Why is information produced? This question is pure Mantra Thinking because it goes directly to the base, it starts at the beginning, it is not premised on proving the person asking it is Up on Things or doing Complex Thinking or any of the other real motives people have for discussing a topic.
The information we receive most is panic. How many hours have we wasted reading about the latest cancer cause.
Demography is a branch of economics, but it is looked down on by serious economists as “Panic Studies” because the only demography anybody knows about is the stuff that gets published about how, since the population growth varied ten percent in the last decade, a projection of this shows the world will be elbow to elbow or else totally depopulated in a hundred years.
In fact, the news is made up almost entirely of crises that occurred because, when something could have been done about it, everybody was talking and thinking only about a crisis at that time which had reached crisis level precisely because nobody had been thinking about that problem because when something could have been done they were fascinated by another crisis from the same cyclical cause.
And, of course, there is never time to stop and think about this fundamental problem because people are concentrating on the latest frontline crises.
Which is why BUGS and Mantra Thinking can NEVER reach the heights of interest The Jewish Conspiracy or the Big Bad Bankers Conspiracy or the Communist Plot did.
People do not want to read about reality and Mantra Thinking on what can be done in the real world. They want to drool over the War in Iraq or the Latest…
Well, the Latest Anything.
And when a crisis occurs, who gets all the consulting money? The EXPERTS in the area where the crisis is occurring of course.
Try to think of a business surviving that way. One section of the company has become so bad that it is about to destroy the whole company.
Would the company then raise the pay of those who had been running that section and call ONLY the people who CAUSED the crisis to solve it?
“What we need to do about this disaster is to call in ONLY the people who CAUSED it to tell us what to do about it.“
In the real world, with real money, a company that called in the experts who formulated the policy disaster to solve it would be put under psychiatric observation.
We have a psychotic system because we do not do Mantra Thinking.
#1 by exerces on 02/20/2012 - 7:16 am
So in other words, Mantra Thinking trains people on a deeper level, to prevent a problem from continuing to form.
The object is to get people exposed to the key phrases, so they will embrace them on a deeper level, to the point that their behavior and choices will be changed.
#2 by BGLass on 02/20/2012 - 8:03 am
the thing we’re allowed to feel, if anything, is “guilt,” white guilt. But this is only a feeling that would happen if the entire life was lived through the paradigm of ‘you are evil,’ from the anti-white narrative. if you really were what they said, then maybe you would feel “guilty,” idk— assuming that you were a truly feeling monster and not a monster incapable of empathy to begin with.
Anyway—- but the panic is the main thing, in real life, really. And so Fear is more likely the emotion.
People will say they don’t really feel guilt. But they rarely identify Fear, much less the sources of it (real and imagined) all around them.
fear, alienation (the result of social in cohesion and living in what amounts to refugee camps with ppl from different lives, histories, narratives, languages, etc.)—
If people TRY TO MAKE one feel guilty all the time, the usual REAL feeling would be Anger. Betrayal (if you fell for it, ever).
Why we’re not animals, imo, what separates us from animals, is the high levels of abstract and symbolic thinking capacities that make these confusions possible.
Psychiatry has concentrated noticeably in the ms, in spreading around ideas about “splitting” and trauma based memory. this involves not the old “repression” but the idea that, in Fear, Panic, the pieces of memory are split apart and stored in memory in different locations— so that you recall a visual, or an audio, or an emotion, a smell— but these things are split apart (dissociated) in the mind, and so you do not have access to a full memory. the other thing is regression and infantile mentality. this seems the focus.
===how to ensure a public does not connect fear-mongering to their fear and identify their fear as their motivation— but rather identify it with the correct idea, such as the guilt. they are told they feel guilt, so they say they feel it.
#3 by BGLass on 02/20/2012 - 8:15 am
Someone apprised me of a rape center, where the victims of violent crime (the victims) were immediately given a –I believe four page– form, multiple choice, to fill out when they arrived. It had questions like: have you bought things you don’t remember buying? had people call you by a name not your own, etc. pages of this.
Unless one was aware of the Fear-Trauma-Memory narrative, it would make no sense why crime victims were asked these questions– (that the assumptions were being made that “dissociations” is normal after “trauma,” and that the victim had produced a “multiple personality.”)
Personally, I went to the place to witness what was happening and went through hours-long group sessions in which —despite all ppl saying they hadn’t had these problems, lol— they were nevertheless schooled in understanding that this would have been a “normal” response.
—one point was normalizing the narrative about panic, also dislocating reasonable panic one might feel in the culture, and also pathologizing all the responses to panic, (so that any anger one might reasonably feel in the surroundings were displaced onto the “free-floating” feelings that must have been from “past victimization” and so on).
mind twisting stuff
the antidote is constant re-questioning: do you really think or feel what you’re told, over and over, you think or feel?
medical-pharm rakes it in
—a great problem with individual Fear-Management is that —given the information produced— one really cannot tell what is worthy of note, and what is not.
Even if one ‘gets’ all the Fear produced (which many do not), they are still stuck with the problem of how to sort through information. Most ppl respond by “shutting down, tuning out, turning off t.v.” —but it’s not a selective “shutting down.’ They just fade into stupidity, fantasy, etc.
they ‘get’ there’s manufactured Fear, but…then what?
#4 by BGLass on 02/20/2012 - 8:30 am
Using crime victims as an entrance into producing consumers of pharmaceutical products— should seem a bit strange.
(another theme of this place was the assumption that the crime victims would wish to ‘self-medicate’ themselves and that there were better solutions, managed by expert counselors, s/a anti-depressants and so on).
—but it was really about the co-option of crime by medical, and then it becomes about who mostly controls centralized medical, etc.
–the ppl were all toned as ‘leftist’ but shouldn’t leftist ‘follow the money’ the way marx said, lol
#5 by shari on 02/20/2012 - 11:41 am
Mantra thinking was just straight forward White thinking,not too many generations ago. We got off the path.
#6 by Gavin on 02/21/2012 - 2:03 am
A lot of people aren’t interested in solving problems, in fact many people can’t even identify problems.
They want to seem “informed” and “on the ball.” They want to be fashionable. They want to feel like they are “making a difference” or they want to brag about something.
A big problem is that people look to other people for what “the problem” is. This happens on a personal scale and a global scale. They can’t identify any problem on their own so they look to others for what “problems” they should be fixing.
I once saw a successful man with big ambitions talk about how he wants to help “solve problems in the middle east.” This guy has no connection to the middle east at all. He is just involving himself in the “problems” that other people are talking about.
#7 by Gavin on 02/21/2012 - 2:07 am
I don’t like the word “expert.” It’s static.
The real world is not static, it’s dynamic.
The “expert” is the old Asian wise man on the hill. The practitioner is constantly evolving to a higher levels of competency and understanding.
#8 by Gavin on 02/21/2012 - 2:18 am
“People do not want to read about reality and Mantra Thinking on what can be done in the real world. They want to drool over the War in Iraq or the Latest…”
Those people do not want real responsibility. They just want to live comfortably and be entertained by actions of others, then bark at them if they don’t like those actions.
#9 by exerces on 02/21/2012 - 11:40 pm
I think we are pre-programmed (by yoo know hoo!) to watch everything on TV, including our own demise.
Who even goes to bars any more? That’s where a lot of great conversation used to occur. Who goes to clubs, or even belongs? We’re all at home watching TV.
Time to get on a consistent message.
#10 by Gavin on 02/22/2012 - 1:32 am
I go to bars a lot.
The new clubs are online. In addition to being a BUGSER, I’m a /new/sman and a /pol/lack
A redditor as well but that’s a subset of the PC cult I’m there to keep an eye them and get my jabs in where I can.
#11 by BGLass on 02/22/2012 - 9:00 am
“…I think we are pre-programmed (by yoo know hoo!) to watch everything on TV, including our own demise….”
shouldn’t comment b/c falls under going on about how bad things are.
But the act of watching t.v., itself, seems far less about the content (although that too) than the orientation of the human subject to the t.v., and by extension their lives.
The subjects become watchers, not doers. In psychiatry, it might be called the creation of the schizoid personality. We are pundits, commentators, watchers, armchair observers. Five hours a day is spent training the human subject to take this attitude, and to feel that this is the appropriate, normal attitude to take toward the world.
the content, itself, is grotesque, demoralizing, sexually perverse, etc. –all jerry springer- or maybe, like court t.v., it normalizes tribunals for stay-at-home people (usually cradle-to-grave government dependents anyway, whether on warfare or welfare)— but the also learn commenatorship as a way of being.
All of them, grand commentators… with “a voice.” an opinion! which means nothing.
#12 by BGLass on 02/23/2012 - 8:57 am
— how many will really watch t.v. and be able to hear what is said and to react in accordance with normal human nature?
Many heard, for instance Susan Sontag’s quotation (and many more) about “Whites being the cancer of humanity.” Just as many parents sent their White children off to the school where she taught, to be in her class.
nothing is connected, nothing has consequence. they cannot react to the information they heard, nor employ cause-and-effect reality to naturally assume their White-child-student may be more connected than they—and react normally to such a teacher.
so many strange children are out there, “acting out.” (An odd phrase in itself.) Acting out what –lol— reality???
they say t.v. ‘dumbs people down’ but by instilling an attitude of non-reaction, even if it ‘smarted them up,’ they could do nothing at all.
the observation of exactly this is what White people are all grappling with. The people who cannot shut up about it, who cannot “shut down,” or “phase out,” or “just concentrate on getting material goodies and be happy with that,” etc, are a real thorn in the side.