I denounced the use of “politically incorrect.” I wrote other articles using the term.

But I denounced it because it was substituted, and substituted HERE, for anti-white. Someone bragged about a Canadian Homeowners’ Association because it was politically incorrect.

I beg to be corrected, but I am willing to bet that they would go NUTS if someone called them “Pro-white.”

We are not here protecting Property Rights or borders. Those who shout about these things are the best friends anti-whites have. Nobody screams integration as loud as the Militia Groups.

Even Eric Fromme happily announced that the Netherlands had renounced multiculturalism and was now going all out for integration.

I do not know whether they were using wry humor to waste our time or what, but some people asked if we were still ALLOWED to talk about our established religion of PC.

This is the sort of thing one expects in SF.

If you are ON THE LINE, you will learn what to use when.

A If you watch a football game, you don’t see strings hanging down on the players from above. Coaching is no substitute for being right in the game itself.

Please look at my advice in CONTEXT.

As usual, a few critical words say it all:

“ I keep thinking about how important BUGS is. I used to get frustrated with all the keyboard commandos we have on the net (SF) who will not engage in the real world. But you BUGSters are just Heroic. What we are doing seems extremely important, maybe it will change the world. I have loads of Hate mail / threats in my inbox from BUGsing, that tells me I am getting somewhere and displays the EVIL we are up against – their nastiness helps to keep me motivated, “

That is the critical story, all in one paragraph.

SOMEONE SEES.

After quoting that statement on, Genseric made another of his own in the Swarm:

“There is a distinct possibility that many pro-whites will be on message in Duluth on March 3. Apparently, the media caught a whiff of the Mantra after their lazy reporter mistakenly pumped BUGS on television. They say they will be boycotting the ‘White Supremacist’ event. It seems they don’t want to risk letting the Mantra go mainstream.”

That is a classical example of Listening to the Silence. People who write on public matters for a living are sleazes, including the one who whorehoused for respectable conservatives years ago name Bob Whitaker, but they get ahead because they know exactly what the power of words is.

No one on our side sees what we are doing, but professional respectables and leftists cow away from it the way a vampire does before a crucifix.

They instinctively throw a body-block on anything that hints of ONLY white countries and ALL white countries. That is worldview they cannot let an air of breath for.

But no one else will DO it. They want to spend their time getting credit for Knowing All About Evil.

You can lecture a vampire all day long, but at night he is still effective.

You have to go for him in his lair and nail him down.

Gavin used the term “militant idiots.”

In the real, one to one battle between us and evil, people who love to hate their own people and glory in it, terms like “militant idiots” are INFINITELY more important than any pamphlet you can write that proves to the world that you are a Genius.

William Buckley hated my guts. Bill Rusher, who had been with him for decades, told me so.

Two of his brothers hated me, too.

Because what I said hit HOME.

I did not criticize his use of “untranslated French.”

I called it “The Miss Piggy Complex.”

He HATED that!

An article in Arizona that was infuriated at the Mantra being posted up IN A MEN’S ROOM was sent to me as a challenge.

I replied, “Maybe next time your Thought Police can keep your toilets free of Heresy.”

I NEVER get a reply.

How can I make this point?

Don’t reply with something that will show the world What You Know.

Your reply should be calculated to hit home.

William Buckley was a pathetic attempt to be a snob.

So I called him Miss Piggy, which was perfectly accurate.

“Militant Idiots,” militant ignorance, Thought Police, Miss Piggy Complex. These hit home and they HURT, because everybody knows they are TRUE..

These represent the short sword. They go for the gut.

It took years of practice on the Field of Mars to develop the short sword.

There was little glory in finding a new short sword thrust.

My experience tells me that there is more POWER in boiling the enemy’s ego down to its basics, to coming out with a phrase like “Miss Piggy Complex, ” than there is to any pamphlet telling the world how sophisticated you are.

Classical history is full of the names of Authors who wrote Great Writings.

But History does not even mention, nor does it KNOW, the names of the people who developed each short sword thrust that ruled the world in the time all the glorious tracts were written.

At the top, they were TERRIFIED of me.

Bill Rusher never understood exactly why they were scared of ME in a way the liberals never SCARED them.

This is serious, this is LITERAL: Find what HURTS.

It takes time, it takes effort.

And no one will ever give you credit for it.

All too regularly a commenter will say how politically incorrect a group is. This means NOTHING. PLEASE stop doing that!

The Reverend Sun Moon was as politically incorrect as you could get, but he forced his followers into as many interracial marriages as he could.

We are not fighting PCs. We are fighting anti-whites, and the loudest and most aggressive anti-whites join militias and cults.

When a group is praised HERE as “politically incorrect,” it does enormous damage. One of the disciplines we all have to learn, and as a decades-long respectable conservative professional prostitute I have to keep kicking it back into my head, is that the left’s enemies are NOT our friends.

In fact, politically incorrect groups, like respectable conservatives, are bulwark of the anti-whites.

Roger Fromme gladly announced that the Netherlands had abandoned multiculturalism. What they did was adopt “integration.” I see Paul’s point, it is a step forward, but it is JUST the kind of thing a BUGSER is trained to look closely at. I am NOT condemning him, and I don’t want to waste time on someone defending Paul, who needs no defense.

Stick to the point. “Multiculturalism” is another barrier they can throw up to not to use “multiracialism.” You’ve caught onto that.

But also, never trust anyone who comes in on your side who is not SPECIFICALLY a BUGSER. To them, multiculturalism is an excuse NOT to “assimilate,” a misuse of all those third world immigrants and their endless offspring by intermarriage.

It is a blow to us to have one of our OWN praising a group for being “politically incorrect. “ Their goal, as they will yell at you, is to get rid of the white race.

The problem is that it is almost impossible, in America and especially abroad, for ANY group to be “pro-white.” To do so, they must do what my book did, USE the Mantra.

Anti-immigration is seldom pro-white. I cannot see how any group that does not USE the Mantra can be described as pro-white. In our society, the goal of immigration and assimilation for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is as much part and parcel of every group, religious or political, the brain is in your body.

No more “politically incorrect.” It is pro-white or anti-white.

PERIOD.

Not just our established religion of Political Correctness, but EVERY ruling group uses the Orwellian Memory Hole. When something it is known for advocating, EVERY ruling group ceases to mention it.

That, after all, is the main POINT of being in control of Opinion, to dictate what is remembered and what is NOT to be remembered.

That is one of the main things respectable conservatives are paid for. National Review grovels before Saint Martin Luther the King and never mentions the disastrous failures of liberalism. NR avoids gun control like the plague.

In other words, if all you have is a huge file of things the media DO say, you are deaf. If you only discuss what they DO say, which is what respectable conservatives get paid for, you are deaf.

How many times have you heard anyone with a paycheck from the media quote what segregationists said integration would lead to?

In the 1960s Hans Eysenck wrote an article for National Review predicting that integration would damage most blacks by having its natural leaders melt into white suburban society, leaving the mass of blacks devoid of leadership and talent. Since then, I have read numerous articles in the mainline media about how this has happened.

Usually when a magazine makes a deadly accurate prediction, it proudly quotes it regularly.

It will be a long, cold day in the Eight Circle of Hell before National Review or any other respectable conservative publication quotes that Eysenck prophecy.

When I was trying to get thousands of Stormfront readers to notice I was tearing the guts out of anti-whites in Opposing Views, they obediently talked about Iraq and ONLY Iraq, which was the media’s choice of Big Issues.

I worked hard, I spent money, but I was stopped by people who didn’t listen to the silence.

Both Lenin and Hitler took power ENTIRELY because of the Three or More Rule. In a multi-strong party parliament which took over after the Czar’s collapse, Lenin joined his Communist Party with coalitions that expelled parties to their right from the Parliament, (I don’t know whether to call it the Duma or the Soviet).

These parties in turn formed rump majority coalitions that expelled yet more parties from the rump parliament.

The last coalition, Communist and Social Revolutionary, ended when Lenin started shooting the SR’s.

This is the way every single Eastern European country went Communist after World War II. In fact, the dubious distinction of being the only country to go Communist by majority vote is one most people have never heard of, but which exists today.

San Marino, about 300 square miles and 13,000 people, out in the middle of Italy, voted Communist in the 1930s. When Germany invaded the USSR, San Marino declared war on Germany, so Mussolini gave the Germans permission to send a platoon or two in to occupy San Marino, which they did.

Finally, I think in the 1960s, San Marino had a revolution which threw out the Commies that took place mostly inside one warehouse. Otherwise all states became Communist entirely by the Three or More Rule.

As we all know, the Communist and Nazi Parties together had a majority of the vote in 1933, so the only way to form a government was to make an agreement one of them. Hindenburg chose Hitler, and the Western media had paid him so little attention that they thought he was a Kaiserist!

In November of 1932 Time Magazine stated flatly that “Nothing on Heaven or Earth is surer than that the Kaiser will be returned to power in Germany.”

If you don’t understand the 3 or more rule, you are a fool about history.

A historian could write a huge, detailed book about three way elections, in extreme detail backed by years of research and thousands of footnotes, and not get the point.

At least three presidential elections were altered completely by having three strong candidates instead of two: the election of John Quincy Adams in 1825, that of Lincoln in 1860, and that of Wilson in 1912. There are hundreds of examples when you throw in all he states, and that is just in America.

It could be a New York Times Best Seller, only three or four people decide that, but this well-researched book would almost certainly miss the point.

It took the public decades to realize that running for the nomination INSIDE the Party is a very different animal from the General Election, so the entire implications of this three or more way election business will probably never be understood, least of all by the trained and obedient historian who writes it.

One of our most basic hopes lies in understanding this three or more way rule:

As long as the white race obeys the anti-whites and looks upon itself as a colonial power which sets the rules for ALL the world, we have a two-way race: Whites versus everybody.

In such a race, when most of the white race itself is anti-white, we cannot win.

But once the realization sets in that not only are we not the colonizers, but ONLY our lands are being colonized, that we are ONE power unit, the entire landscape will change. Instead of competing with the whole world for power, we will be transformed into the overwhelmingly powerful racial group in a world where EVERY race and religious group is fighting for ITS share.

I have visualized this as a political professional. No one else has even LOOKED at it, much less SEEN it.

I wrote a piece about picking the leadership in a group which has subconsciously accepted its role as a permanent extremist organization is very different from picking the leadership in one or two groups that are competing for actual power.

Ulysses S. Grant voted Democratic in 1856 because, like so many others, he saw the Republicans as so extreme that electing Fremont would cause the South to secede. But by 1860 the Democrats were divided into three strong groups, and his conviction was that we might as well go ahead and deal with the expansion of slavery.

Lincoln won with forty percent of the popular vote.

Neither John Quincy Adams nor Woodrow Wilson could have won at all in a two-way race. There are HUNDREDS of examples of this, but a historian would be likely to note that, but miss the basic point.

Applying this BASIC point to our present circumstances is exactly what Mantra Thinking does.

Senator Joseph McCarthy was dead right. In fact, the little time spent looking into the temporarily opened KGB NKVD files showed that not only was almost every one of McCarthy’s accused a Communist, but there were even MORE of these people in high places working for the Soviets.

Lately even the media broke stories about Teddy Kennedy meeting with Soviet leaders abroad in secret to work against the United States.

But the fact it is true doesn’t mean it is a truth you should throw in when you have the enemy cornered with the Mantra.

There is no secret about “Jews” being anti-white. Look at the definition of “Jewish opinion” in the mainline media and, by their definition, they have led the anti-white crusade.

They SAY so.

In fact, you will only get criticism if you use exactly the same term, “Jewish opinion,” that Jews do. Like calling blacks niggers, the reply is “That’s OUR word!”

The standard ADL discussion about whites in history is exactly the same as Goebbels would have made about Jews.

All that this now matters is that THEY knew how to do it. They did what BUGS is doing a century ago. They did not put out anti-white tracts.

NAACP types began their campaign by getting the word “negro” capitalized. You can tell about what year a book is published by when the writer puts in Negro instead of negro. That sounds exactly like our combing sites to see where “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” or other key phrases.

No one could say that their aim in capitalizing a word was to destroy the white race.

But it was.

And so far it has WORKED.

So when you get specific about stopping the genocide, you are being a fool. We are just stating the legitimacy of our concern and demanding it be discussed openly. We know that once he concern is general, our race will be saved.

I am really upset when someone gets off white genocide in our WORK section or in our outside arguments and gets onto Jesus Saves or Jews or ANYTHING.

It is the one weapon that has caused me to lost my attack on anti-whites, because it comes from OUR side and then becomes a legitimate subject of the cornered anti-whites to escape to.

Verbal diarrhea is our ULTIMATE enemy.

The KKK’s burning cross has nothing to do with The Old Rugged Cross. It was adopted by a group that had Clan in its name (Dixon’s book was called the Clansman, not the Klansman) because the South identified with Scotland. When an English Army entered Scotland, every Scotsman up to the Northern Islands knew it because those who saw the English went to the top of a hill — in land filled with hills from top to bottom, and lit a huge cross.

That cross at the border was seen miles further north, where they also found the highest hill and lit a huge cross on it.

Now in a truly idiotic insane world, some kook who saw the burning cross might have said, “Well, it is very important that the English Army is attacking, but I am also pissed at the French for some of the things they do. I am going to put up an extra thing for that. It’ll take a few days to work it out and build it, but it’s IMPORTANT.”

No, that couldn’t have happened, you know it and I know it. Somebody like that would be put in a madhouse.

But with us, it happens ALL THE TIME. We are lighting the Mantra Cross on the hills while MOST of our fellows want to talk about crime statistics, Jews, or just how bad everything is getting.

Do these brain-damaged people actually go home and drool in the evenings?

Why is information produced? This question is pure Mantra Thinking because it goes directly to the base, it starts at the beginning, it is not premised on proving the person asking it is Up on Things or doing Complex Thinking or any of the other real motives people have for discussing a topic.

The information we receive most is panic. How many hours have we wasted reading about the latest cancer cause.

Demography is a branch of economics, but it is looked down on by serious economists as “Panic Studies” because the only demography anybody knows about is the stuff that gets published about how, since the population growth varied ten percent in the last decade, a projection of this shows the world will be elbow to elbow or else totally depopulated in a hundred years.

In fact, the news is made up almost entirely of crises that occurred because, when something could have been done about it, everybody was talking and thinking only about a crisis at that time which had reached crisis level precisely because nobody had been thinking about that problem because when something could have been done they were fascinated by another crisis from the same cyclical cause.

And, of course, there is never time to stop and think about this fundamental problem because people are concentrating on the latest frontline crises.

Which is why BUGS and Mantra Thinking can NEVER reach the heights of interest The Jewish Conspiracy or the Big Bad Bankers Conspiracy or the Communist Plot did.

People do not want to read about reality and Mantra Thinking on what can be done in the real world. They want to drool over the War in Iraq or the Latest…

Well, the Latest Anything.

And when a crisis occurs, who gets all the consulting money? The EXPERTS in the area where the crisis is occurring of course.

Try to think of a business surviving that way. One section of the company has become so bad that it is about to destroy the whole company.

Would the company then raise the pay of those who had been running that section and call ONLY the people who CAUSED the crisis to solve it?

“What we need to do about this disaster is to call in ONLY the people who CAUSED it to tell us what to do about it.“

In the real world, with real money, a company that called in the experts who formulated the policy disaster to solve it would be put under psychiatric observation.

We have a psychotic system because we do not do Mantra Thinking.

Someone put a general comment about how education was the problem, a straight Stormfront comment, not only into the Swarm, but into the main topic there, “Where did you post the Mantra Today?”

I asked the commenter, “What is this Stormfront comment doing HERE?”

For me, the Swarm is what membership and money are to Jared Taylor.

Doing Mantra WORK is what I get out of handful of the thousands who read BUGS.

You can, as some do, make BUGS the place you do your own blog because you don’t want to bother to set up your own and work up an audience.

But NOT the Swarm!

The Swarm is STRICTLY for the handful of people who are actively changing the world

Mantra Thinking, like Hoffer’s “American,” will probably never have a strict definition. Hoffer defines “American” by his usage of the term in actual experiments, which jibes with that of his millions of readers.

So when I discuss Mantra Thinking, it is in jabs at reality.

For example, Mantra Thinking involves a great deal more Rethinking that what professors think of as thinking. The Mantra, for example, is very hard to grasp precisely because those who hear of it have never actually THOUGHT about what their actual ASSUMPTIONS are.

Not only is it difficult for people to realize that all their talk about “men love one another” and “assimilation” applies entirely and unquestionably ONLY to white countries and to ALL white countries. As I have repeatedly pointed out, as soon as the Soviet Empire collapsed, the question came up, “When will Eastern Europe be ready for immigration?”

No one would ask, if North Korea were freed, “When will it be ready for immigration?” Some one who brought up that question in relation to North Korea would be considered a kook: “What in the hell does immigration policy have to do with just having overthrown Communism?”

But the same question was instantaneous in the case of Eastern Europe, and no one asked why because they all KNEW why.

Eastern Europe is WHITE.

The assumption is so deep no one asks about it, but EVERYONE goes by it.

No one is going to be praised for taking that question out and asking it.

That is NOT what is considered “thinking” in this society.

So a major part of Mantra Thinking is going back over the assumptions that got us here.

That used to be called Heresy. It is now called Politically Incorrect.

Eric Hoffer, whose short biography is worth reading, defined the term “American” as I use it. He was a real worker, a longshoreman on the docks, and went never went to school until he was signed on as a full professor temporarily.

Hoffer wrote his first book, The True Believer, when he was 49.

Considering himself entirely American, he spent his life among American working people and reading widely. He never left the United States once. He said he was on the bridge across to Mexico, smelled the rot, and came back before he reached the Mexican side.

He defined the Kennedys, for example, as Europeans. Like me, he defined all of what we would call the blue states as European. He did not define what he meant, it was a matter of gut feel which was obviously shared by his millions of readers.

A New Englander or a San Franciscan would feel right at home in a European or Canadian voting booth.

Like Mantra Thinking, Hoffer’s “American” is in a constant process of identification. So my mind makes stabs at partial explanations.

One difference, vague as it is, between an American and a European strikes me as what might be called A Search for Authority.

Englishmen probably understand more than Americans when I describe professors as merely the priesthood of Political Correctness. The disastrous experiment with socialism Britain chose at the end of World War II made England by the late 50s economically The Sick Man of Europe. Huge numbers of British workmen were going to Germany to earn double the wages they got in England, and to pay less taxes on them.

After 1945, a huge part of Britain stopped looking to Tradition and the Uppah Clahss. But they substituted professors for them, “degreed” persons, especially from the Labor Party’s London School of Economics. Under the semi-Marxist regime, professors were quoted AND OBEYED by the left the way clergy had once been in the Middle Ages.

Americans reject authority, and they find ways to do it. The Bible, for example, allows Americans to contradict the “eggheads.” and the Bible is as certain to say what they want to believe as Political Correctness and the Rule of the Intellectuals always turns out to be what the professors want to believe.

But the Bible is interpreted by Americans in the teeth of the professors. It always has been.

It is generally known that Americans tend to be both more religious and more anti-clerical than Europeans. We do not respect the word of the clerics, the Authority, but Europeans tend to search for living authorities.

In fact, Europeans really look for their living authorities in America. No one could imagine a Frenchman saying that there is no such thing as a French culture. They were boring about it. But the minute “multiculture” became a Harvard and New York credo, centuries of monomaniacal obsession in Paris with “French Culture” simply evaporated.

So, like Hoffer, I simply discuss the phenomenon of “American” versus “European” instead of trying to define it. Language, as Webster said, is usage. Definition is simply a means of describing usage.

SysOp and I would like to request that each and everyone of you change your passwords to a combination of upper and lowercase with numbers.

http://www.whatsmyip.org/random-password-generator/

Tick off the top 5 boxes and set to 12.

—————-

It appears we are all clear. Let us know if you experience any more weirdness in the operation.

Again, we are grateful that there was not any damage done.

Thank you.

SysOp

I know I ask an awful lot of the handful of real BUGSERS.

You do your work alone and unappreciated, two things I have learned to take for granted. This is because you get POWER for doing things like that. There are a lot more people available to get praise or names for themselves or even to march in a group. That is why the very, very few like me WIELD so much real power.

Unfortunately very few people can keep on doing things entirely because they NEED doing. The only really anonymous donors are people who are too rich to care about enhancing their names.

How many people hit the Internet with the Mantra and report back here? We dream of White Rabbit’s goal of 300, but the real number now is probably about 50.

Yet those fifty are spreading the Mantra around the world.

I promised you real power, but I also warned you about the price.

From Norway comes word that they are grouping together. One of our folks has set up a BUGS Circle.

Obviously we desperately need TEAM SPIRIT.

I have worked alone all my life, and I do NOT recommend it for most people.

FIRST, you pay your dues by posting and REPORTING it, as White Rabbit says.

But we also desperately need some sense of BELONGING, some TEAM SPIRIT.

When someone asks you to back them up in an ongoing battle, GO. When someone asks you to “approve” one of his postings, DO IT.

Add a little report that you did. Talk to the BUGSER you just helped, very briefly, right here on the Swarm “Where did you post the Mantra Today?” which to me is far the most important part of BUGS now.

The Legions had the pilum, the soft sword and discipline. But they were also TOGETHER. They couldn’t have done what they did without pride of membership and the feeling of BELONGING.

Only by stating my worry can I raise a possibility it will not come true:

I often feel that I will be the last, as I was the first, true Mantra thinker.

Let me go straight to an example, the mammoth.

In my last book I actually set out the priorities of Political Correctness in English, something no one else would do. I said black good, white bad; female good, male bad; and a list of list of others, Then I discussed, in English, the conflicts that every professional commentator faces when, say, black male rapes white female and how the categories of Good/Bad are balanced.

Few people I know would ever GET there, and no one but me would have gone on BEYOND there.

The English prof who reviewed my first book in National Review, called his review, “Read This One!” and said the best thing about the book were the coruscating insights. I get a lot of insights by going on with my reasoning rather than stopping to find a news item or an impressive philosophy it lets me expound on.

For example, another rule of Political Correctness is “Animal Good, People Bad” Then while thinking over conflicts, I discovered something. It hit me that funded science — which is a good term in itself — has done a screeching U-turn on the extinction of the mammoths. Everybody used to agree that when men came across he Bering Strait, mammoths and nearly every other large animal disappeared.

So the information justified the funding because it fitted the “man evil, animals good” rule. I thought about this screeching U-Turn, where every documentary tries desperately to prove that animals who lived through numerous ice ages simply happened to drop dead in the one when “humans” came over.

What happened was that they ran into a conflict. “Man” almost invariably means the Evil White Man. But according the rules of that day, there wasn’t a single Evil White Man involved.

Just the opposite! The humans who would have killed the Mammoths, according to the rules then, world have been the Good Humans, the Native Americans, those who cry like a baby when a white man takes a pee in their woods!

Somewhere this conflict was noted. I had heard the screech when documentaries abruptly started denying that man killed the mammoths, but until I did some Mantra Thinking while writing, I didn’t realize why.

And no one in our Stormfront-trained generation ever will.

The coruscating insights in my books came from continuing on with my assumptions. All others today get from one statement right into how it fits in being Profound or hits the headlines or their pet ideology.

If I talk about how their media defending them from challenges has weakened the other side, the main thing people think about is how the example I give deals with slavery.

I live in hope that some BUGSERS — and we are VERY few — will begin to learn how to follow these assumptions and sometimes not worry about how the first assumptions offend the present ruling class.

THAT would take you time.

It took ME many years.

When someone starts talking about race mixing being good, it is time to say that all brown countries, and all brown PARTS of countries, are failures.

This is fundamental to Mantra communication. We keep them off of anything familiar. We hit them with our Pilum, the Mantra, and then we follow up on their disorder, not with some version of THEIR tactics, but with our own information and OUR weapon, the short word for gut-jabbing.

This takes a lot of discipline and lot of practice.

When they say anything you should be thinking of how you can use that to make one of OUR points. They have absolutely nothing to say we haven’t heard a thousands times.

So when they say, “We should love all mankind,” we hit them with the FACT that they are using decency as a weapon of genocide. That is like using the name of God to sponsor war, it is exactly like blasphemy, it makes every word they say poison.

I get so TIRED and frustrated seeing someone repeat the old ARGUMENTS, because I know they are losing. Familiar ground is FATAL

When I reply I use the term “Thought Police.” In fact, just using that term makes the communication worth while.

The only way I answer anything THEY say is “You honestly think I haven’t heard all that crap before?’ Then I TELL them something that hits home, like using Thought Police or the truth about colored countries.

TELL, don’t ASK.

I wrote a piece about how the answer to blacks who said their mulattoes were an improvement should be told that all brown countries or brown parts of countries were disasters.

Feu denfer pointed out that that was the kind of stuff I was always hitting you about, getting off the subject of GENOCIDE. To put it in technical terms, I had just made a horse’s ass of myself.

I am glad I did, just for that reply.

If Bob makes a horse’s ass of himself, and I often do, I need correction as much as you do. My dream is that one day BUGSERS will look back fondly and nostalgically on what Bob, not as the end of Wisdom, but as fumbling, early attempts at the techniques and arguments they have perfected.

That is a VERY different way of looking at things from the way a Leader does it.

Feu denfer didn’t begin his disagreement with long apostrophes about how wise and self-sacrificing I have been but in this case my brilliant mind had made an error that this inferior being was daring to correct. His approach was a little different:

“That’s stupid, Bob.”

I got a laugh out of that. Can you imagine one of David Duke’s troops saying, “That’s stupid, Dave,” or one of Jared Taylor’s people beginning his critique with “That’s stupid, Jared.” ? You don’t DO that with a Leader.

But you can do it with a COACH. Especially a Coach who considers it part of your training to give you hell when you break discipline.

A Leader tells you what Truth is. A Coach disciplines you so you can get out there and bang it out for yourself.

I am not asking for a lot of this. You know I HAVE made lifelong sacrifices and done a lot and deserve a LOT of respect.

And I’m old.

So I deserve a lot of deference, just as any Coach does. And when you quote me it shows you are staying on OUR subject. But don’t confuse that with treating me as a Fearless Leader.

IMPORTANT: This is a Subtle Point. Here, you find these subtle differences in my constantly talking about Lord Nelson’s error, but the point has nothing to do with the error itself. The faster you and LN get that the better, because the POINT is how LN TOOK my correction. He took it and he ran with it, and the more time he spends apologizing for it the more he gets us off the SUBTLE POINT I‘m trying to make..

Most training, as opposed to most preaching, consists of pointing out ERRORS. It is something critically important HERE how you deal with them.

Sometimes my mistakes are subtle. But when I do something truly dumb like getting off the Mantra to talk about colored countries, the only proper observation is the one I would make if YOU did that:

“That’s stupid, Bob.”

We’re on the right track.

A usual anti-white comment is about the healthiness of mixed genes. One commenter had a black saying he screwed white women for our own good.

The ONLY answer to this is the short sword gut blow of saying “All brown-skinned countries are failures. All brown skinned PARTS of countries, as in Italy, are failures.”

If you do anything but use this short sword reply you are a fool. This is a legion, and failure to use your sword properly endangers everybody.

Do not answer them when you can knock the hell out of them instead.

We all know that the Thought Police move in if one compares blacks in any way with monkeys.

But honestly it seems that blacks go out of their way to behave like monkeys. For example, the rapper-general Negroid gesture with his left hand in front of him leftward is EXACTLY what one world expect a monkey to do.

Holding a pistol sideways is EXACTLY what one would expect a monkey to do.

We have already noted how an anti-white frustrated with the Mantra pretends to be black and starts shrieking the way he thinks a black — or a monkey — would.

I don’t know if this is consciously done behind a screen of Thought Police protection, but everything blacks adopt as a part of Blackness seems to be directly based on monkeys. It may well be that it is not conscious, but they have adopted a view of THEMSELVES which is unconsciously exactly like that of the society they are raised in.

NEVER let anti-whites retreat to comfortable ground.

Mantra battle does not “use their own words against them.” It doesn’t use their words at all.

For example, when someone starts “Loving everyone” as a cover for immigration and assimilation ONLY in white countries and in ALL white countries, it seems to me that one should not criticize their USE of the words.

One might make it clear from the get go that they are in turn peddling poison.

If they mention religion, go straight to calling it what it is, blasphemy.

A cup of tea may contain only a grain of deadly poison. But the minute the poison goes in, it is no longer tea. It is POISON.

When they mention loving others and drop in that grain of genocide, one should not respond by arguing the words. That is EXACTLY like treating tea with poison as if it were actually partly TEA.

In the twenty-first century, it is important to remember that you are not talking to YOUR doctor.

You are talking to HIS lawyer.

One experienced BUGSER is fan of the voice shows I did for a while until I got tired of doing all that work and getting back nothing but comments on Iraq. He pointed our that my voice explanations were better than my written ones.

I’m sure he is right. I don’t even rewrite my stuff now. And very seldom does the article I begin end up as the one I started. Writing to you makes me think, and new thinking is very different from writing something that is fixed in your mind.

One reason for this may be that when I did the voice I was laying out basics that I had gotten clear in my mind for years.

BUGSERS are not Stormfronters. You already have my thinking and you have tried it out in the field.

Don’t underestimate yourselves.

I have never before had an audience that could take what I had to say and GO ON with it.

I have never before had an audience that wouldn’t read what I write and then go strolling off into profundity or how what I said related to the headlines.

I can see from your responses that the good ones are looking closely at what I say and expanding on the basics.

The result is that I am doing articles that draw a picture no one has ever drawn before.

Look at what we discuss and you will realize that no one who is not a BUGSERS would really understand a major portion of what we say.

One historian pointed out that a Britisher would have perfectly understood the debates that went on in America in 1776. But the theoretical and constitutional underpinnings of battles over states’ rights and most other issues in 1860 would have totally mystified him.

We are becoming similar. Many of our debates are simply incomprehensible to people who are used to complaints and tomes.

Thank God.

Yes, I admit it. I wrote poetry for while when I was young. It was in fact useful in honing my writing skills and exercising me in fitting my thoughts into few words and made me aware of the sound of the words. I got one major New York magazine to ask to look at more of my stuff.

I had a fight with my wife and moved out for a while and forgot all about it.

I was advised and encouraged by some of the few people who do poetry for a LIVING. A girl friend’s mother was a pro, and she encouraged me, and most people don’t realize that James Dickey, who is known for the book and movie Deliverance, was actually a professional poet and lived in Columbia, SC and taught at USC.

One rule was drummed into me by these people: Make It New

One poet was astounded beyond belief when I used the old saw, “windows of your soul“ to describe .eyes. I thought they were going to puke.

It is the nature of real Mantra Thinking that everything affects everything else. And when I think of the Mantra, these words from a whole different phase of my life come back to me: Make It New.

I just wrote a piece about the fact that, despite my lifelong use of Spanish, I did not realize until WW told me that Ole! was a stereotype. I then THOUGHT about it, and realized I had never heard one of the thousands of Spanish speakers I talked with ever use that word.

The reason I developed the Mantra was because so much basic thinking is just plain WRONG. But I forged our weapon by not CORRECTING others, but by Making It New.

You who have used the Mantra know how it catches anti-whites absolutely flat-footed. It refers to nothing they have ever had to do with before. It leaves them no room to reply with the stuff they have been fed all their lives.

And our discipline is to keep their noses right in the things that they could not imagine would come up in the Mantra.

The Mantra keeps it new.

WW informed us that a major Spanish nationalist group now has the slogan, “Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White.”

This was great news, so I responded with the Vivas! and an Ole! You would expect it in Spanish, a language in which, believe it or not, I was once fluent.

WW pointed out to me that Ole! is stereotypical, though the rest was OK.

This caused me to THINK. I have spoken Spanish in probably a dozen countries over the years. When I was nine or ten I was to visit a family in Havana by myself, and I already been there before.

It occurred to me that, as WW pointed out, I had never heard a Spanish-speaking person use the word “Ole!

My reaction to this was, I think, very relevant to understanding what Mantra Thinking is.

A normal person would have been a bit upset at having used a term so mindlessly, resolved not to do it again, and gone on. A normal person might have defended himself by consulting Google, where I am sure you can find statements that real Spanish-speakers seldom say anything BUT Ole!

Or I could have tried to impress you with quotes from writers on the general subject of language.

I can’t define Mantra Thinking, but this is a seminar, so I could use this example to see if I can illustrate it.

First of all, I was IMPRESSED by this correction. According to WW, I have ignored a basic reality in a language that has been important to me for over sixty years.

Mantra Thinking consists to great extent of RETHINKING. The problem in our world is what “everybody knows.” So, while seeing the open cheating STILL being done, now openly, by the global warmers I was deeply impressed to find that, because of a very, very simple mix-up, Napoleon has always famously been called “short,” whereas he was 5’6” or so, average for his day.

The Mantra itself is simply noting that all that Love and Brotherhood and ”mixing of the races” has absolutely nothing to do with the ultimate fate of any race but the white one.

Going back to one’s basic thinking is far more profitable than doing a search and writing a tome on stereotypes. If you go back and rethink, beginning with your childhood thinking, you are dealing with how your whole mind has worked from the start.

WW made me rethink what I had taken for granted almost all my life. As I say, I just then realized I had never heard a Spanish-speaking person use the word Ole! It showed me again how vulnerable I am to stereotypes, despite any real experience.

This is the kind of rethinking I had to do about the Weakest Generation, to whose endless chest-beating I had been subject almost since I was born.

A commenter here would probably make this into a worldview on languages or brainwashing. What it made me do was go back over my lifetime’s thinking, AGAIN. Every time I fool myself that something everybody knows is so wrong it’s a bad joke, examples like Ole! occur to me.