One person — who knows better — said that BUGS should be open to anybody who is the least bit pro-white.
That is the attitude on the part of its enemies that allowed the Roman Legion to conquer and hold its empire.
Everyone who was a Briton came to fight against the Roman invaders.
Now try to imagine someone telling the Romans, “Anybody who is loyal to Rome should be a legionnaire.”
No way, Jose!
In fact, the whole superiority of the Roman Army was based the exact opposite proposition. Anyone who was pro-Roman couldn’t just wander out and yell and charge.
The result was that the Romans were always outnumbered and the Romans always won.
There are many places for pro-whites, so we deny them nothing by closing our little group to anyone who is not obsessive and finicky in exactly the same way the Roman Legions were. There are plenty of places for someone to attack Jewish Bankers or to exchange profound theories with others who think the same way they do.
But in the field, dealing with anti-whites, we want no amateur, independent thinking heroes among us.
“In Rome, each battle was fought first on the Field of Mars, and the Field of Mars was real battle.”
The Field of Mars was the Roman PRACTICE field, where every centurion was obsessive and not a single amateur was trained.
The Indians say white men speak with forked tongue.
Which, when you think about it, is quite a trick.
Stockholm Syndrome — When toadying to bullies becomes sincere.
Freedom of speech is pointless if we are not speaking the same language.
The classic example of freedom of speech is a bad one. It says you have a right to free speech but you do not have the right to shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater.
This is a bad example because of a point that never seems to occur to anyone who repeats this particular drivel:
What if the theater really IS on fire?
We push the Mantra because no one ANSWERS our Question.
They call us Nazis and outlaw the question.
Someone who wants to repeat something they can repeat anywhere and are ENCOURAGED to repeat everywhere is not talking about free speech. He HAS free speech.
We repeat the Mantra because we should have free speech too.
BUGS is not for the repetition of stuff anyone can say anywhere and that we have answered all our lives.
You can only demand the right to scream “Fire!” if there really IS a fire.
The Mantra is legitimate point that one is not ALLOWED to make. This does not obligate us to let every raving anti-white repeat at length the same thing he is not only allowed, but encouraged, to say elsewhere.
Cultural diversity ends with assimilation.
A commenter asked if anyone had contacted me on my running on the Mantra idea.
One commenter told me that Father somebody was running on some ticket, he didn’t know which. Then, in Swarm, right after my article about not deviating off topic, they started a major buzz about the income tax.
I’m not holding my breath.
Ambrose Bierce defined the word “mulatto” as,”A child of two races, ashamed of both.”
When I was discrediting Communism by simply pointing out, again and again, that every Communist state had to kill people who tried to escape, I would have the Commie apologists helpless.
And then someone jumped in with the Lord Jesus Christ.
The whole crowd I had cornered would rush in to talk to the guy who had invoked the Evil Atheism of Communism, and all my work fell to the ground.
Those who use the Mantra know how close the concentration has to be. You can have a whole group unable to deal with your insistent repetition of the truth, and then some idiot jumps in with a remark about Jews.
I noticed a commenter define his position on capital punishment, and then, groggily, say “Maybe I’m getting off the subject.”
Good God, you are not just getting off the subject, you are acting as the enemy’s Fifth Column!
In order to use a candidacy to take advantage of the prohibition of censorship so our candidate can put the Mantras in the media, it would be better if the candidate went into one of the established party’s primaries and ran for a county-level office.
I have not looked up the law exactly, but as I understand it ANY person who becomes a candidate is then allowed to buy a certain amount of media spots at a reduced rate and the media cannot censor what is in these ads.
He does not have to “get on the ballot” in the sense of a petition with thousands of names or anything else. I could run for nomination to the State House of Representatives and receive the same privileges other candidates have.
I believe that all I have to do is pay a registration fee, though you who know how can check that out on Google for us.
That goes not just for me but for all of us.
Melting Pot — People say they ae loyal to America nd America is a melting pot. By definition, a melting pot is nothing specific.
Anyone who can be deeply loyal to nothing specific needs psychiatric care.
Negroid — n, According to the Martians, this is one of the non-green races.
One commenter told how he knocked down the old myth that Puritans threw infected blankets into Indian enclosures.
I remember when it was a historical “fact” that Genghis Khan did that.
I also heard several times about how the Chinese did that
When you answer something like this, don’t think about what THEY get out of your answer, think about what WE get out of your reply.
Remember that anti-whites are 100% attitude and no facts. On self-righteousness, they make even the PURITANS look modest.
The most effective weapon against them is not corrections, but ridicule. When one reels off the number of villains who are supposed to have used those infected blankets you hit them where it counts, in that unspeakable self-righteousness.
Once again, remember that we are not out to dazzle people with our footwork. They are screaming at our endless repetition of the word “genocide.”
The idea is, if you’ve got them by the cajones, don’t let up on your grip. GOOD, well-placed ridicule gets them where it really hurts
That is not only hitting right where you should, but it is also FUN.
Can you imagine ANYBODY, in times before the Evil White Man got rid of smallpox and plague and leprosy, infecting a blanket and confidently carrying it someplace miles away?
Ah, but I have a good time, thousands of good times, rubbing that one in!
Since I have paid for BUGS entirely out of my own pocket, I have a chance to do what an old man does best: Preach about my own self-sacrifice and how others do this stuff for filthy old money.
Unfortunately I remember clearly that I sold my political talents and expertise to get my present money and income, so I can‘t preach at you.
In fact, nothing would please me more than thousands of people making a good living working for our cause.
Oddly enough, there was a very honest system of money-making in Washington when I was there.
Richard Viguerie was one of my colleagues, and he was a multi-multi-millionaire fund raiser. But he not only didn’t ma ke a secret of it, he told everybody how to do it all the time in speeches. They just couldn’t do it as well as he could.
Viguerie was one my writers for the New Right Papers Neither he nor I would realize what a compliment he paid me when one of his staff wrote his article and sent it to me for inclusion in a book to be put out by the world’s third largest publisher.
I don’t know if he saw it. I called him to check out some changes I had made. He said, “Is it what you need?”
I said yes, but I was checking out changes I had made.
His reply was, “Bob, just DO it!”
I was senior staff. John Ashbrook usually did not see what I wrote in his name until someone commented on it. Richard Viguerie wasn’t going to sit around worrying about my ruining him.
But “Just DO it, Bob, gives you an idea of the responsibility I was supposed to take for granted.
Yes, I am bragging.
On fund raising, the best article in my New Right Papers was that of Paul Weyrich. It is worth reading, and it is available through your public library if you want it.
One point Weyrich made was that ALL finances must not only be public property, but it must be up front. It was IN the press kit at any of a group’s news conferences.
The trick here is that one can have a financial dream come true and put it out there in public to be seen. Many a person I knew routinely had an organization he ran that could support him for the rest of his life in comfort.
And anybody who wanted the figures could have them. He committed himself to do honest work for the organization and the organization guaranteed him solid financial security.
Any of us would, I think, consider this the lap of luxury. PLUS most of these guys had regular day jobs on the Hill or elsewhere, on top of that.
Where fund-raising is handled openly and intelligently it is not a problem.
Even if they are out to get you, fund-raising is not a problem, because they are going to get you anyway on something.
Genseric and I have been talking in comments about the possibility of our giving money to a candidate to put the full Mantra into one of his campaign ads. That is as secret as any talk about fund raising will ever get here.
I hope to Heaven you GET financial security by fighting for our side.
Just keep it out in the open.
And put it in your press kit.
I wonder whether anti-whites have ever heard of the French Revolution, when the monarchical tyranny turned into a popular tyranny called the Terror?
Or about the Russian Revolution, where the Czarist tyranny was replaced by Lenin’s Terror and then Stalin’s Oriental Despotism?
Have they ever heard of how movements to stop Communism in Europe turned into Fascism and Nazism?
Have they ever heard of how a simple attempt to end the use of alcohol turned into Prohibition, or how monks who converted heathens were steadily replaced by those who burned people live for getting the words wrong?
Not only is it not surprising that a reaction to white rule would eventually turn into a movement to genocide the entire white race, it is historically routine.
These historical incidents of movements doing like the anti-whites and going nuts are numerous. You might want to suggest some more.
One thing that can help us develop a new way of thinking is my pointing out when you fall into an old rut.
The comments on my “On the Ballot” piece were very good, but they were in an old rut.
The point of the article was that a candidate for ANY public office can get special rights, like no censorship and being able to buy so many ads for a given price.
But old habits die hard, and since Strom Thurmond and Wallace, we have talked about our candidate for the presidency. So much of the talk was about the presidency.
Actually, I was thinking more in terms of the lowest office I could run for and get to put out the Mantra.
Like Buckley in his third-party race for Mayor, if I won the first thing I would do is demand a recount.
But this is an excellent example of how we have been programmed.
In fact, since we collectively know a hell of a lot more about the presidential race than we do about the Coroner’s, we would discuss that in any case, so for once I’m NOT bitching.
Bay Buchanan had the right to put the real profanity of the Gay Pride Parade in her ads. If the public is paying for it, they should have SEEN it. But she decided that wouldn’t be nice and the ads hurt Buchanan because the scenes she showed were NOT from the real Gay Pride Parade.
Another example where half measures are fatal. Show it or don’t show it.
I could expose the whole State of South Carolina to the Mantra this way.
Kelso asked me if he could put me on the Board of the Third Position Party and, as usual with Kelso, I said OK.
They have a candidate in a West Virginia primary who has already said he takes White Peoples’ issues, so he may put on the Mantra, especially for a donation.
There are tens of thousands of offices one can nominally run for all over America at hundreds of time.
It is possible, though the interference will be fanatical, that we could get the Mantra all over with that one device.
And hell, one of us might even get elected Coroner.
It is a long time until the 2012 election, and few of us care who gets elected.
But staying on message is one thing that is critical about an American election: They have to sell you time on TV and they can’t censure it.
I haven’t looked into the election law that closely, but a nice cheap candidate registration would allow us to put on the Mantra.
Does anybody know how many candidacies have these media rights?
I can pay for one here, I think.
One thing that is unique about Jesus seems to be the fact that He took it for granted that His words would be misinterpreted: “Not all that call me Lord, Lord will be saved.” This also seems to be the basis of His parable about the wedding guests..
In short, the concept of Wordism was not alien to Him.
He was a fully-fledged and recognized educator for His time and place but He did not stay inside the Temple. He went out to explain things to the people. As I understand it, He is the first religious leader to be referred to as rabbi , teacher, in the Bible.
The later the book of the Bible, the more it seems to have a hatred of women, an inheritance from degenerate Zoroastrianism, in it.
If the terminology were political rather than religious, we would call Jesus a Populist.
Those who wrote about Christian theology never noticed the giant chasm between Paul and Jesus. Brown made a great thing of this revelation in “The DaVinci Code.”
Paul made being anti-women a major part of his Christianity Jesus did nothing of the sort, but it is always assumed, through Paul, that Jesus rejected women, especially sex with them. There was never any questioning of the fact that Peter, whom the Roman Church claims as the first Pope, was declared the first Pope by Jesus in the full knowledge that he was married.
This is easy because we aren’t comfortable with the idea of the Christ having carnal relations with a woman, in exactly the same way that we did not dwell on the fact that our own parents coupled.
Non-theological Wordists tend be automatic atheists, because to them words are everything, and the churches today are very different from Christ. But if you recognize THEIR religion, their Wordism, as merely the product of the same kind of Wordism that separates Jesus from the institutions that have evolved using his name, you don’t need to reject the faith.
Those who think they are too sophisticated for religion are, as usual with people who think of themselves as ”intellectuals,” just being childish.
The fact is that a much higher percentage of people in quantum physics are practicing Catholics and Baptists than of people who claim they are “social scientists” and claim that “science” makes them atheists.
As usual, Mommy Professor is being childish.
I am NOT recommending religion to you.
I am pointing out that if you do not understand Mantra Thinking, as in the case of Wordism, you have absolutely no way to separate what should be the obvious evolution of institutions from an absolute reliance on a set of words.
The Mantra and the Mantra Approach work because, instead of showing our own inventiveness and our own macho, we simply throw the anti-whites logic right back at them.
I am still bemused by commenters who are frustrated by anti-whites saying race does not exist. “If race doesn’t exist, why is it that for only white majority countries you demand massive immigration and assimilation?”
And don’t let them escape that point.
In 1860 the Southern senators should have kept their seats. They could have said to the North, “Well, you say we are still in the Union. Until you come to your senses we will stay right here.”
Can you imagine the difficulties of mounting a full-scale war against the South while a major portion of both Houses openly represented the South?
It never occurred to Southerners then.
And I remind you of what HAPPENED to Southerners then.
The year 1860 was the first time the United States Government was strong enough to defeat a major section of the country that separated itself from the Union. When New England was considering secession in 1814 at the Hartford Convention, nobody thought that the central government was strong enough to force it back into the Union.
All this requires some knowledge of economic history, I suppose, but it is obvious to just about anybody who has studied the period. Between 1850 and 1860 Northern industry grew predominant. In the 1850s Europe fought the Crimean War and was in no mood to intervene in the Civil War.
So the people who destroyed the South were not its enemies.
The people who destroyed the South were those like Wade Hampton and Robert E. Lee who kept the South from seceding in 1850.
More than one historian has pointed out that the death of President Taylor doomed the South, for a very weird reason. Taylor himself was a plantation owner from Louisiana.
In fact, Jefferson Davis was his son in law.
But, like Andrew Jackson, another unapologetic slave holder, Taylor was ready and willing to fight if the South seceded, and he was absolutely opposed to the Compromise of 1850, which would not have passed over his veto. The Southern States would have seceded.
But Taylor died in office and his successor, Vice President Millard Fillmore, took over and signed the Compromise of 1850.
This was such a convenient presidential death that well over a century later Taylor’s corpse was actually exhumed and checked for poisons.
If it had not been for the influence of Wade Hampton, who bragged about it until his death, South Carolina would have led the way out of the Union then as it did later.
As a result, what happened to the South was the worst thing possible, an UNSUCCESSFUL secession in 1860..
Historically those who compromise and wait too late to take action end up excusing themselves by bragging about how they stopped the “extremists” when there was still time to do something.
Comments about varying words like “genocide” only disturb the Coach because he wonders what they have to do with winning the game.
If you use words like “extinction” is that for your convenience or do they actually HELP?
Anything that DEMONSTRABLY helps is something Ole Coach wants to hear about.
But at the convention, while White Rabbit was answering questions, he referred one to me A sincere guy was asking if we couldn’t use Indo-European or Caucasian as a variation on “white.”
I was tired, and, as you have seen me do here, I lost my temper. All I could do was shout “STAY ON MESSAGE!”
This was, as so often here, utterly uncalled for. The guy was there a the convention asking a question and I had no right to lose my temper.
This sort of thing does make the hear rise in me, because I have worked so hard on nailing down what WORKS, and when someone starts quibbling without reference to how something WORKS, it makes me, as we say down South, “Just tired all over.”
On the other hand, nothing is worse for free thinking than having a bad-tempered old bastard who is easily upset.
Keep in mind that the words “reasonable” and “Coach” do not belonging in the same sentence.
Players are aware that the same coach who comes down on them would tear the arm off of somebody ELSE who said exactly what the Coach did about you.
But what is far more important is that other commenters handled the suggestion “extinction” perfectly.
They criticized this variation from several points of view, all from being IN ON the fight.
One cannot appreciate the Mantra fully until one has USED it in disciplined way and watched the hyenas run for cover.
Besides, I think that hearing that same word, “genocide,” over and over and over and over is a fully appropriate punishment to those who have repeated the same Mommy Professor clichés to us over and over and over the decades.
And if it didn’t WORK, THEY wouldn’t do it.
You may be tired of using the same words, but remember that they are far, far tireder of HEARING them.
Serves the bastards right.
In a recent set of comments in Swarm, Lord Nelson corrected someone who wanted some variation on the word “genocide”. By saying that I have reminded you of the time when he made a similar mistake in wording and I called him down about it.
LN’s ,modesty is all right if it doesn’t make you forget the real point of that criticism.
My point was that when I made the correction LN got it immediately and started WORKING with it.
That is the contrast between BUGS and everything else people are used to. When I stood in front of that convention and began to try to explain to the audience the chasm between what the other speakers had said and what I was trying to introduce, I felt the familiar sense of helplessness.
It takes a long time for someone to understand the difference between my criticizing LN and his agreeing with his Leader, and what that correction was REALLY about.
Outside BUGS, hear and repeat is all that is asked.
Lord Nelson had made the mistake of going on the path of least resistance. He talked about non-whites ”overwhelming” white countries. He found that he got a lot less argument with that, and felt he was therefore succeeding with that approach.
But the REASON that ”overwhelming” was easier was because it did not criticize intermarriage, assimilation, the Holy Grail of anti-whites. As they multiply, there will be plenty of non -whites here to do away with the white race, so they don’t really squeal when the Tea Party criticizes immigration policy, as long as it continues to grovel to assimilation in the person of Saint Martin the Luther the King.
This is a VERY complicated distinction. The point is not that Lord Nelson repeated The Doctrine According to Saint Bob, but that he GOT THE POINT.
Can you imagine trying to explain that to an audience that had just finished seven hours of speeches from their Leaders?
I don’t expect you to just ACCEPT what I say. I ask something a lot harder, that you BUILD on it.
Christianity — Once a religion, it is now simply self-hatred
Judaism — Once a religion, it is now pure self-pity.
Miscegenation — The Final Solution to the White Problem.