If you tailgate, you lose. I just wrote a piece about people who have real trouble with the various “Race doesn’t exist” arguments. This is a classical example of tailgating:
If race doesn’t exist then genocide doesn’t exist. So one does not dig into quotes from the Genocide Treaty to defensively argue that race does exist. The answer to that is in the TITLE of the thing.
When I first got to college, I ran into an example of fatal tailgating. I was sixteen when I got there, so the fact that the Korean War jet pilots were talking about the Old Men who had fought previously in WWII and were in the air in Korea did not sound odd to me.
The Korean War rookies had just reached twenty. The Old, old men who were staggering toward the convalescent home, they were talking about were in their middle or LATE twenties, since it was five years between WWII and Korea.
Tailgating killed a lot of the latter old men. Oh, well, thy were so old they were soon for the graveyard anyway.
The OLD MEN tended to tailgate. That is, though they had been trained otherwise, when the fight started they went into dogfight mode, the ideal of which was to keep your nose directly on the enemy plane’s tail and HANG ON.
At 200 miles per hour, the enemy’s weaponless tail in front of your machine guns was the ideal place to stay. But staying on someone’s tail at 600 Miles per hour was a VERY different proposition. The older guys naturally fell back on this tactic automatically when the actual fighting started, and they ended up spinning blindly with vertigo in the middle of nowhere, which made them excellent targets in the lightning quick movements of jets.
Tailgating here is something you have to train yourself to stop doing.
It doesn’t kill you, but it sure as hell gets you shot down.
#1 by Dave on 03/24/2012 - 9:41 am
I think that Gavin caught this issue quite nicely when he said: “Cats will follow laser pointers around for hours. Humans are the same. They will follow whatever the media says is the hot button issue.”
The issue is about the misdirection of attention and the enemy will do anything to divert from the real issue which is the wholesale assault on our race and posterity and it is so easy to get led into digressions.
#2 by Gavin on 03/24/2012 - 1:15 pm
The only issues I have with this is that I a lot of anti-Whites I have dealt with are so dumb that I don’t know if they would even understand it.
#3 by Gavin on 03/24/2012 - 3:54 pm
Today after I pointed out that the establishment attitude is Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everbody…some anti-White started saying that in the Victorian age the British navy occupied Hong Kong etc…
I replied “Meanwhile back in 2012:” + Mantra
#4 by runner on 03/24/2012 - 6:10 pm
A person needs to believe race exists before they will care about genocide. So, what is your way around this?
#5 by Gavin on 03/24/2012 - 8:45 pm
We are not trying to get them to oppose our genocide. We are pointing out that this is what they are engaging in.
#6 by c-bear on 03/24/2012 - 10:21 pm
I sincerely doubt the type of amateur anti-whites you find on YT really believe race doesn’t exist – they are just trying to argue. Even if they do believe this nonsense you would be hard pressed to convert them. Our job is to point out the double-standards over and over, and over.
Bob’s point is that anti-whites simply cannot argue “race is just a social construct” because there is a document called The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The last word there, GENOCIDE, is all the proof you need.
I like to tell them “Denying that race exists is not a valid justification for genocide.”
#7 by runner on 03/25/2012 - 2:52 am
Remember, all anti-racism is the result of a belief in equality. The Hive isn’t counting on White anti-Whites having some racial-realism underneath all their extremist ideology, right? Anti-Whites don’t agree there is a genocide, but you must be counting on the silent anti-Whites to awaken the masses by adopting our terminology and advocating for halting genocide.
Why would anyone adopt our terminology if they won’t awaken or agree this is a genocide? How can they agree this is a genocide unless they believe race is real?
#8 by Simmons on 03/25/2012 - 9:04 am
We ask them the question would they do this to an African or Asian country.
Questions take care of cognitive dissonance quite nicely.
Hell these people cannot even admit to being okay with making blacks a minoritiy in Detroit (yes I have asked those white people this and they cannot answer and this from a people trained to clap like a seal to the word “diversity”)
#9 by Gavin on 03/25/2012 - 11:10 am
>trained to clap like a seal to the word “diversity”
haha
#10 by Gavin on 03/25/2012 - 6:07 pm
Anti-Whites are trained monkeys. Every time the anti-White media comes out with another “Evil White man, innocent non-White victim” story. They react exactly how they are programmed to and go into their two minutes of hate.