Fifty years ago, when I was a graduate assistant in political science at the University of South Carolina, the head of that Department, my boss, got a promotion to a Chair in Political Science at Emory University.
In his last period of Head of the Department, he said to me: “It turns out that the person who really runs Emory is the Assistant to the President, Bob Whitaker. Do you know about him?”
I replied, “He’s my cousin.” Which was true, but I had never met the man.
But the fact that the real head of Emory was my cousin didn’t seem to make my boss feel more secure.
Titles are traitorous. At the University of South Carolina, the Assistant to the President of the University was a young man whom I knew very well, a few years older than I was. It was a nice job with no authority
In fact, he ended up being fired after being drunk for a couple of weeks.
This is a considerable contrast to my cousin, the Assistant to the President of Emory University, who ran Emory. And Emory, remember, was such a huge institution that the head of the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina could get a big promotion by taking a position there.
Of course, the basic difference was what the title of President meant in each case. The President of the University of South Carolina became, governor, and, briefly, self-appointed Senator. He actually presided as president.
The president of Emory, on the other hand, was an honorary position conferred on members of the Candler family which ran Coca-Cola and largely financed Emory.
My Uncle Bob Whitaker ran Emory because the President barely showed up.
All this was well known in my family. You can run things for thirty years or you can be a United States Senator for a year or two.
Power and a title are two entirely different things.
This is what I learned from MY Uncle Bob.
#1 by Dave on 12/01/2011 - 1:31 pm
All philosophy can be reduced to the simple relation that for every inside there is an outside, it being the case that absolutely everything is in relation.
Please observe that all nonwhite races reflect, in the obverse, the white race.
This fact is entirely true. For nonwhites, there is only one “other” race and that is the white race, so that when we observe nonwhites, we merely observe the obverse of ourselves as whites.
In today’s world, there is not even one nonwhite culture that isn’t a nonwhite version of white culture.
The behavior of nonwhites, the entirety of their aspirations, and everything they perceive themselves to be is simply their REACTION to the overwhelming dominance of the white race over human life, so that the whole of nonwhite existence is the forced direct reflection of the white race.
No radical or regime could possibly alter this fact. It is an unalterable natural fact.
It is why throughout the world every person MUST learn English or fail in the workplace. Everybody takes this fact for granted, but nobody observes its obvious meaning.
If this isn’t power, I don’t know what power is.
#2 by Dick_Whitman on 12/01/2011 - 3:43 pm
“In fact, he ended up being fired after being drunk for a couple of weeks.” (Bob)
I know Bob has experience in the addiction realm. I wonder what he thinks it takes to remain sober? When addicts use, they screw their lives up. They loose all sorts of opportunities. It’s not logical. Using brings destruction to the addicts life, but they use anyway? How do addicts make the logical choice of remaining sober?
I agree with those who claim that power is an addiction. Power is the drug of the choice for the globalist level anti-Whites. The undergrad college student level anti-White gets some purpose out of being anti-White. They feel a sense of moral superiority.
If I understand the White Rabbit, Derek Black is currently attempting to get a formal university education and is being harassed for his beliefs? And something tells me that college security, the school’s administration, and/or the school media are not doing to much to protect Derek Black. lol
That university is “an atmosphere of hate” for Derek Black. It’s pretty much “legal” to terrorize him.
I consider Derek Black to be a brave person. Much more brave then me. I’m supposedly a “hero” because I served in Iraq and Kosovo?
Derek Black is much braver than me.
But the biggest cowards are the anti-White terrorists who think its open season on pro-Whites. They can’t accept people with different points of view.
Contrast Derek Black with the average anti-White student his age on one simple question: Are you willing to allow the other to pursue their way of life?
I never heard Derek Black demand that we deny the anti-Whites their way of life everywhere on the globe. If New York City, Washington, LA/Hollywood, and London want to be multi-racial, multicultural, chimerical with private central banking and certain fraternal organization symbolism, then they can do that. These cities would act as zoos to educate future generations on the habitats of anti-White, Pink Rabbit globalism.
Anyway, Derek Black is an inspiration. And this isn’t some fabricated hero like Rosa Parks (I’m not saying Parks was a bad person but that she really wasn’t that brave). Parks was a typist for a civil rights organization. Someone had her do the bus trick and the media would help give the story its magic. The historians would help create the legend.
The bravery is REAL in Derek Black’s situation because the hero is truly anti-Establishment.
Bravery and heroism are important energies of intent in the universe. It motivates people to see it. The anti-Whites know this and that is why they have their own heroes.
But when the heroism is real it has a deeper cosmic impact. Derrick Black truly is being brave against the system. Rosa Parks was encouraged and supported by the system. Her “bravery” was manufactured.
This means that Black’s bravery is more authentic. Thus, this energy of intention (bravery) will have a stronger impact in the universe. Its cycle will last longer. The people he motivates will create greater forms than the people Rosa Parks motivated.
Our mythology tells us the bravery brings good things. But bravery is difficult. That’s why it’s respected. That’s why it has the effect that it does! It’s not common. There are times when the bravery of a people seems gone forever. But it comes back.
And real bravery will always end up having more change power compared to phony, media fabricated bravely. The person who truly stands up against the zeitgeist creates more energy of intent than the “brave” people telling their stories on Oprah. The universe will always reward the greater act of REAL bravery.
Where Rosa Park’s legend is now loosing its power after 65 years or so, Derek Black’s legend will last 65 million years.
#3 by Truck Roy on 12/01/2011 - 7:25 pm
Its all about finding that control point. Maybe its the secretary. Might be the vice-president.
Forget the title. Who gets it done?
#4 by BGLass on 12/01/2011 - 8:43 pm
Had that conversation just now, in another context. The person was talking about how to get things done. Something went wrong and they went over all heads to the top.
Daddy always told me forget the top, go straight to the secretary. She knows everything. If she’s any good, she knows more than her boss, and she won’t bother him with b.s.
Of course, though, Truck Roy is right, and the person who can get it done can be anyone.
Also, never mistake big-cocked posturing and know-it-all-expert bossiness for competency. Usually, genuinely competent people don’t go around like that. Bossiness can be a real red flag for idiocy.
#5 by Genseric on 12/02/2011 - 9:55 am
Just ask Hillary.
Talk about shrewd and ruthless. Oblameya couldn’t hold a candle to her. I wonder if it is just because she is White or that she’s in the actual driver’s seat?
Probably both.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-12/02/c_131285187.htm