Archive for March, 2012
I remember all the decades I spent with the important things on the right, especially MY important things on the right, being ignored. So I am particularly upset when someone puts a link in the Swarm to a YouTube section and I look at some dork talking about God knows what.
Usually it’s an anti-white YouTube with a hundred thousand or more views already.
And, of course, we had the routine one that showed that JEWS were supporting multiculturalism.
Wow, WHAT a news item!
The people who put this crap in usually don’t even have the courtesy to say what they ARE.
These things keep our attention, RIGHT HERE IN SWARM, OFF of our people who have done special Youtubes, at considerable cost in their own time and effort.
Play your dumbass little Obsession games elsewhere. Put your latest “cute, look at this” Youtube in Stormfront.
This is all we have.
Don’t pollute it.
The funny thing is, all the Jewish Obsessionists against the Mantra are the best friends anti-white Jews have. The fact is that Jewish spokesmen have made it blatantly clear that official Jewish opinion is a major driver in white genocide.
It doesn’t matter at all whether there WAS a Jewish Conspiracy. “I am Jewish, so…” has become synonymous with “I want whites done away with.” All the mainline Protestant denominations shrunk up and began to disappear as they more and more abandoned old religious doctrines and began to desperately insist they were “relevant” and became Social Cause groups.
As the Special Cause of the Future crap began to age out with the media image of hippies as social causers, the population was going up and mainline Protestant membership was dropping like a rock with lead in it. They lost tens of millions of people who had previously been members for generations, and identified themselves as Methodists or Lutherans the way they identified their name as Smith or Jones.
And it was actually worse than it looked. When any population survey is done, half at least of those who answer tell the questioner which church they attended back when they were attending church on orders from their parents. The overwhelming majority of Methodists in America haven’t see the inside of a Methodist church since their parent’s funerals.
My doctor brother died a “Methodist” but he was buried in a Baptist cemetery. He hadn’t seen the inside of a Methodist Church since a wedding about 1961.
Jews have gone out of their way to be totally, completely, irrevocably a part of ridding the world of the white race. You don’t have to tell anybody that, THEY have.
The anti-Mantra Jewish Obsessionists should be, maybe to a great extent are, recipients of that huge Jewish money they are always talking about. They are the best investments the wildly, loudly anti-white Jewish leadership could possibly make.
There are the Politically Correct and there is also the group that thinks of itself as the Independent Thinkers.
I remember one incident when the height of Trendy Crowd fashion was a bumper sticker that showed they had taken up Caring for Animals in the same way that YUPPIES had. The Trendy Crowd started imitating the YUPPIES they worship, who were Caring for Animals at that moment. As always, every one of these people who went for the current trend, then as now, firmly believed he was being an Independent Thinker.
Hell, everybody TOLD him he was an Independent Thinker, because what he was doing was what All the other tens of millions of Independent Thinkers were doing.
So the Independent Thought of the tens of millions was to put a sticker on their car that said “I Brake for Animals,” as the fashion of that month was Care for Animals.
The problem was, they immediately began causing all the old cumbersome trucks to jackknife as they made a show of Concern for the Cat.
Pretty soon truckers began to put on bumper stickers: “I do NOT brake for people who brake for animals.”
Pretty soon they traded in that IT slogan for another.
I went through one phase of this IT stuff when I was in the drug and alcohol program.
The Universalist Unitarian Church has no religion, so it devotes itself entirely to whatever is trendy with the Yuppies right now. I call them “The First Church of Whatever’s Cool.”
One month the Trendy Cause was Narcotics Recovery. So they invited us to have meetings in their church.
Two months after that anti-smoking was the Big Trendy.
So they kicked us out.
You know, if people who are sick of this nonsense just started using the term “Big Trendy”, as in “Yes, what you are saying is the Big Trendy right now”, we could BURY a lot of this crap.
One commenter pointed out that “anti-white” was a term you simply DID NOT HEAR until we got started.
A Warning, the term “anti-white AND anti-Semitic” was used a lot, but “anti-white” as a stand alone was totally absent from ALL public dialogue. I remember because of the reaction I hit when I put it one of John Ashbrook’s speeches. His entire staff other than me thought the term “anti-white” would ruin his political career.
So before absolutely everybody takes credit for it in a few years, let us enjoy our uniqueness.
One of my greatest problems was always to make people understand that our enemies’ dialogue is not even at a human level. People complain about the length of the Mantra, and I see our people are correcting that in Swarm, but the point is that that couple of hundred words covers every single “argument” you will ever hear on the other side in books, “seminars,” or the automatic thousands of words you will get back when you get into the “debate.”
But you can’t truly BELIEVE that, EMPATHIZE with that, until you get out there and DEAL with them.
The anti-Mantra discussions at
serve much the same purpose.
Why HAVE we wasted over a generation talking to each other and leaving anti-whites unscathed? How COULD anybody be so STUPID?
And in the above link, they tell you how.
The self-appointed Royal Prosecutor declares that our efforts are useless, 1) because the Truth cannot be told because of screams of racism and Nazism and, 2) an internet-based strategy will not work because the other side controls the REAL media. He says “somebody” must take over the REAL media.
But since his “somebody” is afraid even to use his name in a public argument, how is “somebody” going to take over the entire national media establishment?
Actually, all the thousands of words the anti-Mantra group uses here contains not one single syllable about what THEY are DOING. The one thing they are all doing is shivering in a corner because the other side is so mean and scares them with words like Nazi.
None of them is doing anything that hasn’t been done for the last two generations. Most of them aren’t doing even that.
The point that you must realize is that this is what has constituted the entire pro-white movement for two generations, and without BUGS it would be all they do today.
I can tell you that, over and over, but there is no substitute for you actually having a place where you can SEE it. That is the only way you can realize how subhuman anti-whites are, that is, by getting in there and facing them.
But unlike anti-whites, who are in control of everything, these anti-Mantra pro-whites are not worth much attention. They are of historical interest, to demonstrate what Kelso points out, that the entire pro-white movement has been Absent Without Leave for fifty years.
The only real pro-whites, us BUGSERS, have FINALLY come charging in.
The Occidental Observer had an article where the Mantra was approach was praised, which is presented and discussed at
But what is important here is that, in this discussion, the anti-Mantra crowd has finally come out from under cover. They have previously been using the same strategy that the anti-white establishment uses, simply putting everything about the Mantra into the Memory Hole and acting like it doesn’t exist.
I hope that the example set by TOO in talking about the Mantra strategy openly will be followed by others.
There was the usual guy who has apparently appointed himself Royal Prosecutor who put in thousands of words attacking me and the Mantra. He reminds me of the old kooks you find at small meetings who preside, not because they have been elected by anybody, but they simply have this idea they are the chairman.
He said I am just like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. I don’t think he requires any courtesy after a personal insult like that. If he knew anything about us, he would know that calling me a respectable conservative is a really vicious slur.
Nobody who criticizes us at TOO shows any sign of having READ anything of ours. I have repeatedly observed that Hannity said David Duke was a Nazi because he opposes interracial marriage. But you would have to have READ our stuff to know that, and personal insults are just so much easier for the Royal Prosecutor.
But let us trace the discussion. Let’s begin at the end. As the discussion wore down, the pro-white anti-Mantra crowd agreed that, gee, the major problem is that we are silenced by charges of racism and Holocaust stuff.
In other words, they finally doddered towards reality which is where the Mantra Strategy BEGINS.
It is an attempt to get us out of this position of being suppressed that the old stuff, the stuff the anti-Mantra crowd is defending, got us into. They declare the glory of a “leadership” that has spend generations getting us into this position where they can’t say anything for fear of “racism” and the Holocaust
The Mantra puts the genocide charge on anti-whites where it belongs. It uses their suppression against them.
We must get rid of this open oppression, we must get free speech before anyone has the right to answer us at all.
So the anti-Mantra group ended up where it always ends up: sniveling about how suppressed we are, and how hopeless it all is.
In our action area of the Swarm, Whiterabbit88 writes:
“Recruiting new Bugsters: When coming across other YT users that seem to understand what is taking place and are speaking out about it, I have taken to messaging them and informing them of what we do and our methods of doing so. I also provide a link to this site, and ask them to message me if they have any questions. I think this is a good tactic to get others active in the struggle.
“I don’t know if other Bugster’s have already been doing this but I just though I would suggest it if no one else has.”
My sincere reply was:
“Whiterabbit88, bless you!”
It is so hard to get a few BUGSERS to get out there that I have given up on trying to get ANYBODY to RECRUIT!
I think that is one reason our numbers stay so small on these, the action, pages.”
The successful Communist campaign that gave them control of Russia in the end was based on the slogan, “Peace, Land and Bread.”
What they planned, and delivered, was a three-year civil war and decades of Terror, specifically demanded by Lenin long before Stalin was neat the top.
As for Bread, they starved tens of millions to death at a time when anyone starving to death was alien to any white country. Slavic countries were relatively poor and backward, but as Solzhenitsyn pointed out, people did not STARVE in Czarist Russia.
The land is really the most comical promise. Stalin told a very sympathetic Roosevelt that his war on the kulaks had been more desperate than the Soviet fight against Nazi Germany. Generally speaking kulaks were those who farmed their own land rather than land that belonged to the State.
No one knows how many kulaks died, two million or ten million, and that was only one starvation campaign under the Soviets. Kulaks were not Jews, so even outside the United States you are free to make up your own numbers or insist that it was all a bad accident or didn’t happen at all.
We can’t confuse a bunch of white gentile Slavs with real people, can we?
The point here is to address, not what we DO if and when we find ourselves with power, but what we SAY to GET power.
Surely no one is going to tell a professional like me that people in politics DO what they SAY.
So back to the question of paying back anti-whites with a short period of dramatic tribunals and violence and imprisonment, or saying we are going to rake up money for our programs and give part of it to GENERATIONS of informers.
This is, in short, a PRACTICAL instead of the GIUT discussion I did on this subject about empathy.
A couple of commenters on “Productive Punishment” pointed out to me that merely depriving anti-whites and their heirs of money was not sufficient to satisfy justice or, as I believe Coniglio Bianco said, his own personal rage at these unnatural beings who are beyond description.
I am asking you for some appreciation for my suffering.
This is hard to do, because in my seventh decade of constantly being told, “You don’t know REAL LIFE!” You don’t know how much I SUFFERED from the generation that made self-pity and putting down everybody else a regular occupation.
I have waited a while before addressing the two commenters who presumably represent others in demanding tribunals as punishment for anti-whites instead of my permanent program of paying informers who go back to this Holocaust and find those responsible and then take away their money, or, in most cases, money from their heirs.
I wrote something and withheld it, because this is a gut issue as well as a practical one.
Lord, so I ever understand your RAGE!
Treason, self-hatred, turning on your own people, the very essence of Dante’s Tenth Circle of Hell has been an integral part of the world around me all my life.
It’s easy for me to SAY “channel your wrath” but it is another thing to DO it. I will soon be seventy one years and have slowly moved toward channeling my wrath for over fifty-five years. I might be bragging, but a thirty-year-old Bob Whitaker was devising things to do to integrationists that would even impress Coniglio at his angriest.
Have a little empathy, Coniglio and timeforfreedom and their sympathizers. I HATE these demons in human form and I have BEEN hating them and fighting them since I was in my impressionable teens.
The people who were REALLY responsible for this are dead. They were pushing this anti-white stuff back when Americans took the Yellow Peril seriously. The World War II Generation has almost died out, and they were brain-dead when they were young, much less now.
Actually I hate the fanatical anti-whites less than I do the whites who just say something like, “It’s 2012,” and for whom white genocide is an abstract, while this year’s deficit is the world to them. It was that kind of lazy, pathological white who made integration possible.
Let us freely discuss the real issues here. timeforfreedom and Coniglio say that, in terms of abstract Justice tribunals are not enough. A third and more practical question is what we TALK about. This is most important because I don’t see any torchlight parades forming out there right now, so what we TALK about is the most important thing in our real world.
I will try to discuss those other two issues later.
But this first discussion is personal.
I treasure white rabbit’s personal comment to me that he cannot believe I fought these — THINGS for DECADES and am still not in a nut house.
I could have made a FAR better living with almost no work in my years in politics.
I might be sitting here telling you how I was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Procurement.
I would HATE to be over seventy and have only that to brag about, but it would have made my life richer and the respectable conservatives and the Jareds of the world would be thrilled to meet me.
No, I channeled my anger and sold out when I had to, all for POWER.
But the point I am making is it HURT, and you should know it hurts.
After all these decades of pain, I honestly don’t CARE what a non-BUGSER thinks of me. And by a BUGSER I don’t mean one of the thousands of readers, but those of you like Coniglio who are out in the Swarm.
As far as opinions of me go, you are the few who really get to me.
I don’t want any of my own to even suspect that I don’t have at least as much pure, repressed FURY at these anti-white animals that they do.
Dante’s Western mind put less extreme versions of today’s anti-whites into the Iced of the Tenth Circle of Hell.
And compared to me, he found them merely irritating.
If you tailgate, you lose. I just wrote a piece about people who have real trouble with the various “Race doesn’t exist” arguments. This is a classical example of tailgating:
If race doesn’t exist then genocide doesn’t exist. So one does not dig into quotes from the Genocide Treaty to defensively argue that race does exist. The answer to that is in the TITLE of the thing.
When I first got to college, I ran into an example of fatal tailgating. I was sixteen when I got there, so the fact that the Korean War jet pilots were talking about the Old Men who had fought previously in WWII and were in the air in Korea did not sound odd to me.
The Korean War rookies had just reached twenty. The Old, old men who were staggering toward the convalescent home, they were talking about were in their middle or LATE twenties, since it was five years between WWII and Korea.
Tailgating killed a lot of the latter old men. Oh, well, thy were so old they were soon for the graveyard anyway.
The OLD MEN tended to tailgate. That is, though they had been trained otherwise, when the fight started they went into dogfight mode, the ideal of which was to keep your nose directly on the enemy plane’s tail and HANG ON.
At 200 miles per hour, the enemy’s weaponless tail in front of your machine guns was the ideal place to stay. But staying on someone’s tail at 600 Miles per hour was a VERY different proposition. The older guys naturally fell back on this tactic automatically when the actual fighting started, and they ended up spinning blindly with vertigo in the middle of nowhere, which made them excellent targets in the lightning quick movements of jets.
Tailgating here is something you have to train yourself to stop doing.
It doesn’t kill you, but it sure as hell gets you shot down.
Gavin pointed out that one “Bob Problem” for others is that “Bob, you present yourself as a peer, not a priest.”
Only a couple of VERY insightful close acquaintances saw that, in a way, my attitude can be seen as snobbery gone wild.
It is very Southern and very American. On a gut basis, my attitude is “I can whip any man in the house!”
Unlike the old Englishman or the New Englander or a black, I do not need an “attitude” to make everybody keep away from me except by appointment to show my status.
In fact, for the Jefferson or Jackson as opposed to an Adams, it is a point of pride to be able to demonstrate your superiority or your correctness right in the middle of the crowd.
Being a dunce when I am actually a dunce bothers me not at all, because I know very well that my flaws are common, but my special abilities are largely unique.
This also true of my race. No one can claim that whites have ever CREATED an evil deed. Being more powerful than others, they have done more evil than anybody else. But the GOOD things we have done ARE unique, from wiping out starvation to representative government to wiping out small pox to reaching the moon to this computer I am on to wiping out slavery to …
As everybody knows, this list could go to book length, even in such brief terms.
The two paragraphs above, used by a professional BUGSER, could reduce those who attack us from their attitude of superiority to the ghetto imitating foul-mouthed shrieks they always resort to when they just can’t take it any more.
I don’t need some kind of barrier between me others to show them how special I am.
And this, as I say, is a very Southern and very American attitude:
I am who I am and if you don’t appreciate it, then you need to wise up.
The story goes that General Lee was riding with a French newspaperman during the War and an old black stood up and took off his hat and said, “Good day, General Lee.”
To the Frenchman’s shock General Lee touched his hat and replied, “Good day to you.”
The Frenchman said, “A French gentleman would not reply to a peasant who presumed to greet him so familiarly. But you have just greeted a SLAVE!”
Lee replied, “I AM a gentleman. How could I let him be more polite than I am?”
If it was good enough for Marse Robert it‘s good enough for me.
There has been an alliance between evangelical Christians and Marxists to censor the Internet in America the way it is censored elsewhere. The evangelicals scream “pornography” and he Marxists scream racism.
But to my astonishment I found that the American web users are actually fairly bright. I thought I would surprise people when I pointed out this Christian Right-Marxist combination years ago, but I was informed that it had been talked about a lot.
I am not used to any part of the public catching onto ANYTHING.
We just had another illustration of the same revival of extinct intelligence on the web.
Listen. Can you hear the silence about it?
When it came up it had chorus of bells and whistles and was in all the commentaries.
“It” was a bill to censor the internet, not for sin or Thought Crime, but for copyright violations. It was featured in commentaries across the establishment press.
Predictably, Salon.com, a leftist blog that attacks property rights and was all for OWS, came out firmly in favor of protecting the rights of the establishment media. I do not know if the professional preachers held up their end of the coalition to censor the Internet.
Then this bill, which seemed to be running right along, ran into a few million infuriated constituents — that part of the electorate which knows best how to hit Washington with e-mail and it just DIED.
I have already told you how to tell something was favored by the media establishment:
Listen to the silence. When something very public suddenly gets shot down and everything about it is dead silence and the Memory Hole, no discussions of what happened or even reminders that it DID happen in the media or in respectable conservative stuff, what went down was something the mainline media wanted very, very much.
You will understand the major lesson of my discussion of “The Bob Problem” with the Mantra if you understand how I have exercised power during my lifetime. What people consider laughable is that I state it baldly.
My method has been described in hundreds of articles here. I PLANT ideas. I can do this in such a way — and it takes work to learn — in such a way that no one can say “This big time writer got this idea from Bob Whitaker.”
My picture was on the front page of the New York Times. People in DC congratulated me about it. But the reason I got my picture there was because I wrote the reporter’s story for him. He was doing a report on the YOUNG Reagan appointees. He put the other two guys’ ages after their names, but my age of forty did not appear.
He had to use me because I had given him almost every single quote he used in the story.
I had done hundreds of press releases by then. More important, I had studied how 1) to come up with ideas that writers could USE and, much harder, 2) I found ways to hand them those ideas in way that even THEY didn’t know they came from me.
So, Presto! Ideas that have changed the world have come from me. To exercise power my way, you have to not only give up all credit for what you do, but you have to become an EXPERT at avoiding credit.
That’s why the Mantra has a Bob Problem. But what that is meant to demonstrate is NOT something critical of pro-white leaders, but to show you why I finally had to get so desperate as to link my own link inextricably to the Mantra.
When you read my stuff, PLEASE read it twice before you comment. This web of ideas is interrelated.
I worked my bohunkus off trying to get the Mantra into Stormfront without its being identified with ME.
When you have written two mainline books and are a senior staffer on Capitol Hill, it can be a real trial keeping anyone from knowing a thing came from you.
But we are dealing with human beings, not angels or devils. An idea a professional writer can take credit for is simply WORTH a lot more than one he has to say he got from somebody else. I was NOT able to do the Mantra my usual very expert way, and it pays the price for that.
Since not taking credit for something is considered such a brag, especially in an ego-driven area like politics, you may think I want credit for NOT taking credit. The IMPORTANT point here is that not only did I eschew credit, I had to become an EXPERT in NOT being accredited with my ideas.
I know my enormous accomplishments. It would sound absurd for me to list or for you to believe them if I did not explain that I had to become an EXPERT at trading credit for power. I wanted POWER. I wanted to change the world.
This sounds like a simple trade-off, but you find that in the real world any method that works in jungle warfare like the competition for power in Washington, DC, is NOT easy.
What you get here is POWER. I hope you will turn it into money and fame, but I was in historically perfect positions to change the world my way in the face of thousands of others who desperately wanted to do the same thing. That takes more than giving up credit and a chance of fame or job offerings.
You START with this tradeoff, but you find that you have to work your butt off and push yourself into exhaustion in learning over years exactly HOW to trade off fame and money for raw, real power.
If all you got out of my Bob Problem article was my talking about Derek or the latest news on the anti-Jews, you need to do some thinking.
The more I read, the more I am amazed by how many things came out of India when it was white. They still call our numbers “Arabic Numerals,” though an educated person who spends his time away from Mommy Professor knows our numbering comes from White India.
There is no way to know how many things came to us from White India, largely because they all appeared to come from the Middle East, which is where all historians, from fundamentalists to Marxists, WANT everything to come from.
Rice, the basis of Chinese culture, came from, guess where? Aquatic rice was developed there and taken into China.
Anti-whites and New Agers want everything to come from Mongoloid China. Yet Kung Fu, a Secret of Ancient China, was developed by a white Indian who is said to have bored a hole in a wall with his BLUE eyes.
The eyes of Buddha were “blue as the blue lotus.”
So India still had a VERY white upper class around the time of Christ. There are still things like the steel pillars sitting all throughout India that is at least two thousand years ahead of any such steel appearing in history.
There are still other things like this steel.
The Sanskrit word for “caste” is the word “color.”
The Buddha and his contemporary Wordists rejected the caste system. So did Asoka, the king who spread Buddhist missionaries all the way to Greece.
Even in 1776 Adam Smith described China as desperately poor, but India as even more poor and stagnant. He was comparing them to eighteenth century England, where starvation was still a routine way of death.
If you want a view of the future if we don’t push the Mantra, India gives it to you. When I was young, EVERYTHING horrible was in India. They still had bubonic plague, as was pointed out of all places on Seinfeld.
It is incredible that Buddha and the Kung Fu originator were STILL very white after India had had the Aryan invaders living side-by-side with the colored people there for two thousand years.
But eventually Wordism, in the form of Buddhism and in Hindu “reformers,” managed to produce the brown country that horrified Adam Smith.
I have a teenage son. He came back from school the other day and recalled a discussion he had with a peer about immigration. The point he brought up was that Irish immigrants actually earned their citizenship, as opposed to the more recent Mexican variety. I explained to him that the main difference between Mexican and Irish immigrants is that the Irish are white. He looked perplexed that I would say something so obvious. I had to explain to him the importance of using the Mantra, that he missed out on the perfect opportunity to go full Mantra. While the kid is racially aware, for which I am grateful, he is still resistant to using the Mantra. This is probably because of pride. The kid is uber intelligent and thinks he should be able to come up with his own talking points. I have explained how practical politics works but once to him. I guess he still needs more work, but he is further ahead on the race issue than I was at his age. He’ll be Swarming soon enough. : )
So the Bear addresses that problem all of us who have used the Mantra out in real battle have: Where does this last-ditch resistance come from?
When Derrick Black called me about the Sevierville convention for me and White Rabbit and Trucker Joe to speak, he told me he had tried every way he could find to find a substitute for the Mantra and for the word “genocide.”
But he did NOT do any explaining as to WHY he had avoided it. We are both professionals, and we both understand this Bob Problem.
One of the basic ways I have exerted power is by avoiding identifying myself with my own ideas. Both Derek and I understand why the identification of the Mantra with me has been a disaster I tried to avoid. I spent a couple of YEARS trying to plant this concept into Stormfront, the way I have planted a hundred others through the years, so it would filter down to a Big Name, or at least a name, that would pick up on it and take it for his own.
I cleared out the friggin‘ Opposing Views, and everybody saw it. They DISCUSSED my beating all the OVs. But nobody wanted to find out HOW I was doing this.
So I had to do what to me was a nightmare: I had to sell the Mantra IN MY OWN NAME.
You would be astonished if you really found out how many things I got through by the opposite means: Developing an idea and then letting it filter in someone else’s name. That’s THEIR incentive.
The effectiveness of my technique is demonstrated by the Bob Problem with the Mantra. I had to become a Coach to push it, and it took YEARS even then. But my usual method is totally destroyed in this case.
Derrick told me how hard he had tried not to use the Mantra, we both understood why so well it didn’t come up. Every professional understands the Mantra’s Bob Problem.
Let the summer warriors get their kicks by talking about shooting the anti-whites, or “tribunals,” and such crap.
I have lived with the real punishment, the one that LASTS, and compared to it tribunals and shootings really are minor.
It seems utterly forgotten, but I have repeatedly proposed and you have agreed with, a FINANCIAL punishment. This is CRITICAL. Tribunals and such DO NOT LAST.
Paying informers lasts forever.
This, to me, is logical and, when the time comes, critical.
There will be no statute of limitations. Every Morning, every person and every HEIR of a person who helped the anti-white campaign, however indirectly, will have to wait for the moment when an informer finds proof of his or his ancestor’s joining in this campaign. Informers will still be on this for a hundred years.
Remind you of the Holocaust?
We will give a percentage of the find to informers, and informers will make their living by never letting anyone forget this campaign for white genocide.
A business which EMPLOYS a person who took part in the anti-white campaign and, to a lesser degree, anyone who INHERITED from a person who took part in the white genocide campaign, will be subject to a penalty.
No blood. No violence. Just a reminder, for a century or two, of what rich white people did to us.
You play into their hands when you start raving about tribunals and firing squads and torchlight parades. They LOVE quotes like that. They are in total contrast to the common sense of the Mantra.
But more important, this will perpetuate itself and the memory of white genocide.
It is a bit like the Chinese water torture. Who could guess that drops of water could be more agonizing than the whip.
And the whip eventually kills and the torture ENDS.
Take it from one who has faced this kind of punishment for over half a century. It makes a firing squad look like a wimp solution.
I have spent over fifty-five years fighting anti-white traitors and predicting what has happened.
I hate the bastards. When I was in my early teens I used to say “Nothing too bad can happen to an integrationist.”
When White Rabbit got going for a while, he asked me how I had stayed sane after all these years of dealing with the people he had suffered from in a short time.
I have had two nervous breakdowns and two heart attacks. And I have forced myself to do, for over half a century, the greatest feat possible of MORAL COURAGE:
I have CHANNELED my anger. Those five words contain more suffering over half a century than you could get in a torture chamber.
One of the first lessons I brought over from Stormfront was that SF is not a weapon of war, it is a VENTING device. Conventions were also good VENTING places. It was wonderful to hear speeches which told the truth.
I bitch about Stormfront all the time, but Stormfront was a major turning point for BUGS, which was Whitakeronline before it evolved into BUGS. To my mind, BUGS is not a contradiction to Stormfront or the Conventions. Instead BUGS is a the next step.
When younger people — at least younger in the movement, read Stormfront and heard the speeches at Conventions, it was major relief to them to see people telling the truth despite our Thought Police.
I had heard those truths in my youth, when I lived where a solid segregationist viewpoint was regularly aired. But I also came from a fight where they had integrated us and forced us to say we LIKED it.
So where newer people felt that conventions and Stormfront were naturally leading somewhere, I had the advantage — if you call something that horrible an advantage — of seeing that telling the truth is not enough.
But I saw another advantage. We are in a different era from the one in which segregationists were trying to explain what this ruling integrationist mentality would LEAD TO. The disaster and the genocide of our kind that we pointed to then are now not only real, they are established doctrine that we have Thought Police to enforce.
They used to chuckle at us for saying integration was aimed at intermarriage. They chuckled at our statement that a country which has no race soon has no borders.
I faithfully attended the conventions and wrote in Stormfront, but I had been through all this before, and we LOST. Most former segregationists have sold out partly because they have been here before and LOST before.
But I saw the GIANT advantage we now have: Everything we predicted is not happening, it is DOCTRINE. Now what we were trying to say then can be stated in 222 words and no one can deny it.
Let me repeat that a major danger to us is being pulled off the subject of Assimilation as integral and essential to white genocide. I always go a little rigid when I see somebody lolling off into a discussion of “culture” or attacking only immigration.
This is the other side’s generations-long campaign to get us to accept intermarriage. When David Duke said he was against whites intermarrying with other races, Hannity said, “You ARE a Nazi!!!”
Opposition to intermarriage is the ultimate sin in the eyes of our enemies. If they can get us to accept it without mentioning it as part of the general program of immigration AND assimilation, white genocide is assured.
It is ALL white countries and ONLY white countries. It is immigration AND assimilation.
Don’t let them get you off the critical points.
Don’t use a book where a sentence will do.
The name of the Genocide Treaty shows that saying race does not exist is no defense against a charge of genocide.
In Swarm, someone said that when they threatened eventual punishment for those participating in white genocide, they got banned. But they bragged they keep doing it.
It reminds me of a scene in an old movie when a hypochondriac told a tired doctor that one his symptoms was that “It hurts when I press right here.”
The doctor replied, “Then don’t press there!”
Our aim here is not to “show ‘em” or “scare ‘em.”
Our main discipline here consists of foregoing showing how smart we are or whatever else the tomeists get out of it and sticking to the pila and the sword thrusts.
It is VERY frustrating to me when someone forgets this. If you get banned, STOP DOING IT.
The danger to our message is that you will go dribbling off the point when I am no longer here. I don’t know how many times I have quoted Caesar as saying the Britons could have destroyed his army if they had stuck to small, surprise attacks.
But that was not macho enough. The Britons wanted to go Bravely Into the Field and defeat the Romans in Brave Battle.
I repeat things for a reason. I know how easy it is to show how wonderful and tough and knowledgeable WE are, but our goal is to expose others to the basic reality of white genocide.
Before you pat your back, CHECK YOUR PREMISES.
Respectable conservatives serve as ratifiers of Politically Correct Policy. Historically, Mommy Professor announces a national policy. Then conservatives argue against him for a generation. Then, if it is a policy that is key to our established religion, conservatives join in denouncing all questions about it.
Today any discussion of where we predicted with 100% accuracy “civil rights” would get us is forbidden in order to be avoided. So respectable conservatives ratify this prohibition. They help scream down any discussion of this history and thereby buy their “respectable” status which keeps their checks coming in.
Conservatives were America First before World War II, and were called Isolationists. So they lost and we went ahead and destroyed the balance between fascism and communism, taking the Communist side, and thereby delivered a third of the human race to the Communists.
Today it is the respectable conservatives who want America’s armed forces in the middle of every war on earth. They have ratified the idea that Mommy Professor was always right to denounce Isolationism.
So all you have to do to overcome any objection to any war we get in is to scream Isolationist and conservatives will move to suppress anything you say even more loudly than the left does.
The trick is that respectable conservatives make history say that the left was always right.
More important, respectable conservatives close the canon for our established religion.
In our national religion a policy is not part of the Established Faith, until the time comes when respectable conservatives agree to declare it Official Heresy.
Historically every prediction made by those who opposed American entry into World War II and those who opposed “civil rights” has turned out to be historically, absolutely, perfectly accurate. The only way to handle it is to denounce anyone who mentions this historical reality.
To ban such discussions requires not only Mommy Professor to be outraged at such discussion, it also MUST HAVE the ban agreed to by what is called “the other side.”
The “other side,” respectable conservatives, is absolutely essential to imposing Thought Police policy.
When “both sides” agree, the Thought Police have a license to kill.
In cases like Isolationism and Civil Rights, respectable conservatives are subtly informed, by a process I have described repeatedly, that a whole area of discussion is simply closed . So today Ron Paul’s discussion of a country in a debt crisis spending trillions on soldiers for anybody in the world is no longer subject to debate.
Respectable conservatives EARN their tithe of the money that is paid to our national Politically Correct priesthood by joining liberals in absolutely closing any area to debate which Mommy Professor can’t handle.
According to a link in Swarm, the Occidental Observer had an article on white genocide!!!
Though such a respectable publication won’t touch such a Whitaker topic, as always, the response was solidly positive.
The negative response was FUNNY!
The writers solemnly discussed the proposition that the term “race problem” was wrong. They said not a word about the simple proposition that immigration and assimilation are required in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.
This is the only kind of “answer” the Mantra ever gets from anybody.
A while back I saw a You Tube by a guy who was going to demolish the Mantra and he read it off his screen.
Well, PART of it. He apparently hadn’t read it closely before, and he kept skipping sections.
His main argument was about the statement that the Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan. Finally he found something he could attack.
He spent the longest part of the show discussing the meaning of the word “crowded.”
Sometimes you really have to have a sense of humor.
Just at the time I was at the Young Republican Leadership Conference in DC in early, 1962, the talk all over was that t William Buckley was to be a guest on the Jack Paar show.
This was unheard of. Conservatives were blacked out. Every “discussion” show about politics on every network had two Eastern liberal Republicans and two Eastern liberal Democrats.
The Fairness Doctrine went on vacation during the 1964 Goldwater election.
But then an evolution began. Faced with an audience which was overwhelmingly conservative the media began to put on a few token conservatives. It sold, so they began to invite very selected ones back, the ones who made them look good.
This looks exactly like a conspiracy. It was the opposite: At the beginning the networks had no intention of inviting ANY conservatives to ANY show twice. But they enjoyed the ones like Buckley or George Will who would share big words with them and assure them that they dreamed their daughters would marry people like these Wonderful Liberals.
We now have a myth taken for granted, a myth called “the middle of the road.” The media found that, if they wanted to suppress discussion of any issue, all they had to do was to get Buckley or Will to agree with them. Then they would say, “Even George Will, the conservative commentator,” says that this should never be discussed.
It was a matter of simple evolution. Those conservatives who learned to say what they were needed to say at any time were published and invited as guests more and more.
Like all evolution, it is obvious once you say it.
Respectable conservatives have been evolving this way for fifty years.
Pat Buchanan is the last of the breed that ever had any real dedication to his principles. But he could never make dogcatcher because, in the end, he is a pathetic theologue. I was a friend of his, and not only could I tell him that, I DID tell him that.
But there is not a single conservative spokesman who makes his living in the trade who has not survived cutthroat competition in reading every signal the media sends out. It isn’t entirely accidental that the embarrassing business of a six year sentence for Holocaust Denial in Austria was totally ignored by the media, and then William Buckley was the only commentator to praise it.
No one TOLD Buckley to do that. No one brought it up. But it was what the media needed at that moment, and Buckley had spent a lifetime competing to read what signal the conservative side of the two side myth, historical evolution required him to flash.
In the course of this seminar, I have emphasized that you must stick to discipline, stick to the Mantra.
New people who are actually trying this will routinely complain that I myself am not sticking to the Mantra because I bring in other points.
So far, my answer has been that these new people need to get in there and fight it out, and THEN they will LEARN where the other points are useful.
Now I think I can be more specific. This is what a seminar is for, thinking things out as you discuss them.
We face the same problems as any other outlawed group which is promoting revolutionary thoughts. Most of our job is raiding, that is, conspiring to give the Mantra maximum exposure before the censors discover us and block us off. This is exciting and promising work, and, for the few who DO it, it can be fun. It is the essence of grassroots revolution.
In these raids we are very lucky to just get the Mantra IN. The simple fact that we have now gotten to the point where even mentioning that immigration and assimilation are required ONLY for white countries and for ALL white countries is inevitably and unapologetically BANNED tells us how sick thinking has gotten and the odds we are fighting against.
But there are other discussions we get into. Usually any discussion with us on any site leads to a complete ban on any further discussion, but such discussions do take place. In those cases you may need more than the Mantra until the discussion is banned. In these case my lifetime of experience fighting this out comes in handy.
But remember, you are NEVER trying to convince the Wordist who is “debating” you. Your discussion is ALWAYS aimed at those who are following the discussion.
You repeat the Mantra regularly, but at the same time you can make other points.
The time will come when SOME ONE on the other side will have to take us on publicly. At present, everyone from the Communist Party to the National Renaissance group simply bans the Mantra, tosses it into the Memory Hole. If NRA doesn’t like the company I just put them in, they should leave it.
I will never forget the shock that hit the Reagan supporters in 1981 then they were suddenly in power. They had done a bang-up job of criticizing and finally unseating the moderate Republicans who had owned the Party through 1977 and, suddenly, they unseated the actual Government of liberals!
They had no idea what to do next.
So my over four thousands articles here, besides giving you ammunition for times when the despots are asleep and giving you a temporary chance to DISCUSS white genocide, also consist of a background for the next stage, when we get more exposure, when we have more decisions to make, and, above and before all, the time when we begin to be allowed to speak.
We must keep in mind that our present discipline is forced on us by pure, unapologetic tyranny. Like all underground movements against blatant tyranny, we must refrain from trying to introduce sanity and simply concentrate for now on getting our word out, despite the Thought Police.
But the whole effort is to weaken the Thought Police power. So it follows that we must also be making preparations for the time when that solid front begins to crumble away.
And we must do all that HERE, because it is major strain to get the people on our side to even mention the Mantra, much less include them in future thinking.
When one tries to express any Mantra Thinking, the first thing one faces is the Simple Reality Problem.
For example, when it comes to gun control or other libertarian issues, the argument immediately jumps into “Well. There could be some nut that…”
The person saying this also demands that we have An Open Society. In this, libertarians, liberals, and all doctrinaires are united. All forms of Wordism agree that, if you just apply the Doctrine in a society, it will make it safe, bountiful, and all things good, no matter who “happens” to be IN that society.
But you can’t demand an open society and at the same time insist that there must be stringent laws because some nut might do something.
Permit holders have once and for all destroyed the illusion that guns are not safe in the hands of responsible citizens who have no costumes. The Memory Hole has totally swallowed up the flat declarations made by ALL gun control advocates that giving out gun permits would “lead to a bloodbath.”
You haven’t heard that crap mentioned ANYWHERE in sixteen years.
One documentary had a rather desperate stretch which gave me a laugh, though I am sure it completely went by the audience. It had one of the most desperate non sequitors I have ever seen. One scene stated that this guy had “filled out all the paperwork for a gun permit.”
The next cut was of him robbing the bank.
Any connection between the two was never mentioned. A law against carrying a gun is no problem for a bank robber. But the documentary makers were DESPERATE to show that one permit holder had actually committed a crime. Either getting that permit was part of brilliant means of avoiding the penalty for armed robbery or that non sequitur was brought in for a reason.
Respectable conservatives don’t like permits either. They never mention the “bloodbath” predictions.
That is because the simple reality demonstrated by permits is that, contrary to all Wordist doctrine, the stability of a society is not ensured by a Holy Constitution, or a Holy Church or a Universal set of Family Values.
The stability of a society depends entirely upon WHO makes that society up.
But once again the Simple Reality Problem pops up. It pops up because of tailgating.
I will point out that this whole talk about “some nut” is a total contradiction of the libertarian, liberal, and conservative shouts that THEIR set of words is all that matters, and an Open Society is fine as long as you have the right words.
But the Simple Truth Problem is that two minutes later no one will REMEMBER this point. They will be off on a Discussion comparing Ayn Rand and Igskov Diadec or somebody, involving lots and lots of Deep Wisdom and quotes popular in libservative comments.
But the point is that it doesn’t MATEER whether Diadec or Kwantovich had the most impressive quote.
The Simple Truth is the point. But the simple basic point is instantly forgotten.
A society that has a Simple Reality Problem has a reality problem, which is a polite way of saying it’s NUTS
Back around 1950 there was a movie, My Son, John, about a man whose mother found out he was a Communist.
The biggest publicity shot for it was a photograph from the scene where his mother was angelically on her knees with his hand on a Bible held by her, swearing to her that he was NOT a Communist.
Back then this was instantly funny, even to college graduates. Everybody knew that a Communist’s oath on a Bible means nothing, and the old lady was funny for being convinced by it.
Today, I do not think anyone would actually GET THE JOKE.
Yes, everybody KNOWS that Communists are atheists.
But for it to be FUNNY, that is, for the reaction to be a guffaw, everybody has to SEE that Communists are atheists. For humor, it has to be a gut reaction.
To me, the difference is that back then people SAW that Communists are real, practicing atheists. Today the reaction to that picture would probably be a thoughtful frown.