One thing nobody but me discusses is the fact that Communism is he first system that failed purely because it was silly. The European Union is collapsing for exactly the same reason.

The theory behind United Europe is multiculture and multiracialism.

But let’s translate that into English. Europe is now operating under the theory that the people who inhabit a country have nothing to do with the nature of the country. A brown Germany will still be Germany as long as it hires the right professors and has the books and documents Germany consists of.

In the New Right Papers I wrote the forbidden words: “Mexico is poor because it is populated by Mexicans.”

We see that in the Euro currency crisis. The Euro was based on the idea that a European currency could ignore the fact that Greece is still run by Greeks and Italy is still run by Italian politicians. Pieces of paper would take care of that because only anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews would say that economics is not just a matter of paper.

So they drew up some papers that made Greece, Portugal and Germany one, a single economy with a single currency.

You see, what finally killed Communism was the simple fact that an entire economy run directly by bureaucrats is ridiculous. It is unworkable..

What is killing the economies that adopted the Euro is the idea that Greeks are Germans.

Americans love to repeat “America is a Land of Immigrants,” but they get all upset about the open borders because they don’t want to live at a Mexican level.

These absurdities are becoming practical, not just theoretical, as they did when the USSR showed its first sign of unwillingness to shoot anybody who disagreed. The whole facade collapsed instantly.

We will see more facades, like the Euro, collapsing.

We have seen a total change in attitude about immigration since the 70s, when Joe Sobran demanded open borders and Pat Buchanan said we fought World War II to open Europe to third world immigration.

But the libservative establishment keeps people from looking at the real reason that this crap is crap. Nobody openly discusses the fact that Communism collapsed because the Mommy Professors who said ”Intellectuals Should Rule’ were total and complete morons.

No one openly discusses the fact that a country which says that the people have nothing to do with the country they inhabit makes all immigration laws immoral.
.
Their stuff doesn‘t work because it is ridiculous, not because it is somehow subtly and intellectually incorrect.

Point and laugh at them and they will cower back into the holes they belong in.

Anti-whites cannot deny the truth of the Mantra. They cannot deny some of our other truths, so they justify suppressing these truths by saying they have “implications.”

And the truth DOES have implications. Church leaders who knew Galileo did not condemn what he said he saw in his telescope — an invention FROM Northern Europe, by the way. Church leaders did not DENY it, but they suppressed it, as Galileo was told to his face, because of its “implications.”

They didn’t care whether the sun went around the earth or vie-versa. It was the implications, the whole cosmology of Christian Europe in the Bible, they were worried about.

So anti-whites suppress any inconvenient truth about the Holocaust, for example, by Soviet — and Nazi — methods, and justify their doing so because of its “implications.”

But the Communists and the Nazis had the SAME excuse for their suppression of free speech. The Nazis said that it was necessary to prevent Communist “imlicati0ns” and the Communists said it was to suppress “fascist” implications.

It is true that when we hammer in an obvious truth like the Mantra the whole debate changes. Those precious few of you who have gotten out there and done it are often amazed at how much the whole debate changes when the Mantra is used.

And, yes, ALL truth has “implications.” Yes, the Mantra puts them on the defensive. The Mantra will cause a LOT of trouble to those screaming ”Nazism” every time Israel is criticized. It will cause people to cease wetting their pants every time “anti-Semitism” or anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews is brought up.

Historians will be challenged to teach more history than “White bad, colored good. UGH!”

Using the Mantra undermines ALL the shibboleths that have dumbed down public discussion and blocked thinking.

Their side knows that. Our side sends up a loud “DUHHH!”

No one is going to take a new look at gentile and Jews until we break the ground with the Mantra. No one is going to take another look at the realities behind conspiracy theories until the Mantra breaks the enemy’s solid front with the Mantra.

But no one on OUR side sees that. Many pro-whites are trying to stop the Mantra because it detracts from THEM.

But American Renaissance can’t even hold meetings now. Their only hope of a new start is when the pitiful few of us hitting the world with the Mantra break through the solid wall anti-whites have up..

So I freely admit that our talking about white genocide has “implications.” The truth always has implications.

But as usual, it is the pro-whites who seem totally blind to this reality.

Capitol Hill and Israel tells us another rule about professional politics.

Anyone who works on Capitol Hill knows exactly what to say: Israel is one of the countries in the Middle East, our only ally. But it gets no special consideration.

This is one of those things that come up in a totalitarian environment.

When a person is sitting there for an interview for a job with ANY congressman, left or right, North or South, he knows what he must say about Israel.

There is an entirely separate set of facts he must KNOW about Israel.

A similar example is a cop being asked about why he stopped some “youths” who were driving through a wealthy white suburb at three o’clock in the morning. He cannot mention that the “youths” were black and they were driving a car that was alien to a wealthy suburb.

The judge lives in just such an upper-income community. If his house were burgled and his wife raped by some “youths” who happened to be black and happened to be driving a lower-income car, and a cop saw that car creeping along in front of his house at 3 AM but had no suspicions, he would blow a gasket.

But in his courtroom, that cop had better be able to explain how his stopping that car had nothing to do with the riders being young or black in the wrong neighborhood.

By the same token, if a person applying for a staff job on Capitol Hill doesn’t know what to say about Israel, he doesn’t have a chance of getting a job.

By exactly the same token, if that applicant doesn’t KNOW the truth about Israel and Capitol Hill, he will not only not get a job, he will be seriously considered for commitment to a Home for the Retarded.

I wonder if any of us older folk here remember beefalo?

Beefalo was a product of the Permanent Meat Shortage.

“HUH,” everyone replies.

Yes, Virginia, there was during one of the decades since the 1960s a Meat Crisis. One of the solutions to this Crisis, which absolutely everyone at the time was talking about, was a cross between buffalo and domestic cattle. As I understand it, the resulting beefalo produced good meat, but without the extreme coddling and special feeding required by our highly bred domestic cattle.

To me, the important thing about the Meat Crisis has nothing whatever to do with cattle, buffalo or meat in general. To me, it is the classic example.

The Permanent Meat Crisis is a perfect example because absolutely nobody remembers it.

Except me. During its year of media alarm, the Permanent Meat Crisis was known about by absolutely everybody. Now it is not merely forgotten. When I talk about it I can hear the Twilight Zone music playing in the background. Everybody who was there looks at me as if I am speaking Algonquin.

Except that more people can understand Algonquin than can remember the Permanent Meat Crisis.

Compared to the Permanent Meat Crisis, the Energy Crisis is not entirely forgotten by the hundred million Americans who heard about it throughout the 1970s. Dozens of them remember THAT crisis.

The Energy Crisis was entirely different from our present Peak Oil discussion, and the simple fact that our oil must eventually run out. No, the Energy Crisis of the 70s began with the OPEC boycott after the US supported Israel about 1972.

The next three elections featured The Oil Crisis. Then when Reagan went in, the Oil Crisis disappeared.

If you asked anyone what happened to it they won’t remember The Oil Crisis. If they do, they have no idea what happened to it.

As I say, this Oil Crisis was not like the depletion of the world’s oil which has been the subject of frantic discussion since the 1920s. This, like the Permanent Meat Shortage, was a “right now“ thing, because under the system as it then existed, there was an actual danger of economic collapse if OPEC turned the screw, not in decades but next week.

My point is that the Permanent Meat Shortage was the perfect example of the kind of thing a professional political advisor recognizes immediately. He puts out a press release for whoever wants it and then gets back to grown-up stuff.

I have quite simply explained the general Jewish hostility to white gentiles, not as a matter of a secret conspiracy but as a logical conclusion of what Jews say all the time. As one founder of the conservative Jewish magazine Commentary said, “The term Jewish conservative is considered practically an oxymoron today.”

If I said exactly the same words, I would labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Henry Kissinger is a professional expert on diplomacy. You simply cannot tell him that ANYBODY is entirely innocent and the other side entirely innocent. When he hears that about Jews, he says, “Any people that is persecuted for two thousands years is doing something wrong.”

Once again, I am anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews for quoting a Jew saying that.

You don’t have to transport somebody into another world to see realities. In fact, the biggest we face is the kooks and basket cases who tried to make our obvious truths into Titanic Secret Conspiracies.

History will record that these idiots damn near destroyed us.

If our race is to survive, we have to get real, and to get real QUICK!

I made the point in “Looking Over the Dam” that anyone ought to get SOMETHING out of my writings because I am treading on ground regular writers are forbidden to tread on.

But please note the word “OVER” here.

Too many otherwise brilliant minds on our side spend all their time looking AT the dam. They give full descriptions of HOW our ideas are banned by the establishment. But they get so tied up in describing the Evil Jews or the Illuminati or the leftist establishment or its other arm, the kept conservatives, that they make no more observations.

For example, the whole concept of Wordism comes from looking OVER the dam of censorship we face today. If the concept of racism has flaws, what flaws are there in racism’s opposite?

The fact is that only by looking OVER the dam against thought called “racism” I have actually seen that there IS an opposite.

The person who says that no loyalty should be based on natural feelings is saying that all our problems can be solved by transferring our loyalties to a set of words.

That concept was tried out thoroughly in the Religious Wars of mid-millennial Europe. The horror and slaughter of those years put previous tribal conflicts to shame.

Wordist Communism, in fact, each branch of Wordist Communism, caused such horror and intellectual atrophy that only a fascist country at war could be compared to it at all, and that only by outlawing any questioning of the victor’s statistics.

Pol Pot killed a third of his own population and abolished its cities. Mao Tse Tung’s death totals dwarf even Stalin’s

And the Communist killings did not take place in wartime. The only emergency that did the killing was Marxism itself.

Wordism is a horror.

But it is a horror that those who spend all their time describing the dam will never see.

A major reason you have reason to read what I write here is because of an ancient rule: Where reality is being unlocked by any kind of man-built dam, the person who sets out to defy that dam, that man, will find something original and useful to say.

It is hard for us to believe some of the things men were required to say under censorship in history. So it would seem logical to look at what is forbidden today and look for the resulting nonsense.

Unless, of course, this is the first generation in the history of civilization where there is no imposed dam.

Before you laugh at that idea, remember that every generation in history HAS believed it was the first generation in the history of civilization that had no unreasonable barriers to discussion.

Rome did not consider its ban on Christians unreasonable, nor did Christianity consider its ban on pagans and heretics at all unreasonable. Christians would laugh at the silly superstitions of the old pagan, but they would lynch anybody for saying the universe was created in more or less than six days.

The power of such a dam against heretical thought can disastrous. The Communist system managed the almost unimaginable feat of keeping two to four hundred millions white people from producing on single new or useful idea for two generations.

We are all familiar with the Periodic Table and with Pavlov’s experiments. These were produced in a Russia in the few years between the time it actually entered the Western world and the time it became an oriental despotism again.

Once again this is a point, and what we make here are POINTS, not just “arguments,” that only BUGS can effectively make.

Instead of accusing the other side of censorship and taking on the burden of proof, I make the full point above: Is this the first society in history where censorship is NOT blocking progress? Every other generation believed that, and was wrong.

You see, when a generation dams up the flow of discussion, the potential knowledge behind those dams builds up. Which, to the best of my ability, means that I am constantly talking about things others are not allowed to THINK about.

If the reader can get nothing out of that, he is in a class with those who kept their flow of thought in line with the Inquisition.

Lawyer — n., Conscience for Hire